Assessing the usability of an immersive virtual reality grocery store in healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Immersive virtual reality (IVR) as a research platform to study human behaviors is an emerging field and may be useful for studying self-care management, especially in the gap between formal healthcare recommendations and day-to-day living. Self-care activities, such as grocery shopping, can be challenging for people with chronic illness. We developed an IVR environment that simulates a real-life grocery store and conducted a usability study to demonstrate the safety and acceptability of IVR as an experimental environment. METHODS: This study was a three-arm randomized control trial involving 24 participants, conducted as a usability study to evaluate aspects of the experimental condition including the effectiveness of a training exposure, the occurrence of undesirable effects associated with IVR, and participants' experiences of realism, immersion, and spatial presence. The experiment, using a head mounted device and handheld controllers, included a 10-minute training exposure, followed by one of three unique 30-minute experimental conditions which exposed participants to different combinations of tasks and stimuli, and a post-experience interview. We measured controller errors, undesirable symptoms associated with IVR, and the perception of realism, immersion, and spatial presence. RESULTS: Participants used controllers effectively to interact within the IVR environment. Hand controller use errors were fewer during the experimental conditions compared to the training exposure. Minimal undesirable IVR symptoms were reported. Presence was rated in the middle range with no significant differences based on experimental condition. Overall, user experience feedback was positive. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that participants could engage in our IVR environment without excessive error or experiencing undesirable effects and confirmed that the virtual experience attained a level of presence necessary to effectively engage in the study. These findings give us confidence that this IVR intervention designed to explore instrumental activities of daily living is safe, effective and provides a credible, controlled simulated community-like setting.

Antipyretic Efficacy of Bromocriptine in Central Fever: an Exploratory Analysis.

BACKGROUND: 'Central' fevers are thought to result from disruption of hypothalamic thermoregulatory pathways following severe brain injuries. Bromocriptine, due to its central dopamine receptor agonism, has been hypothesized to have antipyretic effect in this setting. However, clinical evidence for this off-label use is limited to a few case reports. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the effect of bromocriptine administration on body temperature in acute brain injury patients with suspected central fever. METHODS: We screened a cohort of adult patients that received bromocriptine in the neurologic-intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. Indication of central fever was ascertained by review of clinical documentation. A generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was used to model temperature as a function of time relative to bromocriptine initiation. We adjusted for potential confounding due to the following covariates: temperature recording method (invasive vs surface), concurrent antipyretic administration within 8 h, and surface cooling device use within 4 h of temperature measurement. Temperature-time function was modeled using a cubic spline with k = 10 knots. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included in the analysis (14 women; mean age: 50 y, standard deviation 14 y). Median dose of bromocriptine was 7.5 mg (range 2.5-40) for a median of 13 d (range 5-160). Age and sex did not impact the function of temperature over time. Predicted temperatures were significantly (p < 0.05) higher by 0.4 °C with invasive compared to surface recording methods, lower by 0.2 °C in the presence of cooling device use and lower by 0.1 °C with concurrent antipyretic use. On adjusted analysis with the GAMM, there was decline (p < 0.05) in temperature following bromocriptine initiation by - 0.3 °C at 24 h, - 0.5 °C at 48 h, and - 0.7 °C at 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Bromocriptine use was associated with modest but statistically significant decline in temperature, with nadir at 72 h post initiation. The findings provide a data driven basis for prospective evaluation.

The Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholars Program: Learning healthcare system workforce development through embedded translational research.

Introduction: Texas Health Resources (THR), a large, nonprofit health care system based in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, has collaborated with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) to develop and operate a unique, integrated approach for Learning Health System (LHS) workforce development. This training model centers on academic health system faculty members conducting later-stage translational research within a partnering regional care delivery organization. Methods: The THR Clinical Scholars Program engages early career UTSW faculty members to conduct studies that are likely to have an impact on care delivery at the health system level. Interested candidates submit formal applications to the program. A joint committee comprised of senior research faculty from UTSW and THR clinical leadership reviews proposals with a focus on the shared LHS needs of both institutions-developing high quality research output that can be applied to enhance care delivery. A key prioritization criterion for funding is the degree to which the research addresses a question relevant to THR as a high-volume network with multiple channels for consumers to access care. The program emphasis is on supporting embedded research initiatives using health system data to generate knowledge that will improve the quality and efficiency of care for the patient populations served by the participant organizations. Results: We discuss specific strategic and tactical components of the THR Clinical Scholars Program including an overview of the academic affiliation agreement between the collaborating organizations, criteria for successful program applications, data sharing, and funding. We also share project summaries from selected clinical scholars as examples of the LHS research done in the program to date. Conclusion: This experience report provides an implementation framework for other academic health systems interested in adopting similar LHS workforce training models with community partners.

Relationship between sleep apnea and hospital readmission in rural and urban populations.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate geographic differences in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) prevalence, to determine if readmissions were more likely among rural patients with OSA than others, and to model predictors, including diagnosed OSA, of 30, 60, and 90-day acute-care readmissions. DESIGN: This cohort study employed a secondary analysis of data extracted from the electronic health record shared by all hospitals in a north Texas healthcare system. SAMPLE: The sample consisted of records associated with 472,503 adult patients admitted to any of the study system's acute-care facilities from 2016 through 2019. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements consisted of case-level health information, including admissions, demographic variables, payors, diagnoses, screens, and physician orders. RESULTS: OSA was significantly related to hospital readmission when considered in isolation but did not significantly predict readmission when modeled with plausible covariates. Screening rates for OSA did not vary by geography. Differences in rural/urban-suburban OSA prevalence were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Findings contrast with previous suggestions that OSA plays an independent role in hospital readmissions or that rural resident may be disadvantaged regarding services that support the OSA diagnosis. Prevalence and screening rates were almost identical in urban and rural populations.

Association of Healthcare Access With Intensive Care Unit Utilization and Mortality in Patients of Hispanic Ethnicity Hospitalized With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States experience a disproportionate burden of COVID-19 deaths. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether outcome differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic COVID-19 hospitalized patients exist and, if so, to identify the main malleable contributing factors. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study of 6097 adult COVID-19 patients hospitalized within a single large healthcare system from March to November 2020. EXPOSURES: Self-reported ethnicity and primary language. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and in-hospital death. We used age-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and multivariable analysis to evaluate the associations between ethnicity/language groups and outcomes. RESULTS: 32.1% of patients were Hispanic, 38.6% of whom reported a non-English primary language. Hispanic patients were less likely to be insured, have a primary care provider, and have accessed the healthcare system prior to the COVID-19 admission. After adjusting for age, Hispanic inpatients experienced higher ICU utilization (non-English-speaking: OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.47-2.08; English-speaking: OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.95-1.33) and higher mortality (non-English-speaking: OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.10-1.86; English-speaking: OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.19-1.98) compared to non-Hispanic inpatients. There were no observed treatment disparities among ethnic groups. After adjusting for age, Hispanic inpatients had elevated disease severity at admission (non-English-speaking: OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.89-2.72; English-speaking: OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.10- 1.61). In multivariable analysis, the associations between ethnicity/language and clinical outcomes decreased after considering baseline disease severity (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The associations between ethnicity and clinical outcomes can be explained by elevated disease severity at admission and limited access to healthcare for Hispanic patients, especially non-English-speaking Hispanics.