RESUMEN
Background: Phaeochromocytoma multisystem crisis (PMC) is characterized by labile blood pressures (extremes of hypo- and/or hypertension) and multiorgan failure as a result of catecholamine excess. Initial stabilization requires pharmacological and/or mechanical circulatory support, followed by the institution of antihypertensives to correct the underlying pathophysiology. Case summary: A previously well 40-year-old male developed a sudden onset of breathlessness. On presentation, he was in shock with multiorgan failure. He required intubation, mechanical ventilation, dual inotropic support, and renal replacement therapy. Bedside echocardiogram showed a severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25%. Coronary angiography revealed normal coronary arteries. In view of raised inflammatory markers and transaminitis, a computed tomography abdomen/pelvis was performed. An incidental left adrenal mass was found. Further work-ups revealed raised plasma metanephrine and normetanephrine, 24-h urine epinephrine, and norepinephrine. A cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) showed myocardial inflammation and reverse Takotsubo pattern of regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA). The diagnosis of cardiogenic shock and stress cardiomyopathy secondary to PMC was made. He was subsequently initiated on α- and ß-blockers and goal-directed medical therapy for heart failure. A 68Ga-DOTATATE scan showed avid tracer uptake of the left phaeochromocytoma. An interval CMR 3 weeks from presentation showed near normalization of the LVEF and RWMA. He underwent a successful laparoscopic left adrenalectomy and was antihypertensive-free since. Discussion: The clinical suspicion for PMC as the cause of cardiogenic shock requires astute clinical judgement, while the management requires an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology that calls for multidisciplinary inputs.
RESUMEN
The following case discusses the surgical considerations for a patient presenting with cardiogenic shock secondary to a phaeochromocytoma crisis with stress cardiomyopathy. The patient underwent an interval laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Pneumoperitoneum insufflation was performed at lower pressures; manipulation of the adrenal tumour was minimised, and the adrenal vein was ligated early. However, as intraoperative blood pressure (BP) remained elevated and rising, further gentle dissection revealed an aberrant inferior phrenic vein draining the adrenal nodule. BP was finally reduced following ligation of the inferior phrenic vein, demonstrating the clinical significance of an unusual dual venous drainage from the adrenal nodule in this patient.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales , Adrenalectomía , Feocromocitoma , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugía , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/complicaciones , Adrenalectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Feocromocitoma/cirugía , Feocromocitoma/complicaciones , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Cardiomiopatía de TakotsuboRESUMEN
Median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) was used for screening and diagnosis of neuropathy, but few studies have suggested reference range. Hence, this systematic review was performed to evaluate a normative values of median nerve CSA at various landmarks of upper limb based on ultrasonography. PubMed and Web of science were used to search relevant articles from 2000 to 2020. Forty-one eligible articles (2504 nerves) were included to access median nerve CSA at different landmarks (mid-arm, elbow, mid-forearm, carpal tunnel (CT) inlet and CT outlet). Data was also stratified based on age, sex, ethnicity, geographical location, and method of measurement. Random effects model was used to calculate pooled weighted mean (95% confidence interval (CI), [upper bound, lower bound]) at mid-arm, elbow, mid-forearm, CT inlet and outlet which found to be 8.81 mm2, CI [8.10, 9.52]; 8.57 mm2 [8.00, 9.14]; 7.07 mm2 [6.41, 7.73]; 8.74 mm2 [8.45, 9.03] and 9.02 mm2 [8.08, 9.95] respectively. Median nerve CSA varies with age, geographical location, and sex at all landmarks. A low (I2 < 25%) to considerable heterogeneity (I2 > 75%) was observed, indicating the variation among the included studies. These findings show that median nerve CSA is varying not only along its course but also in other sub-variables.