A method for patient-specific DVH verification using a high-sampling-rate log file in an Elekta linac.

We have proposed a method for patient-specific dose-volume histogram (DVH) verification using a 40-ms high-sampling-rate log file (HLF) available in an Elekta linac. Ten prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were randomly selected, and systematic leaf position errors of ±0.2, ±0.4, or ±0.8 mm were added to the 10 plans, thereby producing a total of 70 plans. An RTP file was created by interpolating each leaf position in the HLF to obtain values at each control point, which is subsequently exported to a treatment planning system. The isocenter dose calculated by the HLF-based plan to a phantom (Delta4 Phantom+) was compared to that measured by the diode in the phantom in order to evaluate the accuracy of the HLF-based dose calculation. The D95 of the planning target volume (PTV) was also compared between the HLF-based plans and the original plans with the systematic leaf position errors, the latter being referred to as theory-based plans. Sensitivities of the DVH parameters in the target, the rectum, and the bladder were also calculated with the varied systematic leaf position errors. The relative differences in the isocenter doses between the HLF-based calculations and the measurements among the 70 plans were 0.21% ± 0.67% (SD). The maximum relative differences in PTV D95 between the HLF-based and the theory-based plans among the 70 cases were 0.11%. The patient-specific DVH verification method detected a change in the target DVH parameters of less than 1% when the systematic leaf position error was ±0.2 mm. It is therefore suggested that the proposed DVH verification method may simplify patient-specific dose quality assurance procedures without compromising accuracy and sensitivity.

Practical dosimetry procedure of air kerma for kilovoltage X-ray imaging in radiation oncology using a 0.6-cc cylindrical ionization chamber with a cobalt absorbed dose-to-water calibration coefficient.

In this study, we implemented a practical dosimetry procedure of air kerma for kilovoltage X-ray beams using a 0.6-cc cylindrical ionization chamber, and validated the procedure with the accuracy of the measurements using the 0.6-cc chamber compared to the measurements using a 6-cc chamber and a semiconductor device. In addition, the kerma area products (KAPs) were compared with the dose reference levels of radiology. A modified air kerma formalism using a 0.6-cc cylindrical ionization chamber air kerma formalism with a cobalt absorbed dose-to-water calibration coefficient was implemented. Validation of the formalism showed good agreement between the 0.6-cc chamber and the 6-cc chamber (< 5%), and between the 0.6-cc chamber and the semiconductor device (< 2%) in the 60-120 kV range. The KAPs for four RO machines had difference factors of 0.04-15.4 and 0.01-4.1 from their median and maximum dose reference levels in radiology, respectively.

A multi-institutional study of secondary check of treatment planning using Clarkson-based dose calculation for three-dimensional radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: As there have been few reports on quantitative analysis of inter-institutional results for independent monitor unit (MU) verification, we performed a multi-institutional study of verification to show the feasibility of applying the 3-5% action levels used in the U.S. and Europe, and also to show the results of inter-institutional comparisons. METHODS: A total of 5936 fields were collected from 12 institutions. We used commercial software employing the Clarkson algorithm for verification after a validation study of measurement and software comparisons was performed. The doses generated by the treatment planning systems (TPSs) were retrospectively analyzed using the verification software. RESULTS: Mean ±â€¯two standard deviations of all locations were 1.0 ±â€¯3.6%. There were larger differences for breast (4.0 ±â€¯4.0%) and for lung (2.5 ±â€¯5.8%). A total of 80% of the fields with differences over 5% of the action level involved breast and lung targets, with 7.2 ±â€¯5.4%. Inter-institutional comparisons showed various systematic differences for field shape for breast and differences in the fields were attributable to differences in reference point placement for lung. The large differences for breast and lung are partially attributable to differences in the methods used to correct for heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The 5% action level may be feasible for verification; however, an understanding of larger differences in breast and lung plans is important in clinical practice. Based on the inter-institutional comparisons, care must be taken when determining an institution-specific action level from plans with different field shape settings and incorrectly placed reference points.

Precision in Wedge Off-axis Using Independent Dose Verification.

It is essential for quality assurance to verify the safety of each individual patient's plan in radiation therapy. The tolerance level for independent verification of monitor unit calculations for non-IMRT clinical radiotherapy has been shown in the AAPM TG114. Thus, we investigated the precision of independent MU (dose) verification considering a wedge off-axis calculation and we conducted a study at twelve institutes for independent verification with the wedge off-axis calculation. The results obtained with the wedge off-axis calculation showed better agreement with the treatment planning system calculation results than those without the former calculation in a phantom study and in the patient retrospective study. The confidence limits with the wedge off-axis calculation were 2.2±3.4% and 2.0±4.3% for the plans with a physical wedge and a non-physical wedge in the patient study, respectively. However, the confidence limits were over 5% without the off-axis calculation. From our multi-institutional study, the results suggested that the tolerance level for the wedge off-axis plan would be 5% when considering the wedge off-axis calculation and the level was similar to that of the treatment planning system using other conventional irradiation techniques.

Independent dose verification for brain stereotactic radiotherapy using different add-on micro multi-leaf collimators.

An add-on micro multi-leaf collimator (mMLC) is used for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and brain stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), in which rotational radiotherapy may make more complex and time-consuming. We performed a retrospective study of an independent dose calculation verification for brain SRS and SRT in two institutions to show the accuracy of the verification system and propose a tolerance value for the verification. Several comparisons of static plans and patients' plans were conducted using a phantom measurement, and patients' plans using the patients' own computed tomography image. We evaluated the accuracy of the Clarkson-based dose calculation based on either the equivalent square field formed by the mMLC or by the collimator jaws to determine the collimator scatter factor (S c). The results for the static plans showed good agreement (<1%), except when we used a 1 cm2 field size (<4%). The phantom measurements for the patients' plans showed deviations of 0.1 ± 2.3 and 1.2 ± 1.6% (2 SD) for the treatment planning system and the verification system, respectively. The patients' plans showed a deviation of 2.0 ± 2.1% (2 SD). Depending on the mMLC system, the S c was calculated using the equivalent field size formed by the mMLC. In this study, we suggest a tolerance level for the brain SRS and SRT of 2-3.5%. However, beam modeling in the treatment planning system would affect the deviation. The S c should be computed according to the size of the collimator fitted to the MLC.