RESUMEN
Cystic fibrosis (CF) has entered the era of variant-specific therapy, tailored to the genetic variants in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. CFTR modulators, the first variant-specific therapy available, have transformed the management of CF. The latest standards of care from the European CF Society (2018) did not include guidance on variant-specific therapy, as CFTR modulators were becoming established as a novel therapy. We have produced interim standards to guide healthcare professionals in the provision of variant-specific therapy for people with CF. Here we provide evidence-based guidance covering the spectrum of care, established using evidence from systematic reviews and expert opinion. Statements were reviewed by key stakeholders using Delphi methodology, with agreement (≥80%) achieved for all statements after one round of consultation. Issues around accessibility are discussed and there is clear consensus that all eligible people with CF should have access to variant-specific therapy.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Quística , Humanos , Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrosis Quística/genética , Regulador de Conductancia de Transmembrana de Fibrosis Quística/genética , Nivel de Atención , Transporte Iónico , Transducción de Señal , MutaciónRESUMEN
The Dutch CF Foundation (NCFS) developed a quality improvement program, to assess and improve quality of care in all CF centers in The Netherlands. Criteria to assess quality of care from the patient perspective were defined, and quality of care was assessed by patients via online surveys and site visits. Recommendations were addressed to all centers to improve quality of care. Most recommendations were related to communicational issues. All centers were given the quality mark of the patient organisation, although two of them needed extra time to meet the lower limit of the core set of criteria. After two years, over 75 % of the recommendations given to the centers were fully or partly implemented, showing a high efficacy of the program.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Quística , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Países BajosRESUMEN
Organoids are three-dimensional multicellular structures grown in vitro from stem cells and which recapitulate some organ function. They are derivatives of living tissue that can be stored in biobanks for a multitude of research purposes. Biobank research on organoids derived from patients is highly promising for precision medicine, which aims to target treatment to individual patients. The dominant approach for protecting the interests of biobank participants emphasizes broad consent in combination with privacy protection and ex ante (predictive) ethics review. In this paradigm, participants are positioned as passive donors; however, organoid biobanking for precision medicine purposes raises challenges that we believe cannot be adequately addressed without more ongoing involvement of patient-participants. In this Spotlight, we argue why a shift from passive donation towards more active involvement is particularly crucial for biobank research on organoids aimed at precision medicine, and suggest some approaches appropriate to this context.
Asunto(s)
Organoides/citología , Medicina de Precisión/ética , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas/ética , Participación de la Comunidad , Donación Directa de Tejido/ética , Donación Directa de Tejido/tendencias , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Técnicas de Cultivo de Tejidos/ética , Técnicas de Cultivo de Tejidos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient participation in decision-making on health-related research has gained ground. Nineteen Dutch health-related research-funding organisations (HFs) have taken up the challenge to include patients in their funding process. A 'Patient participation (PP) advisory team' was set-up, with HF-representatives and patient advocates, who together initiated this study. We provide an overview of when, why, and how PP activities take place in HFs' funding processes, share main challenges and identify possible solutions. METHODS: A qualitative research design was used. Data was gathered by questionnaires (n = 14) and semi-structured interviews (n = 18) with HF employees responsible for patient participation, followed by a workshop (n = 27) with involved employees of HFs and key players in PP from national patient organisations and research organisations. A descriptive analysis was used for the questionnaire. A semi-directed content analysis was used for the interviews and the workshop. RESULTS: Three stages can be identified in the funding process in which HFs carry out PP activities: (1) strategic decision-making about focus of research (e.g. shared research agendas); (2) call for and receipt of research proposals (e.g. mandatory inclusion of letter of recommendation from patient organisation); (3) decision-making about the funding of research proposals (e.g. patients reside in a patient panel to co-review research proposals). Main challenges identified to carry out PP activities include: how to accommodate diversity of the patient body (mainly encountered in stage 1 and 3); to what extent should patients receive training to successfully participate (mainly encountered in stage 1 and 3); and who is responsible for patient-researcher dialogues (mainly encountered in stage 1 and 2). All nineteen HFs agree that patients should be included in at least one stage of the funding process for health-related research. CONCLUSION: Further broadening and optimising patient involvement is still needed. The proposed solutions to the identified challenges could serve as inspiration for national and international research funding foundations that aim to structurally include patients in their funding process.
RESUMEN
The Dutch CF Foundation started to focus on scientific research thirteen years ago. The patient organization defined the patients perspective and unmet needs bottom-up, and through a structured process. The patients research priorities were matched with the research priorities of Dutch basic scientists and clinicians. The Dutch patient organization facilitated the process, in which mutual dependency between patients, scientists and clinicians is the keyword. The, at that time initiated dialogue, maintained. Subsequently a research program called "HIT CF" was composed and executed over five years. HIT CF was financially supported mainly by the patient community and some other stakeholders.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Investigación Biomédica , Fibrosis Quística/epidemiología , Investigación/organización & administración , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Participación del Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigación Biomédica TraslacionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The European cystic fibrosis (CF) Society Standards of Care were set to facilitate the delivery of high-quality care throughout Europe. However, their implementation may be difficult for less economically advantaged countries. This survey was performed to explore the gap in the knowledge of the level of CF care in Eastern Europe. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent online to one CF professional and one CF patient representative for every Eastern European country. RESULTS: Although most respondents indicated the presence of CF centres, disparities in their framework among individual countries and between them and the European CF Standards of Care became apparent. A minority of countries achieved CF centre recognition by the government (6 of 16), provided CF care for adults (6 countries) and had a multidisciplinary team with all team members represented (2 countries). Patients were significantly more critical in the evaluation of various aspects of CF care than physicians, especially in the Balkan region. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results indicate that the organization and level of CF care across Eastern Europe is largely variable and lacks some of its fundamental attributes in several countries.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Quística , Atención a la Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Fibrosis Quística/epidemiología , Fibrosis Quística/terapia , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/normas , Europa Oriental , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Nivel de Atención , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Organoid technology enables the cultivation of human tissues in a dish. Its precision medicine potential could revolutionize the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) field. We provide a first thematic exploration of the patient perspective on organoid technology to set the further research agenda, which is necessary for responsible development of this ethically challenging technology. METHODS: 23 semi-structured qualitative interviews with 14 Dutch adult CF patients and 12 parents of young CF patients to examine their experiences, opinions, and attitudes regarding organoid technology. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) Respondents express a close as well as a distant relationship to organoids; (2) the open-endedness of organoid technology sparks hopes and concerns, (3) commercial use evokes cautiousness. (4) Respondents mention the importance of sound consent procedures, long-term patient engagement, responsible stewardship, and stringent conditions for commercial use. CONCLUSIONS: The precision medicine potential of organoid technology can only be realized if the patient perspective is taken adequately into account.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Quística , Organoides , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Adulto , Niño , Fibrosis Quística/psicología , Fibrosis Quística/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Desarrollo Industrial , Masculino , Países Bajos , Padres , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/ética , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/ética , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Opinión Pública , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New therapeutics have been introduced for cystic fibrosis that modulate cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function in a mutation-specific fashion. Despite CFTR genotype-based stratification of treatments, treatment efficacy is variable between study participants suggesting that individual factors further contribute to drug efficacy. Moreover, these treatments are licensed for a limited amount of CFTR mutations, and study participants with rare mutations that can potentially benefit from available treatments may be missed. New approaches that better support the identification of responders to CFTR modulators are, therefore, needed. RECENT FINDINGS: We, here, review how a patient-oriented research collaboration between basic and clinical scientists and a national cystic fibrosis patient organization led to the development of a CFTR-dependent assay using primary stem cell cultures termed intestinal organoids that can measure the individual efficacy of CFTR modulators in a preclinical laboratory setting. Early observations suggest that drug responses in organoids reflect drug responses in vivo. SUMMARY: We particularly focus on the importance of patient-oriented research collaborations, and how such a collaboration helped to develop a personalized medicine approach for CFTR modulators. Intestinal organoids and biobanks thereof may be used to select optimal, individually tailored treatments for current and future (combinations of) CFTR modulators with only limited patient discomfort.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Quística , Genotipo , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Mutación , Organoides , Medicina de PrecisiónRESUMEN
A significant increase in life expectancy in successive birth cohorts of people with cystic fibrosis (CF) is a result of more effective treatment for the disease. It is also now widely recognized that outcomes for patients cared for in specialist CF Centres are better than for those who are not. Key to the effectiveness of the specialist CF Centre is the multidisciplinary team (MDT), which should include consultants, clinical nurse specialist, microbiologist, physiotherapist, dietitian, pharmacist, clinical psychologist, social worker, clinical geneticist and allied healthcare professionals, all of whom should be experienced in CF care. Members of the MDT are also expected to keep up to date with developments in CF through continued professional development, attendance at conferences, auditing and involvement in research. Specialists CF Centres should also network with other Centres both nationally and internationally, and feed Centre data to registries in order to further the understanding of the disease. This paper provides a framework for the specialist CF Centre, including the organisation of the Centre and the individual roles of MDT members, as well as highlighting the value of CF organisations and disease registries.