RESUMEN
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is the most common valvular pathology after heart transplantation (HTx) and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains responsible for the majority of cases due to the high probability of structural valve damage. The aim of the present review was to describe the results of surgical management of severe tricuspid regurgitation through tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) after a previous HTx. A systematic review was conducted by searching Pubmed, ScienceDirect, SciELO, DOAJ, and Cochrane databases until June 2023 for publications reporting patients undergoing TVR surgery after a previous HTx. If no right heart valve surgery was undertaken, or a heterotopic heart transplant was performed, or if the concomitant procedure was performed during the transplant itself, the paper was excluded. Twenty articles met our inclusion criteria out of 1532 potentially eligible studies, with a total of 300 patients. Mean age was 55.1 ± 9.6 years, and 85.1% were male. The mean number of EMB per patient was 31.1 ± 5.5 with a mean time between HTx and TVR of 7.64 ± 3.31 years. Bioprostheses were used in 83.3% of cases and 75.0% of patients with a bioprosthesis were reported as alive at last follow-up. Tricuspid valve repair is a valuable option, but these patients will be susceptible to recurrent TR after EMB. TVR with a bioprosthesis may provide the optimal solution for this subset of patients, as EMB is not feasible with a mechanical valve.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/complicaciones , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodosRESUMEN
As the survival after heart transplantation (HTx) is steadily improving, an increasing number of patients with late cardiac pathologies such as valvular disease is expected to rise. Nevertheless, no guidelines for indication of redo cardiac surgery after HTx exists. The aim of the present systematic review is to describe the results reported in the literature of surgical management of severe aortic and/or mitral valve disease. A systematic review was conducted including studies reporting on adult patients with severe mitral or aortic valve pathology needing surgery after their previous HTx. Exclusion criteria consisted in surgery with no left heart valve surgery, concomitant valve surgery during heart transplant, transcatheter interventions, and heterotopic HTx. A total of 35 papers met our inclusion criteria out of 2755 potentially eligible studies with 44 mitral valve surgery patients and 20 aortic valve surgery patients. In the entire population, the mean time from HTx to reintervention was 6.19 ± 5.22 years. After a mean follow-up of 2.78 ± 3.54 years and 1.53 ± 2.26 years from reintervention, 65.6% mitral and 86.7% aortic patients were reported as alive, respectively. As guidelines on cardiac surgery after HTx are currently lacking, left-sided valvular cardiac reinterventions can be considered a possible therapeutic approach in carefully selected patients. These interventions may not only improve the patient's functional status and survival, but may ultimately reduce the need for re-transplantation due to the chronic shortage of donor hearts. However, the support of more robust data is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías , Trasplante de Corazón , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Adulto , Humanos , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Donantes de Tejidos , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodosRESUMEN
An increasing number of patients experience late valvular disease after heart transplantation (HTx). While mostly being primarily addressed through surgical interventions, transcatheter valve procedures to treat these conditions are rising, particularly for unsuitable surgical candidates. This review aims at analyzing the outcomes of transcatheter valvular procedures in this subset of patients. A systematic review was conducted including studies reporting on adult patients requiring any form of transcatheter valvular intervention after a previous HTx. Studies involving a surgical approach, heterotopic heart transplants, or concomitant procedures performed during the transplant itself were excluded. Twenty-five articles with a total of 33 patients met the inclusion criteria, 10 regarding the aortic valve (14 patients), 5 the mitral valve (6 patients), and 6 the tricuspid valve (13 patients). In two cases, the procedure was recommended to stabilize the valvular lesion before re-transplantation, as both were very young patients. Overall, the mean time from heart transplantation to reintervention was 14.7 ± 9.5 years. The mean follow-up was 15.5 ± 13.5 months, and only one patient died 22.3 months after the intervention. There is a growing emergence of transcatheter interventions for valvular disease after heart transplantation, especially in cases where surgery is deemed high-risk or prohibitive. A different strategy may also be considered in young patients to permit longer allograft life before later re-transplantation. Although encouraging outcomes have been documented, additional research is required to establish the most appropriate approach within this specific subset of patients.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Short-term mechanical circulatory support (STMCS) may be used as an intentional escalation strategy to treat refractory cardiogenic shock (rCS). However, with growing technical possibilities, making the right choice at the right time can be challenging. We established a shock team in January 2013 comprising a cardiac anaesthetist-intensivist, an interventional cardiologist, and a cardiac surgeon. Since then, a diagnosis of rCS has triggered a multidisciplinary team meeting based on a common algorithm. This study aimed to compare the decision-making process for STMCS for rCS before (2007-2013) and after (2013-2019) the creation of the shock team. METHODS AND RESULTS: This before-and-after cohort study was conducted over a 156-month period. Post-cardiotomy rCS were excluded. The primary outcome was a 1-year survival rate. In total, 250 consecutive adult patients were included in the analysis (84 in the control group and 166 in the shock team group). At baseline, the CardShock score was not different between the two groups (5[3-5] vs. 5[4-6], P = 0.323). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the shock team group compared with the control group (59% vs. 45%, P = 0.043). After a Cox regression analysis, the shock team intervention was independently associated with a significantly improved 1-year survival rate (HR: 0.592, 95% CI: 0.398-0.880, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary shock team-based decision for STMCS device implantation in rCS is associated with better 1-year survival rates.
Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Choque Cardiogénico , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIMS: The prognostic value of 'high dose' loop diuretics in advanced heart failure outpatients is unclear. We aimed to assess the prognosis associated with loop diuretic dose in ambulatory patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT). METHODS AND RESULTS: All ambulatory patients (n = 700, median age 55 years and 70% men) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 were included. Patients were divided into 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' loop diuretics corresponding to furosemide equivalent doses of ≤40, 40-250, and >250 mg, respectively. The primary outcome was a combined criterion of waitlist death and urgent HT. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, creatinine levels, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary pressures gradually increased with higher diuretic dose. At 12 months, the risk of waitlist death/urgent HT was 7.4%, 19.2%, and 25.6% (P = 0.001) for 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' patients, respectively. When adjusting for confounders, including natriuretic peptides, hepatic, and renal function, the 'high dose' group was associated with increased waitlist mortality or urgent HT [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, 1.33 to 3.73; P = 0.002] and a six-fold higher risk of waitlist death (adjusted HR 6.18, 2.16 to 17.72; P < 0.001) when compared with the 'low dose' group. 'Intermediate doses' were not significantly associated with these two outcomes in adjusted models (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 'high dose' of loop diuretics is strongly associated with residual congestion and is a predictor of outcome in patients awaiting HT despite adjustment for classical cardiorenal risk factors. This routine variable may be helpful for risk stratification of pre-HT patients.
Asunto(s)
Diuréticos , Trasplante de Corazón , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Inhibidores del Simportador de Cloruro Sódico y Cloruro Potásico , Pronóstico , FurosemidaRESUMEN
AIMS: The value of Forrester's perfusion/congestion profiles assessed by invasive catheter evaluation in non-inotrope advanced heart failure patients listed for heart transplant (HT) is unclear. We aimed to assess the value of haemodynamic evaluation according to Forrester's profiles to predict events on the HT waitlist. METHODS AND RESULTS: All non-inotrope patients (n = 837, 79% ambulatory at listing) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 with right heart catheterization (RHC) were included. The primary outcome was a combined criteria of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent HT or left ventricular assist device implantation. Secondary outcome was waitlist death. The 'warm-dry', 'cold-dry', 'warm-wet', and 'cold-wet' profiles represented 27%, 18%, 27%, and 28% of patients, respectively. At 12 months, the respective rates of primary outcome were 15%, 17%, 25%, and 29% (P = 0.008). Taking the 'warm-dry' category as reference, a significant increase in the risk of primary outcome was observed only in the 'wet' categories, irrespectively of 'warm/cold' status: hazard ratios, 1.50; 1.06-2.13; P = 0.024 in 'warm-wet' and 1.77; 1. 25-2.49; P = 0.001 in 'cold-wet'. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodynamic assessment of advanced HF patients using perfusion/congestion profiles predicts the risk of the combine endpoint of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation. 'Wet' patients had the worst prognosis, independently of perfusion status, thus placing special emphasis on the cardinal prominence of persistent congestion in advanced HF.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Pronóstico , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Temporary circulatory support (TCS) as a bridge-to-left ventricular assist device (BTL) in cardiogenic shock patients has been increasing, but limited data exists on this BTL strategy. We aimed at analyzing the outcome of BTL patients in a population of cardiogenic shock patients compared with those without TCS at the time of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery and identify predictors of postoperative mortality in this specific population. DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective observational study conducted in 19 centers from 2006 to 2016. SETTING: Nineteen French centers. PATIENTS: A total of 329 cardiogenic shock patients at the time of LVAD implantation were analyzed. Patients were divided in three groups: those under TCS at the time of LVAD implantation (n = 173), those with TCS removal before LVAD surgery (n = 24), and those who did not undergo a bridging strategy (n = 152). Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the BTL group, 68 (39.3%), 18 (10.4%), and 15 (8.7%) patients were under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, and IABP support alone, and 72 patients (20.6%) were under multiple TCS support. BTL patients presented similar 30 days survival compared with the TCS removal and non-BTL groups. However, BTL group had a significantly longer ICU duration stay, with two-fold duration of mechanical ventilation time, but the three groups experienced similar postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis identified three independent predictors of mortality in the BTL group: combined surgery with LVAD, body mass index (BMI), and heart failure (HF) duration. BTL strategy was not an independent predictor of mortality in cardiogenic shock patients who underwent LVAD. CONCLUSIONS: BTL strategy is not associated with a lower survival among cardiogenic shock patients with LVAD implantation. Predictors of mortality are combined surgery with LVAD, higher BMI, and HF duration.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Despite regularly updated guidelines, there is still a delay in referral of advanced heart failure patients to mechanical circulatory support and transplant centres. We aimed to analyse characteristics and outcome of non-inotrope-dependent patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: The ASSIST-ICD registry collected LVAD data in 19 centres in France between February 2006 and December 2016. We used data of patients in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Classes 4-7. The primary endpoint was survival analysis. Predictors of mortality were searched with multivariable analyses. A total of 303 patients (mean age 61.0 ± 9.9 years, male sex 86.8%) were included in the present analysis. Ischaemic cardiomyopathy was the leading heart failure aetiology (64%), and bridge to transplantation was the main implantation strategy (56.1%). The overall likelihood of being alive while on LVAD support or having a transplant at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years was 66%, 61.7%, 58.7%, and 55.1%, respectively. Age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.05; P = 0.02], a concomitant procedure (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.52-3.53; P < 0.0001), and temporary mechanical right ventricular support during LVAD implantation (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.49-5.77; P = 0.002) were the only independent variables associated with mortality. Heart failure medications before or after LVAD implantation were not associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory heart failure patients displayed unsatisfactory survival rates after LVAD implantation. A better selection of patients who can benefit from LVAD may help improving outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Anciano , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
LVAD implantation in patients with a recently diagnosed cardiomyopathy has been poorly investigated. This work aims at describing the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving a LVAD within 30 days following the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. Patients from the ASSIST-ICD study was divided into recently and remotely diagnosed cardiomyopathy based on the time from initial diagnosis of cardiomyopathy to LVAD implantation using the cut point of 30 days. The primary end point of the study was all-cause mortality at 30-day and during follow-up. A total of 652 patients were included and followed during a median time of 9.1 (2.5 to 22.1) months. In this population, 117 (17.9%) had a recently diagnosed cardiomyopathy and had LVAD implantation after a median time of 15.0 (9.0 to 24.0) days following the diagnosis. This group of patients was significantly younger, with more ischemic cardiomyopathy, more sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) events at the time of the diagnosis and were more likely to receive temporary mechanical support before LVAD compared with the remotely diagnosed group. Postoperative in-hospital survival was similar in groups, but recently diagnosed patients had a better long-term survival after hospital discharge. SCA before LVAD and any cardiac surgery combined with LVAD implantation were identified as 2 independent predictors of postoperative mortality in recently diagnosed patients. In conclusion, rescue LVAD implantation for recently diagnosed severe cardiomyopathy is common in clinical practice. Such patients experience a relatively low postoperative mortality and have a better long-term survival compared with remotely diagnosed patients.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Anciano , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatías/mortalidad , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may be an attractive alternative therapeutic option for elderly patients with heart failure who are ineligible for heart transplantation. AIM: We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients (i.e. aged≥70 years) receiving an LVAD. METHODS: This observational study was conducted in 19 centres between 2006 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups-younger (aged<70 years) and elderly (aged≥70 years), based on age at time of LVAD implantation. RESULTS: A total of 652 patients were included in the final analysis, and 74 patients (11.3%) were aged≥70 years at the time of LVAD implantation (maximal age 77.6 years). The proportion of elderly patients receiving an LVAD each year was constant, with a median of 10.6% (interquartile range 8.0-15.4%) per year, and all were implanted as destination therapy. Elderly and younger patients had similar durations of hospitalization in intensive care units and total lengths of hospital stays. Both age groups experienced similar rates of LVAD-related complications (i.e. stroke, bleeding, driveline infection and LVAD exchange), and the occurrence of LVAD complications did not impact survival in the elderly group compared with the younger group. Lastly, when compared with younger patients implanted as destination therapy, the elderly group also exhibited similar mid-term survival. CONCLUSION: This work strongly suggests that selected elderly adults can be scheduled for LVAD implantation.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Francia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We aimed at characterizing the impact of low and high body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery and define the predictors of mortality in patients with abnormal BMI (low/high). This study was conducted in 19 centers from 2006 to 2016. Patients were divided based on their baseline BMI into 3 groups of BMI: low (BMI ≤18.5 kg/m²); normal (BMIâ¯=â¯18.5 to 24.99 kg/m²) and high (BMI ≥25 kg/m²) (including overweight (BMIâ¯=â¯25 to 29.99 kg/m²), and obesity (BMI ≥30 Kg/m²)). Among 652 patients, 29 (4.4%), 279 (42.8%) and 344 (52.8%) had a low-, normal-, and high BMI, respectively. Patients with high BMI were significantly more likely men, with more co-morbidities and more history of ventricular/supra-ventricular arrhythmias before LVAD implantation. Patients with abnormal BMI had significantly lower survival than those with normal BMI. Notably, those with low BMI experienced the worst survival whereas overweight or obese patients had similar survival. Four predictors of mortality for LVAD candidates with abnormal BMI were defined: total bilirubin ≥16 µmol/L before LVAD, hypertension, destination therapy, and cardiac surgery with LVAD. Depending on the number of predictor per patients, those with abnormal BMI may be divided in 3 groups of 1-year mortality risk, i.e., low (0 to 1 predictor: 29% and 31%), intermediate (2 to 3 predictors, 51% and 52%, respectively), and high (4 predictors: 83%). In conclusion, LVAD recipients with abnormal BMI experience lower survival, especially underweight patients. Four predictors of mortality have been identified for LVAD population with abnormal BMI, differentiating those a low-, intermediate-, and high risks of death.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Obesidad/complicaciones , Delgadez/complicaciones , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Delgadez/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/psicología , Corazón Auxiliar/psicología , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Tristeza , Intento de Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The usage of left-ventricular-assist device (LVAD) is increasing in patients presenting with advanced heart failure. However, device-related infections are a challenge to recognize and to treat, with an important morbidity and mortality rate. The role of nuclear medicine imaging remains not well established for LVAD infections. The present study compared the accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET/CT) and radiolabeled leucocyte scintigraphy for the diagnosis of infections in patients supported with a continuous-flow LVAD. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively analyzed the diagnostic performance of radiolabeled leucocyte scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT in 24 patients who had a LVAD with a suspected device-related infection. Both examinations were routinely performed in all patients. Infection was assessed by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included: 15 had a specific VAD infection (5 cardiac-LVAD and 10 driveline), 6 had a VAD-related infection, while 3 patients had a non-VAD-related infection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 95.2%, 66.7%, 95.2%, 66.7%, and 91.6%, respectively, for 18F-FDG-PET; and 71.4%, 100%, 100%, 33.3%, and 75%, respectively, for leucocyte scintigraphy. 18F-FDG PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity (P = 0.01) than leucocyte scintigraphy. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT and radiolabeled leucocyte scintigraphy single-photon emission computed tomography carry high performance in the diagnostic of LVAD infections. 18F-FDG PET/CT shows significantly higher sensitivity and could be proposed as first-line nuclear medicine procedure.
Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Leucocitos/citología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Cintigrafía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón ÚnicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical impact, and predictors of late ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients aiming to clarify implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications. BACKGROUND: The arrhythmic risk and need for ICD in patients implanted with an LVAD are not very well known. METHODS: This observational study was conducted in 19 centers between 2006 and 2016. Late VAs were defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation occurring >30 days post-LVAD implantation, without acute reversible cause and requiring appropriate ICD therapy, external electrical shock, or medical therapy. RESULTS: Among 659 LVAD recipients, 494 (median 58.9 years of age; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 20.7 ± 7.4%; 73.1% HeartMate II, 18.6% HeartWare, 8.3% Jarvik 2000) were discharged alive from hospital and included in the final analysis. Late VAs occurred in 133 (26.9%) patients. Multivariable analysis identified 6 independent predictors of late VAs: VAs before LVAD implantation, atrial fibrillation before LVAD implantation, idiopathic etiology of the cardiomyopathy, heart failure duration >12 months, early VAs (<30 days post-LVAD), and no angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors during follow-up. The "VT-LVAD score" was created, identifying 4 risk groups: low (score 0 to 1), intermediate (score 2 to 4), high (score 5 to 6), and very high (score 7 to 10). The rates of VAs at 1 year were 0.0%, 8.0%, 31.0% and 55.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Late VAs are common after LVAD implantation. The VT-LVAD score may help to identify patients at risk of late VAs and guide ICD indications in previously nonimplanted patients. (Determination of Risk Factors of Ventricular Arrhythmias [VAs] after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device with continuous flow left ventricular assist device [CF-LVAD] [ASSIST-ICD]; NCT02873169).
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas , Desfibriladores Implantables , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Extracorporeal life support and heart and/or lung transplant are the last resort in children with end-stage cardiac and/or pulmonary failure and short-term life threaten. Currently, circulatory support is used as a bridge to recovery or as a bridge to transplant but not as a destination therapy. The Excor Berlin Heart is the long-lasting external pneumatic ventricular assist system that is currently available from infancy to adulthood. Long-term prognosis after pediatric cardiac and/or pulmonary transplant is conditioned by the occurrence of graft failure, coronary disease of the cardiac graft, viral infections and bronchiolitis obliterans of the pulmonary graft, the incidence of which increase with time. The scarcity of grafts and the risk of acute rejection due to lack of compliance with immunosuppressive treatment require the transplant specialized teams to choose the best candidates according to psychosocial and biological criteria. The next expected developments concern mainly long-term ventricular assistance with systems that allow for greater autonomy and a return to the child's home.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón-Pulmón , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/cirugía , Niño , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/ética , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/instrumentación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Trasplante de Corazón-Pulmón/ética , Humanos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmia is common after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, especially in the early postoperative phase (<30 days). AIM: To identify the incidence of and risk factors for electrical storm (ES) occurring within 30 days of HeartMate® II implantation. METHODS: We reviewed data from all consecutive patients undergoing HeartMate® II device implantation at our institution from January 2008 to December 2014. Patient demographic data, pharmacotherapies and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was occurrence of early ES (within 30 days of surgery), defined as three or more separate episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmia within a 24-hour interval, requiring appropriate therapy. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (mean age 56.7±11.2 years; 39 men) were included. At HeartMate® II implantation, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 20±5%, 32 (74.4%) patients had ischaemic cardiomyopathy and 31 (72.1%) were implanted with an indication of bridge to cardiac transplantation. During follow-up, 12 (27.9%) patients experienced early ES after HeartMate® II implantation (median delay 9.1±7.8 days). Early ES was more frequent in larger patients (body surface area 1.99 vs 1.81 m2; P<0.01), tended to be associated with previous sustained ventricular tachycardia (50.0% vs 22.6%; P=0.08), previous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (66.7% vs 38.7%; P=0.09), discontinuation of long-term beta-blocker therapy (75.0% vs 45.2%; P=0.08), weaning of adrenergic drugs after the third day (66.7% vs 35.5%; P=0.06) and the use of extracorporeal life support (50% vs 22.6%; P=0.079), but was not associated with the cardiomyopathy aetiology or the indication for assistance. Catheter ventricular tachycardia ablation was performed in six (14.0%) patients. Early ES was associated with a significantly higher all-cause mortality rate at the 30th day (33.3% vs 6.5%; P=0.02). CONCLUSION: ES is a common and pejorative feature in the early postoperative period.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Cardiomiopatías/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatías/mortalidad , Cardiomiopatías/fisiopatología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Assessment of potential donors is an essential part of heart transplantation. Despite the shortage of donor hearts, donor heart procurement from brain-dead organ donors remains low in France, which may be explained by the increasing proportion of high-risk donors, as well as the mismatch between donor assessment and the transplant team's expectations. Improving donor and donor heart assessment is essential to improve the low utilization rate of available donor hearts without increasing post-transplant recipient mortality. This document provides information to practitioners involved in brain-dead donor management, evaluation and selection, concerning the place of medical history, electrocardiography, cardiac imaging, biomarkers and haemodynamic and arrhythmia assessment in the characterization of potential heart donors.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica/diagnóstico , Selección de Donante/normas , Trasplante de Corazón/normas , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Biomarcadores/sangre , Muerte Encefálica/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca , Consenso , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Francia , Estado de Salud , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children with dilated cardiomyopathy in advanced heart failure may spend a long time awaiting heart transplantation. Consequently, mechanical circulatory support is sometimes required as a bridge to transplantation. Levosimendan, a positive inotropic agent, has been reported to be safe and efficient for the treatment of paediatric heart failure. AIMS: To report our experience with levosimendan in children with decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Paediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy on the transplant waiting list and with criteria for mechanical support were included in this single-centred retrospective study. Each patient received at least one 24-hour infusion of levosimendan before mechanical circulatory support was considered. Biological and echocardiographic data were analysed. RESULTS: Six patients were included over a 24-month period. The median age was 25.5months (7.7-34.2months); 82 infusions were performed. Median B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased significantly between days 0 and 2 (2443ng/L [1458-3819ng/L] vs 1358ng/L [1025-2534ng/L]; P=0.003). While only a trend was noted in left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (P=0.054 by Simpson's method and P=0.068 by the Teicholz method), the subaortic velocity time integral rose significantly between days 0 and 8 (12.8cm/s [10-14.5cm/s] vs 15.3cm/s [14.3-16.9cm/s]; P=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan seems to improve haemodynamics in children with decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy; repeated infusions may delay the need for mechanical circulatory support while awaiting heart transplantation. This therapeutic agent should be systematically considered in this setting, in addition to conventional inotropic drugs.