Long-term follow-up of the incidence of Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVES: Helicobacter pylori causes peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Understanding the incidence of H. pylori could help guide research on potential infection prevention strategies. Previous studies indicate infection occurs in young children, but the risk of infection in older children and adolescents is unclear. Our hypothesis was that H. pylori infection is rare in adolescence or adulthood. Our aim was to determine the incidence of H. pylori over a prolonged follow-up in a cohort of 626 noninfected individuals. METHODS: Participants, including index children, mothers, fathers and siblings, from a previous study (1997-2002) were traced, and 883 of 946 participated in this extended follow-up. We used the 13C urea breath test (13C-UBT) to determine the incidence of H. pylori among 626 family members not infected in 2002, including 75 younger siblings who were not born or too young for testing in 2002. RESULTS: Eight (3.8%) of 210 index participants (mean ± standard deviation age 17.92 ± 0.77 years) became infected during 11.07 ± 0.56 years of follow-up (incidence, 3.42 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-6.74). Only one (0.6%) of 165 older siblings became infected (incidence, 0.57 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.007-3.16) and one of 176 parents became infected (incidence, 0.63 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.01-3.5). Of 75 younger siblings (age 10.9 ± 2.85 years) who were too young for testing or not yet born in 2002, nine (12%) became infected (incidence, 11.32 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 5.27-21.49). The highest incidence of H. pylori infection was in those born after 2005. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of H. pylori was extremely low in older children and adults in developed countries. Spontaneous clearance of infection was uncommon in our study population.

Getting a handle on the general practice workforce in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: General practice makes a critical contribution to healthcare in Ireland. However, there is a weak understanding of the general practice workforce in Ireland. AIMS: The aim of this study is to estimate the number of general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in Ireland. METHODS: A variety of data sources was used to corroborate counts of general practitioners and practice nurses. Capture-recapture methods were used to estimate the hidden population of GPs not identified by the databases included. RESULTS: There are 2,954 general practitioners in Ireland, equivalent to 64.4 per 100,000 population. There are 1,700 practice nurses nationally, equivalent to 37.1 per 100,000 persons. There is substantial regional variation in the number of general practitioners and practice nurses per 100,000. To some extent, deficits in one discipline may be counterbalanced by a surplus in the other. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of a centralised register, it is not possible to track the number of GPs or practice nurses working in Ireland at present. This is despite the fact that there are twice as many general practice visits per annum compared to hospital visits.

Alcohol consumption in pregnancy: results from the general practice setting.

BACKGROUND: There is no established safe level of alcohol consumption in pregnancy. Studies from Ireland have consistently shown lower abstention and higher binge drinking rates in pregnancy than other countries, indicating a high potential for foetal alcohol-related disorders. There has been little research on alcohol in pregnancy in primary care. AIMS: To determine the prevalence of alcohol consumption amongst pregnant women attending their GP for antenatal care, and to compare this to use in the year prior to conception. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in fifteen teaching practices in the greater Dublin area. Women were recruited at their antenatal visits. Data were gathered by self-completed questionnaire in the practice, or researcher-administered telephone questionnaire. The questionnaire was based on the AUDIT, a WHO-validated data collection instrument designed for use in primary care. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty valid questionnaires were returned (80 % recruitment rate). Alcohol intake and binge drinking levels were much lower during pregnancy compared to the year prior to pregnancy (p < 0.001). There was a marked reduction in the prevalence of alcohol use in pregnancy compared to previous research. Over 97 % drink no more than once a week, including almost two-thirds of women who abstain totally from alcohol in pregnancy. Non-pregnant Irish women drink alcohol more frequently, and with higher rates of binge drinking, than women of other nationalities. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care is a suitable setting to research alcohol use in pregnancy. Alcohol use in pregnancy in Ireland has decreased markedly compared to previous research from this jurisdiction.

Chronic disease management in general practice: results from a national study.

The aim of this study was to provide baseline data on chronic disease management (CDM) provision in Irish general practice (GP). The survey instrument was previously used in a study of primary care physicians in 11 countries, thus allowing international comparisons. The response rate was 72% (380/527).The majority of GPs (240/380; 63%) reported significant changes are needed in our health care system to make CDM work better. Small numbers of routine clinical audits are being performed (95/380; 25%). Irish GPs use evidence based guidelines for treatment of diabetes (267/380; 71%), asthma / COPD (279/380; 74%) and hypertension (297/380; 79%), to the same extent as international counterparts. Barriers to delivering chronic care include increased workload (379/380; 99%), lack of appropriate funding (286/380; 76%), with GPs interested in targeted payments (244/380; 68%). This study provides baseline data to assess future changes in CDM.

Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled. SETTING: 20 general practices in the east of the Republic of Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: 395 patients (192 in intervention group, 203 in control group) and 29 peer supporters with type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTION: All practices introduced a standardised diabetes care system. The peer support intervention ran over a two year period and contained four elements: the recruitment and training of peer supporters, nine group meetings led by peer supporters in participant's own general practice, and a retention plan for the peer supporters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HbA(1c); cholesterol concentration; systolic blood pressure; and wellbeing score. RESULTS: There was no difference between intervention and control patients at baseline. All practices and 85% (337) of patients were followed up. At two year follow-up, there were no significant differences in HbA(1c) (mean difference -0.08%, 95% confidence interval -0.35% to 0.18%), systolic blood pressure (-3.9 mm Hg, -8.9 to 1.1 mm Hg), total cholesterol concentration (-0.03 mmol/L, -0.28 to 0.22 mmol/L), or wellbeing scores (-0.7, -2.3 to 0.8). While there was a trend towards decreases in the proportion of patients with poorly controlled risk factors at follow-up, particularly for systolic blood pressure (52% (87/166) >130 mm Hg in intervention v 61% (103/169) >130 mm Hg in control), these changes were not significant. The process evaluation indicated that the intervention was generally delivered as intended, though 18% (35) of patients in the intervention group never attended any group meetings. CONCLUSIONS: A group based peer support intervention is feasible in general practice settings, but the intervention was not effective when targeted at all patients with type 2 diabetes. While there was a trend towards improvements of clinical outcomes, the results do not support the widespread adoption of peer support. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN42541690.

Chronic respiratory disease and multimorbidity: prevalence and impact in a general practice setting.

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity is defined as two or more co-existing chronic conditions in an individual and is common in general practice. It is associated with poorer outcomes for patients. This study aimed to establish the prevalence of multimorbidity in patients with chronic respiratory disease in general practice and to describe its impact on health service use. METHODS: Cross-sectional study based in general practice in Dublin. Drug and disease code searches were performed to identify adult patients with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory disease. Medical records were reviewed for chronic respiratory diagnosis, other chronic conditions, demographic characteristics, General Practitioner (GP) and practice nurse utilisation rates, and numbers of medications. RESULTS: In a general practice population of 16,946 patients 3.9% had chronic respiratory disease and 60% of these had one or more co-existing chronic condition(s). GP and practice nurse utilisation rates, and number of medications were significantly higher among those with multimorbidity compared with those with respiratory disease alone. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing age and low socio-economic status were significantly associated with multimorbidity. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with chronic respiratory disease have multimorbidity. Clinical guidelines based on single disease entities and outcomes are not as easy to implement and may not be as effective in this group.

Reconfiguring a hospital towards general practice: the case of Peamount.

BACKGROUND: The decline in incidence of tuberculosis in Ireland has led Peamount Hospital to reconfigure its services towards the needs of general practice. AIMS: To ascertain views of local GPs on their current use of Peamount, and how the hospital might best serve their future needs. METHODS: Self-administered postal questionnaires sent to 151 GPs practicing in Peamount's catchment area, to determine their current use of services, and likely future use of proposed services. Total valid response rate 64% (n = 84). RESULTS: Responses indicated a lack of awareness of many services currently available, with a concomitant under-use of these services. The majority of GPs would use planned future services, particularly expanded radiology services. CONCLUSIONS: This survey promoted awareness among GPs of services available at Peamount. It informed the planning of future services and promoted a culture of involving local GPs in the planning of services of which they will be the users.

The private sector in healthcare: contributing to service but not to research.

Public and private medicine has lived cheek by jowl in Ireland for many years. In Graves's time, Lyons recounts how "the vacancy at the Meath Hospital filled by the celebrated J Graves in 1821 occurred after an interchange of money" [Lyons JB (1991) 1834-1844. In: The quality of Mercer's-The story of Mercer's Hospital, 1734-1991, Glendale, Dublin, p 70]. Indeed Graves retired from the Meath Hospital aged 47 years to concentrate on his private practice. He continued to work as a consultant to the Adelaide, the Coombe and to Peter's Parish Dispensary, which was an example of how the philanthropic and the private sector worked together in the 1800s.

Limited options: a report on GP access to services.

BACKGROUND: The Structure of Irish General Practice over 23 years was the third in a series of national studies that examined the development of general practice in 1982, 1992, and 2005. AIMS: This study analysed specific data from the 2005 survey to determine the types of services offered by GPs, and to examine the changes in access to diagnostic/treatment services from 1982 to 2005. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of Irish GPs seeking information on their practice. RESULTS: 476 (87%) valid questionnaires were returned. The range of services offered by GPs had increased. Access to diagnostic/treatment services was limited, and varied considerably depending on the type of practice. Access to chest X-rays and skeletal X-rays had decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Access to existing services must be increased, and significant resources must be put into the development of dedicated primary care services.

Perceived and reported access to the general practitioner: an international comparison of universal access and mixed private/public systems.

Timely and convenient access to primary healthcare is essential for the health of the population as delays can incur additional health and financial costs. Access to health care is under increasing scrutiny as part of the drive to contain escalating costs, while attempting to maintain equity in service provision. The objective was to compare primary care services in Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, and to report on perceived and reported access to GP services in universal access and mixed private/public systems. A questionnaire study was performed in Northern Ireland (NI) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI). Patients of 20 practices in the ROI and NI were contacted (n = 22,796). Main outcome measures were overall satisfaction and the access to GP services. Individual responses and scale scores were derived using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (G-PAQ). The response rate was 52% (n = 11,870). Overall satisfaction with GP practices was higher in ROI than in NI (84.2% and 80.9% respectively). Access scores were higher in ROI than in NI (69.2% and 57.0% respectively) Less than 1 in 10 patients in ROI waited two or more working days to see a doctor of choice (8.1%) compared to almost half (45.0%) in NI. In NI overall satisfaction decreased as practice size increased; 82.8%, 80.4%, and 75.8%. In both systems, in large practices, accessibility is reduced when compared to smaller practices. The faster access to GP services in ROI may be due to the deterrent effect of the consultation charge freeing up services although, as it is the poorest and sickest who are deterred by the charge this improved accessibility may come at a significant cost in terms of equity. The underlying concern for policy makers centres around provision of equitable services.

Effectiveness of shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in chronic disease management.

BACKGROUND: Shared care has been used in the management of many chronic conditions with the assumption that it delivers better care than either primary or specialty care alone. It has been defined as the joint participation of primary care physicians and specialty care physicians in the planned delivery of care, informed by an enhanced information exchange over and above routine discharge and referral notices. It has the potential to offer improved quality and coordination of care delivery across the primary-specialty care interface and to improve outcomes for patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of shared-care health service interventions designed to improve the management of chronic disease across the primary-specialty care interface. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) Specialised Register (and the database of studies awaiting assessment); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE); MEDLINE (from 1966); EMBASE (from 1980) and CINAHL (from 1982). We also searched the reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series analyses of shared-care interventions for chronic disease management. The participants were primary care providers, specialty care providers and patients. The outcomes included physical health outcomes, mental health outcomes, and psychosocial health outcomes, treatment satisfaction, measures of care delivery including participation in services, delivery of care and prescribing of appropriate medications, and costs of shared care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty studies of shared care interventions for chronic disease management were identified, 19 of which were randomised controlled trials. The majority of studies examined complex multifaceted interventions and were of relatively short duration. The results were mixed. Overall there were no consistent improvements in physical or mental health outcomes, psychosocial outcomes, psychosocial measures including measures of disability and functioning, hospital admissions, default or participation rates, recording of risk factors and satisfaction with treatment. However, there were clear improvements in prescribing in the studies that considered this outcome. The methodological quality of studies varied considerably with only a minority of studies of high-quality design. Cost data were limited and difficult to interpret across studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates that there is, at present, insufficient evidence to demonstrate significant benefits from shared care apart from improved prescribing. Methodological shortcomings, particularly inadequate length of follow-up, may partially account for this lack of evidence. This review indicates that there is no evidence to support the widespread introduction of shared care services at present. Future shared-care interventions should only be developed within research settings and with account taken of the complexity of such interventions and the need to carry out longer studies to test the effectiveness and sustainability of shared care over time.

Living with Type 2 diabetes: a family perspective.

AIM: To explore the beliefs, attitudes and perceptions of adults with Type 2 diabetes and their family members. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with: (i) people with good diabetes control (HbA1c < 7.0%); (ii) their family members; (iii) people with poor diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%); and (iv) their family members. RESULTS: There were no discernible differences between those with good and poor diabetes control or between the family members of each group. Overall, family members perceived diabetes to be more serious and as having a greater impact on daily life than those with the illness. Those with diabetes were unaware of this heightened concern and had a more relaxed approach to living with diabetes. The lack of information and perceived knowledge about diabetes impacted upon participants' causal attributions about the illness and its perceived severity. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is an illness that affects both individuals and families. There is a need for further investigation into the impact that family members have on the management of diabetes.

Socio-economic gradients in self-reported health in Ireland and Northern Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Research and policy related to reducing health inequalities has progressed separately within Ireland and Northern Ireland. This paper describes the first exploration of the socio-economic influences on health on the island of Ireland since 1922. METHODS: Postal survey. RESULTS: The response rate was 52%; 11,870 respondents. Men reported more long-standing illness (LLTI) or poor general health (PGH); depression was more common amongst women. Socio-economic gradients in health were evident in both jurisdictions, with the effects of household income being particularly marked. Overall, morbidity levels were significantly better in Ireland than in Northern Ireland: adjusted odds ratio of 0.79 (95% CI 0.71 - 0.88) for LLTI; 0.64 (0.57 - 0.72) for PGH; 0.90 (0.82 - 0.99) for depression. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of strong and similar socio-economic gradients in health throughout the island of Ireland. This would suggest joint policy approaches or at least further comparative evaluation of the initiatives in each jurisdiction.

The career plans of Irish interns: results of a national survey.

In anticipation of major changes in medical manpower in Ireland, we surveyed all interns about their career plans. Three hundred (65% of those surveyed) responded. There were clear gender differences in career plans and overall, only 15% planned a career in general practice. There was a negative perception about the quality of postgraduate training in Ireland and 93% planned to go overseas for training. These findings need to influence the debate on medical manpower and postgraduate training.

Symptoms of vertigo in general practice: a prospective study of diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: There is little published evidence of the general practice experience of the diagnostic outcomes when symptoms of vertigo present. What research there is has been dominated by specialist centres. This gives a skewed view of the prevalence of the causes of such symptoms. AIM: To describe the likely diagnosis of symptoms of vertigo. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective cohort study METHODS: Thirteen GPs were recruited and trained to clinically assess and follow up all patients presenting with symptoms of vertigo over a six-month period Age-sex data were simultaneously gathered on those who consulted with non-vertiginous dizziness. RESULTS: The main diagnoses assigned by the GPs in 70 patients were benign positional vertigo, acute vestibular neuronitis and Ménière's disease, which together accounted for 93% (95% confidence interval = 71% to 100%) of patients' symptoms. Ninety-one per cent of patients were managed in general practice and 60% received a prescription for a vestibular sedative. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that presentations of symptoms of vertigo can be clinically diagnosed in most cases. The diagnoses recorded by GPs differ in proportion to those in specialist centres, with a larger number of patients suffering from benign positional vertigo and acute vestibular neuronitis in general practice, in contrast with specialist centres, which see more patients with Ménière's disease.

A systematic review of vertigo in primary care.

The symptom of vertigo is usually managed in primary care without further referral. This review examines the evidence on which general practitioners can base clinical diagnosis and management of this relatively common complaint. Research in this area has in the main been from secondary and tertiary centres and has been of variable quality. Indications are that the conditions that present in general practice are most likely to be benign positional vertigo, acute vestibular neuronitis, and Ménière's disease; however, vascular incidents and neurological causes, such as multiple sclerosis, must be kept in mind. An important practice point is that vestibular sedatives are not recommended on a prolonged basis for any type of vertigo. There is a need for basic epidemiological and clinical management research of vertigo in general practice.

Trends in alcohol consumption in undergraduate third level students: 1992-1999.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption has increased in the Irish population in recent years. It is not known to what extent the student population has been affected by this increase. AIM: To determine levels of alcohol consumption among undergraduates in one Irish university and identify changes in drinking patterns in the years 1992-1999. METHODS: Information on alcohol use was obtained by anonymous self-completed questionnaire in a stratified random cross-faculty sample of undergraduates in 1992 and 1999. The CAGE questionnaire to determine problem drinking was included in both surveys. RESULTS: A statistically significant (p=0.01) drop in weekly alcohol consumption by males was found, although the proportion of male problem drinkers increased. Consumption for females remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are contrary to recent figures for drinking patterns in young Irish people in general. The fall in alcohol consumption in male students may be linked to improved male insight into the negative effects of alcohol or to the substitution of cheaper available substances.

General practitioners and women with urinary incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is a common problem for adult women. It results in a large financial and psychosocial cost. Much urinary incontinence goes unreported. Women with urinary incontinence can be successfully assessed and treated in general practice but studies have shown that many GPs manage the condition inadequately. AIM: This study aims to examine GPs' awareness of urinary incontinence in women and their management of, and attitudes to, female urinary incontinence. METHOD: A qualitative study was conducted with 21 GPs responding to semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was carried out on these interviews, with recurrent views and experiences being identified and grouped. RESULTS: The interviews of 11 male and nine female GPs were suitable for analysis. GPs were aware of the prevalence and under-reporting of urinary incontinence in women. Many were unhappy with their own management of the condition and with the management options available to them. Male GPs in particular were reluctant to carry out gynaecological examinations, and few GPs expressed enthusiasm for teaching pelvic floor exercises or bladder drills. Medications were frequently used but generally considered ineffective or intolerable. The services of both public health nurses and practice nurses were under-used, largely because of lack of training in this area. Although incontinence nurses were employed in the area, many GPs did not know of their availability and, of those who did, few referred to them more than infrequently. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that many GPs avoid dealing with the problem of urinary incontinence in women and that they find it to be a difficult, chronic problem to treat. Specialist options seem not to be useful in general practice. The findings need to be explored in other GP settings.