Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 1(4): 239-242, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32904452

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, attempts to conserve resources and limit virus spread have resulted in delay of nonemergent procedures across all medical specialties, including cardiac electrophysiology (EP). Many patients have delayed care and continue to express concerns about potential nosocomial spread of coronavirus. OBJECTIVE: To quantify risk of development of COVID-19 owing to in-hospital transmission related to an EP procedure, in the setting of preventive measures instituted in our laboratory areas. METHODS: We contacted patients by telephone who underwent emergent procedures in the electrophysiology lab during the COVID-19 surge at our hospital (March 16, 2020, to May 15, 2020, reaching daily census 450 COVID-19 patients,) ≥2 weeks after the procedure, to assess for symptoms of and/or testing for COVID-19, and assessed outcomes from medical record review. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients undergoing EP procedures in this period, none had developed documented or suspected coronavirus infection. Seven patients described symptoms of chest pain, dyspnea, or fever; 3 were tested for coronavirus and found to be negative. Of the remaining 4, 2 had a more plausible alternative explanation for the symptoms, and 2 had transient symptoms not meeting published criteria for probable COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: Despite a high hospital census of COVID-19 patients during the period of hospital stay for an EP procedure, there were no likely COVID-19 infections occurring in follow-up of at least 2 weeks. With proper use of preventive measures as recommended by published guidelines, the risk of nosocomial spread of COVID-19 to patients in the EP lab is low.

2.
Am J Cardiol ; 131: 122-124, 2020 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32718546

RESUMEN

There have been no recent descriptions of the spontaneous conversion of long-standing atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFl) to sinus rhythm which, in the past, has been associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease and treatment with digoxin. We present 3 contemporary cases, all of whom progressed from AF to slow AFl and then spontaneously converted to slow sinus or junctional rhythm. None of these patients had rheumatic heart disease or were treated with digoxin. In conclusion, we believe that they provide support for the broader view that this uncommon phenomenon is associated with a severe atrial myopathy due to scar and inflammation.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Aleteo Atrial/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Electrocardiografía , Mapeo Epicárdico , Humanos , Masculino , Remisión Espontánea
3.
Heart Rhythm ; 17(9): 1417-1422, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32387247

RESUMEN

Background: Many of the drugs being used in the treatment of the ongoing pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are associated with QT prolongation. Expert guidance supports electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring to optimize patient safety. Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish an enhanced process for ECG monitoring of patients being treated for COVID-19. Methods: We created a Situation Background Assessment Recommendation tool identifying the indication for ECGs in patients with COVID-19 and tagged these ECGs to ensure prompt over reading and identification of those with QT prolongation (corrected QT interval > 470 ms for QRS duration ≤ 120 ms; corrected QT interval > 500 ms for QRS duration > 120 ms). This triggered a phone call from the electrophysiology service to the primary team to provide management guidance and a formal consultation if requested. Results: During a 2-week period, we reviewed 2006 ECGs, corresponding to 524 unique patients, of whom 103 (19.7%) met the Situation Background Assessment Recommendation tool-defined criteria for QT prolongation. Compared with those without QT prolongation, these patients were more often in the intensive care unit (60 [58.3%] vs 149 [35.4%]) and more likely to be intubated (32 [31.1%] vs 76 [18.1%]). Fifty patients with QT prolongation (48.5%) had electrolyte abnormalities, 98 (95.1%) were on COVID-19-related QT-prolonging medications, and 62 (60.2%) were on 1-4 additional non-COVID-19-related QT-prolonging drugs. Electrophysiology recommendations were given to limit modifiable risk factors. No patient developed torsades de pointes. Conclusion: This process functioned efficiently, identified a high percentage of patients with QT prolongation, and led to relevant interventions. Arrhythmias were rare. No patient developed torsades de pointes.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Electrocardiografía , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA