[Current Status of Calculation of Continence Care Fee for Out-Patients at Kurosawa Hospital].

The continence self-management programme fee (CSPF) for hospitalized patients was revised in 2020 to include those receiving consistent care on an out-patient basis. We extracted candidate patients for CSPF on an out-patient basis (out-patient candidates hereafter) from those for whom-CSPF had been calculated during hospitalization at our hospital, and defined those who had undergone a medical examination related to continence care as out-patient calculation candidates. Of the 956 patients for whom CSPF had been calculated during hospitalization, 482 patients (50%) were out-patient candidates ; 275 (54%) and 169 (33%) of whom were seen in the urology and neurosurgery departments, respectively. Of the 482 out-patient candidates, 238 (49%) were out-patient calculation candidates ; 197 (83%) and 14 (6%) of whom were seen in the urology and neurosurgery departments, respectively. Forty-two and 41 of the calculation candidates were cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia and bladder cancer, respectively. The CSPF was actually processed 93 times for 78 of the 482 out-patient candidates (16%). There were various obstacles in the current system of calculating the fees to realize consistent care from hospitalization to out-patient care.

Diagnostic Impacts of Clinical Laboratory Based p2PSA Indexes on any Grade, Gleason Grade Group 2 or Greater, or 3 or Greater Prostate Cancer and Prostate Specific Antigen below 10 ng/ml.

PURPOSE: The PROPHET (Prostate Cancer: Prostate Health Index Trial) is a prospective study to clarify the diagnostic impact of laboratory based and prostate volume adjusted p2PSA ([-2] proenzyme prostate specific antigen) related indexes on prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2015 and March 2017, 421 men 50 to 79 years old in the prostate specific antigen range above age specific cutoffs and below 10 ng/ml were registered in the PROPHET. We investigated the diagnostic impacts of various clinical laboratory based free prostate specific antigen related and p2PSA related indexes on any grade and high Gleason grade group prostate cancer. RESULTS: Of the 363 eligible participants 179, 141 and 80 were diagnosed with any grade, and Gleason Grade Group 2-5 and 3-5 prostate cancer, respectively. The AUC-ROCs distinguishing nonprostate cancer vs prostate cancer, nonprostate cancer plus low Gleason Grade Group and low volume vs remaining prostate cancer with a higher Gleason Grade group or a higher volume on the PHI (Prostate Health Index) were significantly superior to the AUC-ROCs of prostate specific antigen and free-to-total prostate specific antigen. At 90% sensitivity in all investigated p2PSA related indexes the false-positive rate was superior to that of prostate specific antigen and free-to-total prostate specific antigen in any group comparison in terms of the Gleason Grade Group and positive biopsy cores. In 35% to 42% of men without prostate cancer and/or those with less aggressive prostate cancer the PHI would avoid unnecessary biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory based p2PSA related indexes were significantly superior for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer compared to free-to-total prostate specific antigen. The indexes those would avoid up to 42% of prostate biopsies in men without aggressive cancer while maintaining 90% sensitivity.

Screening for prostate cancer: History, evidence, controversies and future perspectives toward individualized screening.

Differences in the incidence and mortality rate of prostate cancer between the USA and Japan have been decreasing over time, and were only twofold in 2017. Therefore, countermeasures against prostate cancer could be very important not only in Western countries, but also in developed Asian countries. Screening for prostate cancer in the general population using transrectal ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and/or prostate acid phosphatase began in Japan in the early 1980s, and screening with prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination has been widespread in the USA since the late 1980s. Large- and mid-scale randomized controlled trials on screening for prostate cancer began around 1990 in the USA, Canada and Europe. However, most of these studies failed as randomized controlled trials because of high contamination in the control arm, low compliance in the screening arm or insufficient screening setting about screening frequency and/or biopsy indication. The best available level 1 evidence is data from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer and the Göteborg screening study. However, several non-urological organizations and lay media around the world have mischaracterized the efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening. To avoid long-term confusion about screening for prostate cancer, leading professional urological organizations, including the Japanese Urological Association, are moving toward the establishment of an optimal screening system that minimizes the drawbacks of overdetection, overtreatment and loss of quality of life due to treatment, and maximizes reductions in the risk of death as a result of prostate cancer and the development of metastatic prostate cancer.

Long-term longitudinal changes in baseline PSA distribution and estimated prevalence of prostate cancer in male Japanese participants of population-based PSA screening.

Japan has experienced a drastic increase in the incidence of prostate cancer (PC). To assess changes in the risk for PC, we investigated baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in first-time screened men, across a 25-year period. In total, 72,654 men, aged 50-79, underwent first-time PSA screening in Gunma prefecture between 1992 and 2016. Changes in the distribution of PSA levels were investigated, including the percentage of men with a PSA above cut-off values and linear regression analyses comparing log10 PSA with age. The 'ultimate incidence' of PC and clinically significant PC (CSPC) were estimated using the PC risk calculator. Changes in the age-standardized incidence rate (AIR) during this period were analyzed. The calculated coefficients of linear regression for age versus log10 PSA fluctuated during the 25-year period, but no trend was observed. In addition, the percentage of men with a PSA above cut-off values varied in each 5-year period, with no specific trend. The 'risk calculator (RC)-based AIR' of PC and CSPC were stable between 1992 and 2016. Therefore, the baseline risk for developing PC has remained unchanged in the past 25 years, in Japan. The drastic increase in the incidence of PC, beginning around 2000, may be primarily due to increased PSA screening in the country.

Predictive value of different prostate-specific antigen-based markers in men with baseline total prostate-specific antigen <2.0 ng/mL.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictive value of various molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen in men with baseline prostate-specific antigen <2.0 ng/mL. METHODS: The case cohort comprised 150 men with a baseline prostate-specific antigen level <2.0 ng/mL, and who developed prostate cancer within 10 years. The control cohort was 300 baseline prostate-specific antigen- and age-adjusted men who did not develop prostate cancer. Serum prostate-specific antigen, free prostate-specific antigen, and [-2] proenzyme prostate-specific antigen were measured at baseline and last screening visit. The predictive impact of baseline prostate-specific antigen- and [-2] proenzyme prostate-specific antigen-related indices on developing prostate cancer was investigated. The predictive impact of those indices at last screening visit and velocities from baseline to final screening on tumor aggressiveness were also investigated. RESULTS: The baseline free to total prostate-specific antigen ratio was a significant predictor of prostate cancer development. The odds ratio was 6.08 in the lowest quintile baseline free to total prostate-specific antigen ratio subgroup. No serum indices at diagnosis were associated with tumor aggressiveness. The Prostate Health Index velocity and [-2] proenzyme prostate-specific antigen/free prostate-specific antigen velocity significantly increased in patients with higher risk D'Amico risk groups and higher Gleason scores. CONCLUSIONS: Free to total prostate-specific antigen ratio in men with low baseline prostate-specific antigen levels seems to predict the risk of developing prostate cancer, and it could be useful for a more effective individualized screening system. Longitudinal changes in [-2] proenzyme prostate-specific antigen-related indices seem to correlate with tumor aggressiveness, and they could be used as prognostic tool before treatment and during active surveillance.

Frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcers.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for treatment of orthopedic diseases, inflammatory diseases, etc., and low-dose aspirin is a common antiplatelet therapy given mainly for secondary prevention of atherothrombosis (e.g., myocardial infarction and cerebral infarction). As to the history of NSAID-induced gastric mucosal injury in Japan, the first case of an aspirin-induced gastric ulcer was reported as early as 1934. Based on a meta-analysis of risk factors for peptic ulcers, Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAIDs are the main etiologies of peptic ulcers. NSAIDs alone increase the odds ratio for ulcer development to 19.4 and that for ulcer bleeding to 4.85. In fact, the Japan Rheumatism Foundation reported in 1991 that active gastric ulcers and active duodenal ulcers were detected in 15.5 and 1.9 % of 1008 patients, respectively, taking oral NSAIDs for 3 months or longer. In Japan, which is becoming an increasingly aged society, the numbers of patients taking NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin are expected to increase dramatically in the future. It is hoped that accumulation of evidence on gastrointestinal risk will allow many patients to rationally avoid gastrointestinal complications while receiving the benefits of NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin.

Evaluation of microvessels in colorectal tumors by narrow band imaging magnification: including comparison with magnifying chromoendoscopy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Narrow band imaging (NBI) magnification analysis has entered use in clinical settings to diagnose colorectal tumors. Pit pattern analysis with magnifying endoscopy is already widely used to assess colorectal lesions and invasion depth. Our study compared diagnoses by vascular pattern analysis and pit pattern analysis with NBI magnification. METHODS: We examined 296 colorectal lesions-15 hyperplastic polyps (HP), 213 low-grade adenomas (L-Ad), 26 high-grade adenomas (H-Ad), 31 with intramucosal to scanty submucosal invasion (M-Sm-s), and 11 with massive submucosal invasion (Sm-m)-applying the system of Kudo et al. to analyze pit patterns, and the system of Tanaka et al. to analyze and classify vascular patterns by NBI into three categories: type A (hyperplasia pattern), type B (adenomatous pattern), and type C (carcinomatous pattern). Type C cases were subdivided into subtypes C1, C2, and C3. We used this system to examine histology type and invasion depth. RESULTS: Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100% for both type II pit pattern HP and type A HP. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 85.4, 94.5, and 93.2% for Vi and Vn pit pattern cancer and 95.2, 91.7, and 92.2% for type C cancer (no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy). Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were comparable for Vi high-grade irregularity and Vn pit pattern Sm-m (90.9, 96.8, and 96.7%) and type C2/C3 Sm-m (90.1, 98.2, and 98.0%), with no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular pattern analysis by NBI magnification proved comparable to pit pattern analysis.