Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1355813, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38455035

RESUMEN

Objectives: Anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies have been reported to exhibit both neutralizing and non-neutralizing characteristics. This is the first study investigating the full spectrum of FVIII-specific antibodies, including non-neutralizing antibodies, very-low titer inhibitors, and inhibitors, in a large nationwide population of persons with hemophilia A of all severities. Methods: All persons with hemophilia A (mild (FVIII > 5-40 IU/dL)/moderate [FVIII 1-5 IU/dL)/severe (FVIII < 1 IU/dL)] with an available plasma sample who participated in the sixth Hemophilia in the Netherlands study between 2018 and 2019 were included. The presence of anti-FVIII antibodies of the immunoglobulin A, M, and G isotypes and IgG subclasses, along with antibody titer levels, were assessed using direct-binding ELISAs. FVIII specificity was assessed using a competition-based ELISA approach. The inhibitor status was determined using the Nijmegen ultra-sensitive Bethesda assay (NusBA) and the Nijmegen Bethesda assay (NBA). Results: In total, 788 persons with hemophilia A (336 (42.6%) mild, 123 (15.6%) moderate, 329 (41.8%) severe hemophilia) were included. The median age was 45 years (IQR 24-60), and the majority (50.9%) had over 150 exposure days to FVIII concentrates. Within our population, 144 (18.3%) individuals had non-neutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies, 10 (1.3%) had very low-titer inhibitors (NusBA positive; NBA negative), and 13 (1.6%) had inhibitors (both NusBA and NBA positive). IgG1 was the most abundant FVIII-specific antibody subclass, and the highest titer levels were found for IgG4. In individuals without a reported history of inhibitor development, no clear differences were observed in antibody patterns between those who were minimally or highly exposed to FVIII concentrates. IgG4 subclass antibodies were only observed in persons with a reported history of FVIII inhibitor or in those with a currently detected (very low-titer) inhibitor. Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study, we identified non-neutralizing antibodies in a relatively large proportion of persons with hemophilia A. In contrast, in our population, consisting of persons highly exposed to FVIII concentrates, (very low-titer) inhibitors were detected only in a small proportion of persons, reflecting a well-tolerized population. Hence, our findings suggest that only a small subpopulation of non-neutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies is associated with clinically relevant inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemostáticos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Inmunoglobulina G , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea
2.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost ; 7(1): 100020, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36891524

RESUMEN

Background: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) aims to eradicate anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (inhibitors) in persons with hemophilia A. However, this burdensome treatment fails in 10% to 40%. To estimate the chance of ITI success in clinical decision making, it is important to identify the predictors of ITI success. Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence on determinants of ITI outcome in persons with hemophilia A. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials, cohort, or case-control studies reporting on the predictors for ITI outcome in persons with hemophilia A. The main outcome was ITI success. Methodological quality was assessed using an adapted Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, rating as high if ≥11 of 13 criteria were met. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for ITI success were calculated for each determinant. ITI success was defined as negative inhibitor titer (<0.6 BU/mL), FVIII recovery ≥66% of expected, and FVIII half-life ≥6 hours in 16 (59.3%) studies. Results: We included 27 studies, involving 1,734 participants. Methodological quality of 6 (22.2%) studies (418 participants) was rated as high. Twenty different determinants were assessed. Historical peak titer ≤100 BU/mL (compared with >100 BU/mL, OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.1), pre-ITI titer ≤10 BU/mL (compared with >10 BU/mL, OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3), and peak titer during ITI ≤100 BU/mL (compared with >100 BU/mL, OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-3.8) were associated with a higher chance of ITI success. Conclusion: Our results suggest that determinants related to the inhibitor titer are associated with ITI success.

3.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 40(1): 183-190, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34251329

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal CD20-antibody. Lack of efficacy has been suggested to be related to the presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). The aims of this study were to determine if ADA impact the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of RTX in children, whether the formation of ADA differs between various immune-mediated diseases and if it is related to the occurrence of infusion-related reactions (IRR). METHODS: All children <18 years who had received RTX treatment in our centre between December 2006 and February 2020 with known ADA/RTX-levels, were retrospectively included. The presence of ADA was defined as a titre >8 AU/ml. RESULTS: Of twenty-six children treated with RTX for various immune-mediated diseases, six patients were ADA-positive (23.1%). In all ADA-positive patients, RTX concentrations were undetectable in contrast to ADA-negative patients (median RTX concentration 3.1 µg/ml; IQR 0.57-12.0; p<0.001). Failure of B cell depletion was found in 5/6 ADA-positive and 1/19 ADA-negative patients (p=0.003). In SLE-patients, 50.0% (n=4/8) had developed RTX-ADA. Severe anaphylaxis (n=3) occurred only in the ADA-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of paediatric patients, undetectable RTX concentrations were found in ADA-positive patients, indicative that these ADA have a PK impact. RTX-ADA also seem to affect the PD, as in the majority of these patients, B cell depletion failed. ADA were most present in SLE-patients and anaphylactic reactions occurred only in ADA-positive patients. With this knowledge, a change of drug might be considered in the presence of RTX-ADA.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Antígenos CD20 , Linfocitos B , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Cancer Res ; 77(6): 1485-1491, 2017 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28108515

RESUMEN

Severe late damage to normal tissue is a major limitation of cancer radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients. In a recent retrospective study, late radiation toxicity was found to relate to a decreased decay of γ-H2AX foci and reduced induction of DNA double-strand break repair genes. Here, we report evidence of prognostic utility in prostate cancer for γ-H2AX foci decay ratios and gene expression profiles derived from ex vivo-irradiated patient lymphocytes. Patients were followed ≥2 years after radiotherapy. Clinical characteristics were assembled, and toxicity was recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) v4.0. No clinical factor was correlated with late radiation toxicity. The γ-H2AX foci decay ratio correlated negatively with toxicity grade, with a significant difference between grade ≥3 and grade 0 patients (P = 0.02). A threshold foci decay ratio, determined in our retrospective study, correctly classified 23 of 28 patients with grade ≥3 toxicity (sensitivity 82%) and 9 of 14 patients with grade 0 toxicity (specificity 64%). Induction of homologous recombination (HR) repair genes was reduced with increasing toxicity grade. The difference in fold induction of the HR gene set was most pronounced between grade 0 and grade ≥3 toxicity (P = 0.008). Notably, reduced responsiveness of HR repair genes to irradiation and inefficient double-strand break repair correlated with severe late radiation toxicity. Using a decay ratio classifier, we correctly classified 82% of patients with grade ≥3 toxicity, suggesting a prognostic biomarker for cancer patients with a genetically enhanced risk for late radiation toxicity to normal tissues after radiotherapy. Cancer Res; 77(6); 1485-91. ©2017 AACR.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Roturas del ADN de Doble Cadena/efectos de la radiación , Enzimas Reparadoras del ADN/genética , Recombinación Homóloga/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Traumatismos por Radiación/genética , Reparación del ADN por Recombinación/genética , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Histonas/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA