The predictive potential of autoimmune-inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) criteria to assess the risk of adverse events and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

At the moment, there are no approved predictive markers of immune adverse events (irAES) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the treatment efficacy. The early stages of irAES have some similarities with adjuvant-induced autoimmune/pro-inflammatory syndrome (ASIA). This study aims to assess the predictive possibility of using the "ASIA questionnaire" in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in comparison with determination of PD-L1 expression to predict the risk of irAES development and therapy efficacy. We examined patients (n = 91) being treated for solid tumors. The signs of ASIA were found in 74% (66/91), while ASIA syndrome was diagnosed in 54% of cases (49/91). No statistically significant difference in the frequency of ICI-dependent complication development regarding the presence of previous ASIA clinical manifestations, hereditary factors, sex, different trigger factors was found. Index based on combination of PD-L1 determination and ASIA index was created. With reference > 2.5 units, the disease control rate (DCR) could be predicted with sensitivity 100.0% and specificity 70.00%, p = 0.007. The study did not reveal the diagnostic value of ASIA questionnaire to assess the risk of adverse events; however, in early stages, the development of ASIA symptoms diagnosed with the questionnaire in complex with PD-L1 expression allowed to predict a treatment efficacy.

Hypothesis for the development of immune-related adverse events in immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy.

There are no explanations for the diversity in the development of certain immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The goal of this study is to search for possible predisposing factors that contribute to the development of certain autoimmune complications during anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy. According to the keywords "checkpoint inhibitors, anti-CTLA4, anti-PD1/PD-L1, immune adverse events, paraneoplastic syndrome" the review and original articles published in the international databases to 2021were selected and studied. According to the analysis of the published papers, we consider that a key role in the difference in the types of irAEs lies in the specificity of the drug. The high prevalence of skin and gastrointestinal autoimmune complications can be explained by the presence of gut dysbacteriosis in patients before treatment and developed during the treatment. For the development of specific types of irAEs, a complex of predisposing factors is required, such as HLA-genotype, paraneoplastic syndromes, and the expression of PD-L1 in the thyroid gland in the case of anti-PD1 therapy.

Addition of ramucirumab or merestinib to standard first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers are aggressive, rare, gastrointestinal malignancies with a poor prognosis; approximately half of patients with these cancers survive for less than 1 year after diagnosis with advanced disease. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab or merestinib in addition to first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study at 81 hospitals across 18 countries. We enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, non-resectable, recurrent, or metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinoma, who were treatment-naive, aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, estimated life expectancy of 3 months or more, and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (2:1:2:1) to receive either intravenous ramucirumab 8 mg/kg or placebo (on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles) or oral merestinib 80 mg or placebo (once daily) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or patient or investigator request for discontinuation. All participants received intravenous cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles), for a maximum of eight cycles. Randomisation was done by an interactive web response system using a permuted block method (blocks of six) and was stratified by primary tumour site, geographical region, and presence of metastatic disease. Participants, investigators, and the study funder were masked to treatment assignment within the intravenous and oral groups. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (in the intention-to-treat population). The safety analysis was done in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02711553, and long-term follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between May 25, 2016, and Aug 8, 2017, 450 patients were assessed for eligibility and 309 (69%) were enrolled and randomly assigned to ramucirumab (n=106), merestinib (n=102), or pooled placebo (n=101); 306 received at least one dose of study treatment. The median follow-up time for progression-free survival at data cutoff (Feb 16, 2018) was 10·9 months (IQR 8·1-14·1). Median progression-free survival was 6·5 months (80% CI 5·7-7·1) in the ramucirumab group, 7·0 months (6·2-7·1) in the merestinib group, and 6·6 months (5·6-6·8) in the pooled placebo group (ramucirumab vs placebo hazard ratio 1·12 [80% CI 0·90-1·40], two-sided stratified p=0·48; merestinib vs placebo 0·92 [0·73-1·15], two-sided stratified p=0·64). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (51 [49%] of 104 patients in the ramucirumab group; 48 [47%] of 102 in the merestinib group; and 33 [33%] of 100 in the pooled placebo group), thrombocytopenia (36 [35%]; 19 [19%]; and 17 [17%]), and anaemia (28 [27%]; 16 [16%]; and 19 [19%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 53 (51%) patients in the ramucirumab group, 56 (55%) in the merestinib group, and 48 (48%) in the pooled placebo group. Treatment-related deaths (deemed related by the investigator) occurred in one (1%) of 104 patients in the ramucirumab group (cardiac arrest) and two (2%) of 102 patients in the merestinib group (pulmonary embolism [n=1] and sepsis [n=1]). INTERPRETATION: Adding ramucirumab or merestinib to first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine was well tolerated, with no new safety signals, but neither improved progression-free survival in patients with molecularly unselected, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. The role of these targeted inhibitors remains investigational, highlighting the need for further understanding of biliary tract malignancies and the contribution of molecular selection. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.

Real-World Experience with Targeted Therapy in BRAF Mutant Advanced Melanoma Patients: Results from a Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study Advanced Melanoma in Russia (Experience) (ADMIRE).

Clinical trials of targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IT) for highly aggressive advanced melanoma have shown marked improvements in response and survival rates. However, real-world data on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with advanced BRAF V600 mutant melanoma are ultimately scarce. The study was designed as an observational retrospective chart review study, which included 382 patients with advanced BRAF V600 mutant melanoma, who received TT in a real-world setting and were not involved in clinical trials. The data were collected from twelve medical centers in Russia. The objective response rates (ORRs) to combined BRAFi plus MEKi and to BRAFi mono-therapy were 57.4% and 39.8%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 9.2 months and 22.6 months, respectively, for the combined first-line therapy; 9.4 months and 16.1 months, respectively, for the combined second-line therapy; and 7.4 months and 17.1 months, respectively, for the combined third- or higher-line therapy. Analysis of treatment patterns demonstrated the effectiveness of the combined TT with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors in patients with brain metastases, rare types of BRAF mutations, and across lines of therapy, as well as a well-tolerated and manageable safety profile.

Small fraction of testicular cancer cases may be causatively related to CHEK2 inactivating germ-line mutations: evidence for somatic loss of the remaining CHEK2 allele in the tumor tissue.

A recent study suggested a role of CHEK2 loss-of-function germ-line pathogenic variants in the predisposition to testicular cancer (TC) (AlDubayan et al. JAMA Oncol 5:514-522, 2019). We attempted to validate this finding relying on the high population frequency of recurrent CHEK2 pathogenic variants in Slavic populations. CHEK2 pathogenic alleles (c.1100delC (p.Thr367Metfs); del5395 [del ex9-10]; IVS2 + 1G > A [c.444 + 1G > A]) were detected in 7/280 (2.5%) TC patients vs. 3/424 (0.7%) healthy men and 6/1007 (0.6%) healthy women [OR 4.0 (95% CI 1.5-11), p = 0.009 for pooled control groups]. Somatic CHEK2 loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) was detected in 4 out of 6 tumors available for analysis; strikingly all these instances of LOH involved inactivation of the wild-type allele. The CHEK2 c.470T > C (p.Ile157Thr) variant was detected in 21/280 (7.5%) affected vs. 22/424 (5.2%) non-affected men [OR 1.5 (95% CI 0.8-2.7), p = 0.3]. Somatic CHEK2 LOH was revealed only in 6 out of 21 tumors obtained from CHEK2 c.470T > C (p.Ile157Thr) carriers, with the C-allele lost in two cases and T-allele deleted in four tumors. The results of comparison of allele frequencies in TC patients versus population controls coupled with the data on CHEK2 LOH status in tumor tissues support the association of CHEK2 pathogenic variants with TC risk.

Chemotherapy in combination with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.

Metastatic pancreatic cancer is characterised by poor prognosis. High toxicity of chemotherapy limits its use in elderly patients with severe comorbidities. Meanwhile, in metastatic disease, local treatment did not show the positive effect on life expectancy. We present a clinical case of a 72-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumour, node, metastases (T3N0M1) (according to the seventh TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer). Chemotherapy led to partial response, but later was stopped due to severe toxicity. Thereafter, consolidating radiosurgical treatment was performed. Dose to pancreatic and liver lesions was 35 Gy in five fractions. After 9 months, only one liver lesion and primary pancreatic tumour, stable in size were determined by MRI. At present time, the patient is alive and in good condition, the disease is stable 50 months after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT provides a high level of local control and in combination with systemic treatment can potentially increase survival.

Safety and efficacy of p62 DNA vaccine ELENAGEN in a first-in-human trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Elenagen is a plasmid encoding p62/SQSTM1, the first DNA vaccine possessing two mutually complementing mechanisms of action: it elicits immune response against p62 and mitigates systemic chronic inflammation. Previously, Elenagen demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy and safety in rodent tumor models and spontaneous tumors in dogs. This multicenter I/IIa trial evaluated safety and clinical activity of Elenagen in patients with advanced solid tumors. Fifteen patients were treated with escalating doses of Elenagen (1- 5 mg per doses, 5 times weekly) and additional 12 patients received 1 mg dose. Ten patients with breast and ovary cancers that progressed after Elenagen were then treated with conventional chemotherapy. Adverse events (AE) were of Grade 1; no severe AE were observed. Cumulatively twelve patients (44%) with breast, ovary, lung, renal cancer and melanoma achieved stable disease for at least 8 wks, with 4 of them (15%) had tumor control for more than 24 wks, with a maximum of 32 wks. The patients with breast and ovary cancers achieved additional tumor stabilization for 12-28 wks when treated with chemotherapy following Elenagen treatment. Therefore, Elenagen demonstrated good safety profile and antitumor activity in advanced solid tumors. Especially encouraging is its ability to restore tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy.

Technical success and short-term results of surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an experience of three centers.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) comprise about 80% of gastrointestinal sarcomas. In patients with localized disease, surgery is considered as "Gold Standard" treatment. Organ-sparing radical en-block resection is widely accepted practice. Since lymph node dissection is not routinely indicated, minimally invasive approach is of particular interest. The aim of this study is to investigate the short-term outcomes of different surgical treatment of GISTs. METHODS: We analyzed data of 116 patients who received surgical treatment for localized forms of GIST. Tumors were located in the stomach in 87 (75%) cases, in the small intestine in 26 (22.4%) cases, and extragastrointestinal GISTs were found in 3 (2.6%) patients. Four different approaches were used-open surgery (OpS, n=48), laparoscopic surgery (LS, n=40), endoscopic procedures (EP, n=22) and hybrid rendezvous (HR, n=6). Patient demographics, clinical presentation of tumors, characteristics of operation procedures (duration, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of R0-resection and fragmentation of tumor), postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were examined in all these groups. RESULTS: Radical treatment (R0-resection) was performed in all patients. There were no cases of tumor ruptures during surgical procedure. Mean size of GIST in OpS was 9.1±2.0 [2-35] cm; in LS: 4.9±0.8 (1.5-15) cm; in HR: 3.5±0.8 (2-4.5) cm and in EP: 2.3±0.3 (0.4-3.5) cm. Intraoperative blood loss in OpS was 369.7±209.5 [0-4,000] mL; LS: 63.9±16.0 [0-150] mL; in HR: 96.7±44.3 [50-200] mL; in EP: 33.3±11.0 [0-150] mL. Duration of operation in OpS was 160±20.4 [50-310] min; in LS: 104.7±12.7 [50-185]; in HR: 176.7±44.0 [110-260] min and in EP: 89.8±15.5 [25-190] min. Complication rate in OpS was 5 (10.4%); in LS: 3 (7.5%); in HR: 0% and in EP: 3 (13.6%). Length of hospital stay in OpS was 13.8±2.2 [7-52] days; in LS: 11, 4±2.2 [4-21] days; in HR: 11±3.2 [7-15] days and in EP: 11, 9±2.1 [5-22] days. There were no postoperative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: There is a diversity of surgical approaches for GISTs treatment. From our point of view, the main selection criteria for certain procedure are size, localization, growth type of the tumor and status of overlying mucosa. Nevertheless, due to relative rarity and heterogeneity of this pathology, individualization is necessary in each specific case. Laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery is proved to be safe and feasible for resection of the gastric GISTs, with a reasonable operation time, low blood loss, and an acceptable complication rate. Immediate results indicate that all interventions were performed radically without mortality or serious morbidity.

Unusual Clinical Presentation of Gastrointestinal Clear Cell Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Use of molecular assays is gradually becoming a mandatory part of the clinical management of soft tissue tumors, however the choice and the interpretation of these tests may present a challenge. SUMMARY: This report demonstrates an unusual presentation of sarcoma, which was initially diagnosed as a tumor of unknown primary site. Given the presence of vimentin, Fli-1, CD99 and S100 markers, lack of immunostaining for melan A, HMB45, MITF, synaptophysin, CD56, myf4, CKAE1/3 and WT-1, as well as the presence of EWSR1 translocation determined by a break-apart FISH assay, Ewing's sarcoma (ES) diagnosis seemed to be well justified. However, polymerase chain reaction testing for ES-specific rearrangements (EWSR1/FLI1, EWSR1/ERG, EWSR1/ETV1, EWSR1/ETV4, EWS/FEV) failed to confirm the ES origin of the neoplastic tissue. We further considered clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostic features of other types of EWSR1-rearranged sarcomas and performed molecular testing for gastrointestinal clear cell sarcoma. The polymerase chain reaction assay revealed EWSR1ex7/ATF1ex5 fusion, thus confirming the latter diagnosis. Subsequent high-precision computed tomography of the abdominal cavity revealed a 5-cm tumor of the small bowel, which was subjected to surgical resection. KEY MESSAGE: This report exemplifies that the use of anonymous cytogenetic assays, such as break-apart FISH EWSR1 testing, may not be sufficient even in case of a perfect match with relevant morphological and immunohistochemical tumor features. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Explicit identification of the translocation gene partners is indeed important for proper sarcoma diagnosis management.