Randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Effects of Different Doses of Sildenafil on Mortality in Adults With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil, approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), has a recommended adult dose of 20 mg TID, with a previously approved 5-mg TID dose by the US Food and Drug Administration. Safety concerns arose because of common off-label use of higher doses, particularly after pediatric data linked higher doses to increased mortality. To assess this, the Food and Drug Administration mandated a study evaluating the effects of various sildenafil doses on mortality in adults with PAH. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind study compared sildenafil at doses of 5, 20, or 80 mg TID in adults with PAH. The primary objective was noninferiority of 80 mg of sildenafil versus 5 mg for all-cause mortality. Secondary end points included time to clinical worsening and change in 6-minute walk distance at 6 months. Interim analyses were planned at 50% and 75% of the anticipated mortality events. Safety and tolerability were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: The study was halted after the first interim analysis, demonstrating noninferiority for 80 mg of sildenafil versus 5 mg. Of 385 patients enrolled across all dose groups, 78 died. The primary analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.51 (99.7% CI, 0.22-1.21; P<0.001 for noninferiority) for overall survival comparing 80 mg of sildenafil with 5 mg. Time to clinical worsening favored 80 mg of sildenafil compared with 5 mg (hazard ratio, 0.44 [99.7% CI, 0.22-0.89]; P<0.001). Sildenafil at 80 mg improved 6-minute walk distance from baseline at 6 months compared with 5 mg (least square mean change, 18.9 m [95% CI, 2.99-34.86]; P=0.0201). No significant differences were found between 80 mg of sildenafil and 20 mg in mortality, clinical worsening, and 6-minute walk distance. Adverse event-related drug discontinuations were numerically higher with 80 mg of sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil at 80 mg was noninferior to sildenafil at 5 mg when examining all-cause mortality in adults with PAH. Secondary efficacy end points favored 80 mg of sildenafil over 5 mg. On the basis of these findings, the Food and Drug Administration recently revoked the approval of 5 mg of sildenafil for adults with PAH, reinforced 20 mg TID as the recommended dose, and now allows dose titration up to 80 mg TID, if needed. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02060487.

The ALPHA phase 1 study: pulmonary ArteriaL hypertension treated with CardiosPHere-Derived allogeneic stem cells.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a progressive condition with no cure. Even with pharmacologic advances, survival remains poor. Lung pathology on PAH therapies still shows impressive occlusive arteriolar remodelling and plexiform lesions. Cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) are heart-derived progenitor cells exhibiting anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, are anti -fibrotic, anti-oxidative and anti-apoptotic to potentially impact several aspects of PAH pathobiology. In preclinical trials CDCs reduced right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure, RV hypertrophy, pulmonary arteriolar wall thickness and inflammation. METHODS: The ALPHA study was a Phase 1a/b study in which CDCs were infused into patients with Idiopathic (I)PAH, Heritable (H) HPAH, PAH-connective tissue disease (CTD) and PAH-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The study was IRB approved and DSMB monitored. Phase 1a, was an open label study (n = 6). Phase 1b was a double-blind placebo-controlled study (n = 20) in which half received 100 million CDCs (the maximum feasible dose from manufacturing perspective) and half placebo (PLAC) infusions. Right heart catheterization (RHC) and cardiac MR imaging (cMR) were performed at baseline and at 4 months post infusion. Patients were followed over a year. FINDINGS: No short-term clinical safety adverse events (AE) were related to the IP, the primary outcome measure. There were no adverse hemodynamic, gas exchange, rhythm or other clinical events following infusion and in the 1st 23 h monitored in hospital. There were no long-term AEs over 12 months noted, including unrelated limited hospitalizations. No immunologic short or long-term AEs were noted. We examined exploratory outcomes across multiple domains to determine encouraging signals to motivate future advanced phase testing. Phase 1a data showed encouraging observations for both 50 and 100 million CDC doses. Several encouraging findings favouring CDCs (n = 16) compared to placebo (n = 10) were noted. On cMR, the RV end diastolic volume (RVEDV) and index (RVEDVI) decreased with CDCs with a rise in the PLAC group. The 6-min walk distance was increased 2 months post infusion in the CDC group compared with PLAC. With PLAC, diffusing capacity (DLCO) decreased at 4 months but was unchanged with CDCs. Serum creatinine decreased with CDCs at 4 months. Encouraging observations favouring CDCs were also noted for RV fractional area change on echo and RV ejection fraction (RVEF) on cMR at 4 months. No differences were observed for mean pulmonary artery pressures or pulmonary vascular resistance. Review of long-term data to 12 months showed continued decline in DLCO for the PLAC cohort at 6 months with no change through 12 months. By contrast, CDC subjects showed an unchanged DLCO over 12-months. For parameters exhibiting early encouraging exploratory findings in CDC subjects, no further improvement was noted in long-term follow up through 12 months. INTERPRETATION: Intravenous CDCs were safe in both the short and long term in PAH subjects and thus may be safe in larger cohorts, in line with our extensive track record of safety in clinical trials for other conditions. Further, CDCs exhibited encouraging exploratory findings across several domains. Repeat dosing (quarterly, over one year) of intravenous CDCs has been reported to yield highly significant sustained disease-modifying bioactivity in subjects with advanced Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Because only single CDC doses were used here, the findings represent a lower limit estimate of CDC's potential in PAH. Upcoming phase 2 studies would logically use a repeat dosing paradigm. FUNDING: California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). Project Number: CLIN2-09444.

Parenteral treprostinil induction for rapid attainment of therapeutic doses of oral treprostinil.

RATIONALE: Oral treprostinil slows disease progression and improves exercise capacity in pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, titration can be prolonged. Published data suggests prostacyclin-naïve patients achieve total daily oral treprostinil doses of about 6 mg by Week 16, while those on prior parenteral treprostinil reach higher doses at the same timepoint. OBJECTIVES: EXPEDITE (NCT03497689), a single-arm, multicenter study, assessed the efficacy of rapid parenteral treprostinil induction to quickly reach higher doses of oral treprostinil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. METHODS: Parenteral treprostinil was titrated for 2-8 weeks, followed by cross-titration of oral treprostinil. The primary endpoint was percentage of patients reaching ≥12 mg daily of oral treprostinil at Week 16. Secondary endpoints included clinical changes from baseline to Week 16. RESULTS: Twenty-nine prostacyclin-naïve patients were included in efficacy analyses. At Week 16, the mean daily oral treprostinil dose was 16.4 mg; 79% of patients met the primary endpoint. From baseline to Week 16, median REVEAL Lite 2 score improved (decreased) from 6 to 3.5 (p = 0.0006). Statistically significant improvements were also seen in World Health Organization Functional Class, N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide levels, 6-minute walk distance, right atrial area, Borg Dyspnea Score, and emPHasis-10 score. Favorable trends were seen in risk stratification, echocardiography parameters, disease symptoms, and treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Short-course parenteral treprostinil induction resulted in oral treprostinil doses over twice those reported in de novo initiations and may be a useful approach to quickly achieve the therapeutic benefits of oral treprostinil.

Characteristics of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension from an innovative, comprehensive real-world patient data repository.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, life-limiting disease. PAH registries provide real-world data that complement clinical trial data and inform treatment decisions. The TRIO comprehensive, integrated patient data repository (TRIO CIPDR), is an innovative US repository capturing data on contemporary patients diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension and receiving US Food and Drug Administration-approved PAH therapies. This repository uniquely combines clinical data from electronic medical records with the ability to track drug-prescription and drug-dispensing characteristics, and includes 946 adult patients with PAH (data collected January 2019 to December 2020) enrolled from nine representative US specialist tertiary care centers. Potentially eligible patients were identified based on dispensing data from specialty pharmacies. Hemodynamic and clinical data, as well as dispensing information on prescribed PAH medications, were provided by tertiary centers. At enrollment, 75% of patients were female, 67% were White, median age at PAH diagnosis was 53 years (median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 5 years), and 37% were obese. Comorbidity profiles were as expected for a PAH population, although the proportion with atrial fibrillation (34%) was higher than expected. Overall, 38% of patients had idiopathic PAH and 30% had connective tissue disease-related PAH. Among 917 patients receiving PAH-specific therapy, 40% were on monotherapy, 43% on dual therapy, and 17% on triple therapy. Longitudinal data from this repository will allow tracking of the PAH treatment journey in relation to clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Implementing the EXPEDITE parenteral induction protocol: Rapid parenteral treprostinil titration and transition to oral treprostinil.

Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that targets multiple cellular receptors to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In certain scenarios, patients may require aggressive treprostinil titration. Several studies have demonstrated that higher doses of treprostinil lead to greater clinical benefit. Data supports successful transitions from parenteral to oral treprostinil; however, administration routes, transition duration, and transition setting vary in the real-world. The EXPEDITE clinical trial (NCT03497689) prospectively studied whether rapid parenteral treprostinil induction can be used to achieve high doses of oral treprostinil (total daily dose: ≥12 mg) in prostacyclin naïve PAH patients. Parenteral prostacyclin induction may be more appropriate for patients who need to reach therapeutic dosing more urgently than longer titration durations reported with conventional de novo oral treprostinil initiation. This summary provides strategies utilized in EXPEDITE. Parenteral treprostinil was initiated at 2 ng/kg/min intravenously or subcutaneously; clinicians determined the frequency and dose increment of up-titration. Two distinct transition schedules from parenteral to oral treprostinil were employed: rapid cross-titration in an inpatient setting (median: 2 days) or gradual cross-titration in an outpatient setting (median: 5 days). Patient status was closely monitored after transition; oral treprostinil dose was titrated to clinical effect and tolerability. Factors considered when individualizing dosing strategies included parenteral and oral treprostinil target doses, nursing support, patient education, medication counseling and adverse events management. EXPEDITE demonstrated the time to a therapeutic dose of oral treprostinil is significantly shorter when utilizing a short-term parenteral induction strategy and may be suitable for patients requiring aggressive titration of oral treprostinil.

The heart of the matter: Right heart imaging indicators for treatment escalation in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Right heart (RH) structure and function are major determinants of symptoms and prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). RH imaging provides detailed information, but evidence and guidelines on the use of RH imaging in treatment decisions are limited. We conducted a Delphi study to gather expert opinion on the role of RH imaging in decision-making for treatment escalation in PAH. A panel of 17 physicians with expertise in PAH and RH imaging used three surveys in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on the role of RH imaging in PAH. Survey 1 used open-ended questions to gather information. Survey 2 contained Likert scale and other questions intended to identify consensus on topics identified in Survey 1. Survey 3 contained Likert scale questions derived from Survey 2 and summary information on the results of Survey 2. The Delphi panel reached consensus that RH imaging is likely to improve the current risk stratification algorithms and help differentiate risk levels in patients at intermediate risk. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, right ventricular fractional area change, right atrial area, tricuspid regurgitation, inferior venae cavae diameter, and pericardial effusion should be part of routine echocardiography in PAH. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is valuable but limited by cost and access. A pattern of abnormal RH imaging results should prompt consideration of hemodynamic evaluation and possible treatment escalation. RH imaging is an important tool for decisions about treatment escalation in PAH, but systematically collected evidence is needed to clarify its role.

Using a knowledge translation program to facilitate guideline- and evidence-based patient management: the PAH-QuERI Extension Program.

The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Extension Program was designed to support physicians' adherence to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) guidelines. Guidelines were followed in >95% of patients with functional class (FC) II/III, but for only 28.6% of FC IV patients (Month 36). Low adherence was driven by FC IV patients' preference to avoid parenteral treatment.

Aggressive Afterload Lowering to Improve the Right Ventricle: A New Target for Medical Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension?

Despite numerous therapeutic advances in pulmonary arterial hypertension, patients continue to suffer high morbidity and mortality, particularly considering a median age of 50 years. This article explores whether early, robust reduction of right ventricular afterload would facilitate substantial improvement in right ventricular function and thus whether afterload reduction should be a treatment goal for pulmonary arterial hypertension. The earliest clinical studies of prostanoid treatment in pulmonary arterial hypertension demonstrated an important link between lowering mean pulmonary arterial pressure (or pulmonary vascular resistance) and improved survival. Subsequent studies of oral monotherapy or sequential combination therapy demonstrated smaller reductions in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. More recently, retrospective reports of initial aggressive prostanoid treatment or initial combination oral and parenteral therapy have shown marked afterload reduction along with significant improvements in right ventricular function. Some data suggest that reaching threshold levels for pressure or resistance (components of right ventricular afterload) may be key to interrupting the self-perpetuating injury of pulmonary vascular disease in pulmonary arterial hypertension and could translate into improved long-term clinical outcomes. Based on these clues, the authors postulate that improved clinical outcomes might be achieved by targeting significant afterload reduction with initial oral combination therapy and early parenteral prostanoids.

An expert panel delphi consensus statement on patient selection and management for transitioning between oral and inhaled treprostinil.

Treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), is available for administration by parenteral, oral, or inhaled routes. Transitioning between routes may be beneficial for appropriate patients; however, there is little published data on transitions between oral and inhaled treprostinil. We used a modified Delphi process to develop expert consensus recommendations on transitions between these formulations. Three questionnaires were used to develop statements about relevant aspects of transition management, which the panelists rated, using a Likert scale, from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree). Eleven physicians with expertise in PAH treatment modalities, participated in the panel. Of the 492 statements evaluated, consensus was reached on 215 (43.7%). Key consensus recommendations included (1) accurately defining successful transition, as stable or improved PAH with good tolerability and adherence, and (2) patients with stable, low-risk PAH showing insufficient response or tolerability to their existing treprostinil therapy (and due to restrictions in up titration of dosing), as appropriate candidates for transitions between treprostinil formulations. Panelists did not reach consensus for an overall strategy for performing these transitions, mainly because of variability in their practice parameters. Consensus was also achieved on recommendations for adverse event management, including reassurance, administration of oral treprostinil 3 times daily with food, and dosing inhaled treprostinil at intervals ≥3 hours apart. The Delphi process aided in developing expert consensus recommendations that may provide clinically useful guidance for transitioning between treprostinil formulations. However, additional data from centers with high volumes of PAH patients undergoing treprostinil transitions would be optimal for defining more complete and robust strategies to facilitate successful transition.

Care of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic presents many unique challenges when caring for patients with pulmonary hypertension. The COVID-19 pandemic has altered routine standard of care practice and the acute management particularly for those patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, where pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific treatments are used. It is important to balance the ongoing care and evaluation of pulmonary arterial hypertension patients with "exposure risk" to COVID-19 for patients coming to clinic or the hospital. If there is a morbidity and mortality benefit from starting pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies, for example in a patient with high-likelihood of pulmonary arterial hypertension, then it remains important to complete the thorough evaluation. However, the COVID-19 outbreak may also represent a unique time when pulmonary hypertension experts have to weigh the risks and benefits of the diagnostic work-up including potential exposure to COVID-19 versus initiating targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy in a select high-risk, high likelihood World Symposium Pulmonary Hypertension Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. This document will highlight some of the issues facing providers, patients, and the pulmonary arterial hypertension community in real-time as the COVID-19 pandemic is evolving and is intended to share expected common clinical scenarios and best clinical practices to help the community at-large.

Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with and without cardiovascular risk factors: Results from the AMBITION trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension enrolled in the AMBITION trial with (excluded from the primary analysis set [ex-primary analysis set]) and without (primary analysis set) multiple risk factors for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension were randomized to once-daily ambrisentan and tadalafil combination therapy, ambrisentan monotherapy, or tadalafil monotherapy. The primary end point was time from randomization to first adjudicated clinical failure event. RESULTS: Primary analysis set patients (n = 500), compared with ex-primary analysis set patients (n = 105), were younger (mean, 54.4 vs 62.1 years) with greater baseline 6-minute walk distance (median, 363.7 vs 330.5 meters) and fewer comorbidities (e.g., hypertension and diabetes). Treatment effects of initial combination therapy vs pooled monotherapy were directionally the same for both populations, albeit of a lower magnitude for ex-primary analysis set patients. Initial combination therapy reduced the risk of clinical failure compared with pooled monotherapy in primary analysis set patients (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.72), whereas the effect was less clear in ex-primary analysis set patients (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.37). Overall, primary analysis set patients had fewer clinical failure events (25% vs 33%), higher rates of satisfactory clinical response (34% vs 24%), and lower rates of permanent study drug withdrawal due to adverse events (16% vs 31%) than ex-primary analysis set patients. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of initial combination therapy vs pooled monotherapy was directionally similar for primary analysis set and ex-primary analysis set patients. However, ex-primary analysis set patients (with multiple risk factors for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction) experienced higher rates of clinical failure events and the response to combination therapy vs monotherapy was attenuated. Tolerability was better in primary analysis set than ex-primary analysis set patients.

Clinical outcomes stratified by baseline functional class after initial combination therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil reduced the risk of clinical failure events for treatment-naïve participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as compared to monotherapy. Previous studies in PAH have demonstrated greater treatment benefits in more symptomatic participants. METHODS: AMBITION was an event-driven, double-blind study in which participants were randomized 2:1:1 to once-daily initial combination therapy with ambrisentan 10 mg plus tadalafil 40 mg, ambrisentan 10 mg plus placebo, or tadalafil 40 mg plus placebo. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis, we compared the efficacy data between those with functional class (FC) II vs. FC III symptoms at baseline. RESULTS: This analysis included 500 participants in the previously defined primary analysis set (n = 155 FC II, n = 345 FC III). Comparing combination therapy to pooled monotherapy, the risk of clinical failure events was reduced by 79% (hazard ratio, 0.21 [95% confidence interval: 0.071, 0.63]) for FC II patients and 42% (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% confidence interval: 0.39, 0.86]) for FC III patients. In a post-hoc analysis, the risk of first hospitalization for worsening PAH was also reduced by combination therapy, particularly for FC II patients (0 combination vs. 11 [14%] pooled monotherapy). Adverse events were frequent but comparable between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment benefit from initial combination therapy appeared at least as great for FC II as for FC III participants. Hospitalizations for worsening PAH were not observed in FC II participants assigned to combination. The present data support an initial combination strategy for newly diagnosed patients even when symptoms are less severe. Funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline; AMBITION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01178073.

Update of screening and diagnostic modalities for connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has high morbidity and mortality in connective tissue diseases (CTDs), especially systemic sclerosis (SSc). In this systematic review, we provide an update on screening measures for early detection of PAH in CTD. METHODS: Manuscripts published between July 2012 and October 2017, which incorporated screening measures to identify patients with PAH by right heart catheterization, were identified. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS: The systematic review resulted in 1514 unique citations and 22 manuscripts were included for final review; the majority of manuscripts had a lower risk of bias based on the QUADAS-2 tool. There were 16 SSc cohort studies and 6 case-control studies (SSc 4, SLE 2). Four SSc cohort studies evaluated transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) only. Eight SSc cohort studies evaluated composite measures including ASIG, DETECT, and a combination of tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and PFT variables. DETECT and ASIG had greater sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) compared to the 2009 ESC/ERS guidelines in different cohorts. The addition of PFT variables, such as DLCO or FVC/ DLCO ratio, to TRV, resulted in greater sensitivity and NPV compared to TRV alone. CONCLUSION: Current screening for PAH in CTDs is centered on SSc. Data continues to support the use of TTE and provides additional evidence for use of composite measures.

Effects of oral sildenafil on exercise capacity in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomised trial.

Objective: The 16-week, randomised, double-blind Sildenafil in Treatment-Naïve Children, Aged1-17 years, with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (STARTS-1) study assessed the effect of sildenafil on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in treatment-naïve paediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and included a long-term extension (STARTS-2). CPET has rarely been performed in paediatric patients and we assessed both aerobic capacity with peak oxygen consumption (PVO2) and ventilatory inefficiency with the slope of ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2 slope). Methods: Patients (aged 1-17 year) were randomised to low (10 mg), medium (10-40 mg) and high (20-80 mg) sildenafil dose groups. Patients previously treated with placebo in STARTS-1 were randomised to one of three blinded sildenafil dose groups for STARTS-2. CPET was assessed by cycle ergometry at baseline, week 16, and year 1. Results: Of the 234 children randomised, 115 could exercise. At week 16, the combined sildenafil dose group had a 7.7% increase in mean PVO2 percent change from baseline compared with placebo (95% CI -0.2% to 15.6%; p=0.056); at year 1, a significant increase in mean percent change in PVO2 from baseline was only observed in the low-dose group (mean of 12.4% and 95% CI 3% to 21.8%). For VE/VCO2 slope, at week 16, the combined dose group had a -9.7% mean change from baseline compared with placebo (95% CI -14.9% to -4.5%; p<0.001); at year 1, there were no significant changes for any dose group. Conclusions: Sildenafil monotherapy (combined sildenafil dose group) appeared to improve short-term VE/VCO2 slope versus placebo but did not significantly improve PVO2 in treatment-naïve paediatric patients with PAH who were developmentally able to exercise. Trial registration number: NCT00159913 for A1481131, NCT00159874 for A1481156.

Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.

A revised diagnostic algorithm provides guidelines for the diagnosis of patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension, both prior to and following referral to expert centres, and includes recommendations for expedited referral of high-risk or complicated patients and patients with confounding comorbidities. New recommendations for screening high-risk groups are given, and current diagnostic tools and emerging diagnostic technologies are reviewed.

Clinical and hemodynamic improvements after adding ambrisentan to background PDE5i therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension exhibiting a suboptimal therapeutic response (ATHENA-1).

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a condition which may lead to right ventricular failure and premature death. While recent data supports the initial combination of ambrisentan (a selective ERA) and tadalafil (a PDE5i) in functional class II or III patients, there is no published data describing the safety and efficacy of ambrisentan when added to patients currently receiving a PDE5i and exhibiting a suboptimal response. The ATHENA-1 study describes the safety and efficacy of the addition of ambrisentan in this patient population. METHODS: PAH patients with a suboptimal response to current PDE5i monotherapy were assigned ambrisentan in an open-label fashion and evaluated for up to 48 weeks. Cardiopulmonary hemodynamics (change in PVR as primary endpoint) were evaluated at week 24 and functional parameters and biomarkers were measured through week 48. Time to clinical worsening (TTCW) and survival are also described. RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects were included in the analysis. At week 24, statistically significant improvements in PVR (-32%), mPAP (-11%), and CI (+25%) were observed. Hemodynamic improvements at week 24 were further supported by improvements in the secondary endpoints: 6-min walk distance (+18 m), NT-proBNP (-31%), and maintenance or improvement in WHO FC in 97% of patients. Adverse events were consistent with known effects of ambrisentan. CONCLUSION: The hemodynamic, functional, and biomarker improvements observed in the ATHENA-1 study suggests that the sequential addition of ambrisentan to patients not having a satisfactory response to established PDE5i monotherapy is a reasonable option.

Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil and mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a secondary analysis of the results from the randomised, controlled AMBITION study.

BACKGROUND: In treatment-naive patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil reduces the risk of clinical failure events compared with monotherapy. We did this secondary analysis to further investigate the effect of combination therapy on survival. METHODS: We analysed survival data from the modified intention-to-treat population of the Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (AMBITION) trial. AMBITION was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study, in which treatment-naive patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension were randomly assigned in a 2:1:1 ratio and received combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil, ambrisentan and placebo, or tadalafil and placebo. We did a prespecified analysis of all mortality events from randomisation to the end of the study, including patients who discontinued their assigned treatment. In a post-hoc analysis, we analysed survival at 7 days after the termination of each individual patient's randomised treatment. We used Cox proportional hazard regression, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and the stratified log-rank test to compare the survival of patients receiving initial combination therapy or initial monotherapy. FINDINGS: The study population consisted of 605 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension who were randomly assigned and received combination therapy (n=302) or monotherapy (n=303; 152 patients assigned to ambrisentan monotherapy and 151 patients to tadalafil monotherapy). At the end of the study, 29 (10%) of 302 patients in the combination therapy group had died compared with 41 (14%) of 303 patients in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio 0·67, 95% CI 0·42-1·08; stratified log-rank p=0·10). At 7 days after the end of randomised treatment, fewer patients had died in the combination therapy group (3 [1%] of 302 patients) compared with the monotherapy group (13 [4%] of 303 patients; hazard ratio 0·21, 95% CI 0·06-0·73). INTERPRETATION: These data indicate that initial combination therapy might be associated with a survival advantage compared with initial monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension. This hypothesis needs to be addressed in future studies. FUNDING: Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline.