RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The term inversion refers to an aberration caused by two breakage and fusion events found in one or both arms of a chromosome. The presence of such aberrations can but must not be associated with infertility or unbalanced products of conception. Normally, inversions are not associated with phenotypic alterations for the carrier. Despite the fact that most such inversions are de novo and unique, recurrent breakpoints have also been reported. METHODS: Here two recurrent paracentric inversions in the long arm of chromosomes 11 and 12 and a pericentric one in chromosome 10 were studied in at least 10 unrelated (infertile) patients, each. Breakpoints were narrowed down by fluorescence in situ hybridization applying locus-specific bacterial artificial chromosome-derived probes. RESULTS: Molecular cytogenetically identical breakpoints could be characterized for all three studied inversions. Pericentric inversion inv(10)(p11.21q21.2), previously reported to be of single origin and distributed mainly in Northern Europe, could be found to be present all over Germany, too. In the studied cases with paracentric inversion inv(11)(q21q23.3), recurrent breakpoints were found in all parts of Germany, as well; however, additional 2 cases with slightly different breakpoints were characterized besides. Most interestingly, inversion inv(12)(q14.1â¼14.2q24.11â¼24.13) had always the same recurrent breakpoints and presented an exclusive occurrence in North-Western part of Germany. CONCLUSION: Overall, (at least) three different cytogenetically detectable recurrent inversions were characterized here. This highlights that such events may be more frequent in human population than yet suggested. Accordingly, such events might even spread in (middle European) human population. Specific impact on reproduction and fitness of inversion carriers characterized here seems to be negligible. Nonetheless, such recurrent rearrangements need more attention as they may provide valuable information for genetic counseling in future.
RESUMEN
Amphibian species have the largest genome size enriched with repetitive sequences and relatively similar karyotypes. Moreover, many amphibian species frequently hybridize causing nuclear and mitochondrial genome introgressions. In addition, hybridization in some amphibian species may lead to clonality and polyploidization. All such events were found in water frogs from the genus Pelophylax. Among the species within the genus Pelophylax, P. esculentus complex is the most widely distributed and well-studied. This complex includes two parental species, P. ridibundus and P. lessonae, and their hybrids, P. esculentus, reproducing hemiclonally. Parental species and their hybrids have similar but slightly polymorphic karyotypes, so their precise identification is still required. Here, we have developed a complete set of 13 chromosome painting probes for two parental species allowing the precise identification of all chromosomes. Applying chromosomal painting, we identified homologous chromosomes in both parental species and orthologous chromosomes in their diploid hemiclonal hybrids. Comparative painting did not reveal interchromosomal exchanges between the studied water frog species and their hybrids. Using cross-specific chromosome painting, we detected unequal distribution of the signals along chromosomes suggesting the presence of species-specific tandem repeats. Application of chromosomal paints to the karyotypes of hybrids revealed differences in the intensity of staining for P. ridibundus and P. lessonae chromosomes. Thus, both parental genomes have a divergence in unique sequences. Obtained chromosome probes may serve as a powerful tool to unravel chromosomal evolution in phylogenetically related species, identify individual chromosomes in different cell types, and investigate the elimination of chromosomes in hybrid water frogs.
Asunto(s)
Pintura Cromosómica , Ranidae , Animales , Rana esculenta/genética , Ranidae/genética , Cariotipificación , Anuros/genética , CariotipoRESUMEN
The Neotropical monophyletic catfish genus Harttia represents an excellent model to study karyotype and sex chromosome evolution in teleosts. Its species split into three phylogenetic clades distributed along the Brazilian territory and they differ widely in karyotype traits, including the presence of standard or multiple sex chromosome systems in some members. Here, we investigate the chromosomal rearrangements and associated synteny blocks involved in the origin of a multiple X1X2Y sex chromosome system present in three out of six sampled Amazonian-clade species. Using 5S and 18S ribosomal DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and whole chromosome painting with probes corresponding to X1 and X2 chromosomes of X1X2Y system from H. punctata, we confirm previous assumptions that X1X2Y sex chromosome systems of H. punctata, H. duriventris and H. villasboas represent the same linkage groups which also form the putative XY sex chromosomes of H. rondoni. The shared homeology between X1X2Y sex chromosomes suggests they might have originated once in the common ancestor of these closely related species. A joint arrangement of mapped H. punctata X1 and X2 sex chromosomes in early diverging species of different Harttia clades suggests that the X1X2Y sex chromosome system may have formed through an X chromosome fission rather than previously proposed Y-autosome fusion.
Asunto(s)
Bagres , Animales , Bagres/genética , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Filogenia , Cromosomas Sexuales/genética , Cromosoma YRESUMEN
Crocodilians have maintained very similar karyotype structures and diploid chromosome numbers for around 100 million years, with only minor variations in collinearity. Why this karyotype structure has largely stayed unaltered for so long is unclear. In this study, we analyzed the karyotypes of six species belonging to the genera Crocodylus and Osteolaemus (Crocodylidae, true crocodiles), among which the Congolian endemic O. osborni was included and investigated. We utilized various techniques (differential staining, fluorescence in situ hybridization with repetitive DNA and rDNA probes, whole chromosome painting, and comparative genomic hybridization) to better understand how crocodile chromosomes evolved. We studied representatives of three of the four main diploid chromosome numbers found in crocodiles (2n = 30/32/38). Our data provided new information about the species studied, including the identification of four major chromosomal rearrangements that occurred during the karyotype diversification process in crocodiles. These changes led to the current diploid chromosome numbers of 2n = 30 (fusion) and 2n = 38 (fissions), derived from the ancestral state of 2n = 32. The conserved cytogenetic tendency in crocodilians, where extant species keep near-ancestral state, contrasts with the more dynamic karyotype evolution seen in other major reptile groups.
Asunto(s)
Caimanes y Cocodrilos , Animales , Caimanes y Cocodrilos/genética , Pintura Cromosómica , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Cariotipo , Evolución MolecularRESUMEN
Introduction: With only 39 reported cases in the literature, carriers of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 11 represent an extremely rare cytogenomic condition. Methods: Herein, we present a review of reported sSMC(11), add 18 previously unpublished cases, and closely review eight cases classified as 'centromere-near partial trisomy 11' and a further four suited cases from DECIPHER. Results and discussion: Based on these data, we deduced the borders of the pericentric regions associated with clinical symptoms into a range of 2.63 and 0.96 Mb for chromosome 11 short (p) and long (q) arms, respectively. In addition, the minimal pericentric region of chromosome 11 without triplo-sensitive genes was narrowed to positions 47.68 and 60.52 Mb (GRCh37). Furthermore, there are apparent differences in the presentation of signs and symptoms in carriers of larger sSMCs derived from chromosome 11 when the partial trisomy is derived from different chromosome arms. However, the number of informative sSMC(11) cases remains low, with overlapping presentation between p- and q-arm-imbalances. In addition, uniparental disomy (UPD) of 'normal' chromosome 11 needs to be considered in the evaluation of sSMC(11) carriers, as imprinting may be an influencing factor, although no such cases have been reported. Comprehensively, prenatal sSMC(11) cases remain a diagnostic and prognostic challenge.
RESUMEN
Interphase or metaphase nuclei can be accessed in molecular cytogenetic analyses. Metaphase spreads are routinely studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to answer clinical genetic questions. Even though metaphase quality is essential for FISH studies, there is limited ability in clinical cases to improve the quality of cytogenetic preparations. However, the quality of preps is important for the exact localization of FISH signals, which is necessary to identify individual chromosomes and chromosomal sub-regions using inverted DAPI banding. Here we present an efficient and easy-to-perform variant of standard slide pretreatment before a normal FISH procedure. This method reproducibly leads to solid, "steel," nonfuzzy, and well-DAPI-banded metaphases. This protocol works in blood lymphocyte and amniotic fluid-derived fibroblasts. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Slide pretreatment for high-quality metaphases for molecular cytogenetics.
Asunto(s)
Metafase , Análisis Citogenético , Citogenética , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ/métodos , Interfase , Metafase/genéticaRESUMEN
Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are additional derivative chromosomes present in an otherwise numerically and structurally normal karyotype. They may derive from each of the 24 human chromosomes, and most contain a normal centromeric region with an alphoid sequence from a single chromosome. The majority of human chromosomes have a unique centromeric DNA-sequence enabling their indubitable characterization. However, chromosomes 14 and 22 share a common centromeric sequence D14/22Z1, and sSMCs with this DNA-stretch can derive from either chromosome. Euchromatin-carrying sSMCs(14 or 22) may be further characterized by molecular cytogenetics. However, in most diagnostic laboratories, heterochromatic sSMCs cannot be differentiated between chromosomes 14 or 22 derivation and are often reported as der(14 or 22). Still, heterochromatic sSMC(14 or 22) can be distinguished from each other using the D22Z4 probe (non-commercial) localized to 22p11.2. Herein, 355 sSMC(14 or 22) analyzed in the authors' laboratory during the last ~ 20 years are summarized to address the questions: (1) What are the true frequencies of chromosome 14- and chromosome 22- derived sSMCs within D14/22Z1-positive cases? (2) Does sub-characterization of sSMC(14) and sSMC(22) make a difference in routine diagnostics? These questions could be answered as follows: (ad 1) within the studied group of sSMCs ~ 40% are derived from chromosome 14 and ~ 60% from chromosome 22; (ad 2) the knowledge on exact sSMC origin can help to save costs in routine diagnostics; i.e. in a clinically abnormal person with sSMC(14) a test for uniparental disomy is indicated, which is not necessary if a chromosome 22 origin for the sSMC was determined.
RESUMEN
A balanced pericentric inversion is normally without any clinical consequences for its carrier. However, there is a well-known risk of such inversions to lead to unbalanced offspring. Inversion-loop formation is the mechanism which may lead to duplication or deletion of the entire or parts of the inverted segment in the offspring. However, also partial deletion and duplication may be an effect of a parental inversion, depending on the size of the inversion and the uneven number of crossing over events, also suggested to be due to an inversion loop. Here we describe two new cases of recombinant chromosomes and provide a review of the literature of comparable cases. Interestingly, this survey confirmed the general genetic principle that gain of copy numbers are better tolerated than losses. Furthermore, there is a non-random distribution of all human chromosomes concerning their involvement in recombinant formation, which is also discussed.