Disparities in Time to Diagnosis Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the most diagnosed hematologic malignancies in the United States. Despite improvements in therapy, health disparities persist among patients with MM. Here, we aim to determine whether there are disparities in time to diagnosis (TTD) among MM patients with regard to income, race/ethnicity, and gender. PATIENTS: Patients with a monoclonal protein detected in the serum and/or urine and a subsequent bone marrow biopsy confirmed diagnosis of MM were included in the study. METHODS: We extracted data on patients with MM and assessed whether the predictor variables were associated with the primary outcome of TTD, which we define as the time between detection of a monoclonal protein in the serum or urine and bone marrow biopsy diagnosis of MM. RESULTS: Compared to patients with commercial insurance, patients receiving Medicaid (HR: 0.408, 95% CI: 0.206-0.808; P = .010) and patients without insurance (HR: 0.428, 95% CI: 0.207-0.885; P = .022) were significantly more likely to have delayed TTD. TTD was also prolonged if the provider who ordered the testing for the detection of a monoclonal protein was not a hematologist (HR: 0.435, 95% CI: 0.284-0.668; P < .0001). No disparities were found with regard to race/ethnicity or gender. CONCLUSION: This study suggests there may be socioeconomic disparities in TTD among patients with MM. Interventions such as patient navigation may be useful to reduce TTD among socioeconomically disadvantaged patient populations. Further studies need to be conducted to elucidate reasons for delays.

Morphologic remission status is limited compared to ΔN flow cytometry: a Children's Oncology Group AAML0531 report.

Risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) uses molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities identified at diagnosis. Response to therapy informs risk, and morphology continues to be used more frequently than flow cytometry. Herein, the largest cohort of pediatric patients prospectively assessed for measurable residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry (N = 784) is reported. The "difference from normal" (ΔN) technique was applied: 31% of all patients tested positive (AML range, 0.02% to 91%) after the first course of treatment on Children's Oncology Group study AAML0531. Detection of MRD following initial chemotherapy proved the strongest predicator of overall survival (OS) in univariable and multivariable analyses, and was predictive of relapse risk, disease-free survival, and treatment-related mortality. Clearance of MRD after a second round of chemotherapy did not improve survival. The morphologic definition of persistent disease (>15% AML) failed 27% of the time; those identified as MRD- had superior outcomes. Similarly, for patients not achieving morphologic remission (>5% blasts), 36% of patients were MRD- and had favorable outcomes compared with those who were MRD+ (P < .001); hence an increase in myeloid progenitor cells can be favorable when ΔN classifies them as phenotypically normal. Furthermore, ΔN reclassified 20% of patients in morphologic remission as having detectable MRD with comparable poor outcomes. Retrospective analysis using the relapse phenotype as a template demonstrated that 96% of MRD- patients had <0.02% of the relapse immunophenotype in their end of induction 1 marrow. Thus, the detection of abnormal myeloid progenitor cells by ΔN is both specific and sensitive, with a high predictive signal identifiable early in treatment. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00372593.

Deciphering the Significance of CD56 Expression in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), CD56 expression has been associated with adverse clinical outcome. We reported on a phenotype associated with very poor prognosis (RAM) in children enrolled in the Children's Oncology Group trial AAML0531 (Brodersen et al. Leukemia 30 (2016) 2077-2080). RAM is also characterized in part by high-intensity expression of the CD56 antigen. Herein, we investigate underlying biological and clinical differences among CD56-positive AMLs for patients in AAML0531. METHODS: For 769 newly diagnosed pediatric patients with de novo AML enrolled in AAML0531, bone marrow specimens were submitted for flow cytometric analysis. For each patient, an immunophenotypic expression profile (IEP) was defined by mean fluorescent intensities of assayed surface antigens. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) was completed to group patients with similar immunophenotypes. Clusters were then evaluated for CD56 expression. Principal component analysis (PCA) was subsequently applied to determine whether CD56-positive patient groups were nonoverlapping. RESULTS: HCA of IEPs revealed three unique phenotypic clusters of patients with CD56-positive AML, and PCA showed that these three cohorts are distinct. Cohort 1 (N = 77) showed a prevalence of t(8;21) patients (72%), Cohort 2 (N = 52) a prevalence of 11q23 patients (69%), and Cohort 3 (RAM) (N = 16) a prevalence of patients with co-occurrence of the CBFA2T3-GLIS2 fusion transcript (63%). The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) for Cohorts 1, 2, and 3 were 69, 39, and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When leukemia is considered by its multidimensional immunophenotype and not by the expression of a single antigen, correlations are seen between genotype and there are significant differences in patient outcomes. © 2019 International Clinical Cytometry Society.