A scoping review of patients as partners in undergraduate allied health curriculum: How are they involved?

INTRODUCTION: Patient participation in undergraduate education has been proven to contribute to student skills development complementing their didactic training. An increasing number of educational programs have implemented systematic patient engagement in curriculum to comply with the requirements of professional and regulatory bodies and to ensure greater focus on patient care. This scoping review aims to identify and summarize literature on the integration of patients and associated benefits in undergraduate allied health education programs. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using a comprehensive literature search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. The study was carried out and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guidance for Systematic reviews and Meta Analyses. Inclusion criteria included English language and allied health education. Exclusion criteria were outside the date range of 2011 to 2023, non-allied health programs, and clinical exposure during didactic courses. Literature reviews and commentaries were also excluded. RESULTS: A total of nineteen studies were included in the scoping review. The majority of these papers examined undergraduate programs that engaged patients in curriculum delivery while a few involved patients in feedback delivery and formal assessment. Other forms of patient involvement were through curriculum co-design. Across institutions, evidence suggested the benefits of patient involvement to students, patients, and educational programs for improved delivery of person-centred care. CONCLUSION: Patient involvement in curriculum delivery and student assessment provided valuable teaching and learning experiences for students and patients. Patient engagement also ensured that person-centered care principles were integrated into education programs. Summary of findings are provided to better prepare patients and facilitators for their role and to enhance the benefits to all participants.

COVID-19 stories of success: Teaching and learning in a clinical setting during a pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic halted in-person activities in universities and caused disruption in the usual iteration of the semesters. When the clinical environment resumed student placement, the potential health risks caused additional anxiety to the students and clinical faculty. This paper aims to examine the measures implemented to support the radiation therapy students during their first clinical placement during the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND: The 2nd year radiation therapy students' first clinical placement was organized around pandemic restrictions that required new activities to support student safety and wellness. The clinical faculty team redesigned the clinical course to integrate enhanced communication, additional safety measures and mental wellness sessions, as well as making COVID-19 related resources available during the week-long orientation and throughout the semester. METHODS: Registered students were asked to participate in a 9-item survey questionnaire to gather their perspective on the effectiveness of the orientation and clinical activities during the pandemic. The responses were tabulated and independently analyzed for emergent themes by the clinical faculty. DISCUSSION: The students reported that the combination of activities, workshops, exposure to the treatment unit and feedback from both clinical faculty and learning mentors provided the support needed for physical safety and wellness in the clinic. Identified challenges included communication with continuous masking, the timeliness of communicating evolving clinical safety protocols, and the need for enhanced coordination of interprofessional education. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic brought new challenges and opportunities for students and clinical faculty at the University of Alberta's Radiation Therapy department. The results of the quality improvement survey highlighted the importance and effectiveness of the redesigned clinical course, which integrated COVID-19 related activities, enhanced communication strategies, safety, wellness resources and check-ins throughout the course.

Improving Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Two-Spirit Content in a Radiation Therapy Undergraduate Curriculum.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and two-spirit plus (LGBTQ2S+) people have distinct healthcare needs that may be unaddressed in many undergraduate healthcare curricula. The Radiation Therapy Program (RADTH) at the University of Alberta underwent a review of the three-year didactic curriculum using an online survey. The survey sought to ascertain if, where and how topics related to LGBTQ2S + healthcare are taught. Results indicated that out of 10 RADTH program faculty respondents, three teach related topics. The total time dedicated within the three-year curriculum was approximately three and a half hours. Other findings showed that faculty are interested in receiving more education in this area and would favour discussions about how to incorporate these themes into appropriate courses. This preliminary investigation demonstrated that there has been some initial work in this area, but there is more to be done.

Learning From Cancer Survivors as Standardized Patients: Radiation Therapy Students' Perspective.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Healthcare programs have proven the benefits of standardized patients in educational activities, but limited scholarship exists on the involvement of cancer survivors in radiation therapy education. This innovative approach to simulation-based education in radiation therapy is the first to integrate cancer survivors as standardized patients in a high-fidelity environment. This research aims to examine the impact of cancer survivors on the students' learning during their simulation course. METHODS: This qualitative research used a phenomenological approach to gather data and analyze the students' view of their interactions with cancer survivors in the simulation course. The researchers conducted three focus group discussions with five of the eight radiation therapy students using a set of preformulated questions. RESULTS: The collected data were comparatively analyzed, and the research team identified four main themes: experience, teaching/coaching, patient-centeredness and gratitude. These represented the students' perspective on their experiences and the unique learning opportunities provided by the cancer survivors. FINDINGS/DISCUSSION: The simulation activities with the cancer survivors provided a safe and realistic experience for the students. This research highlighted the influence of the cancer survivors' oncology journey on the skills development of the radiation therapy students. CONCLUSION: The students benefited from the authentic patient perspective of the cancer survivors which helped build their confidence and develop their skills prior to clinical placement. This research demonstrated that incorporating cancer survivors as standardized patients in radiation therapy simulation education has added significant value to the students' learning.