Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 20(1): 3, 2023 01 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36635693

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been used for motor function recovery. However, the effects of NIBS in populations with spinal cord injury (SCI) remain unclear. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of the existing evidence on the effects and safety of NIBS against sham groups for motor dysfunction after SCI to provide a reference for clinical decision-making. METHODS: Two investigators systematically screened English articles from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for prospective randomized controlled trials regarding the effects of NIBS in motor function recovery after SCI. Studies with at least three sessions of NIBS were included. We assessed the methodological quality of the selected studies using the evidence-based Cochrane Collaboration's tool. A meta-analysis was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized control trials involving 225 participants were included. Nine studies used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and five studies used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The meta-analysis showed that NIBS could improve the lower extremity strength (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.02-1.14, P = 0.004), balance (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.05-1.24, P = 0.03), and decrease the spasticity (SMD = - 0.64, 95% CI = - 1.20 to - 0.03, P = 0.04). However, the motor ability of the upper extremity in the NIBS groups was not statistically significant compared with those in the control groups (upper-extremity strength: P = 0.97; function: P = 0.56; and spasticity: P = 0.12). The functional mobility in the NIBS groups did not reach statistical significance when compared with the sham NIBS groups (sham groups). Only one patient reported seizures that occurred during stimulation, and no other types of serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: NIBS appears to positively affect the motor function of the lower extremities in SCI patients, despite the marginal P-value and the high heterogeneity. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to support or refute the use and optimize the stimulation parameters of NIBS in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Espasticidad Muscular/terapia , Encéfalo/fisiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Inorg Chem ; 44(13): 4604-7, 2005 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15962967

RESUMEN

A new layered aluminophosphate, [C6N3H17][Al2(HPO4)(PO4)2] (denoted AlPO-CJ21), has been prepared in an alcoholic system by the use of N-(2-aminoethyl)-piperazine (AEPP) as the template. Its inorganic layer containing a series of bridged six-membered rings (MRs) is a new type of 4.6-net sheet built up from AlO4, PO2(OH)(=O), and PO3(=O) tetrahedra. Interestingly, inorganic helical chains of right- or left-handedness are presented in the aluminophosphate layers, and fascinating hydrogen-bonded helices are self-assembled under solvothermal conditions between organic templates and inorganic sheets via strong hydrogen bondings of O...N atoms. Crystal data: monoclinic, P2(1) (No. 4), a = 10.069(2) A, b = 8.0875(16) A, c = 10.598(2) A, beta = 94.71(3) degrees, z = 2, R(1) = 0.0325 [I > 2sigma(I)], and wR(2) = 0.0807 (all data); Flack parameter: 0.03.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA