Cumulative donor-specific antibody threshold predicts platelet transfusion response in HLA-alloimmunized patients.

ABSTRACT: Up to a third of patients with hemato-oncologic conditions who have received multiply transfusions develop immune-mediated platelet transfusion refractoriness. Yet factors that influence posttransfusion platelet corrected count increments (CCI) in patients with HLA-alloimmune platelet transfusion refractoriness remain less well elucidated. Recent advances in HLA antibody characterization using fluorescent bead-based platforms enable the study of donor-specific antibody (DSA) avidity (as measured by mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]) and its impact on HLA-alloimmune platelet transfusion refractoriness. In this large retrospective study of 2012 platelet transfusions among 73 HLA-alloimmunized patients, we evaluated the impact of cumulative HLA DSA-MFI alongside other donor, platelet component, and patient characteristics on CCI at 2 and 24 hours after transfusion. As part of a quality improvement initiative, we also developed and tested a computerized algorithm to optimize donor-recipient histocompatibility based on cumulative DSA-MFI and sought other actionable predictors of CCI. In multivariate analyses, cumulative HLA DSA-MFI of ≥10 000, major/bidirectional ABO-mismatch, splenomegaly, transfusion reactions, and platelet storage in additive solution negatively affected 2-hour but not 24-hour posttransfusion CCI. The DSA-MFI threshold of 10 000 was corroborated by greater antibody-mediated complement activation and significantly more CCI failures above this threshold, suggesting the usefulness of this value to inform "permissive platelet mismatching" and to optimize CCI. Furthermore, DSA-MFI decreases were deemed feasible by the computer-based algorithm for HLA-platelet selection in a pilot cohort of 8 patients (122 transfusions) evaluated before and after algorithm implementation. When HLA-selected platelets are unavailable, ABO-identical/minor-mismatched platelet concentrates may enhance 2-hour CCI in heavily HLA-alloimmunized patients with platelet transfusion refractoriness.

Donor-Derived Malignancy and Transplantation Morbidity: Risks of Patient and Donor Genetics in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a key treatment option for hematologic malignancies (HMs), although it carries significant risks. Up to 30% of patients relapse after allo-HSCT, of which up to 2% to 5% are donor-derived malignancies (DDMs). DDMs can arise from a germline genetic predisposition allele or clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in the donor. Increasingly, genetic testing reveals that patient and donor genetic factors contribute to the development of DDM and other allo-HSCT complications. Deleterious germline variants in CEBPA, DDX41, GATA2, and RUNX1 predispose to inferior allo-HSCT outcomes. DDM has been linked to donor-acquired somatic CH variants in DNMT3A, ASXL1, JAK2, and IDH2, often with additional new variants. We do not yet have evidence to standardize donor genetic sequencing prior to allo-HSCT. The presence of hereditary HM disorders should be considered in patients with myeloid malignancies and their related donors, and screening of unrelated donors should include family and personal history of cytopenia and HMs. Excellent multidisciplinary care is critical to ensure efficient timelines for screening and necessary discussions among medical oncologists, genetic counselors, recipients, and potential donors. After allo-HSCT, HM relapse monitoring with genetic testing effectively results in genetic sequencing of the donor, as the transplanted hematopoietic system is donor-derived, which presents ethical challenges for disclosure to patients and donors. We encourage consideration of the recent National Marrow Donor Program policy that allows donors to opt-in for notification about detection of their genetic variants after allo-HSCT, with appropriate genetic counseling when feasible. We look forward to prospective investigation of the impact of germline and acquired somatic genetic variants on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization/engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, and DDM to facilitate improved outcomes through knowledge of genetic risk.

Platelet transfusion refractoriness due to HLA alloimmunization: Evolving paradigms in mechanisms and management.

Platelet transfusion refractoriness due to HLA alloimmunization presents a significant medical problem, particularly among multiply transfused patients with hematologic malignancies and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants. HLA compatible platelet transfusions also impose significant financial burden on these patients. Recently, several novel mechanisms have been described in the development of HLA alloimmunization and platelet transfusion refractoriness. We review the history of platelet transfusions and mechanisms of HLA-sensitization and transfusion refractoriness. We also summarize advances in the diagnosis and treatment of platelet transfusion refractoriness due to HLA alloimmunization.

Additional efficacy analysis of avatrombopag phase III data for the treatment of adults with immune thrombocytopenia.

Avatrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) that was approved in the US in 2019 for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase III study (NCT01438840) of avatrombopag in adult patients with ITP evaluated platelet count response to avatrombopag during the core study in different subgroups, and durability of response data in patients who responded to avatrombopag treatment both during the core phase (total population) and during the core and extension phase (total population and by subgroup). Loss of response (LOR [platelet count <30 × 109/L]) was defined as LOR over two consecutive scheduled visits. The response was generally similar between subgroups though a few differences were observed. The durability of response analysis showed that avatrombopag-treated patients maintained their response for 84.5% of time on treatment during the core phase and 83.3% during the core and extension phase; 55.2% of patients in the core phase and 52.3% in the core and extension phase never experienced LOR. We conclude that the initial response to avatrombopag is both stable and durable.

What is the context? Avatrombopag is a medicine that helps the body produce platelet cells, which are necessary for blood clotting.Avatrombopag is used to treat people with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP); these patients have low numbers of platelet cells in their blood, so their blood may not clot efficiently, putting them at risk of uncontrolled bleeding.A phase III clinical study in patients with chronic ITP showed that platelet counts increased for most patients who were treated with avatrombopag; patients who had a platelet count ≥50 × 10⁹/L were considered to have a response to avatrombopag treatment.The present study analyzes data from a phase III clinical study to determine whether there are any characteristics that make a patient more or less likely to have a loss of response (LOR) while taking avatrombopag, whether the initial response to avatrombopag is stable, and how long the response lasts.For this analysis, LOR is defined as platelet count <30 × 10⁹/L for either four consecutive weeks or for two consecutive office visits while taking avatrombopag.What is new? In general, patient characteristics did not influence the likelihood of LOR.Patients who responded maintained their response for most of the time they were taking avatrombopag.Most patients did not experience LOR.What is the impact? The initial response to avatrombopag is stable and long-lasting in patients with chronic ITP.These findings indicate that patients with a variety of background characteristics can experience a durable platelet response with avatrombopag treatment.

Reference gene selection for clinical chimeric antigen receptor T-cell product vector copy number assays.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Reference genes are an essential part of clinical assays such as droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), which measure the number of copies of vector integrated into genetically engineered cells and the loss of plasmids in reprogrammed cells used in clinical cell therapies. Care should be taken to select reference genes, because it has been discovered that there may be thousands of variations in copy number from genomic segments among different individuals. In addition, within the same person in the context of cancer and other proliferative disorders, substantial parts of the genome also can differ in copy number between cells from diseased and healthy people. The purpose of this study was to identify reference genes that could be used for copy number variation analysis of transduced chimeric antigen receptor T cells and for plasmid loss analysis in induced pluripotent stem cells using ddPCR. METHODS: We used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to evaluate candidate reference genes. If TCGA found a candidate gene to have low copy number variance in cancer, ddPCR was used to measure the copy numbers of the potential reference gene in cells from healthy subjects, cancer cell lines and patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma and human papillomavirus-associated cancers. RESULTS: In addition to the rPP30 gene, which we have has been using in our copy number assays, three other candidate reference genes were evaluated using TCGA, and this analysis found that none of the four gene regions (AGO1, AP3B1, MKL2 and rPP30) were amplified or deleted in all of the cancer cell types that are currently being treated with cellular therapies by our facility. The number of copies of the genes AP3B1, AGO1, rPP30 and MKL2 measured by ddPCR was similar among cells from healthy subjects. We found that AGO1 had copy number alteration in some of the clinical samples, and the number of copies of the genes AP3B1, MKL2 and rPP30 measured by ddPCR was similar among cells from patients with the cancer cell types that are currently being treated with genetically engineered T-cell therapies by our facility. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our current results, the three genes, AP3B1, MKL2 and rPP30, are suitable for use as reference genes for assays measuring vector copy number in chimeric antigen receptor T cells produced from patients with acute leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma and human papillomavirus-associated cancers. We will continue to evaluate AGO1 on our future samples.

Effects of extended transport on cryopreserved allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) product quality and optimal methods to assess HPC stability.

BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, cryopreservation of hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) products has been increasingly used to ensure allogeneic donor graft availability prior to recipient conditioning for transplantation. However, in addition to variables such as graft transport duration and storage conditions, the cryopreservation process itself may adversely affect graft quality. Furthermore, the optimal methods to assess graft quality have not yet been determined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all cryopreserved HPCs processed and thawed at our facility from 2007 to 2020, including both those collected onsite and by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP). HPC viability studies were also performed on fresh products, retention vials, and corresponding final thawed products by staining for 7-AAD (flow cytometry), AO/PI (Cellometer), and trypan blue (manual microscopy). Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: For HPC products collected by apheresis (HPC(A)), pre-cryopreservation and post-thaw viabilities, as well as total nucleated cell recoveries were lower for products collected by the NMDP compared to those collected onsite. However, there were no differences seen in CD34+ cell recoveries. Greater variation in viability testing was observed using image-based assays compared to flow-based assays, and on cryo-thawed versus fresh samples. No significant differences were observed between viability measurements obtained on retention vials versus corresponding final thawed product bags. DISCUSSION: Our studies suggest extended transport may contribute to lower post-thaw viabilities, but without affecting CD34+ cell recoveries. To assess HPC viability prior to thaw, testing of retention vials offers predictive utility, particularly when automated analyzers are used.

Association of ABO mismatch with the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). While many factors influence the outcomes of allo-HCT, the independent impact of donor-recipient ABO mismatching remains unclear. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with AML or ALL who underwent allo-HCT between 2008 and 2018. Our objectives were to analyze the outcomes of allo-HCT based on the donor-recipient ABO status (match, minor mismatch, major mismatch, bidirectional mismatch). Among 4946 eligible patients, 2741 patients (55.4%) were ABO matched, 1030 patients (20.8%) had a minor ABO mismatch, 899 patients (18.1%) had a major ABO mismatch, and 276 patients (5.6%) had a bidirectional ABO mismatch. In multivariable analyses, compared to ABO matched allo-HCT, the presence of a major ABO mismatch was associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.29; p = 0.005), inferior platelet engraftment (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90; p < 0.001), and higher primary graft failure (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.12-2.30, p = 0.01). Relapse, acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) grades III-IV and chronic GVHD were not significantly associated with ABO status. While donor age was not significantly associated with outcomes, older recipient age was associated with worse survival and non-relapse mortality. Our study demonstrates that donor-recipient ABO status is independently associated with survival and other post-transplantation outcomes in acute leukemia. This underscores the importance of considering the ABO status in donor selection algorithms and its impact in acute leukemia.

Cryopreserved anti-CD22 and bispecific anti-CD19/22 CAR T cells are as effective as freshly infused cells.

Cryopreservation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells facilitates shipment, timing of infusions, and storage of subsequent doses. However, reports on the impact of cryopreservation on CAR T cell efficacy have been mixed. We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes between patients who received cryopreserved versus fresh CAR T cells for treatment of B cell leukemia across two cohorts of pediatric and young adult patients: those who received anti-CD22 CAR T cells and those who received bispecific anti-CD19/22 CAR T cells. Manufacturing methods were consistent within each trial but differed between the two trials, allowing for exploration of cryopreservation within different manufacturing platforms. Among 40 patients who received anti-CD22 CAR T cells (21 cryopreserved cells and 19 fresh), there were no differences in in vivo expansion, persistence, incidence of toxicities, or disease response between groups with cryopreserved and fresh CAR T cells. Among 19 patients who received anti-CD19/22 CAR T cells (11 cryopreserved and 8 fresh), patients with cryopreserved cells had similar expansion, toxicity incidence, and disease response, with decreased CAR T cell persistence. Overall, our data demonstrate efficacy of cryopreserved CAR T cells as comparable to fresh infusions, supporting cryopreservation, which will be crucial for advancing the field of cell therapy.

Longitudinal transcriptional analysis of peripheral blood leukocytes in COVID-19 convalescent donors.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV2 can induce a strong host immune response. Many studies have evaluated antibody response following SARS-CoV2 infections. This study investigated the immune response and T cell receptor diversity in people who had recovered from SARS-CoV2 infection (COVID-19). METHODS: Using the nCounter platform, we compared transcriptomic profiles of 162 COVID-19 convalescent donors (CCD) and 40 healthy donors (HD). 69 of the 162 CCDs had two or more time points sampled. RESULTS: After eliminating the effects of demographic factors, we found extensive differential gene expression up to 241 days into the convalescent period. The differentially expressed genes were involved in several pathways, including virus-host interaction, interleukin and JAK-STAT signaling, T-cell co-stimulation, and immune exhaustion. A subset of 21 CCD samples was found to be highly "perturbed," characterized by overexpression of PLAU, IL1B, NFKB1, PLEK, LCP2, IRF3, MTOR, IL18BP, RACK1, TGFB1, and others. In addition, one of the clusters, P1 (n = 8) CCD samples, showed enhanced TCR diversity in 7 VJ pairs (TRAV9.1_TCRVA_014.1, TRBV6.8_TCRVB_016.1, TRAV7_TCRVA_008.1, TRGV9_ENST00000444775.1, TRAV18_TCRVA_026.1, TRGV4_ENST00000390345.1, TRAV11_TCRVA_017.1). Multiplexed cytokine analysis revealed anomalies in SCF, SCGF-b, and MCP-1 expression in this subset. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent alterations in inflammatory pathways and T-cell activation/exhaustion markers for months after active infection may help shed light on the pathophysiology of a prolonged post-viral syndrome observed following recovery from COVID-19 infection. Future studies may inform the ability to identify druggable targets involving these pathways to mitigate the long-term effects of COVID-19 infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04360278 Registered April 24, 2020.

Genome-wide profiling of retroviral DNA integration and its effect on clinical pre-infusion CAR T-cell products.

BACKGROUND: Clinical CAR T-cell therapy using integrating vector systems represents a promising approach for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Lentiviral and γ-retroviral vectors are the most commonly used vectors in the manufacturing process. However, the integration pattern of these viral vectors and subsequent effect on CAR T-cell products is still unclear. METHODS: We used a modified viral integration sites analysis (VISA) pipeline to evaluate viral integration events around the whole genome in pre-infusion CAR T-cell products. We compared the differences of integration pattern between lentiviral and γ-retroviral products. We also explored whether the integration sites correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We found that γ-retroviral vectors were more likely to insert than lentiviral vectors into promoter, untranslated, and exon regions, while lentiviral vector integration sites were more likely to occur in intron and intergenic regions. Some integration events affected gene expression at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level. Moreover, γ-retroviral vectors showed a stronger impact on the host transcriptome. Analysis of individuals with different clinical outcomes revealed genes with differential enrichment of integration events. These genes may affect biological functions by interrupting amino acid sequences and generating abnormal proteins, instead of by affecting mRNA expression. These results suggest that vector integration is associated with CAR T-cell efficacy and clinical responses. CONCLUSION: We found differences in integration patterns, insertion hotspots and effects on gene expression vary between lentiviral and γ-retroviral vectors used in CAR T-cell products and established a foundation upon which we can conduct further analyses.

Changing Paradigms in ITP Management: Newer Tools for an Old Disease.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia that may be accompanied clinically by bleeding and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). While corticosteroids, splenectomy, and various immunosuppressants (used off-label) have served as historical mainstays of ITP treatment, their use is associated with adverse effects and morbidity. Over the last 15 years, the advent of the thrombopoietin receptor agonists has revolutionized the management of chronic ITP with high response rates, durable responses, and minimal adverse effects in most patients. With four agents now FDA-approved to manage chronic ITP, there is a renewed emphasis on improving HRQoL and minimizing the toxicities associated with traditional therapies. Promising agents with diverse mechanisms of action, ranging from those targeting Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase to the neonatal Fc receptor, are currently under investigation. This review highlights recent landmark clinical trials which have made significant impacts on ITP management and ongoing drug development. In critically analyzing studies of relevance, we illustrate the changing paradigms of ITP management and how the field is advancing beyond traditional therapies.

Identification of genomic determinants contributing to cytokine release in immunotherapies and human diseases.

BACKGROUND: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a strong immune system response that can occur as a result of the reaction of a cellular immunotherapy with malignant cells. While the frequency and management of CRS in CAR T-cell therapy has been well documented, there is emerging interest in pre-emptive treatment to reduce CRS severity and improve overall outcomes. Accordingly, identification of genomic determinants that contribute to cytokine release may lead to the development of targeted therapies to prevent or abrogate the severity of CRS. METHODS: Forty three clinical CD22 CAR T-cell products were collected for RNA extraction. 100 ng of mRNA was used for Nanostring assay analysis which is based on the nCounter platform. Several public datasets were used for validation purposes. RESULTS: We found the expression of the PFKFB4 gene and glycolytic pathway activity were upregulated in CD22 CAR T-cells given to patients who developed CRS compared to those who did not experience CRS. Moreover, these results were further validated in cohorts with COVID-19, influenza infections and autoimmune diseases, and in tumor tissues. The findings were similar, except that glycolytic pathway activity was not increased in patients with influenza infections and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). CONCLUSION: Our data strongly suggests that PFKFB4 acts as a driving factor in mediating cytokine release in vivo by regulating glycolytic activity. Our results suggest that it would beneficial to develop drugs targeting PFKFB4 and the glycolytic pathway for the treatment of CRS.

Transfusion Reactions and Adverse Events.

Blood transfusions are generally safe but can carry considerable risks. This review summarizes the different types of transfusion reactions and ways to diagnose and manage them. Symptoms are often overlapping and nonspecific. When a reaction is suspected, it is critical to stop the transfusion immediately and report the reaction to the blood bank, as this can affect the patient's outcome. New evidence-based algorithms of transfusion, newer blood screening methods and donor policies and deferrals, new laboratory testing, electronic verification systems, and improved hemovigilance lead to the avoidance of unnecessary transfusions and decrease the incidence of serious transfusion reactions.

Disease severity impacts plerixafor-mobilized stem cell collection in patients with sickle cell disease.

Recent studies suggest that plerixafor mobilization and apheresis in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) is safe and can allow collection of sufficient CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection for clinical gene therapy applications. However, the quantities of plerixafor-mobilized CD34+ cells vary between different SCD patients for unknown reasons. Twenty-three participants with SCD underwent plerixafor mobilization followed by apheresis, processing, and HSC enrichment under a phase 1 safety and efficacy study conducted at 2 institutions. Linear regression or Spearman's correlation test was used to assess the relationships between various hematologic and clinical parameters with total CD34+ cells/kg collected. Median CD34+ cells/kg after 2 or fewer mobilization and apheresis cycles was 4.0 × 106 (range, 1.5-12.0). Similar to what is observed generally, CD34+ yield correlated negatively with age (P < .001) and positively with baseline (P = .003) and preapheresis blood CD34+ cells/µL (P < .001), and baseline white blood cell (P = .01) and platelet counts (P = .03). Uniquely for SCD, CD34+ cell yields correlated positively with the number of days hydroxyurea was held (for up to 5 weeks, P = .01) and negatively with markers of disease severity, including hospitalization frequency within the preceding year (P = .01) and the number of medications taken for chronic pain (P = .002). Unique SCD-specific technical challenges in apheresis were also associated with reduced CD34+ cell collection efficiency and purification. Here, we describe factors that impact plerixafor mobilization success in patients with SCD, confirming known factors as described in other populations in addition to reporting previously unknown disease specific factors in patients with SCD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03226691.

Shorter Interdonation Interval Contributes to Lower Cell Counts in Subsequent Stem Cell Donations.

Approximately 7% of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors are asked to donate stem cells a subsequent time to the same or a different recipient. Recent studies have shown that donation-related symptoms for second donations are similar to those for the first donation. Little is known about differences in stem cell mobilization and yields for subsequent peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and bone marrow (BM) collections. We hypothesized that CD34+ cell yields and total nucleated cell (TNC) concentrations for subsequent PBSC or BM donations are lower than those at the first donation. We also evaluated the factors influencing stem cell yields in healthy unrelated second-time donors. Data were gathered from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database on 513 PBSC and 43 BM donors who donated a second time between 2006 and 2017 through the National Marrow Donor Program. Among the second-time PBSC donors, we found significantly lower preapheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts (68.6 × 106/L versus 73.9 × 106/L; P = .03), and collection yields (556 × 106 versus 608 × 106; P = .02) at the second donation compared to the first. This decrease at the subsequent donation was associated with a shorter interdonation interval, lower body mass index (BMI), and a lower total G-CSF dose. In most instances, suboptimal mobilizers at their first donation donated suboptimal numbers of stem cells at their subsequent donations. Among repeat BM donors, the TNC concentration was lower at the second donation. The small size of this group precluded additional analysis. Overall, when considering repeat donations, increasing the interdonation intervals and evaluating for BMI changes should be considered to optimize stem cell yields. Some of these parameters may be improved by increasing G-CSF dose in PBSC donors within permissible limits.

Comparative engraftment and clonality of macaque HSPCs expanded on human umbilical vein endothelial cells versus non-expanded cells.

Ex vivo hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) expansion platforms are under active development, designed to increase HSPC numbers and thus engraftment ability of allogeneic cord blood grafts or autologous HSPCs for gene therapies. Murine and in vitro models have not correlated well with clinical outcomes of HSPC expansion, emphasizing the need for relevant pre-clinical models. Our rhesus macaque HSPC competitive autologous transplantation model utilizing genetically barcoded HSPC allows direct analysis of the relative short and long-term engraftment ability of lentivirally transduced HSPCs, along with additional critical characteristics such as HSPC clonal diversity and lineage bias. We investigated the impact of ex vivo expansion of macaque HSPCs on the engineered endothelial cell line (E-HUVECs) platform regarding safety, engraftment of transduced and E-HUVEC-expanded HSPC over time compared to non-expanded HSPC for up to 51 months post-transplantation, and both clonal diversity and lineage distribution of output from each engrafted cell source. Short and long-term engraftment were comparable for E-HUVEC expanded and the non-expanded HSPCs in both animals, despite extensive proliferation of CD34+ cells during 8 days of ex vivo culture for the E-HUVEC HSPCs, and optimization of harvesting and infusion of HSPCs co-cultured on E-HUVEC in the second animal. Long-term hematopoietic output from both E-HUVEC expanded and unexpanded HSPCs was highly polyclonal and multilineage. Overall, the comparable HSPC kinetics of macaques to humans, the ability to study post-transplant clonal patterns, and simultaneous multi-arm comparisons of grafts without the complication of interpreting allogeneic effects makes our model ideal to test ex vivo HSPC expansion platforms, particularly for gene therapy applications.

Improving CAR T cell therapy by optimizing critical quality attributes.

Whether as a cure or bridge to transplant, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have shown dramatic outcomes for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, and particularly relapsed/refractory B cell leukemia and lymphoma. However, these therapies are not effective for all patients, and are not without toxicities. The challenge now is to optimize these products and their manufacture. The manufacturing process is complex and subject to numerous variabilities at each step. These variabilities can affect the critical quality attributes of the final product, and this can ultimately impact clinical outcomes. This review will focus on optimizing the manufacturing variables that can impact the safety, purity, potency, consistency and durability of CAR-T cells.

Advances in gene therapy for hematologic disease and considerations for transfusion medicine.

As the list of regulatory agency-approved gene therapies grows, these products are now in the therapeutic spotlight with the potential to cure or dramatically alleviate several benign and malignant hematologic diseases. The mechanisms for gene manipulation are diverse, and include the use of a variety of cell sources and both viral vector- and nuclease-based targeted approaches. Gene editing has also reached the realm of blood component therapy and testing, where cultured products are being developed to improve transfusion support for individuals with rare blood types. In this review, we summarize the milestones in the development of gene therapies for hematologic diseases, mechanisms for gene manipulation, and implications for transfusion medicine and blood centers as these therapies continue to advance and grow.