Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Heliyon ; 10(15): e35223, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39170235

RESUMEN

Background: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) investigated whether hypnosis would lead to favorable outcomes in reducing anxiety, enhancing cooperation, and improving physiological responses in school-aged children undergoing tooth extraction compared to nitrous oxide/oxygen (N2O/O2) and conventional behavior guidance (CBG). Methods: Sixty-six school-aged children (mean age: 7.87 ± 1.18 years) who needed one posterior primary tooth extraction were included. Children with low-to-moderate anxiety were randomly divided into three groups (n = 22 each): hypnosis, N2O/O2, and CBG. Anxiety levels during and after anesthetic injection and tooth extraction were assessed using the Venham Clinical Anxiety Scale (VCAS) and the Venham Picture Test (VPT). Changes in heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored. Children's cooperation levels were measured using the Venham Clinical Cooperation Scale (VCCS). Results: The VPT scores were significantly higher in the CBG group than in the N2O/O2 and hypnosis groups (p < 0.001). The VCAS scores in the N2O/O2 group were lower than those in the CBG group (p < 0.05) and were comparable to those in the hypnosis group. The VCCS scores were significantly higher in the CBG group than in the N2O/O2 and hypnosis groups (p < 0.05). HR changes in the N2O/O2 group were significantly lower than in the hypnosis and CBG groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference in pain was observed between the groups the day after the intervention. Conclusion: N2O/O2 inhalation and hypnosis are effective in reducing self-reported and observed anxiety and improving cooperation levels in pediatric patients during dental extraction. Moreover, the frequency of reported pain was lower in the hypnosis group compared to the other groups.

2.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 175, 2024 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308290

RESUMEN

This study evaluated the efficacy of a formulated remineralizing gallic acid (GA) varnish in treating artificial enamel caries lesions. Fifty-five intact bovine incisors were collected. Enamel blocks (5 × 9 mm) were prepared. A third of each block's surface remained intact. Primary carious lesions were induced on the middle and bottom thirds of the blocks by immersing the samples in a demineralization solution for 6 h. The bottom third of the blocks were further remineralized by randomly applying 0.5%, 2%, or 8% GA varnishes and 2.26% fluoride varnish (V varnish, Vericom, Seoul, Korea), or the varnish base without active ingredients (n = 11 each). The specimens were immersed in a remineralizing solution for 4 h and then subjected to a 2-hour immersion in the demineralizing solution. After six days of pH cycling, the surface microhardness was measured at depths of 30, 75, and 120 µm. The percentage of surface microhardness recovery (SMHR%) was compared among the groups using the Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). The SMHR% of all experimental groups was higher than the control group at 30 µm (p < 0.05). The 0.5% GA varnish showed the highest SMHR% at all depths; however, the difference with the other experimental groups was significant at a depth of 30 µm (p < 0.05). The SMHR% of the fluoride and the 2% and 8% GA varnishes was comparable at all depths. All treatments potentially remineralize enamel lesions, with 0.5% GA varnish having the greatest effect, particularly on the top surface layer. As such, this newly developed varnish may emerge as a promising alternative to fluoride varnish.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental , Fluoruros Tópicos , Animales , Bovinos , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Esmalte Dental , Fluoruros Tópicos/farmacología , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Remineralización Dental
3.
Dent Res J (Isfahan) ; 20: 115, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38169764

RESUMEN

Background: Dental caries is a preventable multifactorial disease, with Streptococcus mutans being suggested to be its primary pathogen. Our study aim was to compare the effects of three different low-cost and easy-to-use regimens with that of the gold standard (chlorhexidine [CHX] mouthwash) on the count of salivary S. mutans in dental students over 30 days. Materials and Methods: In this single-blinded parallel randomized controlled clinical trial, a total of 120 dental students were included and randomly allocated into four intervention groups: (1) CHX mouthwash (control(, (2) probiotic yogurt, (3) casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate chewing gum, and (4) xylitol chewing gum. Salivary S. mutans counts were evaluated at baseline, 15 days, and 30 days after initiation of the study and compared at different times and among different groups using the repeated measures analysis of variance design analysis and least significant difference test with SPSS software version 20. The level of significance was determined to be 0.05. Results: The microorganism count variable at baseline, first, and second follow-ups was significantly different for all groups except the probiotic yogurt group (P = 0.340). S. mutans count was significantly different when comparing the first follow-up and baseline values in the CHX and xylitol gum groups (P = 0.027, P = 0.037). When comparing the second follow-up with baseline values, a significant difference was observed in the xylitol gum group (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Xylitol chewing gum seems to be a viable alternative to the gold standard (CHX mouthwash) in reducing the salivary count of S. mutans.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA