Atrial Fibrillation in Critically Ill Patients: Incidence and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF), either chronic or new onset, is common in critically ill patients. Its epidemiology and relationship with clinical outcomes are poorly known. OBJECTIVE: To understand the burden of AF in patients admitted to the ICU and its impact on patients' outcomes. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating all patients with AF admitted to a non-cardiac intensive care unit over the course of 54 months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in the short (hospital discharge) and long term (two-year follow-up). The hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI was computed for the whole population as well as for propensity score-matched patients, with or without AF. RESULTS: A total of 1357 patients were screened (59.1% male), with a mean age of 75 ± 15.2 years, length of intensive care unit stay of 4.7 ± 5.1 days, and hospital mortality of 26%. A diagnosis of AF was found in 215 patients (15.8%), 142 of whom had chronic AF. The hospital all-cause mortality was similar in patients with chronic or new-onset AF (31% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.779). Patients with AF had higher in-hospital, one-year, and two-year crude mortality (30.2% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.024; 47.9% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.001; 52.6% vs. 38.4%, p < 0.001). However, after propensity score matching (N = 213), this difference was no longer significant for in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.77-1.79), one-year mortality (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.94-2.03), or two-year mortality (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.89-1.90). CONCLUSIONS: In ICU patients, the prevalence of AF, either chronic or new-onset, was 15.8%, and these patients had higher crude mortality. However, after adjustment for age and severity on admission, no significant differences were found in the short- and long-term mortality.

Apical or Septal Right Ventricular Location in Patients Receiving Defibrillation Leads: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study reviews the published data comparing the efficacy and safety of apical and septal right ventricle defibrillator lead positioning at 1-year follow-up. Systemic research on Medline (PubMed), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase was performed using the keywords "septal defibrillation," "apical defibrillation," "site defibrillation," and "defibrillation lead placement," including implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. Comparisons between apical and septal position were performed regarding R-wave amplitude, pacing threshold at a pulse width of 0.5 ms, pacing and shock lead impedance, suboptimal lead performance, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, readmissions due to heart failure and mortality rates. A total of 5 studies comprising 1438 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 64.5 years, 76.9% were male, with a median LVEF of 27.8%, ischemic etiology in 51.1%, and a mean follow-up period of 26.5 months. The apical lead placement was performed in 743 patients and septal lead placement in 690 patients. Comparing the 2 placement sites, no significant differences were found regarding R-wave amplitude, lead impedance, suboptimal lead performance, LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and mortality rate at 1-year follow-up. Pacing threshold values favored septal defibrillator lead placement (P = 0.003), as well as shock impedance (P = 0.009) and readmissions due to heart failure (P = 0.02). Among patients receiving a defibrillator lead, only pacing threshold, shock lead impedance, and readmission due to heart failure showed results favoring septal lead placement. Therefore, generally, the right ventricle lead placement does not appear to be of major importance.

Acute coronary syndrome and stress: Is there a relationship?

INTRODUCTION: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the result of a complex pathophysiological process with various dynamic factors. The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a validated instrument for estimating stress levels in clinical practice and may be useful in the assessment of ACS. METHODS: We carried out a single-center prospective study engaging patients hospitalized with ACS between March 20, 2019 and March 3, 2020. The PSS-10 was completed during the hospitalization period. The ACS group was compared to a control group (the general Portuguese population), and a subanalysis in the stress group were then performed. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients with ACS were included, of whom 36.5% presented ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 38.1% were female and the mean PSS score was 19.5±7.1. Females in the control group scored 16.6±6.3 on the PSS-10 and control males scored 13.4±6.5. The female population with ACS scored 22.8±9.8 on the PSS-10 (p<0.001). Similarly, ACS males scored a mean of 17.4±6.4 (p<0.001). Pathological stress levels were not a predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events or severity at admission. CONCLUSIONS: ACS patients had higher perceived stress levels compared to the control group. Perceived stress level was not associated with worse prognosis in ACS patients.

Early and late new-onset of atrial fibrillation in acute coronary syndromes: Their differences in mortality and cardiac event.

Background: In a stressful situation like acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the occurrence of the first episode of atrial fibrillation is more frequent. The impact of the timing occurrence of AF new-onset (nAF) in the setting of ACS is still debatable. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study based on the Acute Coronary Syndrome Portuguese National Registry, including 29 851 patients admitted for ACS between 1/10/2010 and 4/09/2019. The group with early nAF - nAF in the first 48 h of hospitalization; and late nAF - patients with nAF after the first 48 h of in-hospital admission. Results: New-onset AF was identified in 1067 patients, nonetheless, just 38.1% had late nAF. The group with late nAF presented more cardiovascular comorbidities and worse left ventricular ejection fraction. Late nAF patients received more anti-arrhythmic therapy, and early nAF had a higher beta-block prescription. Early nAF had higher rates of in-hospital complications, on the other hand, late nAF group exhibited more mortality and readmission at one year follow-up. Multiple logistic regression revealed that symptoms onset to the first medical contact time, admission hemoglobin <12 g/dl, right bundle branch block at admission, and diuretic therapy during the hospitalization for ACS were predictors of late nAF in ACS. Conclusions: The ACS population could be divided by the timing of nAF occurrence into the two groups with different characteristics, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes. Late nAF patients had a worse prognosis at 1 year follow-up, however, the early nAF group had more major adverse cardiac events during the hospitalization for ACS.

A systemic review of endocardial left ventricular pacing.

BACKGROUND: Endocardial left ventricular pacing is an alternative technique used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), when placement of a left ventricular lead is not possible via the coronary sinus or in non-responders to conventional CRT. OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of endocardial left ventricular pacing. METHODS: Systematic research on Medline (PubMed), ClinicalTrials.gov and Embase with the terms "endocardial left ventricular pacing", "biventricular pacing" or "endocardial left pacing" was performed with the identification of 1038 results. Eleven studies with endocardial left ventricular pacing patients were included, independent of the technique being applied to naïve CRT patients or con non-responders to conventional CRT. The end-point of this analysis was the impact of endocardial left ventricular pacing techniques regarding New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and QRS width, and the occurrence of complications Mean differences (MD) and confidence interval (CI) was used as a measurement of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients were included, with different techniques used (trans-atrial septal technique, trans-ventricular septal technique and transapical technique). Significant improvement was registered in NYHA class (MD 0.73, CI 0.48-0.98, p<0.00001, I2 = 87%), LVEF (MD -7.63, CI -9.93 - -5.33, p<0.00001, I2 = 69%) and QRS width (MD 29.25, CI 9.99-48.50, p<0.00001, I2 = 91%). Several complications were reported after the procedure, 11 pocket infections, 22 transient ischemic attacks, 18 ischemic strokes, 41 thromboembolic events, among other complications. The mortality rate during the follow-up was 20.54%. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular endocardial pacing is a feasible alternative to conventional CRT, with clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiogrphic improvement. However, first data regarding this procedure was associated with significant complications rates.

High-grade atrioventricular block in acute coronary syndrome: Portuguese experience.

BACKGROUND: The high-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) occurrence in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a potentially life-threatening complication, that demands a rapid and efficient response regarding reperfusion time and rhythm stabilization. This study aimed to analyse the rate, clinical features, therapeutic approach, complications, in-hospital mortality and follow-up of HAVB in the setting of ACS. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study based on the Acute Coronary Syndrome Portuguese National Registry, including 32157 patients admitted for ACS between 1/10/2010-3/05/2020, classified according to the presence or absence of HAVB during the hospitalization for ACS. Comparison between the two groups was performed. Logistic regression was accomplished to assess predictors of HAVB in ACS patients. RESULTS: Patients with HAVB were older, and had higher rates of females, history of stroke and neoplasia. HAVB patients presented more frequently ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, syncope as a major symptom, higher Killip-Kimball class and multivessel disease. Furthermore, HAVB patients had more major adverse cardiac events during the hospitalization for ACS, namely heart failure complication, cardiogenic shock complication, new-onset of atrial fibrillation, ACS mechanical complication, sustained ventricular tachycardia, cardiac arrest, stroke complication and in-hospital death. Logistic regression revealed that female gender, age ≥ 75 years old, heart rate < 60 and Killip-Kimball class > I were predictors of HAVB in ACS patients. Also, HAVB patients presented higher rates of all-causes of death at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Using real-life data, patients with HAVB in the setting of ACS had a worse prognosis during hospitalization and in the short-term follow-up period.