Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain.

Surgical procedures, including nerve reconstruction and end-organ muscle reinnervation, have become more prominent in the prosthetic field over the past decade. Primarily developed to increase the functionality of prosthetic limbs, these surgical procedures have also been found to reduce postamputation neuropathic pain. Today, some of these procedures are performed more frequently for the management and prevention of postamputation pain than for prosthetic fitting, indicating a significant need for effective solutions to postamputation pain. One notable emerging procedure in this context is the Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI). RPNI surgery involves an operative approach that entails splitting the nerve end longitudinally into its main fascicles and implanting these fascicles within free denervated and devascularized muscle grafts. The RPNI procedure takes a proactive stance in addressing freshly cut nerve endings, facilitating painful neuroma prevention and treatment by enabling the nerve to regenerate and innervate an end organ, i.e., the free muscle graft. Retrospective studies have shown RPNI's effectiveness in alleviating postamputation pain and preventing the formation of painful neuromas. The increasing frequency of utilization of this approach has also given rise to variations in the technique. This article aims to provide a step-by-step description of the RPNI procedure, which will serve as the standardized procedure employed in an international, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05009394). In this trial, RPNI is compared to two other surgical procedures for postamputation pain management, specifically, Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) and neuroma excision coupled with intra-muscular transposition and burying.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: Surgical Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postamputation Pain.

Over the past decade, the field of prosthetics has witnessed significant progress, particularly in the development of surgical techniques to enhance the functionality of prosthetic limbs. Notably, novel surgical interventions have had an additional positive outcome, as individuals with amputations have reported neuropathic pain relief after undergoing such procedures. Subsequently, surgical techniques have gained increased prominence in the treatment of postamputation pain, including one such surgical advancement - targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). TMR involves a surgical approach that reroutes severed nerves as a type of nerve transfer to "target" motor nerves and their accompanying motor end plates within nearby muscles. This technique originally aimed to create new myoelectric sites for amplified electromyography (EMG) signals to enhance prosthetic intuitive control. Subsequent work showed that TMR also could prevent the formation of painful neuromas as well as reduce postamputation neuropathic pain (e.g., Residual and Phantom Limb Pain). Indeed, multiple studies have demonstrated TMR's effectiveness in mitigating postamputation pain as well as improving prosthetic functional outcomes. However, technical variations in the procedure have been identified as it is adopted by clinics worldwide. The purpose of this article is to provide a detailed step-by-step description of the TMR procedure, serving as the foundation for an international, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05009394), including nine clinics in seven countries. In this trial, TMR and two other surgical techniques for managing postamputation pain will be evaluated.

Surgical Feasibility Study on Cadaver for Vascularized Wrist Joint Transplantation.

PURPOSE: Despite modern advancements in the treatment of late stages of wrist joint degeneration, few reliable options exist for patients requiring motion-preserving reconstruction of their radiocarpal and midcarpal joints. Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) could be considered an option for wrist reconstruction in the future. The goal of this study was to describe the relevant anatomy and design a potential surgical technique for wrist VCA. METHODS: Anatomic studies were performed on 17 human upper extremities. The arterial system of each cadaver was injected with latex dye or radiographic contrast. After injecting a contrast medium visible on a computerized tomography (CT) scan, the initial three specimens were examined using microCT. This confirmed joint vascular patency and allowed for the dissection of the other specimens that were injected with latex for the study of joint vascularization and the design of the wrist VCA. We then outlined a donor and recipient surgical technique for transplant based on recipient CT scans. Customized cutting guides were designed for the transplant procedure. After the procedure, we performed angiography of the VCA to determine the vascularity of the transplant. RESULTS: Using a combined volar and dorsal approach, we were able to perform a complete wrist VCA procedure. After the completed transplant procedure, angiographic imaging of the specimens demonstrated that the flap dissection and transplantation preserved the nutrient endosteal supply to the distal end of the radius and ulna, as well as to the carpal bones and the metacarpal bases. CONCLUSIONS: The dissection of the donor, recipient, and the entire vascularized joint transplant procedure served to illustrate the anatomical feasibility of the cadaveric surgical technique. This establishes an anatomic basis for the possibility of future human clinical applications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study helps investigate the anatomical feasibility of a wrist VCA.

Surgical treatments for postamputation pain: study protocol for an international, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Painful conditions such as residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP) can manifest after amputation. The mechanisms underlying such postamputation pains are diverse and should be addressed accordingly. Different surgical treatment methods have shown potential for alleviating RLP due to neuroma formation - commonly known as neuroma pain - and to a lesser degree PLP. Two reconstructive surgical interventions, namely targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), are gaining popularity in postamputation pain treatment with promising results. However, these two methods have not been directly compared in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Here, we present a study protocol for an international, double-blind, RCT to assess the effectiveness of TMR, RPNI, and a non-reconstructive procedure called neuroma transposition (active control) in alleviating RLP, neuroma pain, and PLP. METHODS: One hundred ten upper and lower limb amputees suffering from RLP will be recruited and assigned randomly to one of the surgical interventions (TMR, RPNI, or neuroma transposition) in an equal allocation ratio. Complete evaluations will be performed during a baseline period prior to the surgical intervention, and follow-ups will be conducted in short term (1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery) and in long term (2 and 4 years post-surgery). After the 12-month follow-up, the study will be unblinded for the evaluator and the participants. If the participant is unsatisfied with the outcome of the treatment at that time, further treatment including one of the other procedures will be discussed in consultation with the clinical investigator at that site. DISCUSSION: A double-blind RCT is necessary for the establishment of evidence-based procedures, hence the motivation for this work. In addition, studies on pain are challenging due to the subjectivity of the experience and the lack of objective evaluation methods. Here, we mitigate this problem by including different pain evaluation methods known to have clinical relevance. We plan to analyse the primary variable, mean change in NRS (0-10) between baseline and the 12-month follow-up, using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach to minimise bias and keep the advantage of randomisation. The secondary outcomes will be analysed on both ITT and per-protocol (PP). An adherence protocol (PP population) analysis will be used for estimating a more realistic effect of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincialTrials.gov NCT05009394.

Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Posterior Trunk after Tumor Excision: A Surgical Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: The posterior trunk has been considered a challenging area to reconstruct following soft tissue tumor excision because of the shortage of local donor sites. The advent of innovative procedures such as perforator flaps has radically changed this perspective and offered a new approach to the problem. METHODS: Upon a review of the literature and the personal experiences of the senior author, an algorithm is developed according to the most updated procedure, combined with more conventional options that maintain a role in decision-making. RESULTS: The upper back latissimus dorsi and trapezium flap are still the most reliable approaches, while perforator flaps based either on the circumflex scapular arteries or the transverse cervical artery represent a more refined option. In the middle third, few indications remain for the reverse latissimus dorsi, while the gold standard is represented by local perforator flaps based on the posterior intercostal system. In the lower back, conventional VY advancement flaps are still a safe and effective option in the sacral area, and perforator flaps based on posterior intercostal arteries, lumbar arteries and superior gluteal arteries are the first choice in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Using perforator flaps significantly improved soft tissue reconstruction in the posterior trunk.

Validation of a Cleanroom Compliant Sonication-Based Decellularization Technique: A New Concept in Nerve Allograft Production.

Defects of the peripheral nervous system are extremely frequent in trauma and surgeries and have high socioeconomic costs. If the direct suture of a lesion is not possible, i.e., nerve gap > 2 cm, it is necessary to use grafts. While the gold standard is the autograft, it has disadvantages related to its harvesting, with an inevitable functional deficit and further morbidity. An alternative to autografting is represented by the acellular nerve allograft (ANA), which avoids disadvantages of autograft harvesting and fresh allograft rejection. In this research, the authors intend to transfer to human nerves a novel technique, previously implemented in animal models, to decellularize nerves. The new method is based on soaking the nerve tissues in decellularizing solutions while associating ultrasounds and freeze-thaw cycles. It is performed without interrupting the sterility chain, so that the new graft may not require post-production γ-ray irradiation, which is suspected to affect the structural and functional quality of tissues. The new method is rapid, safe, and inexpensive if compared with available commercial ANAs. Histology and immunohistochemistry have been adopted to evaluate the new decellularized nerves. The study shows that the new method can be applied to human nerve samples, obtaining similar, and, sometimes better, results compared with the chosen control method, the Hudson technique.

Megaprostheses for the revision of infected hip arthroplasties with severe bone loss.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic hip infections with severe proximal femoral bone loss may require the use of limb salvage techniques, but no agreement exists in literature regarding the most effective treatment. Aim of this study is to analyze the infection eradication rate and implant survival at medium-term follow-up in patients treated with megaprostheses for periprosthetic hip infections with severe bone loss. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed at a mean 64-month follow-up (24-120). Functional and pain scores, microbiological, radiological and intraoperative findings were registered. Kaplan Meier survival analysis and log rank test were used for infection free survival and implant survival analyses. RESULTS: The infection eradication rate was 90.5%, with an infection free survival of 95.2% at 2 years (95%CI 70.7-99.3) and 89.6%(95%CI 64.3-97.3) at 5 years. Only two patients required major implant revisions for aseptic implant loosening. The most frequent complication was dislocation (38.1%). The major revision-free survival of implants was 95.2% (95%CI 70.7-99.3) at 2 years and 89.6% (95%CI 64.3-97.3) at 5 years. The overall implant survival was 83.35% (CI95% 50.7-93.94) at 2 and 5 years. Subgroup analyses (cemented versus cementless MPs, coated versus uncoated MPs) revealed no significant differences at log rank test, but its reliability was limited by the small number of patients included. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal femoral arthroplasty is useful to treat periprosthetic hip infections with severe bone loss, providing good functional results with high infection eradication rates and rare major revisions at medium-term follow-up. No conclusions can be drawn on the role of cement and coatings.

Management of a rare intra-articular fracture of the lateral femoral condyle: case report.

Unicondylar fractures of the femur are uncommon injuries that can occur in the sagittal or, less frequently, in the coronal plane (Hoffa fractures).  Distal femoral fractures are usually described following the AO/OTA Classification system which includes extra-articular, partial articular and intra-articular injuries, further divided in three types based on the pattern and comminution.  Accurate reduction and stable fixation are needed especially in articular injuries in order to allow early mobilization and reduce complications such as knee stiffness, malunion or secondary osteoarthritis. The aim of this paper is to report a case of an unusual articular fracture of the lateral femoral condyle in a 39 years old man. This fracture reminds the pattern of a typical tibial plateau injury, not embedded in the most common descriptions of femoral traumas. Indeed, in most cases, high energy traumas in valgus of the knee result in a damage to the tibial plateau because of the condyles impact on the tibial articular surface, while in the present case the opposite occurred. The patient was successfully treated with an open reduction and fixation with two cannulated leg screws, reporting  good clinical outcome and excellent healing of the fragment evidenced with CT scan at 6 months follow-up.

Auto-Allo Graft Parallel Juxtaposition for Improved Neuroregeneration in Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction Based on Acellular Nerve Allografts.

INTRODUCTION: Nerve repair poses a significant surgical challenge, and much research on this topic for improvement in reconstruction of segmental defects is ongoing. The aims of the study were to reconfirm the accuracy and safety of a previously described nerve decellularization method on a larger experimental population of rabbits, as well as on human nerves, and to establish in vivo the efficacy of a new-concept mixed graft, comprising autologous and acellular nerve allograft components within the same graft. METHODS: Acellular nerve allografts were implanted into tibial nerve defects of 5 rabbits (group A), autografts were implanted, representing the criterion standard, in other 5 animals (group B), and the innovative technique was used in the remaining 5 (group C). Twelve weeks postoperatively, nerve conduction evaluations were performed; animals were euthanatized, and grafts were harvested and morphologically, histomorphometrically, and immunohistochemically analyzed. Eventually, a preliminary in vitro validation of the decellularization method was performed on human nerves from a cadaver. RESULTS: No clinical adverse effect was revealed during all the experimental times. No tissue reaction was observed, and in all groups, regenerated fascicles and bundles were shown by histology. However, both histology and histomorphometry demonstrated a better regenerative efficiency in group C. The morphological evaluation of the human nerve treated with the novel method showed complete decellularization. CONCLUSION: The microsurgical combined model demonstrated a better neuroregeneration than did pure autografts and acellular nerve allografts. The decellularization method seemed effective also on human nerves. Deeper investigations are necessary to further validate and transfer this new encouraging protocol to the clinical arena.

Cell-Enhanced Acellular Nerve Allografts for Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve reconstruction is a difficult problem to solve. Acellular nerve allografts (ANAs) have been widely tested and are a promising alternative to the autologous gold standard. However, current reconstructive methods still yield unpredictable and unsuccessful results. Consequently, numerous studies have been carried out studying alternatives to plain ANAs, but it is not clear if nerve regeneration potential exists between current biological, chemical, and physical enrichment modes. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effects of cell-enhanced ANAs on regeneration of peripheral nerve injuries. METHODS: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Medline, and Scopus databases were searched for related articles published from 2007 to 2017. Inclusion criteria of selected articles consisted of (1) articles written in English; (2) the topic being cell-enhanced ANAs in peripheral nerve regeneration; (3) an in vivo study design; and (4) postgrafting neuroregenerative assessment of results. Exclusion criteria included all articles that (1) discussed central nervous system ANAs; (2) consisted of xenografts as the main topic; and (3) consisted of case series, case reports or reviews. RESULTS: Forty papers were selected, and categorization included the animal model; the enhancing cell types; the decellularization method; and the neuroregenerative test performed. The effects of using diverse cellular enhancements combined with ANAs are discussed and also compared with the other treatments such as autologous nerve graft, and plain ANAs. CONCLUSION: ANAs cellular enhancement demonstrated positive effects on recovery of nerve function. Future research should include clinical translation, in order to increase the level of evidence available on peripheral nerve reconstruction.

Noncellular Modification of Acellular Nerve Allografts for Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction: A Systematic Critical Review of the Animal Literature.

BACKGROUND: Acellular nerve allografts (ANAs) have been established as promising alternatives to autologous nerve grafts, which represent the reference standard. Our research group recently performed a systematic review of reported cell-based-enriching methods for recellularization of ANAs. Recellularization results in consistent improvement of peripheral neuroregeneration compared with plain ANAs. We systematically reviewed the effects on nerve regeneration when ANA enrichment was obtained through biological, chemical, and physical modification instead of cells. METHODS: The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Medline, and Scopus databases were searched for reports of noncellular modification of ANAs, reported from January 2007 to December 2017. The inclusion criteria were English language, noncellular enrichment of ANAs in peripheral nerve regeneration, an in vivo study design, and postgrafting neuroregenerative outcomes assessment. The exclusion criteria were the central nervous system as the site of ANA application, nerve conduits, xenografts, case series, case reports, and reviews. RESULTS: Only animal studies were found to be eligible. We included 16 studies, which were analyzed regarding the animal model, decellularization method, graft-enriching mode, and neuroregenerative tests performed. CONCLUSIONS: Noncellular-based stimulation of ANAs demonstrated positive effects on recovery of nerve function compared with nerve grafting compared with plain ANAs. The neuroregenerative effect of autografting still appeared superior to ANAs, even with noncellular enrichment of ANAs. However, we found that in a few studies, modified ANAs closely approached or even outperformed autografts. Future research should include more preclinical investigations of this promising tool and clinical translation to increase the level of evidence available in the challenging field of peripheral nerve reconstruction.