RESUMEN
Introduction: Disturbance in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation may overlap with abnormality of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in hydrocephalus. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography is a non-invasive technique able to assess CBF velocity (CBFv) dynamics in response to a controlled rise in ICP during CSF infusion tests. Research question: Which TCD-derived cerebral hemodynamic parameters change during controlled rise of ICP, and in which direction? Material and methods: Infusion tests combined with TCD monitoring and non-invasive monitoring of arterial blood pressure (ABP) were conducted in 65 hydrocephalic patients. TCD-based hemodynamic variables: spectral pulsatility index (sPI), compliance of CSF space (Ci), cerebral autoregulation index (Mx), critical closing pressure (CrCP), cerebrovascular wall tension (WT) and diastolic closing margin (DCM-distance between diastolic ABP and CrCP) were calculated retrospectively. Results: During the test ICP increased on average to 25 mm Hg (p < 0.0001), with a parallel decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP, p < 0.0003). The CBFv waveform changed, showing a rise in sPI (p < 0.0001). Ci decreased inversely proportional to a rise in ICP, and correlated well with changes of compliance calculated from the Marmarou model. CrCP increased in response to rising ICP (p < 0.001) while WT decreased (p < 0.002). DCM correlated with cerebrospinal elasticity (R = -0.31; p < 0.04). Cerebral autoregulation was worse in patients with normal CSF circulation, measured as resistance to CSF outflow (Rout): Pearson correlation between Mx and Rout was R = -0.41; p < 0.02. Conclusion: A controlled rise in ICP affects cerebral hemodynamics in a moderate manner. Parameters like cerebral autoregulation index or DCM correlate with CSF dynamics and may be considered as supplementary variables for the diagnosis of hydrocephalus.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Different paradigms for neurocritical care of traumatic brain injury (TBI) have emerged in conjunction with advanced neuromonitoring technologies and derived metrics. The priority for optimizing these metrics is not currently clear. The goal of this study was to determine whether achieving cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt) also improves other metrics like brain oxygenation and brain blood flow. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of high-frequency data from patients with TBI who were treated at a single center and who had partial pressure of brain oxygen (PbtO2) measurements and/or brain blood flow measurements, while also undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. CPPopt was not calculated or targeted during patient care, but was retrospectively computed, as was the difference between the observed CPP and CPPopt. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients with ICP, PbtO2, and/or brain blood flow monitoring were included in the analysis, and 245.7 days of measurements obtained every second were analyzed including 6,748,866 PbtO2 measurements, 3,296,405 blood flow measurements, and 10,264,770 ICP measurements. The data obtained every second were averaged by minute for analysis. In summative data, PbtO2 measurements peaked near CPPopt and were not improved above CPPopt. Blood flow measurements remained stable near CPPopt, decreased below it, and increased when CPP exceeded CPPopt. ICP decreased linearly with CPP without a specific relationship with CPPopt. In an inverse analysis, the percentage of CPP values at CPPopt, although significantly higher on the favorable side of contemporary treatment thresholds of PbtO2, ICP, and blood flow, was not found to be strongly correlated with the mean values of the physiological measurements obtained every minute (r = 0.27, r = 0.11, and r = 0.47 for ICP, PbtO2, and blood flow, respectively; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although CPPopt was not targeted in the patients in this study, CPPopt was a physiologically significant value based on concurrent measurements of PbtO2 and blood flow. In summative data, achievement of CPPopt was associated with optimized PbtO2 and blood flow. Conversely, the correlation between achievement of CPPopt and the mean measurement value was not strong, strengthening the significance of CPPopt. In individual patients, achieving CPPopt is not always associated with optimal PbtO2 or blood flow. Further research should explore these relationships in treatment paradigms that specifically target CPPopt. These data do not support the premise that targeting and achieving CPPopt obviates the need for concurrent PbtO2 and blood flow monitoring. Although these data suggest that targeting CPPopt may be an appropriate initial treatment strategy, they do not provide evidence that CPPopt should be targeted with highest priority.
RESUMEN
Intracranial hypertension and adequacy of brain blood flow are primary concerns following traumatic brain injury. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a critical diagnostic tool in neurocritical care. However, all ICP sensors, irrespective of design, are subject to systematic and random measurement inaccuracies that can affect patient care if overlooked or disregarded. The wide choice of sensors available to surgeons raises questions about performance and suitability for treatment. This observational study offers a critical review of the clinical and experimental assessment of ICP sensor accuracy and comments on the relationship between actual clinical performance, bench testing, and manufacturer specifications. Critically, on this basis, the study offers guidelines for the selection of ICP monitoring technologies, an important clinical decision. To complement this, a literature review on important ICP monitoring considerations was included. This study utilises illustrative clinical and laboratory material from 1200 TBI patients (collected from 1992 to 2019) to present several important points regarding the accuracy of in vivo implementation of contemporary ICP transducers. In addition, a thorough literature search was performed, with sources dating from 1960 to 2021. Sources considered to be relevant matched the keywords: "intraparenchymal ICP sensors", "fiberoptic ICP sensors", "piezoelectric strain gauge sensors", "external ventricular drains", "CSF reference pressure", "ICP zero drift", and "ICP measurement accuracy". Based on single centre observations and the 76 sources reviewed in this paper, this material reports an overall anticipated measurement accuracy for intraparenchymal transducers of around ± 6.0 mm Hg with an average zero drift of <2.0 mm Hg. Precise ICP monitoring is a key tenet of neurocritical care, and accounting for zero drift is vital. Intraparenchymal piezoelectric strain gauge sensors are commonly implanted to monitor ICP. Laboratory bench testing results can differ from in vivo observations, revealing the shortcomings of current ICP sensors.