Cediranib in addition to chemotherapy for women with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (ICON6): overall survival results of a phase III randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Cediranib, an oral anti-angiogenic VEGFR 1-3 inhibitor, was studied at a daily dose of 20 mg in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance in a randomised trial in patients with first relapse of 'platinum-sensitive' ovarian cancer and has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICON6 (NCT00532194) was an international three-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Between December 2007 and December 2011, 456 women were randomised, using stratification, to receive either chemotherapy with placebo throughout (arm A, reference); chemotherapy with concurrent cediranib, followed by maintenance placebo (arm B, concurrent); or chemotherapy with concurrent cediranib, followed by maintenance cediranib (arm C, maintenance). Due to an enforced redesign of the trial in September 2011, the primary endpoint became PFS between arms A and C which we have previously published, and the overall survival (OS) was defined as a secondary endpoint, which is reported here. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 25.6 months, strong evidence of an effect of concurrent plus maintenance cediranib on PFS was observed [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.72, P < 0.0001]. In this final update of the survival analysis, 90% of patients have died. There was a 7.4-month difference in median survival and an HR of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.67-1.11, P = 0.24) in favour of arm C. There was strong evidence of a departure from the assumption of non-proportionality using the Grambsch-Therneau test (P = 0.0031), making the HR difficult to interpret. Consequently, the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used and the estimated difference over 6 years by the RMST was 4.8 months (95% CI: -0.09 to 9.74 months). CONCLUSIONS: Although a statistically significant difference in time to progression was seen, the enforced curtailment in recruitment meant that the secondary analysis of OS was underpowered. The relative reduction in the risk of death of 14% risk of death was not conventionally statistically significant, but this improvement and the increase in the mean survival time in this analysis suggest that cediranib may have worthwhile activity in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer and that further research should be undertaken.

Improved Survival from Ovarian Cancer in Patients Treated in Phase III Trial Active Cancer Centres in the UK.

AIMS: Ovarian cancer is the principal cause of gynaecological cancer death in developed countries, yet overall survival in the UK has been reported as being inferior to that in some Western countries. As there is a range of survival across the UK we hypothesised that in major regional centres, outcomes are equivalent to the best internationally. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients treated in multicentre international and UK-based trials were obtained from three regional cancer centres in the UK; Manchester, University College London and Leeds (MUL). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were calculated for each trial and compared with the published trial data. Normalised median survival values and the respective 95% confidence intervals (ratio of pooled MUL data to trial median survival) were calculated to allow inter-trial survival comparisons. This strategy then allowed a comparison of median survival across the UK, in three regional UK centres and in international centres. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the trial-reported PFS was the same in the UK, in the MUL centres and in international centres for each of the trials included in the study. Overall survival was, however, 45% better in major regional centre-treated patients (95% confidence interval 9-73%) than the median overall survival reported in UK trials, whereas the median overall survival in MUL centres equated with that achieved in international centres. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that international survival statistics are achieved in UK regional cancer centres.

Serial MRI scans help in assessing early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and tailoring breast cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Tailoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) during breast cancer treatment is performed to improve overall tumour response, with increasing evidence to support its role. This study evaluates our breast unit's experience in MRI assessment of tumour response as an aid in tailoring NAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients treated with NAC for breast cancer between 2005 and 2009 who underwent MRI to assess tumour response. Response to NAC was monitored before NAC and after 2 and/or 4 cycles of anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy. Taxane was substituted for AC if MRI response was deemed inadequate. Tumour response on last MRI was correlated with final pathology against different tumour subtypes and in inflammatory tumours. Strength of agreement was measured using Kappa analysis. Potential predictive factors for MRI response were assessed for significance. RESULTS: 166 tumours were assessed with serial MRI scans. MRI showed high sensitivity rate (93.1%) in predicting response to NAC particularly for tumours showing partial (PR) or complete (CR) response on pathology (p < 0.001) with fair agreement on Kappa analysis (K = 0.31). MRI seems more accurate in triple negative, HR+/HER2+ and high-grade tumours. Early identification of non-responders on MRI resulted in early tailoring of NAC, with improved rates of tumour response seen in 74.2% following switching NAC. Logistic regression showed that PR or CR observed on MRI after 2 NAC cycles significantly predicted pCR (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Serial MRI can be used to assess patterns of tumour response to NAC. This study shows that tailoring NAC according to pattern of response can improve overall tumour response rates.

Mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Mucinous tumours involving the ovary may be benign, borderline, or malignant. Malignant tumours may be primary or metastatic. Differentiation between primary and metastatic involvement of the ovary is critical for optimal patient management. Even among skilled pathologists, this distinction can be problematic, as can the distinction between borderline ovarian tumour of intestinal type and well-differentiated invasive primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Primary invasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma metastatic to the ovary do have distinct patterns of macroscopic and microscopic involvement which will reveal the correct diagnosis in many cases. There are also well-recognized patterns of immunohistochemical staining that can further assist in this differentiation. As a result of the application of these histopathological techniques, the incidence of primary invasive mucinous epithelial carcinoma has fallen over recent years from ∼12% to ∼3%. However, even in recent multicentre clinical trials such as GOG 182, expert pathological review suggests that ∼60% of tumours originally classified as primary invasive mucinous carcinomas were in fact metastatic tumours to the ovary. Review of outcome data for patients with mucinous carcinoma entered into multicentre trials suggests that this subtype of disease has a particularly poor prognosis in comparison with other subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. Historically, patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (mEOC) have been treated in the same way as other subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. While there is undoubtedly a response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy, retrospective reviews of individual centre experience suggest that this is substantially lower than for high-grade papillary serous carcinoma and in the order of only 30%-40%. The mEOC trial was established to investigate the possibility that the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (chemotherapy drugs more commonly used in colorectal carcinoma) may be superior to conventional carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, there was also a randomization to bevacizumab. Unfortunately, this trial closed early, 5 years after initiation having recruited just 50 of a proposed 322 patients. mEOC is now characterized as a type I tumour with an identifiable stepwise progression from a premalignant lesion, through non-invasive, to invasive malignancy. Molecular characterization of mEOC reveals it to be distinct from other subtypes of the disease with a KRAS mutation occurring in 40%-50% of patients. Other gene abnormalities including HER2 amplification in ∼19% also occur. This raises the possibility of the use of targeted molecular therapies which with molecular analysis of individual patient tumours could form the basis of a future clinical trial. It is, however, clear that if trials are to be conducted in this rare subtype of disease, they will need to be truly international in nature and carefully designed, possibly using an adaptive stepwise approach and will require an appropriate level of funding with a realistic assessment of likely recruitment. Associated translational research will clearly be essential.

Targeted anti-vascular therapies for ovarian cancer: current evidence.

Ovarian cancer presents at advanced stage in around 75% of women, and despite improvements in treatments such as chemotherapy, the 5-year survival from the disease in women diagnosed between 1996 and 1999 in England and Wales was only 36%. Over 80% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer will relapse and despite a good chance of remission from further chemotherapy, they will usually die from their disease. Sequential treatment strategies are employed to maximise quality and length of life but patients eventually become resistant to cytotoxic agents. The expansion in understanding of the molecular biology that characterises cancer cells has led to the rapid development of new agents to target important pathways but the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer biology means that there is no predominant defect. This review attempts to discuss progress to date in tackling a more general target applicable to ovary cancer-angiogenesis.

A prospective randomised phase II trial of thalidomide with carboplatin compared with carboplatin alone as a first-line therapy in women with ovarian cancer, with evaluation of potential surrogate markers of angiogenesis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of thalidomide in combination with carboplatin to carboplatin alone as a first-line therapy in women with ovarian cancer and to evaluate the anti-angiogenic effects of thalidomide by measurement of surrogate markers of angiogenesis. METHODS: Forty patients with Stage IC-IV ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive either carboplatin (AUC 7) intravenously every four weeks for up to six doses (n = 20) or carboplatin at the same dose and schedule, plus thalidomide 100 mg orally daily for six months (n = 20). RESULTS: After median follow-up of 1.95 years, there was no difference in the overall response rate (90% in carboplatin arm, 75% in combination arm; p = 0.41). Increased incidence of symptoms of constipation, dizziness, tiredness and peripheral neuropathy was observed in the combination arm. There was a significant fall in CA-125 and E-selectin in both arms after treatment and VCAM-1 in the carboplatin arm. No significant difference between the two arms was observed in any of the markers analysed. CONCLUSIONS: In our trial the addition of thalidomide to carboplatin was well tolerated with no increased efficacy. The fall in some of the angiogenic markers in both groups may reflect tumour response rather than any specific anti-angiogenic effect of thalidomide.

A phase II trial evaluating two schedules of sagopilone (ZK-EPO), a novel epothilone, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sagopilone, the first fully synthetic epothilone, has shown promising preclinical activity in tumour models. This open-label randomised phase II study investigated two infusion schedules of sagopilone in women with ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with ovarian cancer recurring within 6 months of end of last platinum-containing treatment received sagopilone 16 mg/m(2) as a 3- or 0.5-h i.v. infusion every 21 days for up to 6 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients received sagopilone as a 3-h (n=38) or 0.5-h (n=25) infusion. There were nine confirmed tumour responses [by modified RECIST (n=8) and by Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup CA-125 criteria (n=1)] in 57 patients assessable for efficacy overall [three (13%) with 0.5-h and six (18%) with 3-h infusions]. The 0.5-h arm was closed when it failed to meet its target efficacy. Main drug-related adverse events were peripheral sensory neuropathy (73%; 16% grade 3), nausea (37%; 2% grade 3), fatigue (35%; 3% grade 3) and arthralgia (30%; 5% grade 3). Overall incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy was similar in both treatment arms, with no grade 4 neuropathy events. No acute allergic infusion reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: Sagopilone is effective, with balanced tolerability, in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

A randomised comparative trial of infusional ECisF versus conventional FEC as adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: the TRAFIC trial.

BACKGROUND: The epirubicin with cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECisF) regimen was found to be highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and as neoadjuvant therapy. The UK TRAFIC (trial of adjuvant 5-FU infusional chemotherapy) trial (CRUK/95/007) compared this schedule with 5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC60) as adjuvant therapy in patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial, 349 women were randomly assigned to receive i.v. ECisF [epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2), day 1 and 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) by daily 24-h infusion (n = 172)] or FEC [5-FU 600 mg/m(2), day 1, epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), day 1 (n = 177)]. Both treatments were delivered every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free interval (RFI). TRAFIC is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial (ISRCTN 83324925). RESULTS: All randomised patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 112 months, there was no significant difference in RFI between the treatment groups [hazard ratio 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.19); P = 0.33]. Toxic effects were more frequent in patients allocated to ECisF. CONCLUSIONS: While limited by size, TRAFIC has long follow-up. No evidence of a clinically worthwhile benefit for the infusional treatment compared with standard treatment was observed which would justify further investigation or widespread use.

Timing of breast cancer surgery in relation to menstrual cycle phase: no effect on 3-year prognosis: the ITS Study.

The effect of breast cancer surgery timing during the menstrual cycle on prognosis remains controversial. We conducted a multicentre prospective study to establish whether timing of interventions influences prognosis. We report 3-year overall and disease-free survival (OS/DFS) results for 'primary analysis' patients (regular cycles, no oral contraceptives within previous 6 months). Data were collected regarding timing of interventions in relation to patients' last menstrual period (LMP) and first menstrual period after surgery (FMP). Hormone profiles were also measured. Cox's proportional hazards model incorporated LMP in continuous form. Exploratory analyses used menstrual cycle categorisations of Senie, Badwe and Hrushesky. Hormone profiles with LMP and FMP data were also used to define menstrual cycle phase. Four hundred and twelve 'primary analysis' patients were recruited. Three-year OS from first surgery was 90.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) [87.9, 93.6%]. Menstrual cycle according to LMP was not statistically significant (OS: hazard ratio (HR)=1.02, 95%CI [0.995,1.042], P=0.14; DFS: HR=1.00, 95%CI [0.980,1.022], P=0.92). Timing of surgery in relation to menstrual cycle phase had no significant impact on 3-year survival. This may be due to 97% of patients receiving some form of adjuvant therapy. Survival curves to 10 years indicate results may remain true for longer-term survival.

p-53 gene mutations as a predictive marker in a population of advanced breast cancer patients randomly treated with doxorubicin or docetaxel in the context of a phase III clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data indicate that p-53 gene mutations predict resistance to doxorubicin (A) but not to docetaxel (Taxotere) (T). In the TAX 303 trial, A and T have been compared with advanced breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary tumor samples from patients participating in the TAX 303 trial were collected. p-53 gene mutations were evaluated by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and confirmed by sequencing. Topoisomerase II alpha (topo II alpha) protein levels were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Clinical and biological data were correlated. RESULTS: Tumor samples for DHPLC analysis were available for 108 of 326 patients from the clinical trial. p-53 gene mutations were observed in 20% of patients. In patients with a mutated p-53 gene, a trend for a lower percentage of responders was observed in the A arm (17%) compared with the T arm (50%). In the wild-type p-53 cohort, response rates to A and T were 27% and 36%, respectively. Of the 16 patients carrying wild-type p-53- and topo II protein-positive tumors, seven (44%) responded to anthracyclines, while response rate to the same drug was 13% in the remaining cohorts [odds ratio 5.06 (95% confidence interval 1.19-21.41), P = 0.03]. The combination of the two markers had no predictive value in patients treated with docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS: (i) p-53 gene analysis indicates that gene mutations may compromise the efficacy of A while they do not interfere with the antitumor activity of T; and (ii) the evaluation of multiple molecular markers including p-53 and proliferation markers as topo II protein levels looks more promising in predicting response to anthracyclines.

Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: Efficacy of image-guided biopsy to determine site-specific diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of image-guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site-specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. POPULATION: A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB. METHODS: Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin-eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rate of site-specific diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6-year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site-specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site-specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site-specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer. CONCLUSIONS: IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site-specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible.

Optimized sequence of drug administration and schedule leads to improved dose delivery for gemcitabine and paclitaxel in combination: a phase I trial in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

We examined appropriate sequence, schedule, and doses of gemcitabine (G) and paclitaxel (T) in patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients received a maximum of six cycles of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 (starting 1000 mg/m(2)), and paclitaxel (starting 135 mg/m(2)) on day 8 (groups A and B) or day 1 (group C). Drug sequences (G-->T and T-->G) were tested in group A. In group A, changing sequences of gemcitabine and paclitaxel infusion were evaluated. Sequence G-->T raised grade 3 alanine transaminase in two of three patients leading to use of T-->G sequence for remainder of study. In group B, maximum tolerable dose was reached at gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2). Reducing paclitaxel to 150 mg/m(2) allowed escalation of gemcitabine to 1250 mg/m(2), but neutropenia-related treatment delays occurred. Giving paclitaxel on day 1 (group C) enabled administration of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) with minimal dose adjustments. The overall response rate was 41.0%, with 2 complete responses and 14 partial responses in 39 eligible patients. The schedule of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 1) and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8), with sequence of T-->G, appears most suitable with tolerable toxicity and promising activity.

Image-guided biopsy in women with breast cancer presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

When women with a history of breast cancer present with peritoneal carcinomatosis, the differential diagnosis lies between recurrent breast cancer or a new primary tumor. This scenario is of particular relevance to women with a BRCA gene mutation, who have a genetic predisposition to develop second primary tumors of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. We describe the use of image-guided core biopsy as an alternative to laparoscopy or exploratory laparotomy in providing minimally invasive diagnosis in this increasingly common clinical dilemma.

Maintenance treatment with interferon for advanced ovarian cancer: results of the Northern and Yorkshire gynaecology group randomised phase III study.

A randomised phase III trial was conducted to assess the role of interferon-alpha (INFalpha) 2a as maintenance therapy following surgery and/or chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Patients were randomised following initial surgery/chemotherapy to interferon-alpha 2a as 4.5 mega-units subcutaneously 3 days per week or to no further treatment. A total of 300 patients were randomised within the study between February 1990 and July 1997. No benefit for interferon maintenance was seen in terms of either overall or clinical event-free survival. We conclude that INF-alpha is not effective as a maintenance therapy in the management of women with ovarian cancer. The need for novel therapeutics or strategies to prevent the almost inevitable relapse of patients despite increasingly effective surgery and chemotherapy remains.

A phase II feasibility study of carboplatin followed by sequential weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment for ovarian cancer.

A total of 53 women with chemotherapy-naïve stage Ic-IV ovarian cancer were treated with four cycles of carboplatin area under the curve 7 every 3 weeks, followed by four cycles of paclitaxel 70 mg m(-2) (days 1, 8, and 15) and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. In all, 37 (70%) had stage III/IV disease, with 22 (42%) having tumour >2 cm; 38 patients (72%) completed all planned treatment; 27 of the 32 (84%) patients with radiologically evaluable disease had partial or complete responses; and 30 of the 39 patients (77%) with elevated cancer antigen (CA) 125 had a greater than 75% fall in this value. At a median follow-up of 28 months, 31 patients had relapsed with a median progression-free survival of 19.5 months. In total, 79% of patients were alive at 2 years. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 haematological toxicity, predominantly neutropenia, was seen in 57% of the patients. A certain degree of pulmonary toxicity was observed; eight patients had symptomatic breathlessness, +/- decreased diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and interstitial chest X-ray changes during the weekly phase. In all cases, this toxicity was reversible. No significant neurotoxicity was seen. This regimen is generally well tolerated with encouraging efficacy. However, the observation of pulmonary toxicity, potentially a feature of the weekly taxane-gemcitabine regimen, was of some concern. Alternative schedules, including 3-weekly taxanes, are currently being evaluated.

Phase II study of docetaxel in combination with epirubicin and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ETF) in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. A Yorkshire breast cancer research group study.

This study was originally designed as a phase I/II study, with a dose escalation of docetaxel in combination with epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 200 mg m(-2) day(-1). However, as dose escalation was not possible, the study is reported as a phase II study of the combination to assess response and toxicity. A total of 51 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were treated on this phase II study, with doses of docetaxel 50 mg m(-2), epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and infusional 5-FU 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 21 days. The main toxicity of this combination was neutropenia with 89% of patients having grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, and 39% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Nonhaematological toxicity was mild. The overall response rate in the assessable patients was 64%, with median progression-free survival of 38 weeks, and median survival of 70 weeks. The ETF regimen was found to be toxic, and it was not possible to escalate the dose of docetaxel above the first dose level. This regimen has therefore not been taken any further, but as a development of this a new study is ongoing, combining 3-weekly epirubicin, weekly docetaxel and capecitabine, days 1-14.

A novel continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen compared with conventional chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: 5 year results of the TOPIC trial.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy against conventional bolus chemotherapy in the preoperative treatment of patients with large operable early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and twenty-six women with histologically proven 3 cm invasive early breast cancer were randomised to receive pre-operative infusional 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) by daily 24 h continuous infusion via a Hickman line for 18 weeks with epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on day 1 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on day 1, both repeating 3-weekly (infusional ECisF), or conventional bolus doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, both repeating 3-weekly (AC), both schedules for six courses. Patients subsequently had local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy or both) and tamoxifen 20 mg orally daily as appropriate. RESULTS: The 5 year results for AC and infusional ECisF, respectively, were as follows: overall response, 75% and 77%; complete clinical remission, 31% and 34%; pathological complete remission (pathCR), 16% for both; and pathCR with residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 25% and 24%. Mastectomy rates were 37% and 34%, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 74% for AC and 82% for infusional ECisF (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.13; P = 0.18). Both treatments were well tolerated. Grade III/IV lethargy, vomiting, alopecia and plantar-palmar erythema were significantly greater for infusional ECisF; grade III/IV leucopenia was significantly greater for AC. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative continuous infusional 5-FU-based chemotherapy is no more active than conventional AC for early breast cancer; with a median 5 year follow-up, the infusion-based schedule shows a non-significant trend towards improved survival.