Is adenine phophorybosiltransferase deficiency a still underdiagnosed cause of urolithiasis and chronic renal failure? A report of two cases in a family with an uncommon novel mutation.

We describe two patients that had a history of recurrent renal stones and chronic renal insufficiency. The first case was a 51-year-old man with an adenine phophoribosyltransferase (APRT) deficiency who was diagnosed only after he had been referred for severe renal failure requiring hemodialysis. This led to a screening of the entire family, which identified six carriers and an additional affected relative (a 41-year-old man and the second case reported herein). Genetic analysis of the APRT gene revealed an atypical mutation previously described only once in a compound heterozygote.

Clinical, biochemical and molecular diagnosis of a compound homozygote for the 254 bp deletion-8 bp insertion of the APRT gene suffering from severe renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the type of mutation in a patient with clinical diagnosis of suspected APRT deficiency. DESIGN AND METHODS: A 51-year-old male patient, with a clinical history of two prior episodes of renal colic with urinary stone excretion (reported as uric acid stones in the first episode and as calcium oxalate stones in the second), was admitted to the hospital with severe non-oliguric renal failure (1.06 mmol/L serum creatinine), severe hyponatremia (114 mmol/L Na(+)), metabolic acidosis (14 mmol/L HCO(3)(-)) and uricemia in the normal range. Abnormalities at renal scan and persistency of severe renal failure required to start haemodialysis. Results of renal biopsy prompted us to undertake a biochemical and molecular biological evaluation of the patient for suspected adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) deficiency. RESULTS: HPLC analysis of serum and urine, for determining purine derivative profile, showed the pathological presence of adenine in both biological fluids (3.57 micromol/L and 7.11 micromol/mmol creatinine in serum and urine, respectively; not detectable in both fluids in healthy controls). APRT assay in a sample of patient hemolysate showed no detectable activity of the enzyme (25.56+/-9.55 U/L red blood cells in control healthy subjects). Molecular biological analysis of the amplified APRT gene revealed that the patient harboured in exon 3 a homozygous 254 bp deletion-8 bp insertion, previously described only once in a compound heterozygote. Analysis of the patient family showed that heterozygotes for this APRT gene mutation, in spite of a 69% lower APRT enzymatic activity than that of healthy subjects, had no detectable adenine concentrations in both serum and urine. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the first patient harbouring the homozygous 254 bp deletion-8 bp insertion of the APRT gene strongly indicated that definitive diagnosis of APRT deficiency (often under or misdiagnosed) would require a combined clinical, biochemical and molecular biological evaluation.

In vivo assessment of intact parathyroid hormone adsorption by different dialysis membranes during hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Different parathyroid hormone (PTH) behavior during hemodialysis with different types of dialysis membranes has been reported. The behavior of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) adsorption using different dialysis membranes was assessed in 12 dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: The study was performed according to a longitudinal scheme comprising three treatment modalities, each lasting 2 weeks, for 6 weeks altogether. The first treatment consisted of standard bicarbonate dialysis with low-flux polysulfone, followed by acetate-free biofiltration with high-flux-polysulfone or with polyacrylonitrile-AN69. In the first week of each period, dialysis was delivered by using a 1.3 m(2) surface area and subsequently, a 1.8 m(2) surface area. Intact parathyroid hormone was assayed on the blood and dialysate samples to calculate iPTH adsorption. RESULTS: The results showed that polyacrylonitrile-AN69 and high-flux polysulfone induce a significantly larger drop in PTH serum levels as compared with low-flux-polysulfone, particularly in the first half of the dialysis session, while the ionized calcium increase is comparable in all different hemodialysis treatments. The measurement of iPTH in the dialysate showed lower values than those disappearing on the blood side, thus suggesting the presence of an adsorptive mechanism in the different dialysis membranes. CONCLUSION: High-flux polysulfone is endowed with a comparable adsorptive capacity per surface unit compared to polyacrylonitrile-AN69, although it seems to show a different behavior, as polyacrylonitrile-AN69 saturates early in the first hour of dialysis corresponding to its maximum adsorption power, while high-flux-polysulfone displays a more lasting adsorptive capacity. Thus, iPTH changes during hemodialysis also depend on dialyzer characteristics and the dialysis membrane adsorption.