The presence of resistance mutations to protease and polymerase inhibitors in Hepatitis C virus sequences from the Los Alamos databank.

Several new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs are in development for chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection, and NS3-NS4A serine protease and the NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase have been the major targets. HCV variants displaying drug-resistant phenotypes have been observed both in vitro and during clinical trials. Our aim was to characterize amino acid changes at positions previously associated with resistance in protease (NS3) and polymerase (NS5B) regions from treatment-naïve HCV patients infected with genotypes 1a, 1b and 3a. All 1383 NS3 protease sequences (genotype 1a = 680, 1b = 498 and 3a = 205) and 806 NS5B polymerase sequences (genotypes 1a = 471, 1b = 329, 3a = 6) were collected from Los Alamos databank. Genotype 3a protease sequences showed the typical low-level resistance mutation V36L. NS3 sequences from other genotypes presented mutations on positions 36, 39, 41, 43, 54, 80, 109, 155 and 168 in a frequency lower than 2%, except for the mutation Q80R found in 35% of genotype 1a isolates. Polymerase sequences from genotype 3a patients showed five typical mutations: L419I, I424V, I482L, V499A and S556G. Two positions presented high polymorphism in the NS5B region from genotype 1a (V499A) and genotype 1b (C316N) subjects. Our results demonstrated a natural profile of genotype 3a that can be associated with the pre-existence of HCV variants resistant to first-generation protease inhibitors and to non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitors. Likewise, genotype 1b isolates and genotype 1a sequences exhibited pre-existing mutations associated with resistance to Palm II and Thumb I polymerase inhibitors, respectively.

Evolution of viral quasispecies in interferon-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate whether interferon treatment failure/relapse is related to changes in hepatitis C virus quasispecies complexity (number of variants) or diversity (genetic relatedness of variants). METHODS: We analyzed hypervariable region heterogeneity in hepatitis C virus-infected patients by heteroduplex mobility assay and by phylogenetic analysis of sequenced clones. Sera from 11 patients were tested. Response was defined biochemically and virologically. Patients were treated with 3 or 6 MIU interferon for 6 months and followed up for 6 months. Four patients were non-responders, four were transient responders and three untreated patients served as controls. Three time points were studied for the non-responders (pre-interferon, end of interferon, end of 6 months of follow-up), two for the transient responders (pre-interferon and post follow-up) and two for the controls (1 year apart). A total of 260 clones were examined by heteroduplex mobility assay and 144 clones were sequenced. RESULTS: A linear correlation between heteroduplex mobility and nucleotide substitutions was observed, validating this method for assessment of quasispecies diversity. Although complexity at each time point was similar in all groups, diversity increased significantly with interferon treatment. The percentage of new variants in follow up was significantly higher in non-responders than in controls. These new variants exhibited a greater change in heteroduplex mobility, a higher percentage of changes in amino acids in non-responders compared to controls and were found to cluster separately from pretreatment variants when analyzed phylogenetically. These changes were less marked in transient responders. CONCLUSIONS: These mutations may allow hepatitis C virus to escape antiviral effects of interferon therapy.

Evolution of hepatitis C virus quasispecies in patients with severe cholestatic hepatitis after liver transplantation.

Evolution of hepatitis C quasispecies may be one mechanism by which fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis develops after liver transplantation. In this study, we compared changes in quasispecies complexity and/or divergence in (1) hepatitis C-infected immunosuppressed transplant recipients and in immunocompetent controls; (2) transplant recipients with mild recurrence, and in those with the most severe form of posttransplantation recurrence. Quasispecies were measured in 12 hepatitis C-infected patients pretransplantation and posttransplantation (6 with mild and 6 with severe recurrence), and in 5 immunocompetent patients with similar follow-up, and characterized by heteroduplex mobility and sequence analysis of the hypervariable region. Although the number of variants (complexity) did not change with time in either group, there was a qualitative change in the variants with time (divergence) in immunocompromised, but not in immunocompetent patients. These changes were most marked with severe recurrence, and preceded the development of severe disease. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that most posttransplantation variants were unrelated to those detected pretransplantation. These observations suggest that in the absence of immune suppression, there is minor evolution of quasispecies. With immune suppression, divergence of quasispecies is enhanced, resulting in selection/emergence of many new variants, particularly in those with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Thus, quasispecies may influence disease progression in immune suppressed populations.

Update on clinical trials in the treatment of hepatitis B.

Chronic hepatitis B infection is a worldwide public health problem, which is particularly important in countries of Asia. Interferon has long been available for the treatment of patients with active replication (hepatitis B virus (HBV) e antigen and HBV-DNA positive) with evidence of chronic liver disease (elevated serum alanine aminotransferase and chronic hepatitis on liver biopsy). Doses of interferon of 10 MU, t.i.w. or 5 MU, q day for 16 weeks result in e antigen and HBV-DNA loss in approximately one-third of individuals who meet these treatment criteria. The major limitations of interferon are: (i) side effects of influenza-like symptoms; (ii) need for parenteral administration; and (iii) concerns about safety in patients with hepatic decompensation. Nucleoside and nucleotide analogues have potent antiviral activity. The largest experience is with lamivudine (3-thiacytadine), a reverse transcriptase inhibitor that was recently approved by the USA Federal Drug Administration. At doses of 100 mg/day for 52 weeks, suppression of HBV replication is almost universal, with e antigen loss and improvement in histology being achieved in one-third and two-thirds of patients, respectively. The major advantages of lamivudine are: (i) good tolerability; (ii) oral route of administration; and (iii) safety in patients with hepatic decompensation. The major disadvantage is drug resistance, which is observed with increasing frequency following prolonged administration. New agents, such as adefovir dipivoxil, offer promise either alone or in combination with lamivudine in the treatment of individuals who are 'treatment naive' as well as in the treatment individuals who have developed lamivudine resistance.

Antienvelope antibodies are protective against GBV-C reinfection: evidence from the liver transplant model.

An assay for the detection of antibody against the second envelope (E2) protein of GB virus type C (GBV-C) has been developed. Early reports suggested that this antibody was a marker of viral clearance, yet it is unknown whether anti-E2 is protective against further GBV-C infection. The primary aims were to determine (1) if posttransplantation immunosuppression alters the prevalence of anti-E2; and (2) if anti-E2 positivity pretransplantation protects against acquisition of GBV-C infection posttransplantation. Fifty-four recipients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease of nonviral etiologies were tested for GBV-C RNA using a PCR-based assay and anti-E2 antibodies by an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Anti-E2 was present in 35% and in 46% of patients pre- and posttransplantation, respectively. Anti-E2 positivity pretransplantation was strongly associated with anti-E2 positivity after transplantation (P < 0.001); 83% of patients with anti-E2 prior to transplantation remained anti-E2-positive after transplantation. A negative association between presence of GBV-C viremia and presence of anti-E2 was found in all patients tested either prior to or following transplantation (P=0.03). Acquisition of GBV-C infection was significantly lower in patients who were anti-E2-positive prior to transplantation (2/13) compared to those who were anti-E2-negative (12/26) (P=0.05). It is concluded that immunosuppression does not reduce the prevalence of anti-E2 after transplantation in those who are seroreactive prior to transplantation. Anti-E2 appears to be a neutralizing antibody whose presence at the time of liver transplantation protects against acquisition of GBV-C infection in the peritransplantation period.

Hepatitis after liver transplantation: the role of the known and unknown viruses.

This study was designed to determine the cause of posttransplantation hepatitis in patients undergoing transplantation for liver disease of nonviral cause; the role of acquired hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis G virus (HGV) in posttransplantation hepatitis; and the course of posttransplantation hepatitis of unknown cause. Two hundred forty-three patients underwent transplantation for nonviral liver diseases (mean age, 48 years; 103 men, 140 women). Serological and virological assays for HBV and HCV were performed pretransplantation to exclude preexisting infection and posttransplantation to investigate the cause of posttransplantation hepatitis. Histology was graded on all available biopsy specimens; posttransplantation hepatitis was assessable in 150 patients. Posttransplantation hepatitis was present in 29% (44 of 150) of the patients after a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 1 to 101 months). Actuarial survival was significantly lower in patients with posttransplantation hepatitis compared with patients without (71% v 89% at 5-year follow-up; P = .03). HCV and HBV were identified posttransplantation in 14% and 9% of patients with hepatitis, respectively. After the exclusion of HCV and HBV infection, 22% (33 of 150) of the patients had posttransplantation hepatitis of unknown cause. HGV was present in 58% of these patients, but HGV was equally prevalent in patients without posttransplantation hepatitis. When patients with HBV and HCV were excluded, there was no difference in survival between patients with posttransplantation hepatitis compared with patients without (P = .08, log-rank test). Posttransplantation hepatitis was present in approximately 30% of the patients undergoing transplantation for nonviral diseases, with a median follow-up of 47 months. Known hepatitis viruses (HBV, HCV) were present in one fourth of the patients with posttransplantation hepatitis; 22% (33 of 150) of the patients had hepatitis of unknown cause, suggesting that other, as yet undiscovered, hepatitis viruses may exist.

Quantitation of hepatitis G and C viruses in the liver: evidence that hepatitis G virus is not hepatotropic.

Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is prevalent in patients with chronic liver disease and has been previously detected in liver specimens. However, it is unknown whether the virus is replicating in the liver or is simply a contaminant from serum. We sought to determine whether HGV was hepatotropic and to determine whether coinfection with HGV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) influenced the level of either virus. Virus was quantitated using branched DNA (bDNA) assay for both HGV and HCV in the liver explants and pretransplant serum samples from 30 transplant recipients: Group I, HGV/HCV coinfection (n = 10); group II, HCV infection alone, (n = 8); group III, HGV alone (n = 12). In patients with coinfection HCV (RNA) titers in liver were consistently higher than those for HGV RNA (median 1.13 x 10(8) and 360,000 Eq/g respectively, P < .01). The ratio of liver/serum viral RNA was significantly higher for HCV than for HGV (median 129 and 0.3 respectively, P < .01). Levels of HCV RNA were similar in patients with HCV infection alone versus those with HGV/HCV coinfection (median; liver = 1.15 x 10(7) vs. 1.13 x 10(8) Eq/g, serum = 500,000 vs. 200,000 Eq/mL) and levels of HGV RNA in liver and serum were similar in patients with HGV infection alone compared to those with HGV/HCV coinfection (median; liver = 1.2 x 10(6) vs. 4.0 x 10(5) Eq/g, serum = 4.5 x 106 vs. 2.6 x 10(6) Eq/mL). Levels of either virus appeared unaffected by the presence of an additional virus. The high ratio of HCV RNA levels in liver compared to serum is consistent with its known hepatotropism, but this pattern was not observed for HGV. The median liver/serum ratio of HGV RNA was less than unity, a finding consistent with serum contamination of liver tissue. Thus we conclude that the liver is not the main site of HGV replication.

Hepatitis G virus in patients with cryptogenic liver disease undergoing liver transplantation.

To examine the prevalence of hepatitis G virus (HGV) in end-stage liver disease of unknown cause and the role of HGV infection in posttransplantation hepatitis, we studied 46 patients undergoing liver transplantation (mean age, 50 years; M:F, 18:28) with cryptogenic cirrhosis. HGV RNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and was quantified by a branched DNA (bDNA) assay. The prevalence of HGV RNA was determined in samples collected before and after liver transplantation and was found to be 22% and 67%, respectively. We evaluated the prevalence of posttransplantation hepatitis in 25 patients, 16 of whom were HGV-positive and 9 were HGV-negative. The proportion of patients with hepatitis was not significantly different in the two groups (38% in HGV-positive and 22% in HGV-negative patients). The median histological scores were significantly higher in liver biopsies from patients with HGV infection than in those without HGV infection (2 [range, 0-14] and 1 [range, 0-3]; P = .01), but the histological scores were low overall. The duration of follow-up was similar in the two groups. HGV RNA levels were not correlated with the severity of liver disease based on histological score (r = -.08). Graft survival and patient survival were not significantly different. We concluded that liver disease was frequent (32%) after transplantation in patients with a pretransplantation diagnosis of cryptogenic cirrhosis, although the disease was generally mild. Although HGV RNA was demonstrable in the majority (67%) of patients after transplantation, there was no relationship between the presence of HGV RNA and the presence of posttransplantation liver disease. The finding of posttransplantation hepatitis in the absence of known viruses (A-G), suggests that other, as-yet-unidentified viruses may be important.

Hepatitis C infection in transplantation.

This review emphasizes the role of HCV in the transplant setting. Prolonged HCV infection results in end-stage liver disease and as such represents a common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of infection is almost universal after transplantation in those with viremia before transplantation. Acquired disease is uncommon but nevertheless important, particularly in organ populations in whom screening for infection is not routine. The natural history of post-transplantation disease suggests that the effect on graft or patient survival is minor, at least during short-term follow-up. Long-term follow-up is needed, as well as more detailed study of the factors contributing to severity of post-transplantation disease. Kidney transplant recipients are commonly infected with HCV prior to transplantation. HCV infection after transplantation is associated with an increased risk of liver disease and infectious complications, but its effect on survival is still controversial. Similarly, observations in recipients of other solid organ transplants, such as heart and lung, and bone marrow patients suggest that HCV infection usually is not a major cause of mortality in the first 5 to 10 years of follow-up. Many issues still need to be addressed. The most important is the identification of factors that contribute to disease progression. Finally, effective therapies to eradicate infection and prevent disease progression are awaited.

[Chronic hepatitis non-A, non-B hepatitis: a clinical and morphologic study]. / Hepatite crônica não-A, não-B: estudo clínico e morfológico.

Few data on chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANB-CH) have been published so far in our country. We have studied 85 patients classified into four groups: I. post-transfusional (PT), 35 patients (41.2%); II. risk group (GR), including health professionals and drug addicts, 11 (12.9%); III. sporadic with a well defined beginning (EBD), 19 (22.4%) and IV. sporadic with ill-defined beginning (END), 20 (23.5%). The mean age in group I was significantly higher than in groups II and III. A polyphasic pattern of serum aminotransferases and severe histological forms were observed in all groups. It is concluded that the way of infection has probably no prognostic importance.