Clinical inertia is the enemy of therapeutic success in the management of diabetes and its complications: a narrative literature review.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease characterized by high social, economic and health burden, mostly due to the high incidence and morbidity of diabetes complications. Numerous studies have shown that optimizing metabolic control may reduce the risk of micro and macrovascular complications related to the disease, and the algorithms suggest that an appropriate and timely step of care intensification should be proposed after 3 months from the failure to achieve metabolic goals. Nonetheless, many population studies show that glycemic control in diabetic patients is often inadequate. The phenomenon of clinical inertia in diabetology, defined as the failure to start a therapy or its intensification/de-intensification when appropriate, has been studied for almost 20 years, and it is not limited to diabetes care, but also affects other specialties. In the present manuscript, we have documented the issue of inertia in its complexity, assessing its dimensions, its epidemiological weight, and its burden over the effectiveness of care. Our main goal is the identification of the causes of clinical inertia in diabetology, and the quantification of its social and health-related consequences through the adoption of appropriate indicators, in an effort to advance possible solutions and proposals to fight and possibly overcome clinical inertia, thus improving health outcomes and quality of care.

Blood glucose pre-prandial baseline decreases from morning to evening in type 2 diabetes: role of fasting blood glucose and influence on post-prandial excursions.

BACKGROUND: To know the relationships between pre- and postprandial blood glucose (BG), i.e. BG profile shape, is a requisite for an appropriate therapy for type 2 diabetic patients. In non diabetic subjects, pre-breakfast, pre-lunch and pre-dinner BG are similar, so that BG postprandial excursions are superimposed on a stable BG preprandial baseline. We aimed to clarify: (a) whether BG preprandial baseline is stable also in type 2 diabetes and (b) whether fasting BG (FBG) influences the slope of BG preprandial baseline and the relationships between pre- and postprandial BG. DESIGN: We evaluated self-measured BG profiles of 237 type 2 diabetic patients on diet alone (M/F, 152/85; age 58.6 +/- 0.7 years; years from diagnosis 4.8 +/- 0.6; BMI 28.0 +/- 0.3 kg m-2): 536 profiles containing preprandial BG (corresponding HbA1c 6.8 +/- 0.06%) and 208 profiles containing both pre- and postprandial BG (corresponding HbA1c 6.8 +/- 0.09%). The profiles, measured by nurses, of 866 type 2 diabetic patients on diet alone were also considered (corresponding HbA1c 6.7 +/- 0.04%). RESULTS: In self-measured profiles containing only preprandial BG: (i) FBG (6.77 +/- 0.07 mmol L(-1)) is higher than pre-lunch BG (6.09 +/- 0.07 mmol L(-1)), P = 0.0001) and pre-dinner BG (5.84 +/- 0.06 mmol L(-1)), P =0.0001); (ii) the delta value between FBG and pre-dinner BG is correlated with FBG (r = 0.57, P = 0.0001), the highest FBG, the steepest the fall of BG preprandial baseline throughout the day. This trend is confirmed in profiles measured by nurses. In profiles containing both pre- and postprandial BG: (i) there is a trend to preprandial BG fall (P = 0.0001) and to postprandial BG increase (P = 0.0001) from morning to evening; (ii) postprandial excursions are influenced and sometimes masked by the slope of BG preprandial baseline, thus, in profiles with FBG < or = 6.7 mmol L(-1), all postprandial values are higher than FBG (P = 0.0001), whereas in profiles with FBG > 7.8 mmol L(-1), postprandial values are not significantly higher than FBG. CONCLUSION: In type 2 diabetes, the shape of BG profiles changes in relation to FBG, because it deeply influences the slope of BG preprandial baseline on which postprandial excursions are superimposed. Thus, before planning treatment policies, not only the extent of fasting and postprandial hyperglycaemia, but also the shape of profiles should be considered, to safely correct hyperglycaemia without inducing hypoglycaemia.

Platelet resistance to nitrates in obesity and obese NIDDM, and normal platelet sensitivity to both insulin and nitrates in lean NIDDM.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies in our laboratory showed that the platelet anti-aggregating effect exerted by insulin, mediated by a nitric oxide (NO)-induced increase of guanosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP), is lost in the insulin-resistant of obesity and obese NIDDM. It is not clear 1) whether the alterations observed in obese NIDDM patients are attributable to the obesity-related insulin resistance or to diabetes per se and 2) whether insulin-resistant states present a normal or a blunted response to NO. This study has been conducted to investigate 1) the platelet sensitivity to insulin in lean NIDDM and 2) the platelet sensitivity to an NO donor, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), in obesity and in both lean and obese NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We determined 1) ADP-induced platelet aggregation and platelet cGMP content in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) obtained from 11 lean NIDDM patients, after a 3-min incubation with insulin (0, 240, 480, 960, 1,920 pmol/l) and 2) ADP-induced platelet aggregation and platelet cGMP content in PRP obtained from 9 obese subjects, 11 lean and 8 obese NIDDM patients, and 18 control subjects, after a 3-min incubation with 0, 20, 40, and 100 mumol/l GTN. RESULTS: Insulin dose-dependently decreased platelet aggregation in lean NIDDM patients (P = 0.0001): with 1,920 pmol/l of insulin, ADP ED50 was 141.5 +/- 6.4% of basal values (P = 0.0001). Furthermore, insulin increased platelet cGMP (P = 0.0001) from 7.5 +/- 0.2 to 21.1 +/- 3.7 pmol/10(9) platelets. These results were similar to those previously described in healthy subjects. GTN reduced platelet aggregation in all the groups (P = 0.0001) at all the concentrations tested (P = 0.0001), but GTN IC50 values were much higher in insulin-resistant patients: 36.3 +/- 5.0 mumol/l in healthy control subjects, 26.0 +/- 6.0 mumol/l in lean NIDDM patients (NS vs. control subjects), 123.6 +/- 24.0 mumol/l in obese subjects (P = 0.0001 vs. control subjects), and 110.1 +/- 19.2 mumol/l in obese NIDDM patients (P = 0.0001 vs. control subjects). GTN dose-dependently increased platelet cGMP in all the groups (P = 0.0001 in control subjects, lean NIDDM patients, and obese subjects; P = 0.04 in obese NIDDM patients). Values reached by obese subjects and obese NIDDM patients, however, were lower than those reached by control subjects (with 100 mumol/l of GTN, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0001, respectively). In healthy control subjects and in obese subjects, the insulin:glucose ratio, used as an indirect measure of insulin sensitivity, was positively correlated to GTN IC50 (r = 0.530, P = 0.008), further suggesting that the sensitivity to NO is reduced in the presence of insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The insulin anti-aggregating effect is preserved in lean NIDDM; platelet sensitivity to GTN in preserved in lean NIDDM but is reduced in the insulin-resistant states of obesity and obese NIDDM. Resistance to nitrates, therefore, could be considered another feature of the insulin-resistance syndrome.

Impaired insulin-induced platelet antiaggregating effect in obesity and in obese NIDDM patients.

To investigate the effects of insulin on platelets in obesity and in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)--classic insulin-resistant states--we determined ADP-induced platelet aggregation and platelet cGMP (guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate) content in platelet-rich plasma obtained from nine obese subjects and nine age-matched healthy volunteers and from eight NIDDM obese patients and nine age-matched healthy volunteers after a 3-min incubation with human recombinant insulin (0, 240, 480, 960, and 1,920 pmol/l). Platelet aggregation was evaluated using different ADP doses to measure the ADP concentration determined on the basis of a dose-response curve necessary to elicit a maximal aggregation of 50% (ED50). Insulin induced a dose-dependent decrease of platelet aggregation to ADP (P = 0.0001) in healthy subjects. A significant effect was evident starting from an insulin concentration of 240 pmol/l. On the contrary, in insulin-resistant subjects, insulin reduced platelet sensitivity to ADP only at a concentration of 1,920 pmol/l. When ADP ED50 values obtained in platelet-rich plasma incubated with insulin were expressed in percentage of the ADP ED50 values obtained in platelet-rich plasma without insulin, considered as 100%, we observed that ADP ED50 with 1,920 pmol/l insulin was 153.6 +/- 13.2% in the younger healthy subject group (P = 0.004), 150.0 +/- 3.8% in the older healthy subject group (P = 0.0001), 116.1 +/- 6.1% in obese subjects (P = 0.031), and 120.0 +/- 8.6% in NIDDM patients (P = 0.05). In healthy subjects, insulin induced a dose-dependent increase of platelet cGMP (P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)