Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 36(3): 517-533, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021623

RESUMEN

Nasogastric/nasoenteric (NG/NE) feeding tube placements are associated with adverse events and, without proper training, can lead to devastating and significant patient harm related to misplacement. Safe feeding tube placement practices and verification are critical. There are many procedures and techniques for placement and verification; this paper provides an overview and update of techniques to guide practitioners in making clinical decisions. Regardless of placement technique and verification practices employed, it is essential that training and competency are maintained and documented for all clinicians placing NG/NE feeding tubes. This paper has been approved by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Board of Directors.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral , Intubación Gastrointestinal , Adulto , Humanos , Intubación Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos
2.
J Surg Res ; 251: 137-145, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32143058

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fostering medical students' appreciation for team members particularly those from other disciplines with varying levels of experience promotes a promising beginning to a health care career. METHODS: During surgical clerkship orientation, third-year medical students completed 30-item TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire preintervention and postintervention, spent 7 min identifying errors in a simulated operating room, followed by recorded physician-led 30-min discussions. RESULTS: Postintervention (67) compared with preintervention (141) mean TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire domain scores were statistically significantly higher for team structure (4.59, 4.70; P = 0.03) and higher but not significant for leadership (4.74, 4.75; P = 0.86), situation monitoring (4.62, 4.68; P = 0.32), communication (4.40, 4.50; P = 0.14), and decreased for mutual support (4.43, 4.36; P = 0.43). Medical students identified 2%-93% of 33 staged errors and 291 additional errors, which were placed into 14 categories. Soiled gloves in the operative field and urinary bag on the floor were the most frequently identified staged errors. Experienced nurses compared with medical students identified significantly more errors (mean, 17.7 versus 11.7, respectively; P < 0.001). Recognizing errors when lacking familiarity with the operative environment and appreciating teammates' perspectives were themes that emerged from discussions. CONCLUSIONS: This well-received teamwork exercise enabled medical students to appreciate team members' contributions and other disciplines' perspectives, in addition to the synergy that occurs with multidisciplinary teams.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Cooperativa , Educación Médica/métodos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Errores Médicos , Estudiantes de Medicina , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/educación , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Comunicación , Humanos , Quirófanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Entrenamiento Simulado , Equipo Quirúrgico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA