Immunosuppressive therapy for IgA nephropathy in children.

BACKGROUND: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common cause of primary glomerulonephritis. It is a heterogeneous disease with different presentations and high morbidity. Thirty per cent of adults and 20% of children (followed into adulthood) will have a 50% decline in kidney function or develop kidney failure after 10 years. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of IgAN in children. SEARCH METHODS: We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 03 October 2023 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) investigating the treatment of IgAN in children with immunosuppressive therapies compared to placebo, no treatment, supportive care, standard therapy (Japanese protocol), other immunosuppressive therapies or non-immunosuppressive therapies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analyses were used to summarise estimates of treatment effects. Treatment effects were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs and the ROBIN-I tool for NRSIs. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). MAIN RESULTS: This review included 13 studies with 686 participants. Ten RCTs included 334 children and 191 adults, and three NRSIs included 151 participants, all children. Most participants had mild kidney disease. The risk of bias was unclear for most of the domains relating to allocation concealment, blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessment. In children with IgAN, it is uncertain if corticosteroid (steroid) therapy, compared to placebo reduces proteinuria (1 study, 64 children and young adults: RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.72; low certainty evidence) or the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (1 study, 64 children and young adults: RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.39; low certainty evidence). It is uncertain if steroids reduce proteinuria compared to supportive care (2 studies, 61 children: RR 0.04, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.72; low certainty evidence). Adverse events associated with steroid therapy were not assessed due to heterogeneity in steroid protocols, including dose and duration, and lack of systematic assessment for adverse events in the included studies. Azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, mizoribine, or cyclophosphamide alone or in combination with steroid therapy had uncertain effects on improving proteinuria or preventing eGFR decline in children with IgAN. Fish oil, vitamin E and tonsillectomy had uncertain effects on improving proteinuria or preventing eGFR decline. Effects of other immunosuppressive therapies, secondary outcomes and adverse events were not assessed due to insufficient data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of high-quality evidence to guide the management of IgAN in children. There is no evidence to indicate that steroids, other immunosuppressive therapies, or tonsillectomy, when added to optimal supportive care, prevent a decline in eGFR or proteinuria in children with IgAN. Available studies were few, with small numbers, low-quality evidence, high or uncertain risk of bias, did not systematically assess harms associated with treatment, or report net benefits or harms. Severe cases and atypical presentations of IgAN were not included in the reviewed studies, and our findings cannot be generalised to these situations.

The integrated care model: facilitating initiation of or transition to home dialysis.

A proportion of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients require kidney replacement therapy to maintain clinical stability. Home dialysis therapies offer convenience, autonomy and potential quality of life improvements, all of which were heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the superiority of specific modalities remains uncertain, patient choice and informed decision-making remain crucial. Missed opportunities for home therapies arise from systemic, programmatic and patient-level barriers. This paper introduces the integrated care model which prioritizes the safe and effective uptake of home therapies while also emphasizing patient-centered care, informed decision-making, and comprehensive support. The integrated care framework addresses challenges in patient identification, assessment, eligibility determination, education and modality transitions. Special considerations for urgent dialysis starts are discussed, acknowledging the unique barriers faced by this population. Continuous quality improvement is emphasized, with the understanding that local challenges may require tailored solutions. Overall, the integrated care model aims to create a seamless and beneficial transition to home dialysis therapies, promoting flexibility and improved quality of life for ESKD patients globally.

Global variations in funding and use of hemodialysis accesses: an international report using the ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of contemporary data describing global variations in vascular access for hemodialysis (HD). We used the third iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) to highlight differences in funding and availability of hemodialysis accesses used for initiating HD across world regions. METHODS: Survey questions were directed at understanding the funding modules for obtaining vascular access and types of accesses used to initiate dialysis. An electronic survey was sent to national and regional key stakeholders affiliated with the ISN between June and September 2022. Countries that participated in the survey were categorized based on World Bank Income Classification (low-, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income) and by their regional affiliation with the ISN. RESULTS: Data on types of vascular access were available from 160 countries. Respondents from 35 countries (22% of surveyed countries) reported that > 50% of patients started HD with an arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF or AVG). These rates were higher in Western Europe (n = 14; 64%), North & East Asia (n = 4; 67%), and among high-income countries (n = 24; 38%). The rates of > 50% of patients starting HD with a tunneled dialysis catheter were highest in North America & Caribbean region (n = 7; 58%) and lowest in South Asia and Newly Independent States and Russia (n = 0 in both regions). Respondents from 50% (n = 9) of low-income countries reported that > 75% of patients started HD using a temporary catheter, with the highest rates in Africa (n = 30; 75%) and Latin America (n = 14; 67%). Funding for the creation of vascular access was often through public funding and free at the point of delivery in high-income countries (n = 42; 67% for AVF/AVG, n = 44; 70% for central venous catheters). In low-income countries, private and out of pocket funding was reported as being more common (n = 8; 40% for AVF/AVG, n = 5; 25% for central venous catheters). CONCLUSIONS: High income countries exhibit variation in the use of AVF/AVG and tunneled catheters. In low-income countries, there is a higher use of temporary dialysis catheters and private funding models for access creation.

Impact of Prior Abdominal Procedures on Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Outcomes: Findings From the North American Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Registry.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: A history of prior abdominal procedures may influence the likelihood of referral for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion. To guide clinical decision making in this population, this study examined the association between prior abdominal procedures and outcomes in patients undergoing PD catheter insertion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing their first PD catheter insertion between November 1, 2011, and November 1, 2020, at 11 institutions in Canada and the United States participating in the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis North American Catheter Registry. EXPOSURE: Prior abdominal procedure(s) defined as any procedure that enters the peritoneal cavity. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was time to the first of (1) abandonment of the PD catheter or (2) interruption/termination of PD. Secondary outcomes were rates of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and procedures. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cumulative incidence curves were used to describe the risk over time, and an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between the exposure and primary outcome. Models for count data were used to estimate the associations between the exposure and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 855 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31% had a history of a prior abdominal procedure and 20% experienced at least 1 PD catheter-related complication that led to the primary outcome. Prior abdominal procedures were not associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68-1.84). Upper-abdominal procedures were associated with a higher adjusted hazard of the primary outcome, but there was no dose-response relationship concerning the number of procedures. There was no association between prior abdominal procedures and other secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Observational study and cohort limited to a sample of patients believed to be potential candidates for PD catheter insertion. CONCLUSION: A history of prior abdominal procedure(s) does not appear to influence catheter outcomes following PD catheter insertion. Such a history should not be a contraindication to PD. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a life-saving therapy for individuals with kidney failure that can be done at home. PD requires the placement of a tube, or catheter, into the abdomen to allow the exchange of dialysis fluid during treatment. There is concern that individuals who have undergone prior abdominal procedures and are referred for a catheter might have scarring that could affect catheter function. In some institutions, they might not even be offered PD therapy as an option. In this study, we found that a history of prior abdominal procedures did not increase the risk of PD catheter complications and should not dissuade patients from choosing PD or providers from recommending it.

Risk Factors for Developing Low Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Albuminuria in Living Kidney Donors.

Rationale & Objective: Chronic kidney disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the general population, but little is known about the incidence and risk factors associated with developing low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and moderate-severe albuminuria in living kidney donors following nephrectomy. Study Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. Setting & Participants: Kidney donors in Alberta, Canada. Exposure: Donor nephrectomy between May 2001 and December 2017. Outcome: Two eGFR measurements <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 2 measurements of moderate or severe albuminuria from 1-year postdonation onwards that were at least 90 days apart. Analytical Approach: Associations between potential risk factors and the primary outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 8.6 years (IQR, 4.7-12.6 years), 47 of 590 donors (8.0%) developed sustained low eGFR or moderate-severe albuminuria with an incidence rate of 9.2 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 6.6-11.8). The median time for development of this outcome beyond the first year after nephrectomy was 2.9 years (IQR, 1.4-8.0 years). Within the first 4 years of follow-up, a 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower predonation eGFR increased the hazard of developing postdonation low eGFR or moderate-severe albuminuria by 26% (adjusted HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.44). Furthermore, donors were at higher risk of developing low eGFR or albuminuria if they had evidence of predonation hypertension (adjusted HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.28-4.96) or postdonation diabetes (adjusted HR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.54-14.50). Limitations: We lacked data on certain donor characteristics that may affect long-term kidney function, such as race, smoking history, and transplant-related characteristics. Conclusions: A proportion of kidney donors at an incidence rate of 9.2 per 1,000 person-years will develop low eGFR or albuminuria after donation. Donors with lower predonation eGFR, predonation hypertension, and postdonation diabetes are at increased risk of developing this outcome.

The purpose of this study was to understand the risk of developing kidney disease in living kidney donors after donation. We followed 590 donors in Alberta, Canada for almost 9 years. Approximately 8% of donors developed reduced kidney function (low estimated glomerular filtration rate) or increased protein in the urine (albuminuria). Donors with lower kidney function before donation, hypertension before donation, or diabetes after donation had a higher likelihood of experiencing these kidney outcomes. This research provides important insights to patients and health care providers to better support the long-term kidney health of living kidney donors.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Population-Based Study.

Background: Kidney transplant recipients are commonly prescribed proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), but due to concern for polypharmacy, chronic use should be limited. Objective: The objective was to describe PPI use in kidney transplant recipients beyond their first year of transplant to better inform and support deprescribing initiatives. Design: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked health care databases. Setting: This study was conducted in Alberta, Canada. Patients: We included all prevalent adult, kidney-only transplant recipients between April 2008 and December 2017 who received their transplant between May 2002 and December 2017. Measurements: The primary outcome was ongoing or new PPI use and patterns of use, including frequency and duration of therapy, and assessment of indication for PPI use. Methods: We ascertained baseline characteristics, covariate information, and outcome data from the Alberta Kidney Disease Network (AKDN). We compared recipients with evidence of a PPI prescription in the 3 months prior to study entry to those with a histamine-2-receptor antagonist (H2Ra) fill and those with neither. Results: We identified 1823 kidney transplant recipients, of whom 868 (48%) were on a PPI, 215 (12%) were on an H2Ra, and 740 (41%) were on neither at baseline. Over a median follow-up of 5.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.6-9.3), there were almost 45 000 unique PPI prescriptions dispensed, the majority (80%) of which were filled by initial PPI users. Recipients who were on a PPI at baseline would spend 91% (IQR = 70-98) of their graft survival time on a PPI in follow-up, and nephrologists were the main prescribers. We identified an indication for ongoing PPI use in 54% of recipients with the most common indication being concurrent antiplatelet use (26%). Limitations: Our kidney transplant recipients have access to universal health care coverage which may limit generalizability. We identified common gastrointestinal indications for PPI use but did not include rare conditions due to concerns about the validity of diagnostic codes. In addition, symptoms suggestive of reflux may not be well coded as the focus of follow-up visits is more likely to focus on kidney transplant. Conclusions: Many kidney transplant recipients are prescribed a PPI at, or beyond, the 1-year post-transplant date and are likely to stay on a PPI in follow-up. Almost half of the recipients in our study did not have an identifiable indication for ongoing PPI use. Nephrologists frequently prescribe PPIs to kidney transplant recipients and should be involved in deprescribing initiatives to reduce polypharmacy.

Contexte: On prescrit couramment des inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons (IPP) aux receveurs d'une greffe rénale; une pratique qui devrait cependant être limitée en raison de préoccupations liées à la polypharmacie. Objectif: Décrire l'utilisation des IPP chez les receveurs d'une greffe rénale au-delà de la première année post-greffe, afin de mieux informer et de soutenir les initiatives de déprescription. Type d'étude: Étude de cohorte populationnelle rétrospective réalisée à partir des bases de données couplées du système de santé. Cadre: Alberta, Canada. Sujets: Nous avons recueilli les données d'avril 2008 à décembre 2017 de tous les adultes qui avaient reçu un rein seulement entre mai 2002 et décembre 2017. Mesures: Le principal critère de jugement était la prise continue ­ ou une nouvelle ordonnance ­ d'IPP et les modalités d'utilisation, notamment la fréquence et la durée du traitement, ainsi que l'indication pour la prescription d'IPP. Méthodologie: Nous avons vérifié les caractéristiques initiales, les informations covariées et les données sur les résultats colligées dans l'Alberta Kidney Disease Network (AKDN). Nous avons comparé des receveurs présentant des preuves d'une prescription d'IPP au cours des trois mois précédant l'entrée dans l'étude à des patients avec une ordonnance d'antagonistes des récepteurs de l'histamine-2 (aRH2), ainsi qu'à des patients n'ayant aucune de ces prescriptions. Résultats: Nous avons identifié 1 823 receveurs d'une greffe rénale; 868 (48 %) recevaient un IPP, 215 (12 %) recevaient un aRH2 et 740 (41 %) ne recevaient aucun traitement à l'inclusion. Au cours d'un suivi médian de 5,4 ans (intervalle interquartile [IIQ]: 2,6-9,3), près de 45 000 ordonnances uniques d'IPP ont été délivrées, dont la majorité (80 %) avait été remplie par des utilisateurs initiaux d'IPP. Les receveurs qui prenaient des IPP à l'inclusion avaient passé 91 % (IIQ: 70-98) de leur temps de survie du greffon à prendre un IPP durant la période de suivi, et ces médicaments avaient été majoritairement prescrits par des néphrologues. Une indication justifiant l'utilisation continue d'un IPP était présente chez 54 % des receveurs; la plus courante étant l'utilisation concomitante d'un agent antiplaquettaire (26 %). Limites: Les receveurs inclus dans notre étude ont accès à une couverture médicale universelle, ce qui peut limiter la généralisabilité des résultats. Nous avons repéré des indications gastro-intestinales courantes pour l'utilisation d'IPP, mais nous n'avons pas inclus les affections rares en raison de préoccupations concernant la validité des codes diagnostiques. Aussi, les symptômes évocateurs d'un reflux pourraient ne pas être bien codés, car les visites de suivi sont plus susceptibles de porter sur la transplantation rénale. Conclusion: De nombreux receveurs d'une greffe rénale se voient encore prescrire un IPP dans l'année suivant la transplantation, ou au-delà, et sont susceptibles de continuer d'en prendre pendant le suivi. Près de la moitié des receveurs de notre étude n'avaient pas d'indication clairement identifiable de prendre un IPP en continu. Les néphrologues prescrivent fréquemment des IPP aux receveurs d'une greffe rénale et devraient être impliqués dans les initiatives de déprescription visant à réduire la polypharmacie.

The impact of the Starting dialysis on Time, At home on the Right Therapy (START) project on the use of peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is actively promoted, but increasing PD utilisation is difficult. The objective of this study was to determine if the Starting dialysis on Time, At Home, on the Right Therapy (START) project was associated with an increase in the proportion of dialysis patients receiving PD within 6 months of starting therapy. METHODS: Consecutive patients over age 18, with end-stage kidney failure, who started dialysis between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2018 in the province of Alberta, Canada. Programmes were provided with high-quality data about the individual steps in the process of care that drive PD utilisation that were used to identify problem areas, design and implement interventions to address them, and then evaluate whether those interventions had impact. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving PD within 6 months of starting dialysis. Secondary outcomes included hospitalisation, death or probability of transfer to haemodialysis (HD). Interrupted time series methodology was used to evaluate the impact of the quality improvement initiative on the primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1962 patients started dialysis during the study period. Twenty-seven per cent of incident patients received PD at baseline, and there was a 5.4% (95% confidence interval: 1.5-9.2) increase in the use of PD in the province immediately after implementation. There were no changes in the rates of hospitalisation, death or probability of transfer to HD after the introduction of START. CONCLUSIONS: The approach used in the START project was associated with an increase in the use of PD in a setting with high baseline utilisation.

The Association of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions with Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter-Related Complications.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the association of intra-abdominal adhesions with the risk of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter complications. METHODS: Individuals undergoing laparoscopic PD catheter insertion were prospectively enrolled from eight centers in Canada and the United States. Patients were grouped based on the presence of adhesions observed during catheter insertion. The primary outcome was the composite of PD never starting, termination of PD, or the need for an invasive procedure caused by flow restriction or abdominal pain. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-eight individuals were enrolled, of whom 201 (27%) had adhesions during laparoscopic PD catheter insertion. The risk of the primary outcome occurred in 35 (17%) in the adhesion group compared with 58 (10%) in the no adhesion group (adjusted HR, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 2.55) within 6 months of insertion. Lower abdominal or pelvic adhesions had an adjusted HR of 1.80 (95% CI, 1.09 to 2.98) compared with the no adhesion group. Invasive procedures were required in 26 (13%) and 47 (8%) of the adhesion and no adhesion groups, respectively (unadjusted HR, 1.60: 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47) within 6 months of insertion. The adjusted odds ratio for adhesions for women was 1.65 (95% CI, 1.12 to 2.41), for body mass index per 5 kg/m 2 was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.003 to 1.34), and for prior abdominal surgery was 8.34 (95% CI, 5.5 to 12.34). Common abnormalities found during invasive procedures included PD catheter tip migration, occlusion of the lumen with fibrin, omental wrapping, adherence to the bowel, and the development of new adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: People with intra-abdominal adhesions undergoing PD catheter insertion were at higher risk for abdominal pain or flow restriction preventing PD from starting, PD termination, or requiring an invasive procedure. However, most patients, with or without adhesions, did not experience complications, and most complications did not lead to the termination of PD therapy.

Implementing a Formalized Risk-Based Approach to Determine Candidacy for Multidisciplinary CKD Care: A Descriptive Cohort Study.

Background: The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) can be used to predict progression to end-stage kidney disease in a clinical setting. Objective: Evaluate implementation of a formalized risk-based approach in nephrologists' outpatient clinics and multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics to determine candidacy for multidisciplinary care, and the impact of CKD care selection on clinical outcomes. Design: Population-based descriptive cohort study. Setting: Alberta Kidney Care South. Patients: Adults attending or considered for a multidisciplinary CKD clinic between April 1, 2017, and March 31, 2019. Measurements: Exposure-The course of CKD care assigned by the nephrologist: management at multidisciplinary CKD clinic; management by a nephrologist or primary care physician. Primary Outcome-CKD progression, defined as commencement of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Secondary Outcomes-Death, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Methods: We linked operational data from the clinics (available until March 31, 2019) with administrative health and laboratory data (available until March 31, 2020). Comparisons among patient groups, courses of care, and clinical settings with negative binomial regression count models and calculated unadjusted and fully adjusted incidence rate ratios. For the all-cause death outcome, we used Cox survival models to calculate unadjusted and fully adjusted hazard ratios. Results: Of the 1748 patients for whom a KFRE was completed, 1347 (77%) remained in or were admitted to a multidisciplinary CKD clinic, 310 (18%) were managed by a nephrologist only, and 91 (5%) were referred back for management by their primary care physician. There was a much higher kidney failure risk among patients who remained at or were admitted to a multidisciplinary CKD clinic (median 2-year risk of 34.7% compared with 3.6% and 0.8% who remained with a nephrologist or primary care physician, respectively). None of the people managed by their primary care physician alone commenced KRT, while only 2 (0.6%) managed by a nephrologist without multidisciplinary CKD care commenced KRT. The rates of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and death were lower in those assigned to management outside the multidisciplinary CKD clinics when compared with those managed in the multidisciplinary care setting. Limitations: The follow-up period may not have been long enough to determine outcomes, and potentially limited generalizability given variability of care in multidisciplinary clinics. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a portion of patients can be directed to less resource-intensive care without a higher risk of adverse events. Trial registration: Not applicable.

Contexte: L'équation KFRE (Kidney Failure Risk Equation) peut être utilisée en environnement clinique pour prédire le risque d'évolution vers l'insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT). Objectif: Évaluer la mise en œuvre d'une approche structurée fondée sur le risque dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) et les cliniques ambulatoires des néphrologues afin de déterminer l'aptitude des patients à recevoir des soins multidisciplinaires et de mesurer l'incidence des soins d'IRC reçus sur les résultats cliniques. Conception: Étude de cohorte populationnelle descriptive. Cadre: Alberta Kidney Care South. Sujets: Adultes fréquentant ou envisageant de fréquenter une clinique multidisciplinaire d'IRC entre le 1er avril 2017 et le 31 mars 2019. Mesures: Exposition­le parcours de soins d'IRC attribué par le néphrologue ­ prise en charge en clinique multidisciplinaire d'IRC; prise en charge par un néphrologue ou un médecin de premier recours. Principaux résultats­progression de l'IRC, définie comme l'amorce d'une thérapie de remplacement rénal (TRR). Résultats secondaires­décès, visites aux urgences et hospitalisations. Méthodologie: Nous avons couplé les données opérationnelles des cliniques (disponibles jusqu'au 31 mars 2019) aux données administratives de santé et aux données de laboratoire (disponibles jusqu'au 31 mars 2020). Des modèles de régression binomiale négative et des rapports des taux d'incidence non corrigés et entièrement corrigés ont servi aux comparaisons entre les groupes de patients, les parcours de soins et les environnements cliniques. Les risques relatifs non corrigés et entièrement corrigés de décès toutes causes confondues ont été calculés à l'aide de modèles de survie de Cox. Résultats: Des 1 748 patients avec une KFRE calculée, 1 347 (77 %) sont restés ou ont été admis dans une clinique multidisciplinaire d'IRC, 310 (18 %) ont été pris en charge par un néphrologue seulement et 91 (5 %) ont été orientés pour une prise en charge par leur médecin de premier recours. Le risque d'insuffisance rénale terminale était beaucoup plus élevé chez les patients restés ou admis dans une clinique multidisciplinaire d'IRC (risque médian à 2 ans : 34,7 %) que chez ceux pris en charge par un néphrologue (3,6 %) et par un médecin de premier recours (0,8 %). Aucun patient pris en charge par un médecin de premier recours n'avait amorcé une TRR; 2 personnes (0,6 %) prises en charge par un néphrologue sans soins multidisciplinaires d'IRC avaient amorcé une TRR. Les taux de visites aux urgences, d'hospitalisations et de décès étaient plus faibles chez les patients pris en charge à l'extérieur des cliniques multidisciplinaires d'IRC comparativement à ceux pris en charge dans ces cliniques. Limites: La période de suivi n'était peut-être pas été assez longue pour déterminer les résultats. La variabilité des soins dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires pourrait également limiter la généralisation des résultats. Conclusion: Nos résultats suggèrent qu'une partie des patients pourrait être dirigée vers des soins nécessitant moins de ressources sans hausser le risque d'événements indésirables.

Alignment Among Patient, Caregiver, and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Hemodialysis Vascular Access Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Updates to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access emphasize the "right access, in the right patient, at the right time, for the right reasons." Although this implies a collaborative approach, little is known about how patients, their caregivers, and health care providers engage in vascular access (VA) decision-making. Objective: To explore how the perspectives of patients receiving hemodialysis, their caregivers, and hemodialysis care team align and diverge in relation to VA selection. Design: Qualitative descriptive study. Setting: Five outpatient hemodialysis centers in Calgary, Alberta. Participants: Our purposive sample included 19 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis, 2 caregivers, and 21 health care providers (7 hemodialysis nurses, 6 VA nurses, and 8 nephrologists). Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with consenting participants. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, we coded transcripts in duplicate and characterized themes addressing our research objective. Results: While participants across roles shared some perspectives related to VA decision-making, we identified areas where views diverged. Areas of alignment included (1) optimizing patient preparedness-acknowledging decisional readiness and timing, and (2) value placed on trusting relationships with the kidney care team-respecting decisional autonomy with guidance. Perspectives diverged in the following aspects: (1) differing VA priorities and preferences-patients' emphasis on minimizing disruptions to normalcy contrasted with providers' preferences for fistulas and optimizing biomedical parameters of dialysis; (2) influence of personal and peer experience-patients preferred pragmatic, experiential knowledge, whereas providers emphasized informational credibility; and (3) endpoints for VA review-reassessment of VA decisions was prompted by access dissatisfaction for patients and a medical imperative to achieve a functioning access for health care providers. Limitations: Participation was limited to individuals comfortable communicating in English and from urban, in-center hemodialysis units. Few informal caregivers of people receiving hemodialysis and younger patients participated in this study. Conclusions: Although patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers share perspectives on important aspects of VA decisions, conflicting priorities and preferences may impact the decisional outcome. Findings highlight opportunities to bridge knowledge and readiness gaps and integrate shared decision-making in the VA selection process.

Contexte: Les mises à jour des lignes directrices de pratiques cliniques en matière d'accès vasculaire de la KDOQI (Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) insistent sur la création « du bon accès, à la bonne personne, au bon moment et pour les bonnes raisons ¼. Ces recommandations sous-entendent une approche collaborative, mais la façon dont les patients, leurs soignants et les prestataires de soins de santé participent à la prise de décision sur l'accès vasculaire (AV) demeure mal connue. Objectif: Explorer les accords et les divergences dans les points de vue des patients sous hémodialyse, leurs soignants et leur équipe de soins relativement à la sélection de l'AV. Conception: Étude qualitative et descriptive. Cadre: Cinq centres d'hémodialyse ambulatoire à Calgary (Alberta). Sujets: Notre échantillon choisi à dessein était composé de 19 patients sous hémodialyse d'entretien, 2 soignants et 21 prestataires de soins de santé (7 infirmières en hémodialyse, 6 infirmières en AV et 8 néphrologues). Méthodologie: Nous avons mené des entrevues semi-structurées auprès des participants consentants. Une approche d'analyse thématique inductive a été employée pour coder les transcriptions en double et caractériser les thèmes répondant à l'objectif de recherche. Résultats: Certains points de vue sur la prise de décision en matière d'AV étaient partagés par tous les participants, mais nous avons identifié quelques domaines de divergence. Les participants s'entendaient sur : 1) l'optimisation de la préparation des patients ­ reconnaître l'état de préparation et le moment de prendre la décision; et 2) la valeur accordée aux relations de confiance avec l'équipe de soins rénaux ­ respecter l'autonomie décisionnelle après conseils. Les points de vue divergeaient sur : 1) les priorités et préférences à l'égard de l'AV ­ l'accent mis par les patients sur la minimisation des perturbations de la vie courante contrastait avec les préférences des prestataires de soins pour les fistules et l'optimisation des paramètres biomédicaux de la dialyse; 2) l'influence de l'expérience personnelle et des pairs ­ les patients préféraient des connaissances pragmatiques et expérientielles, tandis que les prestataires de soins mettaient l'accent sur la crédibilité de l'information; et 3) les critères d'évaluation de l'AV ­ la réévaluation du choix de l'AV est motivée par l'insatisfaction des patients à l'égard de l'accès et, du côté des prestataires de soins, par l'impératif médical de parvenir à un accès fonctionnel. Limites: Seules les personnes fréquentant une unité d'hémodialyse en centre urbain et à l'aise de communiquer en anglais ont pu participer. Les participants comptaient peu de patients plus jeunes et de soignants informels de personnes sous hémodialyse. Conclusion: Bien que les patients, les soignants et les prestataires de soins de santé s'entendent sur certains aspects importants de la décision concernant l'AV, celle-ci pourrait être influencée par des priorités et préférences contradictoires. Nos résultats mettent en évidence des occasions d'intégrer la prise de décision partagée dans le processus de sélection d'un AV et de combler les lacunes dans les connaissances et la préparation des patients.

Follow-up Care of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Cohort Study.

Rationale & Objective: To evaluate follow-up care of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with AKI in Alberta, Canada from 2005 to 2018, who survived to discharge without kidney replacement therapy or estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Exposure: AKI (defined as ≥50% or ≥0.3 mg/dL serum creatinine increase). Outcomes: The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of an outpatient serum creatinine and urine protein measurement at 3 months postdischarge. Secondary outcomes included an outpatient serum creatinine or urine protein measurement or a nephrologist visit at 3 months postdischarge. Analytical Approach: Patients were followed from hospital discharge until the first of each outcome of interest, death, emigration from the province, kidney replacement therapy (maintenance dialysis or kidney transplantation), or end of study period (March 2019). We used non-parametric methods (Aalen-Johansen) to estimate the cumulative incidence functions of outcomes accounting for competing events (death and kidney replacement therapy). Results: There were 29,732 critically ill adult patients with AKI. The median age was 68 years (IQR, 57-77), 39% were female, and the median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 72 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 53-90). The cumulative incidence of having an outpatient creatinine and urine protein measurement at 3 months postdischarge was 25% (95% CI, 25-26). At 3 months postdischarge, 64% (95% CI, 64-65) had an outpatient creatinine measurement, 28% (95% CI, 27-28) had a urine protein measurement, and 5% (95% CI, 4-5) had a nephrologist visit. Limitations: We lacked granular data, such as urine output. Conclusions: Many critically ill patients with AKI do not receive the recommended follow-up care. Our findings highlight a gap in the transition of care for survivors of critical illness and AKI.

Home Dialysis in North America: The Current State.

There is widespread interest in expanding the uptake of home dialysis in North America. Although kidney transplantation should be the preferred option in eligible patients, home hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) offer cost-effective options for KRT. In this review, the motivation for promoting home dialysis is presented, and the literature supporting it is critically reviewed. Randomized comparisons of home HD and PD with in-center HD have been challenging to conduct and provide only limited information. Nonrandomized studies are heterogeneous in their design and have often yielded conflicting results. They are prone to bias, and this must be carefully considered when evaluating this literature. Home modalities seem to have equivalent clinical outcomes and quality of life when compared with in-center HD. However, the cost of providing home therapies, particularly PD, is lower than conventional, in-center HD. Measures of home dialysis utilization, the philosophy behind their measurement, and important factors to consider when interpreting them are discussed. The importance of understanding measures of home dialysis utilization in the context of rates of kidney failure, the proportion of individuals who opt for conservative care, and rates of kidney transplantation is highlighted, and a framework for proposing targets is presented, using PD as an example.

Progression of Kidney Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients With a Failing Graft: A Matched Cohort Study.

Background: Few studies have assessed outcomes in transplant recipients with failing grafts as most studies have focused on outcomes after graft loss. Objective: To determine whether renal function declines faster in kidney transplant recipients with a failing graft than in people with chronic kidney disease of their native kidneys. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Alberta, Canada (2002-2019). Patients: We identified kidney transplant recipients with a failing graft (2 estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] measurements 15-30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ≥90 days apart). Measurements: We compared the change in eGFR over time (eGFR with 95% confidence limits, LCLeGFRUCL) and the competing risks of kidney failure and death (cause-specific hazard ratios [HRs], LCLHRUCL). Methods: Recipients (n = 575) were compared with propensity-score-matched, nontransplant controls (n = 575) with a similar degree of kidney dysfunction. Results: The median potential follow-up time was 7.8 years (interquartile range, 3.6-12.1). The hazards for kidney failure (HR1.101.331.60) and death (HR1.211.592.07) were significantly higher for recipients, while the eGFR decline over time was similar (recipients vs controls: -2.60-2.27-1.94 vs -2.52-2.21-1.90 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year). The rate of eGFR decline was associated with kidney failure but not death. Limitations: This was a retrospective, observational study, and there is a risk of bias due to residual confounding. Conclusions: Although eGFR declines at a similar rate in transplant recipients as in nontransplant controls, recipients have a higher risk of kidney failure and death. Studies are needed to identify preventive measures to improve outcomes in transplant recipients with a failing graft.

Contexte: Peu d'études ont évalué les résultats chez les patients transplantés dont le greffon est défaillant; la majorité des études s'étant plutôt concentrées sur les résultats après la perte du greffon. Objectif: Vérifier si la fonction rénale décline plus rapidement chez les patients transplantés dont le greffon est défaillant que chez les personnes souffrant d'une insuffisance chronique sur reins natifs. Conception: Étude de cohorte rétrospective. Cadre: Alberta, Canada (2002 à 2019). Sujets: Nous avons identifié des patients transplantés dont le greffon est défaillant (défini par deux mesures du débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé [DFGe] de 15-30 ml/min/1,73 m2 à au moins 90 jours d'intervalle). Mesures: Nous avons comparé l'évolution du DFGe dans le temps (DFGe avec intervalles de confiance [IC] à 95 % inférieur et supérieur: ICIDFGeICS) et les rapports de risque d'insuffisance rénale et de décès (intervalles de rapport de risque (RR) lié à la cause: ICIRRICS). Méthodologie: Les transplantés dont le greffon est défaillant (n=575) ont été comparés à des témoins non transplantés (n=575) appariés selon le score de propension et présentant un niveau similaire de dysfonctionnement rénal. Résultats: Le temps médian de suivi potentiel était de 7,8 ans (ÉIQ: 3,6 à 12,1). Les risques d'insuffisance rénale (RR: 1,101,331,60) et de décès (RR: 1,211,592,07) étaient significativement plus élevés chez les transplantés dont le greffon est défaillant, mais le déclin du DFGe au fil du temps était similaire dans les deux groupes (receveurs: -2,60-2,27-1,94 ml/min/1,73 m2 par an; témoins: -2,52-2,21-1,90 ml/min/1,73 m2 par an). Le taux de déclin du DFGe a été associé à une insuffisance rénale terminale, mais pas au décès. Limites: Il s'agit d'une étude observationnelle rétrospective et il existe un risque de biais dû à des facteurs de confusion résiduels. Conclusion: Bien que le DFGe décline à un rythme similaire chez les transplantés dont le greffon est défaillant et les témoins non transplantés, le risque d'insuffisance rénale terminale et de décès est plus élevé pour les transplantés. D'autres études sont nécessaires pour identifier les mesures préventives qui pourraient améliorer les résultats des patients transplantés dont le greffon est défaillant.

Long-Term Outcomes for Living Kidney Donors With Early Guideline-Concordant Follow-up Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Current guidelines recommend that living kidney donors receive lifelong annual follow-up care to monitor kidney health. In the United States, the reporting of complete clinical and laboratory data for kidney donors has been mandated for the first 2 years post-donation; however, the long-term impact of early guideline-concordant care remains unclear. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare long-term post-donation follow-up care and clinical outcomes of living kidney donors with and without early guideline-concordant follow-up care. Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. Setting: Linked health care databases were used to identify kidney donors in Alberta, Canada. Patients: Four hundred sixty living kidney donors who underwent nephrectomy between 2002 and 2013. Measurements: The primary outcome was continued annual follow-up at 5 and 10 years (adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, LCLaORUCL). Secondary outcomes included mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time and rates of all-cause hospitalization. Methods: We compared long-term follow-up and clinical outcomes for donors with and without early guideline-concordant care, defined as annual physician visit and serum creatinine and albuminuria measurement for the first 2 years post-donation. Results: Of the 460 donors included in this study, 187 (41%) had clinical and laboratory evidence of guideline-concordant follow-up care throughout the first 2 years post-donation. The odds of receiving annual follow-up for donors without early guideline-concordant care were 76% lower at 5 years (aOR 0.180.240.32) and 68% lower at 10 years (aOR 0.230.320.46) compared with donors with early care. The odds of continuing follow-up remained stable over time for both groups. Early guideline-concordant follow-up care did not appear to substantially influence eGFR or hospitalization rates over the longer term. Limitations: We were unable to confirm whether the lack of physician visits or laboratory data in certain donors was due to physician or patient decisions. Conclusions: Although policies directed toward improving early donor follow-up may encourage continued follow-up, additional strategies may be necessary to mitigate long-term donor risks.

Contexte: Les lignes directrices actuelles recommandent que les donneurs de rein vivants soient suivis annuellement, et ce, à vie, afin de surveiller leur santé rénale. Aux États-Unis, la déclaration des données cliniques et des données de laboratoire complètes pour les donneurs de rein est exigée pour les deux premières années suivant le don. On ignore cependant les répercussions à long terme pour ceux qui reçoivent des soins précoces conformes aux lignes directrices. Objectif: Le principal objectif de cette étude était de comparer les soins de suivi post-don à long terme et les résultats cliniques des donneurs de rein vivants, selon qu'ils avaient reçu ou non des soins de suivi précoces conformes aux recommandations. Type d'étude: Étude de cohorte rétrospective basée sur une population. Cadre: Les banques de données couplées du système de santé ont été utilisées pour identifier les donneurs de rein de l'Alberta (Canada). Sujets: L'étude porte sur 460 donneurs de rein vivants ayant subi leur néphrectomie entre 2002 et 2013. Mesures: Le principal critère d'évaluation était un suivi annuel continu à 5 et à 10 ans post-don (rapport de cotes corrigé avec intervalle de confiance de 95 % [LICRRcLSC]). Les résultats secondaires comprenaient la variation moyenne du débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) au fil du temps et les taux d'hospitalisation toutes causes confondues. Méthodologie: Nous avons comparé le suivi à long terme et les résultats cliniques de donneurs qui avaient reçu ou non des soins précoces conformes aux directives, définis par une visite annuelle chez le médecin et des mesures de la créatinine sérique et de l'albuminurie pour les deux premières années post-don. Résultats: Des 460 donneurs inclus à l'étude, 187 (41 %) disposaient de preuves de suivi conformes aux directives, soit de données cliniques et de laboratoire, pour les deux premières années post-don. Les chances d'avoir un suivi annuel pour les donneurs qui n'avaient pas reçu de soins précoces conformes aux directives étaient de 76 % inférieures à 5 ans (RRc: 0,180,240,32) et de 68 % inférieures à 10 ans (RRc: 0,230,320,46) par rapport aux donneurs qui en avaient reçu. Les chances de poursuivre le suivi sont demeurées stables au fil du temps pour les deux groupes. Le fait d'avoir reçu des soins de suivi précoces conformes aux recommandations ne semble pas avoir eu d'incidence importante sur les mesures de DFGe ou les taux d'hospitalisation à long terme. Limites: Nous n'avons pas été en mesure de confirmer si l'absence de visites chez le médecin ou le manque de données de laboratoire chez certains donneurs était dû à des décisions du médecin ou du patient. Conclusion: Bien que les politiques visant à améliorer le suivi précoce des donneurs d'organes puissent encourager la poursuite du suivi, des stratégies supplémentaires pourraient être nécessaires pour atténuer les risques à long terme pour ces personnes.

Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in Vascular Access Selection: A Qualitative Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Collaborative approaches to vascular access selection are being increasingly encouraged to elicit patients' preferences and priorities where no unequivocally superior choice exists. We explored how patients, their caregivers, and clinicians integrate principles of shared decision making when engaging in vascular access discussions. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative description. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, their caregivers, and clinicians from outpatient hemodialysis programs in Alberta, Canada. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We used a thematic analysis approach to inductively code transcripts and generate themes to capture key concepts related to vascular access shared decision making across participant roles. RESULTS: 42 individuals (19 patients, 2 caregivers, 21 clinicians) participated in this study. Participants identified how access-related decisions follow a series of major decisions about kidney replacement therapy and care goals that influence vascular access preferences and choice. Vascular access shared decision making was strengthened through integration of vascular access selection with dialysis-related decisions and timely, tailored, and balanced exchange of information between patients and their care team. Participants described how opportunities to revisit the vascular access decision before and after dialysis initiation helped prepare patients for their access and encouraged ongoing alignment between patients' care priorities and treatment plans. Where shared decision making was undermined, hemodialysis via a catheter ensued as the most readily available vascular access option. LIMITATIONS: Our study was limited to patients and clinicians from hemodialysis care settings and included few caregiver participants. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that earlier, or upstream, decisions about kidney replacement therapies influence how and when vascular access decisions are made. Repeated vascular access discussions that are integrated with other higher-level decisions are needed to promote vascular access shared decision making and preparedness.

A Qualitative Content Analysis of Comments on Press Articles on Deemed Consent for Organ Donation in Canada.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2019, two Canadian provinces became the first jurisdictions in North America to pass deemed consent legislation to increase deceased organ donation and transplantation rates. We sought to explore the perspectives of the deemed consent legislation for organ donation in Canada from the viewpoint of individuals commenting on press articles. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this qualitative descriptive study, we extracted public comments regarding deemed consent from online articles published by four major Canadian news outlets between January 2019 and July 2020. A total of 4357 comments were extracted from 35 eligible news articles. Comments were independently analyzed by two research team members using a conventional content analysis approach. RESULTS: Commenters' perceptions of the deemed consent legislation for organ donation in Canada predominantly fit within three organizational groups: perceived positive implications of the bills, perceived negative implications of the bills, and key considerations. Three themes emerged within each group that summarized perspectives of the proposed legislation. Themes regarding the perceived positive implications of the bills included majority rules, societal effect, and prioritizing donation. Themes regarding the perceived negative implications of the bills were a right to choose, the potential for abuse and errors, and a possible slippery slope. Improving government transparency and communication, clarifying questions and addressing concerns, and providing evidence for the bills were identified as key considerations. CONCLUSIONS: If deemed consent legislation is meant to increase organ donation and transplantation, addressing public concerns will be important to ensure successful implementation.

Calculated versus measured albumin-creatinine ratio to predict kidney failure and death in people with chronic kidney disease.

Albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), the preferred method to quantify proteinuria, can be calculated from urine dipstick protein or protein-to-creatinine ratio (PCR). The performance of calculated vs. measured ACR in predicting kidney failure and death without kidney failure in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. Here, we used population-based data from Alberta, Canada, to identify adults with incident moderate-severe CKD (sustained for more than 90 days) from 2008-04-01 to 2017-03-31, who had same-day measures of ACR and urine dipstick (ACR-dipstick cohort) or PCR (ACR-PCR cohort) in the two years before cohort entry. We followed participants until 2019-03-31 and trained competing risk models of kidney failure and death without kidney failure including age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and either measured or calculated ACR. Model performance was tested in cohorts created using the same algorithm in Manitoba, Canada. The ACR-dipstick and ACR-PCR cohorts included 18,731 and 4,542 people (training cohorts) and 821 and 1,831 people (testing cohorts), respectively. In internal and external testing, there was closer agreement between predictions based on measured vs. PCR-calculated ACR than between those based on measured vs. dipstick-calculated ACR. The dipstick-calculated ACR had higher Brier scores than measured ACR from year three for both outcomes, indicating worsening calibration. Models including measured or calculated ACR had similar discrimination: year one-to-five area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 83-89% for kidney failure and 69-75% for mortality. Thus, if confirmed in different ethnic groups, calculated ACR can be used for risk predictions when the measured ACR is not available. PCR-calculated ACR may have superior performance to dipstick-calculated ACR.