Identifying hospital-acquired infections using retrospective record review from the Irish National Adverse Events Study (INAES) and European point prevalence survey case definitions.

BACKGROUND: Point prevalence surveys (PPSs) collect data on hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) at one point in time but do not provide information on incidence over the entire admission or impact on patients or healthcare resources. Retrospective record review examines the entire admission to determine adverse event prevalence, incidence, preventability, physical impairment and additional length of stay. AIM: To establish whether European HAI surveillance definitions can be applied to the Irish National Adverse Events Study (INAES) retrospective record review data to determine HAI burden. METHODS: In the INAES, 1574 admissions were reviewed using a two-stage methodology and 247 adverse events were found. These were examined against European HAI case definitions to determine whether the event was an HAI. Results were compared with the 2011/12 European PPS data for Ireland. FINDINGS: The prevalence of HAI adverse events in INAES was 4.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-6.1%) with an incidence of 3.8 (95% CI 2.5-5.2) HAI adverse events per 100 admissions. The PPS HAI prevalence for Ireland was 5.2%. HAI types and micro-organisms were similar in INAES and the PPS. Approximately three-quarters of INAES HAI adverse events were preventable, 7% caused permanent impairment and 7% contributed to death. A mean of 10 additional bed days were attributed to HAI adverse events, equivalent to €9400 per event. CONCLUSION: Retrospective record review is an accurate source of information on HAI incidence, preventability and impact that complements PPS prevalence rates. HAI adverse events result in higher costs to the healthcare system than other adverse events.

Adverse events in healthcare: learning from mistakes.

Large national reviews of patient charts estimate that approximately 10% of hospital admissions are associated with an adverse event (defined as an injury resulting in prolonged hospitalization, disability or death, caused by healthcare management). Apart from having a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality, adverse events also result in increased healthcare costs due to longer hospital stays. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of adverse events are preventable. Through identifying the nature and rate of adverse events, initiatives to improve care can be developed. A variety of methods exist to gather adverse event data both retrospectively and prospectively but these do not necessarily capture the same events and there is variability in the definition of an adverse event. For example, hospital incident reporting collects only a very small fraction of the adverse events found in retrospective chart reviews. Until there are systematic methods to identify adverse events, progress in patient safety cannot be reliably measured. This review aims to discuss the need for a safety culture that can learn from adverse events, describe ways to measure adverse events, and comment on why current adverse event monitoring is unable to demonstrate trends in patient safety.