Impact of prior cancer history on survival in brain malignancy: A propensity score-adjusted, population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with a Prior Cancer History (PCH) are often excluded from clinical trials. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that prior cancer history does not present adverse outcomes on cancer patients. The evidence on the survival of brain cancer patients in this regard remains widely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to estimate the prevalence and impact of prior cancer on survival of patients diagnosed with brain cancer. Data of patients who were diagnosed with brain cancer as their first or second primary malignancy between 2000 and 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to ensure comparable baseline characteristics among the patients. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, as well as multivariate Cox proportional hazard and multivariate competing risk models. RESULTS: Out of 42 726 patients, 1189 (2.78%) had PCH. Genitourinary (40.4%), Breast (13.6%), Hematologic and Lymphatic (11.4%), and Gastrointestinal malignancies (11.3%) were the most common types of prior cancer. PCH served as a significant risk factor for Overall Survival (OS) (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR] 1.26; 95% CI [1.15-1.39]; p < .001) but did not have a statistically significant impact on Brain Cancer-Specific Survival (BCSS) (AHR 0.97; 95% CI [0.88-1.07]; p = .54). Glioblastoma exhibited the most substantial and statistically significant impact on survival as compared to other histological types. Of all the organs systems, only prior Gastrointestinal and Hematologic and Lymphatic malignancies had a statistically significant impact on OS of patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that PCH does not exert a substantial impact on the survival of brain cancer patients, except in cases involving gastrointestinal or hematologic and lymphatic PCH, or when the brain cancer is glioblastoma.

Left bundle branch pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that achieves more physiologic native ventricular activation than biventricular pacing (BiVP). AIM: To explore the validity of electromechanical resynchronization, clinical and echocardiographic response of LBBP-CRT. METHODS: Systematic review and Meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines as mentioned in detail in the methodology section. RESULTS: In our analysis, the success rate of LBBP-CRT was determined to be 91.1%. LBBP-CRT significantly shortened QRS duration, with significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter in comparison with BiVP-CRT. CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in New York Heart Association class and B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also observed in the LBBP-CRT group vs BiVP-CRT group. Lastly, the LBBP-CRT cohort had a reduced pacing threshold at follow-up as compared to BiVP-CRT.

Factors associated with safe and successful postoperative day 1 discharge after lung operations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A shorter length of stay (LOS) is associated with fewer hospital-acquired adverse conditions and decreased utilization of hospital resources. While modern perioperative care protocols have enabled some ambitious surgical teams to achieve discharge as early as within postoperative day 1 (POD1), most other teams remain cautious about such an approach due to the perceived risk of missing postoperative complications and increased readmission rates. We aimed to identify factors that would help guide surgical teams aiming for safe and successful POD1 discharge after lung resection. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL databases for articles comparing perioperative characteristics in patients discharged within POD1 (DWPOD1) and after POD1 (DAPOD1) following lung resection. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We included eight retrospective cohort studies with a total of 216,887 patients, of which 22,250 (10.3%) patients were DWPOD1. Our meta-analysis showed that younger patients, those without cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities, and those with better preoperative pulmonary function are more likely to qualify for DWPOD1. Certain operative factors, such as a minimally invasive approach, shorter operations, and sublobar resections, also favor DWPOD1. DWPOD1 appears to be safe, with comparable 30-day mortality and readmission rates, and significantly less postoperative morbidity than DAPOD1. CONCLUSIONS: In select patients with a favorable preoperative profile, DWPOD1 after lung resection can be achieved successfully and without increased risk of adverse outcomes such as postoperative morbidity, mortality, or readmissions.

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Erythropoietin Therapy for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin (EPO) is a proposed drug for the treatment of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Multiple studies have linked its use, either as a monotherapy or in conjunction with therapeutic hypothermia (TH), with improved neonatal outcomes including death and neurodisability. However, there is also evidence in the literature that raises concerns about its efficacy and safety for the treatment of neonatal encephalopathy (NE). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase for both observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of EPO in treating NE. Only studies in which at least 300 U/kg of EPO was used and reported any one of the following outcomes: death, death or neurodisability, and cerebral palsy, were included. RESULTS: Seven studies with 903 infants with the diagnosis of NE were included in our meta-analysis. EPO did not reduce the risk of death or neurodisability (risk ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43 to 1.09]) (P = 0.11). Similarly, the risk of cerebral palsy was not reduced by the administration of EPO (risk ratio 0.68 [95% CI: 0.33 to 1.40]) (P = 0.30). The risk of death was also not reduced at any dose of EPO regardless of the use of TH. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our meta-analysis do not support the use of EPO for the treatment of neonatal encephalopathy. However, future large-scale RCTs are needed to strengthen these findings.

Incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data.

Insomnia is a prevalent sleeping disorder associated with increasing cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity. However, data incorporating recent clinical studies evaluating these outcomes is scarce. Hence, we aimed to investigate the association of insomnia with CV mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and incidence of CV disease by conducting the first-ever meta-analysis of real-world data evaluating these CV outcomes. MEDLINE and Scopus databases were queried till August 2022 to identify studies comparing prespecified outcomes in patients with and without insomnia. The primary outcomes were CV mortality and myocardial infarction, while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, and CV-disease incidence. All data were pooled using an inverse-variance weighted random-effects model, and results were reported as relative risks (RRs) and p-values. 21 studies were analyzed. Risks for CV mortality and MI were significantly higher in patients with insomnia (RR 1.53, p<0.01, and RR 1.48, p = 0.03, respectively). The risk for all-cause mortality and CV disease incidence was also significantly higher in insomnia patients (RR 1.14, p = 0.03, and RR 1.31, p<0.01, respectively). Individuals with insomnia experience a higher risk of long-term mortality, MI, and incidence of CV disease.