Increased time exposure to tenofovir is associated with a greater decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate in HIV patients with kidney function of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Tenofovir (TDF), atazanovir (ATAZ) and indinavir (IND) have been reported as possible risk factors for incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) in HIV-infected patients. We investigated the relationship between the duration of antiretroviral exposure and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) evolution in CKD patients. In a cohort of 1,750 HIV-infected patients, we identified 121 CKD patients with a mean follow-up of 44 ± 35 months. The relationship between mean eGFR at baseline, eGFR slope and time exposure to antiretroviral treatment as well as confounding factors were investigated using a joint modeling procedure. Seventy (58%), 30 (25%) and 33 patients (27%), with a mean age of 50.3 ± 11.7 years, mean eGFR at baseline of 53.0 ± 0.8 (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and eGFR slope of 0.46 ± 0.07 ml/min/1.73 m(2)/year, were exposed to TDF, ATAZ and IND, respectively. In univariate analysis, hepatitis C virus infection, decreased nadir of log CD4 count, high blood pressure at baseline, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment and greater time exposure to TDF during follow-up were associated with a higher slope, whereas greater time exposure to IND was associated with a lower slope. In multivariate analysis, higher TDF time exposure was still significantly associated with eGFR decline, with a dose-effect relationship (slope ± standard error of the mean: 1.1 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1, -0.07 ± 0.08 and -0.87 ± 0.06 ml/min/1.73 m(2)/year for no time exposure, <34, 34-67 and ≥67%, respectively; trend test: p < 0.001), whereas the IND time exposure association was abolished. In HIV patients with CKD, a greater TDF time exposure was independently associated, in a graded manner, with a greater eGFR decline.

High prevalence of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus infection in different risk groups of HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA and anti-E2 antibodies in different risk groups of HIV-infected patients compared to that in healthy blood donors, and to study the effects of possible interactions between HIV and GBV-C/HGV on the carrier state and hepatic changes. METHODS: Sera from 100 consecutive unselected HIV-infected outpatients and from 100 healthy blood donors were screened for GBV-C/HGV viremia and anti-E2 antibodies. Anti-E2 antibodies were detected using an immunoassay developed by Boehringer Mannheim according to the manufacturer's instructions. GBV-C/HGV RNA was extracted from sera and reverse transcribed. The resulting cDNA was amplified with a PCR developed in the laboratory with primers derived from the 5prime prime or minute noncoding region of the viral genome and detected with a specific capture probe. This procedure was validated by a French multicenter quality control group. RESULTS: Thirty-one of the 100 HIV-infected patients and 8% of the healthy blood donors displayed anti-E2 antibodies. Four HIV-infected patients and one healthy blood donor were found to be GBV-C/HGV viremic. When analyzed by risk factor for the acquisition of HIV, no differences in the prevalence of anti-E2 antibodies were found between intravenous drug users and homosexual and heterosexual patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of GBV-C/HGV infection in the HIV-infected population, irrespective of the risk group factor for HIV infection, suggesting that the sexual route is as effective as the parenteral route for the acquisition of GBV-C/HGV. No biological alteration could be attributed to GBV-C/HGV, even in the viremic patients. HIV-infected patients were able to clear GBV-C/HGV viremia and to mount a humoral immune response.

Efficacy and safety of Buxus sempervirens L. preparations (SPV(30)) in HIV-infected asymptomatic patients: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two doses of SPV(30) in HIV asymptomatic patients. The study was designed as a randomized double-blind multicentre trial of two doses of SPV(30) (990 mg/d and 1980 mg/d) versus placebo. 145 previously untreated subjects with asymptomatic HIV infection (CDC group IV) and CD4 cell counts between 250 and 500 × 10(6)/1 were recruited. There was a statistically significant difference in therapeutic failures between groups in favor of SPV(30) 990 mg including decreases of CD4 cell count < 200 × 10(6)/1 and/or number of clinical aggravations (progression to AIDS or AIDS related complex). The treatment groups differed statistically in the rate of disease progression also in favor of SPV(30) 990 mg/d. Fewer patients receiving SPV(30) 990 mg/d had at the end an increase of viral load greater than 0.5 log (P = 0.029). No severe side-effects were reported in the 3 groups. From these results we conclude that SPV(30) 990 mg/d has beneficial effects in HIV asymptomatic patients and appears to delay the progression of HIV disease.