RESUMEN
Objective Accurate preoperative characterization of adnexal masses is essential for optimal patient management. Two-dimensional ultrasonography (USG) based "International Ovarian Tumuor Analysis Simple Rules (IOTA-SR)" are used primarily in clinical practice. Three-dimensional (3D) USG is an emerging modality. The authors conducted this study to compare the performance of 3D USG with IOTA-SR for preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses. Methods This prospective observational study recruited 84 patients with adnexal masses undergoing surgical management. IOTA-SR and 3D USG with power Doppler examination were applied to characterize the masses and correlated with histopathology. Logistic regression analysis defined individual 2D and 3D USG parameters' significance in predicting malignancy. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for significant variables, and area under the curves (AUCs) with cut-off values were calculated using the Youden index. Results Out of the 84 adnexal masses, 41 were benign and 43 were malignant. IOTA-SR were conclusive in 88.1% (74/84) cases, with a sensitivity of 83.78% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.99-93.81%) and specificity of 89.19% (95% CI: 74.58-96.97%). The sensitivity and specificity of 3D USG with power Doppler were 84% and 88%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92-0.99). Ten cases were inconclusive by the IOTA-SR, and 3D USG could further correctly differentiate four of these cases. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of both techniques is comparable. With good diagnostic performance and easy applicability, IOTA-SR remain the standard of care. 3D USG, although a more objective assessment, requires further validation and standardization.
RESUMEN
Background: Predictors, pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy outcomes in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are poorly understood in our geographical region. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 58 women with PPCM diagnosed using criteria by the European Society of Cardiology during 2015 to 2019. The main outcome measures were predictors of left ventricular (LV) recovery. LV recovery was defined as return of LV ejection fraction to over 50%. Results: Nearly 80% of women had LV recovery during 6 months follow up. Univariate logistic regression revealed LV end diastolic diameter (adjusted odds ratio (OR); 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98; p = 0.02), LV end systolic diameter (OR; 0.89; 95% CI, 0.8-0.98; p = 0.02) and inotrope use (OR; 0.2, 95% CI, 0.05-0.7; p = 0.01) as predictors of LV recovery. Relapse was not seen in any of the nine women who had a subsequent pregnancy. Conclusion: LV recovery was higher than those reported in contemporary PPCM cohorts from other parts of the world.
RESUMEN
Pelvic reconstructive surgery with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been reported to have a superior anatomical cure rate compared with traditional repair methods. Mesh-related adverse events are increasing worldwide. We describe a case of excision of mesh erosion following vaginal hysterectomy. A 45yr old lady presented with 3 × 2â cm infected mesh erosion on the anterior vaginal wall following a vaginal hysterectomy a year earlier in a camp setting. Cystoscopy was normal. Under anesthesia, the mesh was dissected from the vagina and excised. The vaginal edges were freshened, and approximated Postoperative period was uneventful, and she was discharged home the next day. Surgical revision is indicated for large or multiple erosions. Mesh excision can be a challenging procedure with difficulty in gaining access and increased risk of surgical bleeding. A multidisciplinary approach in conjunction with a urologist will help optimise outcomes.