Treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) undergoing treatment. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were women with CSP undergoing treatment. The primary outcome was successful treatment for CSP, defined as no need for additional medical or surgical strategies. Secondary outcomes were the type of additional treatment (surgical or medical), need for blood transfusion, emergency laparotomy, hysterectomy, post-treatment complications.All these outcomes were explored in women undergoing single and compound treatments for CSP. Furthermore, we performed a separate sub-group analysis only including studies which reported on the outcomes of elective treatments. Random effects meta-analyses were used to analyze the data and results reported as pooled proportions or odd ratio (OR). RESULTS: 176 studies (13431 women with CSP undergoing treatment) were included.Successful treatment after primary intervention was achieved in 86.2% (95% CI 82.3-89.7) of women with CSP undergoing treatment with ultrasound guided suction curettage, 72.4% (95% CI 64.8-79.3) with systemic MTX, 81.6% (95% CI 72.3-89.3) with local MTX, 83.9% (95% CI 66.7-95.6) with interventional radiology, 90.42% (95% CI 82.9-96.0) with hysteroscopy, 96.1% (95% CI (92.3-98.6) with laparoscopy and 92.6 with high intensity focused ultrasound (95% CI 78.2-99.6). Post-treatments complications were reported in 3.5% (95% CI 1.7-6.0) of women treated with systemic MTX, 5.9% (95% CI 0.8-15.1) with local MTX or KCl, 1.2% (95% CI 0.1-3.5) with interventional radiology, 1.4% (95% CI 0.4-2.9) with hysteroscopy, 5.5% (95% CI 0.4-25.7) with high intensity focused ultrasound and in none of the cases treated with ultrasound guided suction curettage.When considering compound treatments, successful resolution of CSP was achieved in 91.9% (95% CI 88.0-95.10) of women treated with interventional radiology followed by curettage, 83.3% (95% CI 68.8-93.8) with systemic MTX and curettage, 79.4% (95% CI 56.3-95.2) with local MTX and curettage, 96.2% (95% CI 92.3-98.7) with curettage followed by single or double balloon insertion in the uterine cavity, 98.3% (95% CI 95.9-99.7) with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by curettage, 91.1% (95% CI 3.4-97.0) with interventional radiology followed by removal of CSP with hysteroscopy, 64.3% (95% CI 13.8-99.2) with interventional radiology and systemic MTX and in 95.5% (95% CI 92.9-97.5) with curettage and hysteroscopy.When considering studies reporting a comparison between different treatments, there was no difference between systemic vs local MTX in the primary outcome. Curettage was associated with a higher chance of achieving a successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A multitude of treatments for CSP have been reported in the published literature. All treatments described for CSP are apparently equally effective in treating this condition. The findings from this systematic review highlight the need for adopting a common definition and outcome reporting of CSP to better elucidate its natural history, estimate the magnitude of maternal complication after treatment and design appropriately powered RCT to elucidate the optimal treatment of CSP according to its ultrasound phenotype and gestational age at treatment, in terms of effective resolution of the condition and risk of post-intervention complications.

Gestational diabetes: A link between OGTT, maternal-fetal outcomes and maternal glucose tolerance after childbirth.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The relationship among distribution of pathological values at the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), metabolic risk factors and pregnancy outcomes in women with Gestational Diabetes (GDM), has not been clearly identified. We retrospectively compared metabolic and therapeutic parameters, maternal-fetal outcomes and post-partum OGTTs, with respect to the number and distribution of altered values of diagnostic OGTT in pregnancy. Secondly, we assessed whether insulin therapy predictive factors were identifiable. METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis included 602 pregnant women with GDM, followed in Diabetes and Pregnancy Unit of Perugia Hospital from diagnosis to childbirth. All women were diagnosed diabetic upon 75g OGTT, according IADPSG criteria. Women were divided into 3 groups, respect to distribution of diagnostic blood glucose (BG) values at OGTT: Group 1: only fasting BG (OGTT0h); Group 2: 1 and/or 2h (OGTT1-2h); Group 3: both fasting and 1 h and/or 2h (OGTT0+1-2h) BG. Pregnant women with fasting hyperglycemia at OGTT (Groups 1 and 3) had similar metabolic characteristics (weight, prevalence of obesity, gestational weight gain, HbA1c), a greater need for insulin therapy, and a higher risk of impaired glucose tolerance persistence after childbirth, as compared to Group 2. No significant differences were observed in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes (p > 0.05), except for a greater prevalence of caesarean sections in Group 3. CONCLUSION: The metabolic characteristics of GDM women are mirrored by OGTT values at diagnosis, but are not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Intensive management and a tailored treatment of GDM improve maternal-neonatal outcomes, regardless of diagnostic values distribution and pre-gestational metabolic characteristics.