RESUMEN
Background: The recent development of new antileukemic therapies (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhbitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, and B-cell lymyphoma-2 antagonists) improved the progression-free survival (PFS) compared with selected standard regimens in clinical trials for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Unfortunately, the relative efficacy of all possible therapeutic options remains unknown because there is no direct evidence for all possible comparisons. Objectives: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of novel agents, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Design: Systematic literature review with Bayesian NMA. Methods: An extensive systematic literature review of randomized clinical trials for relapsed/refractory CLL was performed. We searched for articles indexed in medical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library) and gray literature that could be further implemented into the Bayesian NMA. Results: The systematic search identified 15 randomized trials that formed networks comparing PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rates, and serious adverse events. Our study showed that all regimens containing novel agents significantly prolonged PFS compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy. Among targeted drugs, venetoclax (VEN) + rituximab (RTX) had comparable efficacy in terms of PFS to zanubrutinib (ZAN) [hazard ratio (95% credible interval), 1.10 (0.59-2.08)], acalabrutinib (ACA) [0.78 (0.47-1.30)], ibrutinib (IBR) monotherapy [0.72 (0.41-1.27)], and other IBR-based regimens. ZAN was superior to IBR monotherapy [0.65 (0.49-0.86)] but not to ACA [0.71 (0.49-1.02)]. There were no significant differences in OS in any of the above comparisons. Conclusion: All novel therapies have better efficacy than chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy regimens. Among novel agents, the relative efficacy of VEN + RTX was similar to all BTKi, while ZAN was superior to IBR and comparable to ACA. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022304330.
RESUMEN
This systematic literature review (CRD42023393903) and a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to assess the relative safety profile of first-line targeted therapies (acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, pirtobrutinib, ublituximab, umbralisib, venetoclax, zanubrutinib) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients with advanced age and/or comorbidities. The NMA revealed that zanubrutinib was the safest treatment option in terms of the overall safety profile (e.g., serious adverse events [AEs] grade 1-5), followed by venetoclax-obinutuzumab, which showed an advantage in terms of AEs grade 1-5. The use of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) monotherapy was more favourable in terms of the risk of haematological AEs, but chemoimmunotherapy showed advantages in terms of cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and infectious AEs. The risk of secondary cancers was similar between treatments. In conclusion, targeted therapies are associated with variable and clinically relevant AEs. The therapies appear to be safer when used as monotherapy rather than in combination with immunological agents in naïve CLL patients with advanced age and/or comorbidities.