RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Posttraumatic nightmares (PTNs) are common among service members with a history of combat or mission-related trauma and are associated with decreased well-being. Unfortunately, beyond establishing an association between mental health symptoms and PTNs, the existing literature fails to provide a more comprehensive understanding of factors associated with PTNs. The effectiveness of current recommended treatments is frequently debated, with the literature varying in levels of support. Treatment of PTN is complicated, given their association with a number of mental health difficulties including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression. The present study sought to better delineate the association of these difficulties with PTNs, in an effort to inform and improve treatments for the nation's service members. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilized de-identified data collected during standard procedures for an interdisciplinary intensive outpatient program for service members with a history of traumatic brain injury and/or psychological health conditions (N = 1,550). Study analyses were performed under a Walter Reed National Military Medical Center institutional review board-approved protocol. Three cross-sectional forward likelihood ratio logistic regressions predicting the presence of PTNs were conducted while controlling for the alpha-blocker prazosin, as it is recommended for the treatment of PTSD-associated nightmares. Separate models were created for posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), depression, and anxiety because of multicollinearity concerns. Additional variables considered for inclusion were psychological symptoms (e.g., suicide ideation, postconcussive symptoms), satisfaction with life, sleep (e.g., pain that disrupts sleep, early awakenings, sleepiness), demographics (e.g., sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, age), and military characteristics (e.g., rank, branch, special operator status, time in service). RESULTS: PTSS (odds ratio [OR]: 1.13), anxiety (OR: 1.19), and depression (OR: 1.19) were associated with increased odds of PTNs when controlling for prazosin. Each of the final models accounted for a significant amount of variance in the presence/absence of PTN. The included variables differed across models. The PTSS model included pain that disrupted sleep, postconcussive symptoms, special operator status, and early awakenings. The anxiety model included postconcussive symptoms, pain that disrupted sleep, special operator status, and prazosin use. The depression model included postconcussive symptoms, pain that disrupted sleep, special operator status, difficulty falling asleep within 30 min, and prazosin use. Although most variables were associated with an increased odds of PTNs, postconcussive symptoms in the PTSS model and special operator status in all 3 models were associated with decreased odds of PTNs. These findings are illustrated in Tables 2 to 4. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the association of PTSS, anxiety, and depression to PTNs, and, importantly, suggest that other factors may be equally or more important in understanding PTNs. Notably, increased odds of PTNs were observed among patients with pain that disrupts their sleep. The cross-sectional nature of the study allows examination of these co-occurring symptoms as they would present in the clinic, potentially informing assessment and treatment strategies; however, it precludes consideration of temporal relationships. Results highlight the importance of considering comorbid symptoms and relevant military characteristics to gain a more complete understanding of PTNs. Future research utilizing longitudinal methods are needed to inform the temporal/causal aspects of these relationships.
RESUMEN
Background: Symptom accommodation by family members (FMs) of individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) includes FMs' participation in patients' avoidance/safety behaviours and constraining self-expression to minimise conflict, potentially maintaining patients' symptoms. The Significant Others' Responses to Trauma Scale (SORTS) is the only existing measure of accommodation in PTSD but has not been rigorously psychometrically tested.Objective: We aimed to conduct further psychometric analyses to determine the factor structure and overall performance of the SORTS. Method: We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using a sample of N = 715 FMs (85.7% female, 62.1% White, 86.7% romantic partners of individuals with elevated PTSD symptoms).Results: After dropping cross-loading items, results indicated good fit for a higher-order model of accommodation with two factors: an anger-related accommodation factor encompassed items related largely to minimising conflict, and an anxiety-related accommodation factor encompassed items related primarily to changes to the FM's activities. Accommodation was positively related to PTSD severity and negatively related to relationship satisfaction, although the factors showed somewhat distinct associations. Item Response Theory analyses indicated that the scale provided good information and robust coverage of different accommodation levels.Conclusions: SORTS data should be analysed as both a single score as well as two factors to explore the factors' potential differential performance across treatment and relationship outcomes.
We examined the Significant Others' Responses to Trauma Scale (SORTS), a measure of symptom accommodation in PTSD, among a large sample of family members.As measured by the SORTS, accommodation in PTSD could be broken down into two aspects: anger-related accommodation and anxiety-related accommodation.Accommodation was positively related to PTSD severity and negatively related to relationship satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Psicometría , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Análisis Factorial , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Familia/psicología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Military personnel and veterans are at heightened risk for exposure to traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as well as intimate relationship problems associated with PTSD.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of CBCT and PE in improving intimate relationship functioning in active duty military personnel or veterans and their intimate partners; both conditions were hypothesized to significantly improve PTSD. Method: In this study, 32 military service members or veterans with PTSD and their intimate partners were randomized to receive either Cognitive-Behavioral Conjoint Therapy for PTSD (n = 15; CBCT; [Monson, C. M., & Fredman, S. J. (2012). Cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: Harnessing the healing power of relationships. Guilford]), a trauma-focused couple therapy, or Prolonged Exposure (n = 17; PE; [Foa, E. B., Hembree, E. A., Dancu, C. V., Peterson, A. L., Cigrang, J. A., & Riggs, D. S. (2008). Prolonged exposure treatment for combat-related stress disorders - provider's treatment manual [unpublished]. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania]), a front-line evidence-based individual treatment for PTSD.There were significant challenges with recruitment and a significant difference in dropout from treatment for the two therapies (65% for PE; 27% for CBCT). Treatment dropout was differentially related to pre-treatment relationship functioning; those with below average relationship functioning had higher dropout in PE compared with CBCT, whereas those with above average relationship functioning did not show differential dropout. In general, CBCT led to relational improvements, but this was not consistently found in PE. Clinician- and self-reported PTSD symptoms improved with both treatments.This study is the first to test a couple or family therapy against a well-established, front-line recommended treatment for PTSD, with expected superiority of CBCT over PE on relationship outcomes. Lessons learned in trial design, including considerations of equipoise, and the effects of differential dropout on trial analyses are discussed. This trial provides further support for the efficacy of CBCT in the treatment of PTSD and enhancement of intimate relationships.
Differential dropout from trial of couple versus individual therapy for PTSD.General pattern of improvements in relationship outcomes in couple therapy for PTSD.PTSD symptoms improved in the individual and couple therapy for PTSD.Lessons learned in trial design, including considerations of equipoise, and the effects of differential dropout by condition on trial analyses are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Personal Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , CogniciónRESUMEN
Since September 11, 2001, over 2.7 million United States service members have deployed to South-West Asia and the Middle East and have been exposed to environmental hazards and psychological trauma. Many of these service members have returned with medical and psychological illnesses, some of which have proved complex and resistant to treatment. One notable constellation of symptoms is post-deployment respiratory illness, which has become a focus of research and policy efforts. The present study sought to examine the impact of post-deployment psychological distress on respiratory symptom severity. Data were obtained from the Veterans Affairs Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry (AHOBPR) health surveillance database (N =107,403). Psychological factors were compared against common organic and environmental predictors of post-deployment respiratory distress. Psychological distress following deployment was a stronger predictor of 12-month shortness of breath severity than general respiratory pathology or level of exposure to environmental hazards, controlling for gender, age, race, and tobacco use. Additionally, psychological distress was a better predictor of shortness of breath severity than documented respiratory illnesses including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic bronchitis. Implications and directions for future research are discussed, as well as potential alterations to existing treatment and health surveillance paradigms.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Personal Militar , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Veteranos/psicología , Disnea/epidemiología , Asma/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Few service members with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) receive evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) in the military health system (MHS). Efforts to increase EBP implementation have focused on provider training but have not adequately addressed organizational barriers. Thus, although behavioral health providers are trained in EBPs, clinic-, facility-, and system-level barriers preclude widespread EBP implementation. Building on work examining barriers to EBP use for PTSD across eight military treatment facilities, we propose recommendations for increasing the implementation of EBPs for PTSD and improving the quality of behavioral health care in MHS outpatient behavioral health clinics. Increasing the use of EBPs for PTSD will require that their use is supported and prioritized through MHS policy. We recommend that psychotherapy appointments are scheduled at least once weekly, as clinically indicated, as this frequency of care is prerequisite for EBP delivery. We propose several recommendations designed to increase system capacity for weekly psychotherapy, including improved triaging of potential patients, incentivizing and supporting group psychotherapy, matching the modality (i.e., group vs. individual) and frequency of treatment to patients' needs, and using behavioral health technicians as clinician extenders. Additional recommendations include providing ongoing support for EBP implementation (e.g., protected time to participate in EBP consultation) and matching patients to providers based on patient's clinical needs and treatment preferences. The barriers to EBP implementation that these recommendations target are interrelated. Therefore, adopting multiple policy recommendations is likely necessary to yield a meaningful and sustained increase in the implementation of EBPs for PTSD in the MHS.
RESUMEN
Posttraumatic nightmares commonly occur after a traumatic experience. Despite significant deleterious effects on well-being and their role in posttraumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic nightmares remain understudied. The neuroanatomical structures of the amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and anterior cingulate cortex constitute the AMPHAC model (Levin and Nielsen, 2007), which is implicated in the neurophysiology of disturbing dreams of which posttraumatic nightmares is a part. However, this model has not been investigated using neuroimaging data. The present study sought to determine whether there are structural differences in the AMPHAC regions in relation to the occurrence of posttraumatic nightmares. Data were obtained from treatment-seeking male active duty service members (N = 351). Posttraumatic nightmares were not significantly related to gray matter volume, cortical surface area, or cortical thickness of any the AMPHAC regions when controlling for age and history of mild traumatic brain injury. Although the present analyses do not support an association between structural measures of AMPHAC regions and posttraumatic nightmares, we suggest that functional differences within and/or between these brain regions may be related to the occurrence of posttraumatic nightmares because functional and structural associations are distinct. Future research should examine whether functional differences may be associated with posttraumatic nightmares.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Masculino , Humanos , Sueños , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Prolonged exposure therapy is an effective treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder that is underutilized in health systems, including the military health system. Organizational barriers to prolonged exposure implementation have been hypothesized but not systematically examined. This multisite project sought to identify barriers to increasing the use of prolonged exposure across eight military treatment facilities and describe potential solutions to addressing these barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a larger project to increase the use of prolonged exposure therapy in the military health system, we conducted a needs assessment at eight military treatment facilities. The needs assessment included analysis of clinic administrative data and a series of stakeholder interviews with behavioral health clinic providers, leadership, and support staff. Key barriers were matched with potential solutions using a rubric developed for this project. Identified facilitators, barriers, and potential solutions were summarized in a collaboratively developed implementation plan for increasing prolonged exposure therapy tailored to each site. RESULTS: There was a greater than anticipated consistency in the barriers reported by the sites, despite variation in the size and type of facility. The identified barriers were grouped into four categories: time-related barriers, provider-related barriers, barriers related to patient education and matching patients to providers, and scheduling-related barriers. Potential solutions to each barrier are described. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the numerous organizational-level barriers to implementing evidence-based psychotherapy in the military health system and offer potential solutions that may be helpful in addressing the barriers.
RESUMEN
Deployed service members regularly undergo demanding and stressful experiences that can contribute to mental health difficulties; however, there is a scarcity of studies examining rates of mental health disorders in-theater. The current study examined case rates of mental health disorders among deployed U.S. Army Soldiers using diagnostic encounter data from the Theater Medical Data Store. Case rates were calculated across 12 categories of mental health disorders. While in theater, soldiers' highest rates were for stress reactions and adjustment disorders, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders. The lowest rates in theater were for psychosis, bipolar, somatic, and eating disorders. Notably, female soldiers had higher rates than their male counterparts for disorders in each of the 12 diagnostic categories. Results provide crucial information to aid in decision making about necessary interventions and provider competencies in deployed settings. Knowledge gained from these data may improve force readiness, help lessen disease burden, and inform military policy and prevention efforts.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Personal Militar , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Trastornos de AdaptaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Mental health disparities and differences have been identified amongst all age groups, including adolescents. However, there is a lack of research regarding adolescents within the Military Health System (MHS). The MHS is a universal health care system for military personnel and their dependents. Research has indicated that the MHS removes many of the barriers that contribute to health disparities. Additional investigations with this population would greatly contribute to our understanding of disparities and health services delivery without the barrier of access to care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed the diagnostic trends of anxiety, depression, and impulse control disorders and differences within a national sample of adolescents of active-duty military parents. The study utilized 2006 to 2014 data in the MHS Data Repository for adolescents ages 13-18. The study identified 183,409 adolescents with at least one diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to assess the differences and risks for anxiety, depression, and impulse control disorders in the identified sample. RESULTS: When compared to White Americans, minority patients had a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with an impulse control disorder (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43; confidence interval [CI] 1.39-1.48) and a decreased likelihood of being diagnosed with a depressive disorder (OR = 0.98; CI 0.95-1.00) or anxiety disorder (OR = 0.80; CI 0.78-0.83). Further analyses examining the subgroups of minorities revealed that, when compared to White Americans, African American adolescents have a much higher likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of an impulse control disorder (OR = 1.66; CI 1.61-1.72) and a lower likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of a depressive disorder (OR = 0.93; CI 0.90-0.96) and an anxiety disorder (OR = 0.75; CI 0.72-0.77). CONCLUSION: This study provides strong support for the existence of race-based differences in adolescent mental health diagnoses. Adolescents of military families are a special population with unique experiences and stressors and would benefit from future research focusing on qualitative investigations into additional factors mental health clinicians consider when making diagnoses, as well as further exploration into understanding how best to address this special population's mental health needs.
Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Personal Militar , Adolescente , Negro o Afroamericano , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Humanos , Personal Militar/psicología , Población BlancaRESUMEN
Barriers to mental healthcare services are reported among military service members. However, little is known about these barriers among the spouses of military personnel, who face unique stressors and may subsequently be at high-need for mental health services. Understanding barriers to care among this vulnerable population may help improve access to psychological services. The current study utilized data from the Millennium Cohort Family Study. Participants were referred by their military spouses or through targeted mailers. Participants completed self-report measures of mood, psychosocial functioning, and perceived barriers to mental healthcare via web- or paper-based surveys. A factor analysis was conducted to identify subscales of the barriers to mental healthcare measure, and logistic regressions were conducted adjusting for relevant sociodemographic variables, to determine psychosocial factors associated with likelihood of reporting barriers to mental healthcare. The sample comprised 9,666 military spouses (86% female; Mage: 27.73 ± 5.09; 29.2% racial/ethnic minority; 19.5% with prior/current military service). Logistic factors were the most frequently reported barrier to care (63%), followed by negative beliefs about mental healthcare (52%), fear of social/occupational consequences (35%), and internalized stigma (32%). Spouses with prior or current military service themselves and individuals with a psychiatric condition were most likely to report barriers to mental healthcare. A preponderance of military spouses reported barriers to mental healthcare services. Prospective data are needed to elucidate the associations between barriers to care and mental healthcare utilization. Efforts may be warranted to improve access to mental healthcare among the spouses of military personnel. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Mental , Personal Militar , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Personal Militar/psicología , Grupos Minoritarios , Estudios Prospectivos , Esposos/psicologíaRESUMEN
TBI and PTSD occur in a significant number of service members and can each result in considerable distress and cognitive challenges. Past research has established the individual impact of mild TBI (mTBI) and PTSD on cognitive performance; however, findings regarding the combined effects of mTBI and PTSD on cognitive performance are inconsistent. The present study examined the potentially synergistic effects of mTBI and PTSD symptoms on cognitive performance in a sample of 180 treatment-seeking active duty service members. As part of a larger clinical study, participants completed several self-report measures and an objective cognitive assessment via computer-based testing. Compared to norms, service members with mTBI-only, PTSD-symptoms-only, and comorbid TBI and PTSD performed significantly worse on cognitive tests, and there was a significant effect of group on cognitive performance, even when controlling for performance validity. Notably, individuals experiencing both mTBI and PTSD performed worse than those with either condition alone; service members with mTBI-only and those with PTSD symptoms-only did not differ. Findings further illustrate the complexity of the relationship between these two conditions, indicating comorbid mTBI and PTSD may represent a unique challenge to cognitive performance. Additional research is needed to clarify their combined impact on post-injury functioning.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Department of Defense policy prohibits, with limited exceptions, transgender individuals from serving in their affirmed gender in the U.S. Military, citing potential impact on unit cohesion and military readiness. To date, however, little is known about the sociodemographic profile and health of transgender military personnel. Methods: U.S. Military personnel who self-identified as transgender completed anonymous online measures of demographics and military service. Participants also completed measures of health, mood, eating pathology, and risk behaviors. Results: One hundred ninety-five service members (mean age: 28.9±7.2 years, 48.7% transmale, 70.3% non-Hispanic White, 7.83±5.9 years in service) completed the survey. The majority of respondents first identified as transgender before military accession. Most had disclosed their gender identity to their command and providers, and had undertaken steps toward gender affirmation. The sample as a whole reported above average physical health, with mood symptoms within normal ranges and few reported risk behaviors. Analyses of covariance indicated that transmales reported significantly better mental health and psychosocial functioning compared with transfemales. Conclusion: In light of current policy that precludes, with limited exceptions, transgender individuals from serving in the U.S. Military in their affirmed gender, the current study provides an initial sociodemographic profile of this understudied population and indicates that transgender service members report above average physical health and few risk behaviors. Preliminary analyses indicated that transfemales in the military may be at higher risk for mental health concerns, compared with transmales. Additional research is needed to elucidate risk and protective factors among transgender service members.
RESUMEN
Over the last two decades, treatment guidelines have become major aids in the delivery of evidence-based care and improvement of clinical outcomes. The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) produced the first guidelines for the prevention and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in 2000 and published its latest recommendations, along with position papers on complex PTSD (CPTSD), in November 2018. A rigorous methodology was developed and followed; scoping questions were posed, systematic reviews were undertaken, and 361 randomized controlled trials were included according to the a priori agreed inclusion criteria. In total, 208 meta-analyses were conducted and used to generate 125 recommendations (101 for adults and 24 for children and adolescents) for specific prevention and treatment interventions, using an agreed definition of clinical importance and recommendation setting algorithm. There were eight strong, eight standard, five low effect, 26 emerging evidence, and 78 insufficient evidence to recommend recommendations. The inclusion of separate scoping questions on treatments for complex presentations of PTSD was considered but decided against due to definitional issues and the virtual absence of studies specifically designed to clearly answer possible scoping questions in this area. Narrative reviews were undertaken and position papers prepared (one for adults and one for children and adolescents) to consider the current issues around CPTSD and make recommendations to facilitate further research. This paper describes the methodology and results of the ISTSS Guideline process and considers the interpretation and implementation of the recommendations.
Spanish Abstracts by Asociación Chilena de Estrés Traumático (ACET) Nuevas guías para la prevención y el tratamiento del trastorno de estrés postraumático de la Sociedad Internacional de Estudios de Estrés Traumático: metodología y proceso de desarrollo GUIAS DE LA ISTSS PARA EL TEPT En las últimas dos décadas, las guías de tratamiento se han convertido en una ayuda importante para la prestación de atención basada en la evidencia y la mejora de los resultados clínicos. La Sociedad Internacional de Estudios de Estrés Traumático (ISTSS en sus siglas en inglés) produjo las primeras guías para la prevención y tratamiento del trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) en 2000 y publicó sus últimas recomendaciones, junto con los documentos de posición sobre el TEPT complejo (TEPT-C), en noviembre de 2018. Se desarrolló y siguió una metodología rigurosa; se plantearon preguntas de alcance, se realizaron revisiones sistemáticas y se incluyeron 361 ensayos controlados aleatorizados de acuerdo con los criterios de inclusión acordados a priori. En total, se realizaron 208 metanálisis y fueron utilizados para generar 125 recomendaciones (101 para adultos y 24 para niños y adolescentes) para intervenciones específicas de prevención y tratamiento, utilizando una definición acordada de la importancia clínica y un algoritmo de configuración de recomendaciones. Hubo ocho estudios con pruebas sólidas, ocho como estándar, cinco con bajo efecto, 26 con evidencia emergente y 78 fueron evaluados como con evidencia insuficiente para ser recomendados en las recomendaciones. Se consideró la inclusión de preguntas de alcance separadas sobre tratamientos para presentaciones complejas de TEPT, pero se decidió en contra debido a cuestiones de definición y ausencia virtual de estudios diseñados específicamente para responder con claridad las posibles preguntas de alcance en esta área. Se realizaron revisiones narrativas y se prepararon documentos de posición (uno para adultos y otro para niños y adolescentes) para considerar los problemas actuales en torno al TEPT-C y hacer recomendaciones para facilitar la investigación adicional. Este documento describe la metodología y los resultados del proceso de la Guía de la ISTSS y considera la interpretación y la implementación de las recomendaciones.
Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are used to support clinicians and patients in diagnostic and treatment decision-making. Along with patients' preferences and values, and clinicians' experience and judgment, practice guidelines are a critical component to ensure patients are getting the best care based on the most updated research findings. Most CPGs are based on systematic reviews of the treatment literature. Although most reviews are now restricted to randomized controlled trials, others may consider nonrandomized effectiveness trials. Despite a reliance on similar procedures and data, methodological decisions and the interpretation of the evidence by the guideline development panel can result in different recommendations. In this article, we will describe key methodological points for 5 recently released CPGs on the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in adults and highlight some of the differences in both the process and the subsequent recommendations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Psicoterapia/métodos , Psicoterapia/normas , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
(Reprinted with permission from Depression and Anxiety 2014; 31:412-419).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prolonged Exposure (PE) therapy is an efficacious treatment for PTSD; despite this, many clinicians do not utilize it due to concerns it could cause patient decompensation. METHOD: Data were pooled from four published well-controlled studies of female assault survivors with chronic PTSD (n = 361) who were randomly assigned to PE, waitlist (WL), or another psychotherapy, including cognitive processing therapy (CPT), Eye Movement and Desensitization Reprocessing (EMDR), or the combination of PE plus stress inoculation training (SIT) or PE plus cognitive restructuring. PTSD and depression severity scores were converted to categorical outcomes to evaluate the proportion of participants who showed reliable symptom change (both reliable worsening and reliable improvement). RESULTS: The majority of participants completing one of the active treatments showed reliable improvement on both PTSD and depression compared to WL. Among treatment participants in general, as well as those who received PE, reliable PTSD worsening was nonexistent and the rate of reliable worsening of depression was low. There were no differences on any outcome measures among treatments. By comparison, participants in WL had higher rates of reliable symptom worsening for both PTSD and depression. Potential alternative explanations were also evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: PE and a number of other empirically supported therapies are efficacious and safe treatments for PTSD, reducing the frequency of which symptom worsening occurs in the absence of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Terapia Implosiva/métodos , Violación/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Violencia/psicología , Adolescente , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Determinación de la Personalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Listas de Espera , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Between 2006 and 2012, the Department of Defense trained thousands of military mental health providers in the use of evidence-based treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder. Most providers were trained in multiday workshops that focused on the use of Cognitive Processing Therapy and Prolonged Exposure. This study is a follow-up evaluation of the implementation practices of 103 Air Force mental health providers. A survey was administered online to workshop participants; 34.2% of participants responded. Findings on treatment implementation with the providers indicated that a majority of respondents found the trainings valuable and were interested in using the treatments, yet they reported a lack of time in their clinic appointment structure to support their use. Insufficient supervision was also cited as a barrier to treatment use. Results suggest the need to improve strategies for implementing evidence-based practices with providers to enhance clinical outcomes in military settings.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Terapia Implosiva , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/educación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Terapia Implosiva/educación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal Militar , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Alcohol dependence comorbid with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been found to be resistant to treatment. In addition, there is a concern that prolonged exposure therapy for PTSD may exacerbate alcohol use. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of an evidence-based treatment for alcohol dependence (naltrexone) plus an evidence-based treatment for PTSD (prolonged exposure therapy), their combination, and supportive counseling. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial of 165 participants with PTSD and alcohol dependence conducted at the University of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia Veterans Administration. Participant enrollment began on February 8, 2001, and ended on June 25, 2009. Data collection was completed on August 12, 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to (1) prolonged exposure therapy plus naltrexone (100 mg/d), (2) prolonged exposure therapy plus pill placebo, (3) supportive counseling plus naltrexone (100 mg/d), or (4) supportive counseling plus pill placebo. Prolonged exposure therapy was composed of 12 weekly 90-minute sessions followed by 6 biweekly sessions. All participants received supportive counseling. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The Timeline Follow-Back Interview and the PTSD Symptom Severity Interview were used to assess the percentage of days drinking alcohol and PTSD severity, respectively, and the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale was used to assess alcohol craving. Independent evaluations occurred prior to treatment (week 0), at posttreatment (week 24), and at 6 months after treatment discontinuation (week 52). RESULTS: Participants in all 4 treatment groups had large reductions in the percentage of days drinking (mean change, -63.9% [95% CI, -73.6% to -54.2%] for prolonged exposure therapy plus naltrexone; -63.9% [95% CI, -73.9% to -53.8%] for prolonged exposure therapy plus placebo; -69.9% [95% CI, -78.7% to -61.2%] for supportive counseling plus naltrexone; and -61.0% [95% CI, -68.9% to -53.0%] for supportive counseling plus placebo). However, those who received naltrexone had lower percentages of days drinking than those who received placebo (mean difference, 7.93%; P = .008). There was also a reduction in PTSD symptoms in all 4 groups, but the main effect of prolonged exposure therapy was not statistically significant. Six months after the end of treatment, participants in all 4 groups had increases in percentage of days drinking. However, those in the prolonged exposure therapy plus naltrexone group had the smallest increases. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study of patients with alcohol dependence and PTSD, naltrexone treatment resulted in a decrease in the percentage of days drinking. Prolonged exposure therapy was not associated with an exacerbation of alcohol use disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00006489.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Implosiva , Naltrexona/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Consejo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In the past decade, military personnel supporting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have faced multiple deployments and repeated traumatic stressors. Despite efforts to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other combat-related emotional difficulties, a significant number of military personnel experience psychological injuries during and following their deployments. Despite increased attention to prevention and treatment of these problems, it is clear that substantially more work is required to fully understand the emotional impact of combat and to better intervene to prevent potentially chronic problems. In the present article, the authors discuss possible avenues for future research and interventions (clinical and otherwise) to better prevent the development of combat-related PTSD. We discuss screening, assessment, education, and intervention for PTSD throughout the deployment cycle. In this discussion, we attend to both the needs of the current cohort of combat veterans and the potential advances that may mitigate the severity and chronicity of post-traumatic problems arising from future conflicts.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Combate/terapia , Personal Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Adaptación Psicológica , Trastornos de Combate/prevención & control , Trastornos de Combate/psicología , Humanos , Medicina Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/prevención & control , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicologíaRESUMEN
Deployment separation constitutes a significant stressor for U.S. military men and women and their families. Many military personnel return home struggling with physical and/or psychological injuries that challenge their ability to reintegrate and contribute to marital problems, family dysfunction, and emotional or behavioral disturbance in spouses and children. Yet research examining the psychological health and functioning of military families is scarce and rarely driven by developmental theory. The primary purpose of this theoretical paper is to describe a family attachment network model of military families during deployment and reintegration that is grounded in attachment theory and family systems theory. This integrative perspective provides a solid empirical foundation and a comprehensive account of individual and family risk and resilience during military-related separations and reunions. The proposed family attachment network model will inform future research and intervention efforts with service members and their families.