RESUMEN
Writing is a critical skill for graduate students, but few studies in the literature describe how it is supported in the training of biomedical graduate students. The Initiative for Maximizing Student Development program at Loma Linda University aims to develop this important skill in its students through an integrated, structured writing intervention. Specifically, the program hired a writing specialist who taught writing seminars, facilitated writing and publishing workshops, and mentored students in one-on-one writing conferences. Doctoral students in the program, primarily underrepresented minority students with some not having English as a first language, all exhibited writing apprehension and blocking behaviors. The percentage of students graduating, publishing, and entering science careers, all of which require writing, is high. To yield insight into how this intervention worked, we conducted in-depth interviews of six of the earliest graduates, derived themes, analyzed data from pre- and post-assessments, and described their publication records. Participating students increased their writing confidence, adopted productive writing strategies, decreased writing anxiety and blocking behaviors, and published successfully.
Asunto(s)
Eficiencia , Estudiantes , Escritura , Humanos , UniversidadesRESUMEN
This paper presents the outcomes of a Dialectical Behavior Treatment (DBT) program, implemented in intensive outpatient care with two groups of adolescents (n = 55 and n = 45), ages 12-18, who engaged in deliberate self-harm (DSH) but had different insurance/funding sources and risk backgrounds. This pre-post study examined variability in clinical functioning and treatment utilization between the two groups and investigated moderating risk factors. Findings support DBT's effectiveness in improving clinical functioning for youth with DSH regardless of insurance type. However, lower rates of treatment completion among youth without private insurance call for extra engagement efforts to retain high-risk youth in DBT.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista , Organización de la Financiación , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Autodestructiva/terapia , Adolescente , Atención Ambulatoria , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
An urgent need exists for graduate and professional schools to establish evidence-based STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) pipeline programs to increase the diversity of the biomedical workforce. An untapped yet promising pool of willing participants are capable high school students that have a strong STEM interest but may lack the skills and the guided mentoring needed to succeed in competitive STEM fields. This study evaluates and compares the impact of the Loma Linda University (LLU) Summer Health Disparities Research Program on high school (HS) and undergraduate (UG) student participants. The primary focus of our summer research experience (SRE) is to enhance the research self-efficacy of the participants by actively involving them in a research project and by providing the students with personalized mentoring and targeted career development activities, including education on health disparities. The results of our study show that our SRE influenced terminal degree intent and increased participant willingness to incorporate research into future careers for both the HS and the UG groups. The quantitative data shows that both the HS and the UG participants reported large, statistically significant gains in self-assessed research skills and research self-efficacy. Both participant groups identified the hands-on research and the mentor experience as the most valuable aspects of our SRE and reported increased science skills, increased confidence in science ability and increased motivation and affirmation to pursue a science career. The follow-up data indicates that 67% of the HS participants and 90% of the UG participants graduated from college with a STEM degree; for those who enrolled in graduate education, 61% and 43% enrolled in LLU, respectively. We conclude that structured SREs can be highly effective STEM strengthening interventions for both UG and HS students and may be a way to measurably increase institutional and biomedical workforce diversity.
Asunto(s)
Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Grupos Minoritarios , Estudiantes , Adolescente , Adulto , California , Humanos , Universidades , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The study employed 90 children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) who were matched to 90 typically developing children on age, gender, and ethnicity. Using structural equation modeling, maternal sleep and maternal stress mediated the relationship between children's sleep and mothers' mental health for mothers of children with and without ASDs. Mothers of children with ASDs reported more problems related to children's sleep, their own sleep, greater stress, and poorer mental health; however, children's sleep and maternal sleep were more closely related to maternal stress for mothers of typically developing children. Implications of these findings and future directions for research are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Generalizados del Desarrollo Infantil/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Madres/psicología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/psicología , Sueño/fisiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Relaciones Madre-Hijo , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is important for health care professionals to understand the pain experience in children with advanced cancer. There has been increased attention to this topic, but systematic studies are limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine pain symptoms and management in children with advanced cancer using child self-report and nurse documentation. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal method was used to collect data from 62 children over a 5-month period. Children were English and Spanish speaking, ages 6 to 17 years, with advanced cancer. Nurses also provided data. RESULTS: Across all interviews, pain was reported 56% of the time by all children. Nurses documented pain only 23% of the time. Children most frequently reported head pain (31%), followed by abdomen, lower back, leg, and feet pain (20% to 30%). Children consistently reported more intense pain compared with nurses. Nonopioids were used more frequently (45%) than opioids (32%), and nurses' perception of pain intensity was more highly correlated with administration of opioids (r = .72, P < .001). Children who died during their participation in this study received more opioids over time. Pain intensity was relatively stable over time. Nurses noted ethnicity related differences with higher pain levels for Caucasian children, who received analgesics more frequently. DISCUSSION: The children consistently reported pain. Child self-report and nurse documentation of pain differed, as did pain management among children who died compared with those who did not. Ethnicity differences in the identification and management of pain by nurses begs further study. Overall, nurses were aware of and responsive to pain and pain management.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/complicaciones , Registros de Enfermería , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor/etiología , Autoinforme , Adolescente , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/patología , Evaluación en Enfermería , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Enfermería Oncológica , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/enfermería , Dimensión del Dolor/enfermería , Enfermería Pediátrica , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To identify useful acute indicators of long-term neurocognitive outcome beyond clinical variables for children and adolescents treated for a traumatic brain injury (TBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacy of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) acquired 6+/-4 days after TBI in 20 children/adolescents in predicting intellectual and neuropsychological functioning one to four years post injury was assessed. Short echo-time single voxel MRS (SVS) from normal-appearing brain was compared to intermediate echo-time multivoxel MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) from normal-appearing and visibly-injured brain acquired through the level of the corpus callosum (CC). RESULTS: N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) was moderate to strongly correlated with cognitive scores. Mean NAA/creatine (Cre) from MRSI alone explained over 40% of the variance in cognitive scores and 18% of the variance above and beyond demographic and clinical variables alone. Mild to moderate associations were noted between SVS metabolites (glutamate/glutamine [Glx] and myoinositol [mI]) and cognitive scores, with no such associations apparent for choline (Cho) or Cre. Exploratory analyses revealed trends for regional neuroimaging data and specific cognitive abilities. CONCLUSION: Acute MR spectroscopy of the pediatric brain injury patient improves prognostic ability and may provide valuable information for early treatment and intervention planning.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/fisiopatología , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adolescente , Ácido Aspártico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Aspártico/metabolismo , Lesiones Encefálicas/metabolismo , Niño , Preescolar , Creatina/metabolismo , Femenino , Ácido Glutámico/metabolismo , Glutamina/metabolismo , Humanos , Lactante , Inositol/metabolismo , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Recuperación de la Función , Estadísticas no ParamétricasRESUMEN
In the present study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Observer Alexithymia Scale-French translation (OAS-F), a 33-item, observer-rated alexithymia measure. The scale, accessible to lay and professional raters, taps everyday expressions of alexithymia. French university students (N = 159) were asked to rate a person they knew well or ask an acquaintance to rate them. Those being rated (N = 159) were parents, siblings, children, and friends. OAS-F total and subscale scores were comparable to those in the English normative samples. Moreover, OAS scores were reliable, and the scale's five-factor structure (distant, uninsightful, somatizing, humorless, and rigid) was confirmed. Importantly, too, OAS total scores correlated 0.31 with (self-report) 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) scores. The OAS-F appears to be a psychometrically sound observer-rated alexithymia measure.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas Afectivos/diagnóstico , Síntomas Afectivos/etnología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Traumatic brain injury is among the most frequent pediatric neurologic disorders in the United States, affecting multiple aspects of neuropsychologic functioning. This study assessed the efficacy of susceptibility weighted imaging as a predictor of long-term neuropsychologic functioning after pediatric brain injury compared with magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Susceptibility weighted imaging is a relatively new method that is considered superior to traditional magnetic resonance imaging sequences for detecting hemorrhagic diffuse axonal injury. In this study, imaging and spectroscopy were acquired 6 +/- 4 days after injury. Measures of neuropsychologic functioning were administered to 18 children and adolescents 1-4 years post injury. Negative correlations between lesion number and volume with neuropsychologic functioning were demonstrated. Lesion volume explained over 32% of the variance in cognitive performance, explaining at least an additional 20% beyond injury severity and age at injury alone and 19% beyond magnetic resonance spectroscopic metabolite variables. Exploratory analyses resulted in notable trends, with lesions in deeper brain regions more strongly associated with poorer neuropsychologic performance. Improved detection of the extent of diffuse axonal injury following a brain injury will allow for a better understanding of its association with long-term outcome, which in turn can improve prognostic efficacy for effective treatment planning.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Encefálica Traumática/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Encefálica Traumática/psicología , Inteligencia , Adolescente , Ácido Aspártico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Aspártico/metabolismo , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Encéfalo/patología , Hemorragia Encefálica Traumática/metabolismo , Niño , Preescolar , Creatina/metabolismo , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Pruebas de Inteligencia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to determine: 1) the degree of pain experienced by patients during probing and debridement; 2) whether the treating hygienists could estimate the degree of pain experienced by the patients; and 3) whether the patients' pain responses could be predicted by factors such as the patients' age, gender, number of residual periodontal lesions, and answers to a questionnaire on dental anxiety. METHODS: Prior to periodontal maintenance procedures, two groups of 20 adult patients to be treated by two hygienists completed an anxiety questionnaire. Subsequently, measurements of probing depths were performed, followed by pain ratings by each patient using a visual analog scale (VAS). The hygienists also completed a VAS, estimating the pain level they perceived their patient to have experienced. The same protocol was repeated for instrumentation (debridement). RESULTS: Most patients showed low pain responses to both probing and instrumentation. However, using an arbitrary threshold of VAS > or = 40 mm, 20% to 33% of the patients had a significant pain experience. The hygienists were quite accurate in their relative estimates of their patients' pain experiences. Regression analyses disclosed that significant portions of the pain responses could be predicted by the patients' answers to one of the dental anxiety questions. CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of patients who are likely to experience significant pain during periodontal treatment may be facilitated by the use of one question on dental anxiety. During treatment, the ability to gauge and respond to patients' pain experiences would seem to be an important component of a therapist's clinical skills.
Asunto(s)
Dolor/etiología , Enfermedades Periodontales/prevención & control , Adulto , Afecto/fisiología , Factores de Edad , Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/etiología , Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/psicología , Higienistas Dentales , Raspado Dental , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor , Umbral del Dolor/fisiología , Bolsa Periodontal/clasificación , Bolsa Periodontal/terapia , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Análisis de Regresión , Factores Sexuales , Curetaje SubgingivalRESUMEN
The purposes of the present study were to evaluate 1) the correspondence between two observer-rated alexithymia measures, the Observer Alexithymia Scale and the modified Beth Israel Hospital Psychosomatic Questionnaire (BIQ) and 2) the psychometric properties of both instruments. Clinical and counseling psychologists (N=131) used the two instruments to rate outpatients with various psychiatric diagnoses. Correspondence was excellent; the correlation between the two scales was 0.69. Moreover, Observer Alexithymia Scale and modified BIQ scores are reliable (total and subscale alphas were within acceptable ranges), and both theoretical structures were confirmed. Both instruments can be recommended for alexithymia studies requiring observer ratings.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas Afectivos/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Adulto , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Psicometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop a non-condition-specific scale to capture biases, emotions, and expectations generated by medical condition descriptors. METHOD: An 18-item pilot scale was developed from the literature on physicians' responses to patients they like and dislike, stigma definitions, and discussions with primary care faculty. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted after 440 medical students rated one of 12 diverse conditions. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed after 163 medical students rated two psychiatric conditions. Validity was evaluated by the scale's ability to meaningfully stratify the 12 conditions and identify changes in attitudes toward psychiatric conditions after a psychiatry clerkship. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis supported an 11-item unidimensional solution (all factor loadings >.40, coefficient alpha =.87). The final scale, the Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS), taps the degree to which medical students find patients with a given medical condition to be enjoyable, treatable, and worthy of medical resources. The unidimensional model also was supported by the confirmatory factor analyses for the two psychiatric conditions (both comparative fit indices =.98). The scale stratified the 12 conditions as expected: straightforward medical conditions rated highest, somatoform conditions rated lowest. Students showed greater regard for patients with major depression after the psychiatry clerkship, and students who rotated through an addiction treatment program showed a greater increase in regard for patients with alcoholism than did students not exposed to addiction treatment. CONCLUSION: MCRS scores are reliable, and the scale appears to be a valid instrument for assessing regard for any medical condition.