Acute Respiratory Failure Secondary to Low-Dose Opioid Administration in a Patient With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome After Undergoing Trans-sphenoidal Tumor Resection.

We present a case of an obese 56-year-old male with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), and pituitary macroadenoma, who underwent nasal endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia, uneventfully as planned. The patient experienced, however, delayed emergence despite receiving adequate neuromuscular blockade agent reversal. Extubation was performed and the patient was transferred to the recovery room on a Venturi mask (50% fraction of inspired oxygen, FIO2)and 93% saturation. Postoperatively, the patient was complaining of acute pain that did not resolve with non-opioid medications and a low morphine dose (0.035 mg/kg) for pain management was administered. Subsequently, he developed severe respiratory depression, requiring intubation. After three hours, the patient was extubated, transferred to the intensive care unit, and discharged five days later. Although the patient recovered favorably, this case highlights the risks of administering opioids to patients with OSA and OHS. To our knowledge, this is the first case reporting extreme respiratory depression secondary to the administration of a very low dose of morphine in patients with these comorbidities. Therefore, it is essential to be cautious with the use of opioids and to explore multimodal pain relief methods for these patients.

Orthopaedic Surgeon Communication Skills: Perception of Empathy and Patient Satisfaction Through the Use of Anatomic Models.

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is an increasingly emphasized measure of patient-centered care and important component of reimbursement programs. Orthopaedic surgeons are regarded as low-empathy surgeons. Our goals were to understand the role of anatomic models during the orthopaedic appointment and how their use can affect patient satisfaction and perceived empathy. METHODS: New patients at an outpatient clinic were asked to participate in a postencounter questionnaire to asses empathy perception (n = 304). Clinic days were randomly assigned to use anatomic models during the encounter to assist with clinical information transmission. The instrument provided contained Consultation and Relational Empathy questionnaire (ie, a person-centered process that was developed to measure empathy in the context of the therapeutic relationship during a one-on-one consultation between a clinician and a patient). RESULTS: A total of 304 participants were included in the study. Analyses of the sociodemographic characteristics did not reveal any significant difference between the control and experimental groups. Consultation and Relational Empathy scores for the nonanatomic group (46.0 ± 9.0) and anatomic group (48.0 ± 7.7) were not statistically different (P = 0.482). The encounter time was significantly increased with the use of anatomic models (P < 0.005). DISCUSSION: The use of anatomic models during initial orthopaedic encounter did not improve perceived empathy and satisfaction scores in our study. Longer encounter time in the orthopaedic appointment does not mean higher empathy perception. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic surgeons have the duty to find new strategies to improve communication with the patient. Better communication has been associated with better patient satisfaction. Further investigation should be considered to use other strategies to provide better care for our patients.