Reliability of EuroSCORE II on Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality and Long-Term Results in Patients Treated with Sutureless Valves.

Background: EuroSCORE II (ES2) is a reliable tool for preoperative cardiac surgery mortality risk prediction; however, a patient's age, a surgical procedure's weight and the new devices available may cause its accuracy to drift. We sought to investigate ES2 performance related to the surgical risk and late mortality estimation in patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with sutureless valves. Methods: Between 2012 and 2021, a total of 1126 patients with isolated aortic stenosis who underwent surgical AVR by means of sutureless valves were retrospectively collected from six European centers. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the EuroSCORE II risk classes (ES2 < 4%, ES2 4-8% and ES2 > 8%). The accuracy of ES2 in estimating mortality risk was assessed using the standardized mortality ratio (O/E ratio), ROC curves (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test for goodness-of-fit. Results: The overall observed mortality was 3.0% (predicted mortality ES2: 5.39%) with an observed/expected (O/E) ratio of 0.64 (confidential interval (CI): 0.49-0.89). In our population, ES2 showed a moderate discriminating power (AUC 0.65, 95%CI 0.56-0.72, p < 0.001; HL p = 0.798). Good accuracy was found in patients with ES2 < 4% (O/E ratio 0.54, 95%CI 0.23-1.20, AUC 0.75, p < 0.001, HL p = 0.999) and for patients with an age < 75 years (O/E ratio 0.98, 95%CI 0.45-1.96, AUC 0.76, p = 0.004, HL p = 0.762). Moderate discrimination was observed for ES2 in the estimation of long-term risk of mortality (AUC 0.64, 95%CI: 0.60-0.68, p < 0.001). Conclusions: EuroSCORE II showed good accuracy in patients with an age < 75 years and patients with ES2 < 4%, while overestimating risk in the other subgroups. A recalibration of the model should be taken into account based on the complexity of actual patients and impact of new technologies.

Risk Score for Long-Term Survival and Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.

To develop risk scoring models predicting long-term survival and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including myocardial infarction and stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). All 4,821 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG at Lankenau between January 2005 and July 2021 were included. MACCE was defined as all-cause mortality + myocardial infarction + stroke. Variable selection for both outcomes was obtained using a double-selection logit least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with adaptive selection. Model performance was internally evaluated by calibration and accuracy using bootstrap cross-validation. Mortality and MACCEs were compared in patients split into 3 groups based on the predicted risk scores for all-cause mortality and MACCEs. An external validation of our database was performed with 665 patients from the University of Brescia, Italy. Preoperative risk predictors were found to be predictors for all-cause mortality and MACCEs. In addition, being of African-American ethnicity is a significant predictor for MACCEs after isolated CABG. The areas under the curve (AUCs), which measures the discrimination of the models, were 80.4%, 79.1%, 81.3%, and 79.2% for mortality at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years follow-up. The AUCs for MACCEs were 75%, 72.5%, 73.8%, and 72.7% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years follow-up. For external validation, the AUCs for all-cause mortality and MACCEs at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 73.7%, 70.8%, 68.7%, and 72.2% and 72.3%, 68.2%, 65.6%, and 69.6%, respectively. The Advanced (AD) Coronary Risk Score for All-Cause Mortality and MACCE provide good discrimination of long-term mortality and MACCEs after isolated CABG. External validation observed a more AUCs greater than 70%.

Surgical options for atrial fibrillation treatment during concomitant cardiac procedures.

Current guidelines recommend concomitant surgical ablation (SA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of mitral valve disease. A variety of energy sources have been tested for SA to perform effective transmural lesions reliably. To date, only radiofrequency and cryothermy energies are considered viable options. The gold standard for SA is the Cox-Maze ablation set, especially for non-paroxysmal AF (nPAF), with the aim of interrupting macro-reentrant drivers perpetuating AF, without hampering the sinus node activation of both atria, and to maintain the atrioventricular synchrony. Although the efficacy of SA in terms of early and late sinus rhythm restoration has been clearly demonstrated over the years, concomitant AF ablation is still underperformed in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery. From a surgical standpoint, concerns have been raised about whether a single (left) or double atriotomy would be justified in AF patients undergoing a "non-atriotomy" surgical procedure, such as aortic valve or revascularization surgery. Thus, an array of simplified lesion sets have been described in the last decade, which have unavoidably hampered procedural efficacy, somewhat jeopardizing the standardization process of ablation surgery. As a matter of fact, the term "Maze" has improperly become a generic term for SA. Surgical interventions that do not align with the principles of forming conduction-blocking lesions according to the Maze pattern, cannot be classified as Maze procedures. In this complex scenario, a tailored approach according to the different AF patterns has been proposed: for patients with concomitant nPAF, a biatrial Cox-Maze ablation is recommended. Conversely, it might be reasonable to limit lesions to the left atrium or the pulmonary veins in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) in some clinical scenarios. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current ablation strategies for patients with AF undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery.

Hybrid strategies for stand-alone surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported as a major cause of cardiac morbidity and mortality, and significantly reduces the quality of life in symptomatic patients. Current guidelines recommend antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation (CA) as first-line therapy. Despite CA showed to be associated with lower incidence of peri-procedural complications, rhythm outcomes are far from optimal. Indeed, patients undergoing CA frequently require multiple AF ablation procedures, especially in those with persistent and long-standing persistent AF. While surgical ablation can provide transmural lesions, surgical invasiveness has limited the widespread use of this approach due to the increased perioperative complications. The development of minimally invasive thoracoscopic approaches has renewed the interest towards surgical ablation, thus favoring more simplified ablation sets. Therefore, the concept of "hybrid" ablation has emerged in order to theoretically enhance advantages of both minimally invasive and CA procedures while seeking to improve rhythm outcomes and reduce invasiveness and incidence of perioperative complications. On one hand, it provides the effectiveness of a surgical ablation, on the other, electrical mapping during CA can identify and treat any ablation gap or provide additional ablation lines, thus improving the chance of a stable sinus rhythm restoration at long-term follow-up. Three main thoracoscopic strategies are currently available. All of them can be performed in conjunction with the "catheter ablation procedure": the "Fusion" technique, the bipolar clamp technique, and the most recent "convergent" technique. CA can be performed either simultaneously or with a staged approach after a blanking period in order to allow the ablation lesion to stabilize. Excellent results of the hybrid procedures have been reported in terms of rhythm outcomes and incidence of perioperative complications. This narrative review aims to discuss the rationale behind the concept of hybrid ablation for the treatment of AF regarding different available strategies, results and expert opinions.

Impact of coronary-subclavian steal after surgical myocardial revascularization with internal thoracic artery in chronic hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis.

Patients in hemodialysis with an arm arteriovenous fistula undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an internal thoracic artery have been reported to suffer from coronary-subclavian steal (CSS) during dialysis session. However, its occurrence is still debated. A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies investigating the occurrence of a CSS event in this subset of patients. The primary endpoint was the analysis of CSS and the following early and late survival outcomes. Independent determinants of CSS and the impact of the distance between the arteriovenous fistula (upper arm vs forearm) and the ipsilateral internal thoracic artery graft on CSS events and mortality were studied. Early and late survival outcomes were analyzed by comparing ipsilateral versus contralateral arteriovenous fistula. Of the 1,383 retrieved articles, 10 were included (n = 643 patients). The pooled event rate of CSS was 6.46% [95%CI=2.10-18.15], while of symptomatic CSS incidence was 3.99% [95%CI=0.95-15.25]. No survival differences were noted when comparing ipsilateral to contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combinations. On meta-regression, the upper arm was associated with more CSS events, while the forearm to lower late mortality rates. Independently from arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination, CSS was not associated to higher mortality rates. Particular attention is warranted when selecting the type of conduits for CABG in patients with an arteriovenous fistula or if highly expected to need one in the near future after surgery. A contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination is preferable. If this is not possible, a forearm arteriovenous fistula position should be preferred.

Mitral valve surgery in acute infective endocarditis: long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement.

AIMS: Timing and surgical strategies in acute infective endocarditis are still questionable. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVR) compared with mitral valve replacement [mitral valve prosthesis (MVP)] for acute infective endocarditis. METHODS: From 2004 to 2019, 109 consecutive patients with acute mitral valve infective endocarditis were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical strategy: MVR 53/109 (48.6%) versus MVP 56/109 (51.4%). Primary end points were in-hospital mortality and overall survival at 10 years. Secondary end point was the freedom from infective endocarditis relapse. RESULTS: Our institutional surgical approach for infective endocarditis allowed us to achieve MVR in 48.6% of patients. Hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups [MVR: 1/53 (1.9%) versus MVP: 2/56 (3.6%), P  = 1.000]. Overall 10-year survival was 80.0 ±â€Š14.1 and 77.2 ±â€Š13.5% for MVR and MVP, respectively ( P  = 0.648). MVR showed a lower incidence of infective endocarditis relapse compared with MVP (MVR: 93.6 ±â€Š7.1 versus MVP: 80.9 ±â€Š10.8%, P  = 0.041). At Cox regression, infective endocarditis relapse was an independent risk factor for death (hazard ratio 4.03; 95% confidence interval 1.41-11.52; P  = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The tendency to postpone surgery in stable patients with mitral infective endocarditis allowed achievement of MVR in almost 50% of patients. Although repair remains the approach of choice in our institution, no differences between MVR and MVP were reported in terms of early/late survival. However, MVP had a higher incidence of infective endocarditis relapse that represents an independent risk of mortality.

Del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: Clinical outcomes in a single center all-comer study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of Del Nido Cardioplegia (DNC) has been extended in the latest years from pediatrics to adult cardiac surgery with encouraging results. We sought to investigate clinical and biochemical outcomes in adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with different degrees of complexity who received DNC for myocardial protection. METHODS: Data on one-thousand patients were retrospectively collected from 2020 to 2022. The only exclusion criteria was off-pump adult cardiac surgery. Surgical procedures weight was categorized according EuroSCORE II in six groups: Single-CABG(G1), isolated non-CABG(mitral) (G2), isolated non-CABG(aortic) (G3), isolated non-CABG(any) (G4), 2-procedures(G5), 3/more-procedures(G6). Primary endpoint was to identify a binomial correlation between hs-TnT/CK-MB and the cross-clamp time (X-Clamp). A secondary endpoint was the comparison between the treatment groups of the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and the need of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). RESULTS: A linear correlation was identified between hs-TnT and X-clamp in the overall population (rho:0.447, p< .001) and in the treatment groups (G1:rho=0.357, p< .001/G2:rho=0.455, p< .001/G3:rho=0.307, p= .001/G4:rho=0.165, p= .257/G5:rho=0.157, p= .031/G6:rho=0.226, p= .015). Similarly, a linear correlation between CK-MB and X-clamp in the overall population (rho=0.457, p< .001) and treatment group (G1:rho=0.282, p< .001/G2:rho=0.287, p= .025/G3:rho=0.211, p= .009/G4:rho=0.0878, p= .548/G5:rho=0.309, p< .001/G6: rho=0.212, p= .024) was identified. As regard for the secondary endpoint, no differences were reported between the treatment groups in terms of VIS and MCS (VIS G1:7; G2:4; G3:7; G4:7, G5:5.5, G6:6, p-value= .691) (MCS G1: 4.5%; G2:4.8%; G3:3.3%; G4:3.1%; G5:1.4%; G6:5.3%; p-value= .372). CONCLUSIONS: Del Nido Cardioplegia is a safe and useful tool in adult cardiac surgery allowing operators to achieve a stable and durable cardioplegic arrest. Despite accounting with different types of surgery, the six subgroups of our study population showed similar perioperative results.

Left Atrium Volume Reduction Procedure Concomitant With Cox-Maze Ablation in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Rhythm Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The management of an enlarged left atrium (LA) in mitral valve (MV) disease with atrial fibrillation (AF) is still being debated. It has been postulated that a reduction in LA size may improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to assess rhythm and clinical outcomes of combined surgical AF treatment with or without LA volume reduction (LAVR) in patients undergoing MV surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was performed and all available literature to May 2022 was included. The primary endpoint was analysis of early and late mortality and rhythm outcomes. Secondary outcomes included early and late cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and permanent pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 2,808 potentially relevant articles, and 19 papers were eventually included. The pooled estimated rate of 30-day mortality was 3.76% (95% CI 2.52-5.56). The incidence rate of late mortality and late cardiac-related mortality was 1.75%/year (95% CI 0.63-4.84) and 1.04%/year (95% CI 0.31-3.53), respectively. At subgroup analysis when comparing the surgical procedure with and without AF ablation, the ablation subgroup showed a significantly lower rate of postoperative CVA (p<0.0001) and higher restoration to sinus rhythm at discharge (p=0.0124), with only a trend of lower AF recurrence at 1 year (p=0.0608). At univariable meta-regression, reintervention was significantly associated with higher late mortality (p=0.0033). CONCLUSION: In enlarged LA undergoing MV surgery, LAVR combined with AF ablation showed a trend of improved rhythm outcomes when compared with AF ablation without LAVR. Each LAVR technique has its advantages and disadvantages, which must be managed accordingly.

Sutureless versus transcatheter valves in patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate risk: A multi-institutional European study.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials showed comparable short-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate and low-risk patients. However, independent studies comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation results versus surgical aortic valve replacement at 5 years showed worsening outcomes in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The aim of this study was to analyze mid- to long-term outcomes of patients with isolated aortic stenosis and an intermediate-risk profile who underwent aortic valve replacement using a sutureless valve versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: This retrospective multi-institutional European study investigated 2,123 consecutive patients with isolated aortic stenosis at intermediate risk profile treated with sutureless aortic valve replacement (824 patients) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (1,299 patients) from 2013 to 2020. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 2 balanced groups of 517 patients were obtained. Primary endpoints were as follows: 30 days, late all-cause, and cardiac-related mortality. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events (all-cause death, stroke/transient ischemic attack, endocarditis, reoperation, permanent pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular leak grade ≥2). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.3 years (interquartile range 1.1-7.4 years). Primary endpoints were as follows-30-day mortality sutureless aortic valve replacement: 2.13% versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 4.64% (P = .026), all-cause mortality sutureless aortic valve replacement: 36.7% ± 7.8% vs transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 41.8% ± 8.2% (P = .023), and cardiac-related mortality sutureless aortic valve replacement: 10.2% ± 2.8% vs transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 19.2% ± 3.5%;(P = .00043) at follow-up. Secondary endpoints were as follows-major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events in the sutureless aortic valve replacement group: 47.2% ± 9.0% versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 57.3% ± 7.5% (P < .001). In particular, the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (sutureless aortic valve replacement: 6.38% versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 11.8% [P = .002]) and paravalvular leak ≥2 (sutureless aortic valve replacement: 0.97% versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 4.84% [P = .001]) was significantly higher in transcatheter aortic valve implantation group. At Multivariable Cox regression analysis, paravalvular leak ≥2 (hazard ratio: 1.63%; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.53, P = .042) and permanent pacemaker implantation (hazard ratio: 1.49%; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-2.20, P = .039) were identified as predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Sutureless aortic valve replacement showed a significantly lower incidence of all-cause mortality, cardiac-related death, permanent pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular leak than transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Moreover, permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leak negatively affected survival in patients treated for isolated aortic stenosis.

Sutureless and Rapid Deployment vs. Transcatheter Valves for Aortic Stenosis in Low-Risk Patients: Mid-Term Results.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials showed that TAVI is neither inferior nor superior to surgical aortic valve replacement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of Sutureless and Rapid Deployment Valves (SuRD-AVR) when compared to TAVI in low surgical risk patients with isolated aortic stenosis. METHODS: Data from five European Centers were retrospectively collected. We included 1306 consecutive patients at low surgical risk (EUROSCORE II < 4) who underwent aortic valve replacement by means of SuRD-AVR (n = 636) or TAVI (n = 670) from 2014 to 2019. A 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity-score was performed, and two balanced groups of 346 patients each were obtained. The primary endpoints of the study were: 30-day mortality and 5-year overall survival. The secondary endpoint was 5-year survival freedom from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was similar between the two groups (SuRD-AVR:1.7%, TAVI:2.0%, p = 0.779), while the TAVI group showed a significantly lower 5-year overall survival and survival freedom from MACCEs (5-year matched overall survival: SuRD-AVR: 78.5%, TAVI: 62.9%, p = 0.039; 5-year matched freedom from MACCEs: SuRD-AVR: 64.6%, TAVI: 48.7%, p = 0.004). The incidence of postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and paravalvular leak grade ≥ 2 (PVL) were higher in the TAVI group. Multivariate Cox Regression analysis identified PPI as an independent predictor for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI patients had a significantly lower five-year survival and survival freedom from MACCEs with a higher rate of PPI and PVL ≥ 2 when compared to SuRD-AVR.

Frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic arch surgery: the Bordeaux University Hospital experience with Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic arch surgery still represents a challenge, and the frozen elephant trunk (FET) allows a one-step surgery for complex aortic diseases. The aim of the study was to analyze the results of patients undergoing FET procedure for aortic arch surgery at Bordeaux University Hospital. METHODS: Patients undergoing FET procedure for multisegmented aortic arch pathologies were analyzed in this single-center retrospective study. Further subgroup analyses were performed according to the degree of urgency of the operation (elective versus emergent surgery) and cerebral protection technique: bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (B-SACP) versus the unilateral one (U-SACP), regardless of the degree of urgency. RESULTS: From August 2018 to August 2022, 77 consecutive patients (64.1±9.9 years, 54 males) were enrolled: 43 (55.8%) for elective surgery and 34 (44.2%) in emergency. Technical success was 100%. 30-day mortality was 15.6% (N.=12, 7% elective vs. 26.5% emergent, P=0.043). Six (7.8%) non-disabling strokes occurred (1.9% B-SACP vs. 20% U-SACP, P=0.021). Median follow-up was 1.11 years (interquartile range, 0.62-2.07). The 1-year overall survival was 81.6±4.45%. The elective group showed a survival trend when compared to the emergency one (P=0.054). However, further examination at landmark analysis elective surgery showed a better survival trend compared to emergency surgery up to 1.78 years (P=0.034), after which significance was lost (P=0.521). CONCLUSIONS: Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis for FET technique demonstrated feasibility and satisfactory short-term clinical outcomes, even in emergent settings. In our practice B-SACP seems to offer better protection and less neurological complications compared to U-SACP, nevertheless further analyses are warranted.

Cerebral Perfusion and Neuromonitoring during Complex Aortic Arch Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Complex ascending and aortic arch surgery requires the implementation of different cerebral protection strategies to avoid or limit the probability of intraoperative brain damage during circulatory arrest. The etiology of the damage is multifactorial, involving cerebral embolism, hypoperfusion, hypoxia and inflammatory response. These protective strategies include the use of deep or moderate hypothermia to reduce the cerebral oxygen consumption, allowing the toleration of a variable period of absence of cerebral blood flow, and the use of different cerebral perfusion techniques, both anterograde and retrograde, on top of hypothermia, to avoid any period of intraoperative brain ischemia. In this narrative review, the pathophysiology of cerebral damage during aortic surgery is described. The different options for brain protection, including hypothermia, anterograde or retrograde cerebral perfusion, are also analyzed, with a critical review of the advantages and limitations under a technical point of view. Finally, the current systems of intraoperative brain monitoring are also discussed.

Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation of Lone Atrial Fibrillation: Long-term Outcomes at 7 Years.

BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic drugs and transcatheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) provide suboptimal rhythm control with a not negligible rate of failure in paroxysmal AF (PAF) and nonparoxysmal AF (n-PAF) at midterm and long-term follow-up. This study evaluated the safety profile and long-term efficacy of thoracoscopic ablation in patients with lone AF. METHODS: A consecutive 153 patients with lone AF were prospectively enrolled and underwent thoracoscopic surgical ablation. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic AF refractory to pharmacologic therapy (Vaughan-Williams class I-III), age >18 years, and absence of left atrial thrombosis. Exclusion criteria were long-standing AF >5 years, left atrial diameter >55 mm, and contraindication to oral anticoagulation. The "box lesion set" (encircling of pulmonary veins) was always used. Exclusion of the left atrial appendage was performed only in selected cases. The primary study end point was freedom from AF. Secondary end points were overall survival and cumulative incidence function of cardiac event-related death, cerebrovascular accidents, and pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: There was no in-hospital mortality. Early postoperative complications were pacemaker implantation (4/153 [2.6%]), cerebrovascular accident (2/153 [1.3%]) with full recovery of both, and bleeding requiring surgical revision (2/153 [1.3%]). Overall freedom from AF at 7 years was 86% ± 4% (76.9% in n-PAF, 96.1% in PAF). Survival freedom from AF in patients without antiarrhythmic drugs in PAF and n-PAF groups was 79.1% and 52.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic surgical ablation of lone AF by means of an isolated left atrial box lesion provided an excellent long-term rhythm outcome, even in long-standing persistent AF. The isolated left atrial ablation showed an excellent safety profile with low incidence of pacemaker implantation and postoperative complications.

Coronary artery disease and TAVI: Current evidence on a recurrent issue.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a frequent finding in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Concomitant coronary artery bypass and aortic valve replacement is considered the gold standard treatment in surgical candidates. However, limited evidence is available regarding the role of coronary revascularization in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). How to evaluate CAD severity in patients with AS, whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) needs to be performed and what is the timing for revascularization to minimize procedural risks, remains matters of debate. The aim of this review is to summarize epidemiology, diagnostic tools and possible options for CAD management in patients undergoing TAVI with specific focus on the pros and the cons of the different timing of PCI.

Rhythm outcomes of minimally-invasive off-pump surgical versus catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.

BACKGROUND: Mid- and long-term rhythm outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) are reported to be suboptimal. Minimally invasive surgical off-pump ablation (MISOA), including both thoracoscopic and trans-diaphragmatic approaches, has been developed to reduce surgical invasiveness and overcome on-pump surgery drawbacks. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of MISOA and CA for AF treatment. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed including studies comparing MISOA and CA. The primary endpoint was survival freedom from AF at follow-up after a 3-month blanking period. Subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint was performed according to the type of surgical incision and hybrid approach. RESULTS: Freedom from AF at 4 years was 52.1% ± 3.2% vs 29.1% ± 3.5%, between MISOA and CA respectively (log-rank p < 0.001; Hazard Ratio: 0.60 [95%Confidence Interval (CI):0.50-0.72], p < 0.001). At landmark analysis, a significant improvement in rhythm outcomes was observed in the MISOA group after the 5th month of follow-up (2 months from the blanking period). The Odds Ratio between MISOA and CA of postoperative cerebrovascular accident incidence and postoperative permanent pacemaker implant (PPM) were 2.00 (95%CI:0.91-4.40, p = 0.084) and 1.55 (95%CI:0.61-3.95, p = 0.358), respectively. The incidence rate ratio of late CVA between MISOA and CA was 0.86 (95%CI:0.28-2.65, p = 0.787), while for late PPM implant was 0.45 (95%CI:0.11-1.78, p = 0.256). CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis suggests that MISOA provides superior rhythm outcomes when compared to CA in terms of sinus rhythm restoration. Despite the rhythm outcome superiority of MISOA, it is associated to higher postoperative complications compared to CA.

Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Conduit Harvesting Technique Using a Non-Sealed System for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Objective: Endoscopic vessel harvest (EVH) is evolving as the standard of care for coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the increase in upfront equipment-related costs has resulted in reluctance of uptake globally. We investigated the costs involving a non-sealed technique for EVH versus open vessel harvesting techniques (OVH) for both the greater saphenous vein and radial artery with a 6-month follow-up. Methods: From September 2016 to December 2018, 226 patients underwent OVH while 251 patients underwent EVH using a reusable non-sealed system and a single-use radiofrequency sealing system. Cumulative costs for OVH versus EVH were calculated as a summation of total operative and in-hospital stay costs. Costs related to harvest site complication management were also analyzed for up to 6 months. Results: Total operative costs were greater in the EVH group (Can$2,283.70 [Can$1,377.60 to $4,183.50] vs Can$1,742.40 [Can$998.50 to $3,628.10], P < 0.001). Total length of stay was significantly shorter for the EVH group (5.9 [4 to 43] days vs 6.8 [4 to 55] days, P = 0.018). Cumulative costs were comparable at the end of the hospitalization period (EVH, Can$6,534.70 [Can$2,076.50 to $33,087.70] vs OVH, Can$6,112.50 [Can$3,322.30 to $45,503.50], P = 0.06). After discharge, harvest site-related complications occurred more frequently in the OVH group (27% vs 4.4%, P < 0.001), resulting in increased use of antibiotics (2.2% vs 0.8%, P = 0.02) as well as more frequent requirement for home nursing assistance in the OVH group (5.7% vs 0.8%, P = 0.002) at 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Cumulative costs did not show a statistical difference between OVH and EVH, with higher intraoperative costs for EVH being offset by higher harvest site management costs in the OVH group.

Every cloud has a silver lining: COVID-19 chest-CT screening prevents unnecessary cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Unenhanced chest CT can identify incidental findings (IFs) leading to management strategy change. We report our institutional experience with routine chest-CT as preoperative screening tool during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the impact of IFs. METHODS: All patients scheduled for cardiac surgery from May 1st to December 31st 2020, underwent preoperative unenhanced chest-CT according to COVID-19 pandemic institutional protocol. We have analyzed IFs incidence, reported consequent operative changes, and identified IFs clinical determinants. RESULTS: Out of 447, 278 patients were included. IFs rate was 7.2% (20/278): a solid mass (11/20, 55%), lymphoproliferative disease (1/20, 5%), SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (2/20, 10%), pulmonary artery chronic thromboembolism (1/20, 5%), anomalous vessel anatomy (2/20, 10%), voluminous hiatal hernia (1/20, 5%), mitral annulus calcification (1/20, 5%), and porcelain aorta (1/20, 5%) were reported. Based on IFs, 4 patients (20%-4/278, 1.4%) were not operated, 8 (40%-8/278, 2.9%) underwent a procedure different from the one originally planned one, and 8 (40%-8/278, 2.9%) needed additional preoperative investigations before undergoing the planned surgery. At univariate regression, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and history of cancer were significantly more often present in patients presenting with significant IFs. History of malignancy was identified as the only independent determinant of significant IFs at chest-CT (OR=4.27 IQR: [1.14-14.58], P=0.0227). CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced chest-CT as a preoperative screening tool in cardiac surgery led to incidental detection of significant clinical findings, which justified even procedures cancellation. Malignancy history is a determinant for CT incidental findings and could support a tailored screening approach for high-risk patients.

Atrioventricular node ablation and pacing for atrial tachyarrhythmias: A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) and pacemaker (PM) is performed in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) unresponsive to medical treatment and percutaneous ablation. This meta-analysis evaluated results after AVNA and PM. METHODS: Primary and secondary endpoints were early/late overall/cardiac-related mortality and early/late postoperative complications. Meta-regression explored mortality and preoperative characteristics relation. RESULTS: We selected 93 studies with 11,340 patients: 9105 right ventricular (RV)-PM, and 2235 biventricular PM (cardiac resynchronization therapy, CRT). Malignant arrhythmia (2.5%), heart failure (2.4%), and lead dislodgement (2.0%) were most common periprocedural complications. Pooled estimated 30-day mortality was 1.08% (95%CI:0.65-1.77). At 19.9 months median follow-up (IQR: 10.3-34 months), rehospitalization (0.79%/month) and heart failure (0.48%/month) were the most frequent complications. Overall mortality incidence rate (IR) was 0.43%/month (95%CI:0.36-0.51), and cardiac death IR 0.27%/month (95%CI:0.22-0.32). No mortality determinants emerged in the AVNA CRT subgroup. AVNA RV-PM subgroup univariable meta-regression showed inverse relationship between age, ejection fraction (EF), and late cardiac death (Beta = -0.0709 ± 0.0272; p = 0.0092 and Beta = -0.0833 ± 0.0249; p = 0.0008). Coronary artery disease (CAD) was directly associated to follow-up overall/cardiac mortality at univariable (Beta = 0.0550 ± 0.0136, p < 0.0001; Beta = 0.0540 ± 0.0130, p < 0.0001) and multivariable (Beta = 0.0460 ± 0.0189, p = 0.152; Beta = 0.0378 ± 0.0192, p = 0.0491) meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS: Solid long-term evidence supporting AVNA and pace is lacking. Younger patients with reduced LVEF% have increased follow-up cardiac mortality after AVNA RV and may require CRT. Alternative strategies to maintain sinus rhythm and ventricular synchronism should be compared to AVNA to support future treatment strategies.