Evaluation of an experiential training program in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research for diverse researcher communities and health care organizations.

Background/Objective: The goal of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Partnership was to prepare health care professionals and researchers to conduct patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research (CER). Substantial evidence gaps, heterogeneous health care systems, and decision-making challenges in the USA underscore the need for evidence-based strategies. Methods: We engaged five community-based health care organizations that serve diverse and underrepresented patient populations from Hawai'i to Minnesota. Each partner nominated two in-house scholars to participate in the 2-year program. The program focused on seven competencies pertinent to patient-centered outcomes and CER. It combined in-person and experiential learning with asynchronous, online education, and created adaptive, pragmatic learning opportunities and a Summer Institute. Metrics included the Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory (CRAI), a tool designed to assess research self-efficacy and clinical research skills across 10 domains. Results: We trained 31 scholars in 3 cohorts. Mean scores in nine domains of the CRAI improved; greater improvement was observed from the beginning to the midpoint than from the midpoint to conclusion of the program. Across all three cohorts, mean scores on 52 items (100%) increased (p ≤ 0.01), and 91% of scholars reported the program improved their skills moderately/significantly. Satisfaction with the program was high (91%). Conclusions: Investigators that conduct patient-centered outcomes and CER must know how to collaborate with regional health care systems to identify priorities; pose questions; design, conduct, and disseminate observational and experimental research; and transform knowledge into practical clinical applications. Training programs such as ours can facilitate such collaborations.

"Hot Topics in Practice" Webinars: Best Practices for Public Health Webinar Development.

CONTEXT: Online education is well researched in some professions; yet, little evidence exists regarding related quality standards for public health practice-particularly with regard to popular webinar offerings. Our objective was to identify and disseminate best practices in public health webinar development for use in development of high-quality, timely webinars for public health practice. PROGRAM: We assessed data from the Hot Topics in Practice monthly webinar series that included public health professionals primarily from US Northwest states as regular webinar participants. IMPLEMENTATION: We conducted a secondary analysis, using participant evaluation data from 9 years of online questionnaires. Subsequent recommendations were developed using participants' responses to postwebinar questionnaires. Thematic analysis of qualitative quarterly reports, as well as 12 years of webinar production team knowledge, supplemented development of best practice recommendations that were not recognized through secondary analysis of respondent questionnaires alone. EVALUATION: Participant responses tended to be positive when specific practices were followed. These best practices were identified as follows: Address timely topics on current events; Feature only 1 to 2 speakers; Use a limited number of consistently formatted slides; Stay on schedule and make time for audience questions; Minimize technical difficulties; Use effective storytelling to share lessons and key data; Intentionally foster audience engagement (eg, through audience polling, question and answer); Develop clear learning objectives; Provide appropriate resources for continued learning; and Consider audience feedback for continuous improvements. DISCUSSION: Our team identified essential elements for creating high-quality, engaging webinars for public health learning. Best practice recommendations resulting from this study address gaps in quality standards and provide knowledge needed for making effective learning accessible to public health practice and supportive of advancing the field. Findings were synthesized into a practice guide, And We're Live: Creating Engaging Public Health Webinars , to aid public health learning.

Enhancing Access to Quality Online Training to Strengthen Public Health Preparedness and Response.

OBJECTIVES: To improve access to quality online training materials developed from 2010 to 2015 by 14 Preparedness and Emergency Response Learning Centers (PERLCs) by creating quality standards and enhancing searchability through a new Web-based public health training catalog. METHODS: The PERLC-developed training materials (n = 530) were evaluated for their capability to support development of preparedness competencies as established by 2 evidence-based competency frameworks. Inclusion/exclusion criteria and evaluation guidelines regarding training quality (design, technology, and instructional components) were systematically applied to PERLC products to create a training catalog. Twenty emergency preparedness professionals pilot tested content and provided feedback to improve catalog design and function. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of PERLC resources (n = 413) met our quality standards for inclusion in the catalog's searchable database: 358 self-paced courses, 55 informational briefs, and other materials. Twenty-one training bundles were curated. DISCUSSION: We established quality guidelines, identified strengths and weaknesses in PERLC resources, and improved accessibility to trainings. Guidelines established by this work can be generalized to trainings outside the preparedness domain. Enhancing access to quality training resources can serve as a valuable tool for increasing emergency preparedness competence.

Real-time assessment of nurse work environment and stress.

Ecological momentary assessment methods were used to examine real-time relationships between work environment factors and stress in a sample of 119 registered nurses (RNs) in acute and critical care settings of three hospitals. The RNs carried handheld computers for 1 week of work shifts and were randomly surveyed within 90-min intervals to self-report work activity, perceived workload, and stress. Mixed effects linear regression analyses were completed to predict the stress score in the sample. The number of patients assigned significantly predicted stress; the greater the number of assigned patients, the higher the reported stress (p<.01). Age, gender, adult versus pediatric facility type, familiarity with patients, and proportion of direct care tasks were not significant predictors of stress. Further research is needed to link work environment factors and stress with errors among nurses.