Knees with isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis show a substantial variability in functional knee phenotypes with demographic-specific variations: Phenotypic analysis of 305 knees.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to assess and describe the phenotypic variation in the coronal plane of knees affected by isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA). The secondary aim was to investigate the potential gender-specific and age-related differences in functional knee phenotypes among knees with isolated lateral compartment OA. METHODS: A comprehensive classification system was used to categorize 305 knees with isolated lateral compartment OA based on their mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA), and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). The phenotypic variation of functional knee phenotypes was assessed for the entire cohort and stratified by gender and age category. RESULTS: Among knees with isolated lateral compartment OA, a total of 60 distinct functional knee phenotypes were identified, with phenotype VALHKA6°NEUFMA0°VALTMA3° being the most prevalent (10.8 %). Gender-specific differences were evident, with females exhibiting significantly greater valgus alignment in both mean HKA and TMA values compared with males (HKA: -6.4° vs. -5.4°, respectively; P = 0.02 and TMA 94.4° vs. 89.0°, respectively; P = 0.005). Age-related variations included younger patients predominantly displaying femoral deformities, while older patients primarily exhibited isolated tibial- or combined femoral and tibial deformities. CONCLUSIONS: There is a broad variation of functional knee phenotypes among knees affected by isolated lateral compartment OA, with gender-specific and age-related differences. Recognizing this inherent phenotypic diversity during preoperative planning may facilitate the implementation of tailored approaches that account for the unique characteristics and bony deformities of the individual knee.

Higher incidence of patellar incongruence after under correction of pre-arthritic coronal alignment following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare patellofemoral joint alignment of knees with restored pre-arthritic coronal alignment versus knees with under- or overcorrection from their pre-arthritic coronal alignment following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and evaluate the effect of patellofemoral joint alignment on patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 517 knees following robotic-arm assisted medial UKA was conducted. Postoperative mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA) was compared to estimated pre-arthritic coronal alignment, using the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA). Knees were considered restored to the pre-arthritic coronal alignment if mHKA was within 2.0° of aHKA (Group 1). Non-restored knees were subdivided into > 2.0° over correction (Group 2), or > 2.0° under correction (Group 3) from the pre-arthritic coronal alignment. Patellar congruence and patellar tilt angles were compared between groups. The Kujala score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) were analyzed by group. Continuous data was compared using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Chi-squared tests were used to compare discrete variables. Logistic regressions were conducted to estimate the probability of postoperative patellofemoral malalignment. RESULTS: Group 1 included 357 knees (69.1%), Group 2 included 57 knees (11.0%), and Group 3 included 57 knees (11.0%). The prevalence of postoperative abnormal patellar congruence (i.e. ≥ 17°) was higher in Group 3 at 40.4% (p = 0.009), with a higher odds ratio of having an abnormal patellar congruence angle (2.3, p = 0.01) compared to Group 1. The prevalence of postoperative abnormal patellar tilt (i.e. ≥ 14°) was comparable between groups (n.s.). At mean follow up of 4.4 ± 1.6 years, Kujala was worse in Group 3 (76.6 ± 17.4 compared to 84.0 ± 14.9 and 85.0 ± 14.4 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.006). Mean KOOS, JR outcomes were comparable among groups. No significantly inferior Kujala or KOOS, JR outcomes were observed in patients across all groups with abnormal patellar congruence or tilt angles. CONCLUSION: Knees with under correction from their pre-arthritic coronal alignment following medial UKA were associated with a two-fold higher probability of having postoperative patellofemoral incongruence, as well as inferior mid-term Kujala scores compared to knees with restored pre-arthritic coronal alignment and knees with overcorrection from their pre-arthritic coronal alignment. Patellofemoral incongruence alone did not negatively impact functional outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Knees with anteromedial osteoarthritis show a substantial phenotypic variation prior and following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the phenotypic variation using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification among 1000 knees with anteromedial osteoarthritis (OA) both prior to and following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The secondary aim of this study was to investigate whether knees maintained their preoperative CPAK phenotype and to evaluate the phenotypic alterations following medial UKA. METHODS: The CPAK classification was used to analyze 1000 knees that underwent medial UKA as treatment for anteromedial OA. Knees were categorized into nine distinct CPAK phenotypes based on their arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), which estimates the pre-arthritic alignment, and joint line obliquity (JLO), both pre- and postoperatively. Phenotypic variation was analyzed by sex and age, and the phenotypic alterations following medial UKA were evaluated by phenotype. RESULTS: Preoperatively, CPAK phenotype I had the highest prevalence (45.0%). Among males, the preoperative prevalence of CPAK phenotype I was significantly higher compared to females (53.2% vs. 35.0%, respectively; p ≤ .001), whereas females exhibited a significantly higher occurrence of CPAK phenotype V compared to males (9.8% vs. 4.4%, respectively; p ≤ .015). Following medial UKA, CPAK phenotype II had the highest prevalence (53.3%). Overall, 45.1% of knees maintained their preoperative CPAK phenotype following medial UKA, which was most frequently observed among CPAK phenotype II (67.7%) and III (65.8%). CONCLUSION: There is a substantial variation in CPAK phenotypes among knees with anteromedial OA, as well as following treatment with medial UKA. This variability challenges the assumption of uniform characteristics among knees with an identical wear pattern associated with anteromedial OA and emphasizes the complexity and variability of this specific form of OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective cohort study.