Relationship between functional capacity and quality of life in heart transplant patients.

The goal of heart transplantation (HT) is not only to prolong the life of patients with end-stage heart failure, but also to offer them the sort of health they enjoyed before the disease. It is widely known that patients' functional capacity improves after HT but what about their quality of life (QoL)? Do functional capacity and QoL improve simultaneously? In the present study, we compared the progression of effort capacity and QoL in the first 2 years after HT. A prospective longitudinal study was performed in 58 heart transplant recipients (43 males, 15 females, age 51.6 ± 10 years) able to complete an effort test 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after transplantation. The studied variables included the five dimensions of the Euroqol-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D) test: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety, and depression; a visual analog scale from 0 to 100; and the results (metabolic equivalent units [METs] and time of exercise) of the effort test at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after transplantation. Analysis of variance was used to compare these variables at each point. Significance was set at P < .05. Functional capacity, measured by both METs and time of exercise, improved progressively (METs: 2 months: 5.2 ± 1.8, 6 months: 6.6 ± 2.1, 12 months: 7.5 ± 2.2, and 24 months: 8.5 ± 2.3, P < .001). As well, the result of EQ-5D questionare improved in parallel to exercise capacity. However, visual analog scale score did not change significatively during the follow-up (2 months: 78.9.3 ± 16.1, 6 months: 83.8 ± 11.3, 12 months: 83.3 ± 11.1, 24 months: 85.2 ± 14.9; P = .192), reaching a plateau at 6 to 24 months. In conclusion, the improvement in functional capacity shown by heart transplant recipients in the first 2 years after transplantation was not parallel to the feelings of well-being measured by the analog scale of the EQ-5D. Possibly long after transplantation patients will compare themselves to healthy people rather than to their state before HT, resulting in improvements the visual analog scale.

Long-term prognostic implications of metabolic syndrome in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MS) increases the risk of cardiovascular events due to endothelial dysfunction. There are few studies evaluating the impact of MS on the survival of heart transplantation (HTx) patients. AIM: The aim of this study was to study the impact of MS in the early period and on the long-term survival after HTx. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 196 HTx patients with a minimum survival of 1 year post-HTx. A diagnosis of MS was made at 3 months after HTx, if at least 3 of the following criteria were met: triglyceride levels ≥150 mg/dL (or drug treatment for hypertriglyceridemia); high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <40 mg/dL in men and <50 mg/dL in women (or drug treatment to raise HDL-C levels); diabetes mellitus on drug treatment or fasting glucose levels ≥100 mg/dL; blood pressure ≥130/85 mm Hg (or on antihypertensive drug treatment); and body mass index (BMI) ≥30. We used the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test) to calculate long-term survival and Student t and chi-square tests for comparisons. RESULTS: Among 196 patients, 96 developed MS. There were no differences between the groups with versus without MS in recipient gender, underlying etiology, smoking, pre-HTx diabetes, or immunosuppressive regimen. However, differences were observed between groups in age (MS: 53 ± 9 vs non-MS: 50 ± 12 years; P = .001); pre-HTx creatinine (MS: 1.2 ± 0.3 vs non-MS: 1.0 ± 0.4 mg/dL; P = .001); BMI (MS: 27.3 ± 4 vs non-MS: 24.6 ± 4; P = .001); pre-HTx hypertension (MS: 48% vs non-MS: 17%; P < .001); and dyslipidemia (MS: 53% vs non-MS: 37%; P = .023). Long-term survival was better among the non-MS group, but the difference did not reach significance (MS: 2381 ± 110 vs non-MS: 2900 ± 110 days; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: The development of MS early after HTx is a common complication that affects nearly 50% of HTx patients. The prognostic implication of this syndrome on overall survival might occur in the long term.

Normalization of the heart rate response to exercise 6 months after cardiac transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplant recipients show an abnormal heart rate (HR) response to exercise due to complete cardiac denervation after surgery. They present elevated resting HR, minimal increase in HR during exercise, with maximal HR reached during the recovery period. The objective of this study was to study the frequency of normalization of the abnormal HR in the first 6 months after transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 27 heart transplant recipients who underwent treadmill exercise tests at 2 and 6 months after heart transplantation (HT). HR responses to exercise were classified as normal or abnormal, depending on achieving all of the following criteria: (1) increased HR for each minute of exercise, (2) highest HR at the peak exercise intensity, and (3) decreased HR for each minute of the recovery period. The HR response at 2 months was compared with the results at 6 months post-HT. RESULTS: At 2 months post-HT, 96.3% of the patients showed abnormal HR responses to exercise. Four months later, 11 patients (40.7%) had normalized HR responses (P<.001), which also involved a significant decrease in the time to achieve the highest HR after exercise (124.4±63.8 seconds in the first test and 55.6±44.6 seconds in the second). A significant improvement in exercise capacity and chronotropic competence was also shown in tests performed at 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We observed important improvements in HR responses to exercise at 6 months after HT, which may represent early functional cardiac reinnervation.

Exercise tolerance after beta blockade in recent cardiac transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Exercise capacity has been shown to be reduced among cardiac transplant recipients. This observation is directly connected to both the transplanted heart's dependence on circulating catecholamines and the abnormal sympathoadrenal response to exercise in these patients. Taking into account this background, there is reluctance to use beta-blockers after heart transplantation. Nevertheless, this point remains controversial. Our aim was to examine exercise tolerance after an oral dose of atenolol early after cardiac transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen nonrejecting, otherwise health, cardiac transplant recipients were included in this study at a mean of 61.9 +/- 25.6 days after surgery; 13 were men. Patients performed controlled exercise to a symptom-limited maximum before and 2 hours after taking an oral dose of atenolol. Heart rate, blood pressure, exercise time, and metabolic equivalent units (METS) were recorded at rest as well as during and after exercise. We compared results depending on taking atenolol. RESULTS: Resting (101.7 +/- 14.5 vs 84 +/- 12.4 bpm; P = .001) and peak heart rates (128.5 +/- 12.9 vs 100.7 +/- 16 bpm; P = .001) were significantly higher before than after beta blockade. Resting systolic blood pressure was slightly higher before compared with after beta blockade (129.3 +/- 23.6 vs 122.2 +/- 20.3 mm Hg; P = .103). However, there was neither a significant difference in the length of exercise (3.17 +/- 1.96 vs 3.40 +/- 2.48 minutes; P = .918) nor in the estimated oxygen consumption (METS; 5.07 +/- 1.8 vs 5.31 +/- 2.2; P = .229). Furthermore, no patient reported a greater degree of tiredness after beta blockade. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed little adverse effect on exercise tolerance by beta blockade in recently transplanted patients. Atenolol seemed to be safe in this context.

Effect of clinical trials on survival after heart transplantation.

UNLABELLED: The application of clinical trials (CTs) to daily practice is based on the assumption that the patients included in these trials are similar to those seen on a daily basis. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate patient survival depending on whether they were included in a CT. We studied 217 patients who underwent heart transplantation (HT) between January 2000 and September 2006. We excluded patients who received combination transplants, those who underwent repeat HT, and pediatric patients who underwent HT. In total, 54 patients were included in a CT and 163 were not (NCT). The statistical tests included the t test, the chi(2) test and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Patients in the NCT group were in worse condition at HT, with a greater percentage of inotropic treatments pre-HT (36% vs 17%; P = .005), emergency transplants procedures (30% vs 13%; P = .01), and worse functional status pre-HT (P = .03). The NCT group exhibited lower survival (80.37% vs 87.04%; P = 0.13, log-rank test). There were no significant differences in the other analyzed variables. CONCLUSIONS: Patients included in CTs tend to have better long-term survival rates, for several reasons: patients in the CT group were more stable at HT (selection bias), and the close follow-up of patients in CTs makes it more likely that any complication will be detected and treated early (follow-up bias).

Hypertension after heart transplantation: predictive factors and number and classes of drugs for its management.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the factors that cause arterial hypertension after heart transplantation (HT) and the drugs used in its management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 247 consecutive patients who had undergone HT between 2000 and 2006 and who survived for at least 6 months. We excluded patients who received combination transplants, those who underwent repeat transplantation, and pediatric patients who had received transplants. Hypertension was defined as the need to use drugs for its control. Renal dysfunction was defined as serum creatinine concentration greater than 1.4 mg/dL, and diabetes as the need for an antidiabetes drug for its control. Statistical analyses were performed using the t test, the chi(2) test, and Cox regression. RESULTS: Mean (SD) patient age was 52 (10) years, and 87.4% of the patients were men. Follow-up was 72 (42) months. Hypertension was present in 33.3% of patients before HT and in 71.1% at some time after HT. The number of drugs used to control hypertension was 1.3 (0.5); one drug was used in 72.9% of patients. The most often used single class of drugs were calcium channel blockers (63.2%), followed by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (20%), and angiotensin receptor blockers (15.8%). Only pre-HT hypertension was significantly associated with greater use of antihypertensive drugs post-HT (mean [SD], 1.48 [0.65] vs 1.22 [0.41]; P = .005). At univariate analysis, only pre-HT hypertension was associated with the presence of post-HT hypertension (80.5% vs 65.5%; P = .02). At Cox regression analysis, recipient age (P = .02) and pre-HT hypertension (P = .004) were associated with post-HT hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension is common after HT; however, in most patients, it can be controlled with a single antihypertensive agent. The most important factors in the development of hypertension are the presence of pre-HT hypertension and advanced age.