Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 22(3): 265-270, 2023 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36877883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance related to prolonged antibiotic use is an emerging threat to public health. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recent trends in oral antibiotic use for acne treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2014 through September 2016 using the IBM MarketScan® claims database. Patients were aged ≥9 years, prescribed an oral antibiotic, and diagnosed with acne vulgaris on 2 separate occasions. The primary outcome was the duration of oral antibiotic treatment over 12 months; continuous use was defined as ≤30-day gap between prescriptions. RESULTS: The most commonly prescribed antibiotic treatments (N=46,267) were doxycycline (36.7%) and minocycline (36.5%). Overall, 36%, 18%, 10%, and 5% of patients continuously used any oral antibiotic at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Among patients who continuously used tetracyclines, a similar percentage was prescribed minocycline (40.2%, 18.6%, 10.5%, and 5.1%) vs doxycycline (34.7%, 14.6%, 7.7%, and 3.9%) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. A greater percentage of patients continued use of tetracyclineclass antibiotics than other therapeutic classes. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis of health-care claims data. Relatively short study duration. CONCLUSION: Nearly 20% of patients continuously used oral antibiotics for ≥6 months, exceeding American Academy of Dermatology guideline recommendations of 3 to 4 months. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(3):265-270. doi:10.36849/JDD.7345.


Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Antibacterianos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Minociclina/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 1033980, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36569144

RESUMEN

Background: Vestibular side effects such as dizziness and vertigo can be a limitation for some antibiotics commonly used to treat acne, rosacea, and other dermatology indications. Objective: Unlike minocycline, which is a second-generation tetracycline, sarecycline, a narrow-spectrum third-generation tetracycline-class agent approved to treat acne vulgaris, has demonstrated low rates of vestibular-related adverse events in clinical trials. In this work, we evaluate the brain-penetrative and lipophilic attributes of sarecycline in 2 non-clinical studies and discuss potential associations with vestibular adverse events. Methods: Rats received either intravenous sarecycline or minocycline (1.0 mg/kg). Blood-brain penetrance was measured at 1, 3, and 6 h postdosing. In another analysis, the lipophilicity of sarecycline, minocycline, and doxycycline was measured via octanol/water and chloroform/water distribution coefficients (logD) at pH 3.5, 5.5, and 7.4. Results: Unlike minocycline, sarecycline was not detected in brain samples postdosing. In the octanol/water solvent system, sarecycline had a numerically lower lipophilicity profile than minocycline and doxycycline at pH 5.5 and 7.4. Conclusion: The reduced blood-brain penetrance and lipophilicity of sarecycline compared with other tetracyclines may explain low rates of vestibular-related adverse events seen in clinical trials.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA