Expression of L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule (L1CAM), A Nephronal Principal Cell Marker, in Nephrogenic Adenoma.

Nephrogenic adenoma is a benign, reactive lesion seen predominantly in the urinary bladder and often associated with an antecedent inflammation, instrumentation, or operative history. Its histopathological diversity can create diagnostic dilemmas and pathologists utilize morphological evaluation along with available immunohistochemical markers to navigate these challenges. Immunohistochemical assays currently do not designate or specify nephrogenic adenoma's potential putative cell of origin. Leveraging single-cell RNA sequencing technology, we nominated a principal cell collecting duct marker, L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM), as a potential biomarker for nephrogenic adenoma. Immunohistochemical characterization revealed L1CAM to be positive in all 35 (100%) patient samples of nephrogenic adenoma; negative expression was seen in the benign urothelium, benign prostatic glands, urothelial carcinoma in situ, prostatic adenocarcinoma, majority of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In the study, we also utilized single-cell RNA sequencing to nominate a novel compendium of biomarkers specific for proximal tubule, loop of Henle, and distal tubule (including principal and intercalated cells) which can be used to perform nephronal mapping utilizing RNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry technology. Employing this technique on nephrogenic adenoma we found enrichment of both principal cell marker L1CAM and, the proximal tubule types-A and -B cells markers, PDZKI1P1 and PIGR respectively. The cell type markers for the intercalated cell of distal tubules (LINC01187 and FOXI1), and the loop of Henle (UMOD and IRX5), were found to be uniformly absent in nephrogenic adenoma. Overall, our findings show that based on cell type-specific implications of L1CAM expression, the shared expression pattern of L1CAM between distal tubule principal cell (P) cells and nephrogenic adenoma. L1CAM expression will be of potential value in assisting surgical pathologists towards a diagnosis of nephrogenic adenoma in challenging patient samples.

Diagnosing liposarcoma on (peri)-renal mass biopsy: A clinicopathological study of 30 cases.

AIMS: Classification of renal neoplasms on small tissue biopsies is in increasing demand, and maintaining broad differential diagnostic considerations in this setting is necessary. When evaluating a renal or perirenal tumour biopsy with sarcomatoid morphology, together with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma as top diagnostic considerations, it is vital to additionally consider the possibility of well-differentiated and de-differentiated liposarcoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study reports a series of 30 biopsy samples from sites in or around the kidney collected from four institutions in which the correct diagnosis was either well-differentiated or de-differentiated liposarcoma. The majority (26 of 30, 87%) of lesions were accurately diagnosed on biopsy sampling, all of which incorporated testing for MDM2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) or a combination of the two as part of the diagnostic work-up. Tumour expression of MDM2 by IHC without confirmatory FISH analysis was sometimes (30%) sufficient to reach a diagnosis, but demonstration of MDM2 amplification by FISH was ascertained in the majority (57%) of biopsy samples. A diagnosis of de-differentiated liposarcoma was not definitively established until resection in four (13%) patients, as no MDM2 testing was performed on the corresponding pre-operative biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: When a retroperitoneal tumour is not clinically suspected, histological consideration of a liposarcoma diagnosis may be overlooked. Implementation of ancillary immunohistochemical and cytogenetic testing can ultimately lead to a definitive diagnosis in this potentially misleading anatomical location.

Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma With Extensive Retraction Artifact: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall From Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma.

In addition to "classic" and eosinophilic subtype, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is well-known to demonstrate various morphological patterns including adenomatoid, microcystic, pigmented, multicystic, papillary, neuroendocrine-like, and small cell-like, all of which are important to appreciate for accurate diagnosis. Herein, we expand on a unique chromophobe RCC morphology not previously described consisting of tumor cells with extensive stromal retraction, mimicking upper urothelial tract micropapillary carcinoma (MPC). Twelve MPC-like chromophobe RCC nephrectomies were reviewed with clinicopathological features recorded; molecular testing was performed on 7 of 12 tumors. Patients were mostly men (n=10) with a mean age of 65 years. Mean tumor size was 6.4 cm with pathological stage distribution as follows: 4 (33%) T1a, 2 (17%) T1b, 1 (8%) T2b, and 3 (25%) T3a. The extent of MPC-like chromophobe RCC foci ranged from 10% to 40% (mean=26%; there was no correlation between the extent of MPC-like chromophobe RCC foci and tumor stage). Other chromophobe RCC morphological patterns were not identified. When performed, all (100%) tumors depicted prototypic chromophobe RCC staining pattern of KIT positivity/KRT7 positivity. Molecular showed 6 of 7 (86%) with multiple chromosomal losses. Clinically significant mutations were identified in NF1, TP53, FLCN (likely somatic), CHEK2, and ZFHX3 genes. Follow up available in 9 patients showed no evidence of disease (mean=23 months). Although the etiology behind the extensive stromal retraction in our tumors is unknown, this may likely be artifactual in nature. Nonetheless, it is important to include MPC-like chromophobe RCC in the spectrum of "variant" morphologies to avoid diagnostic pitfalls from micropapillary carcinoma.

GATA3 Expression in Prostatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

Urothelial carcinoma and prostatic adenocarcinoma can have overlapping histologic features and in some instances pose challenges to pathologists. GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a well-established tool to aid in this specific diagnostic dilemma as it has been shown to be a sensitive marker for urothelial carcinoma and a putatively specific marker in excluding prostatic adenocarcinoma. However, in encountering an index tumor of prostatic adenosquamous carcinoma positive for GATA3, herein we sought to investigate this potential diagnostic pitfall in a larger series of tumors. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed prostatic adenosquamous carcinomas diagnosed in 17 patients across the authors' institutions and personal consult collections in the past 10 years. GATA3 IHC was either reviewed or performed on tumors not previously tested. We also recorded other immunostains that were performed at initial diagnosis. Positivity for GATA3 was found in 9 of 17 (53%) tumors, all within squamous regions (2 tumors also showed concomitant moderate GATA3 positivity within glandular elements). The GATA3 positive tumors were all positive for p63 in the 7 tumors where p63 was also performed. Of all tumors tested, NKX3.1 was positive in 100% (13/13) of the glandular elements (3 tumors also showed NKX3.1 concomitant positivity within squamous regions). In summary, when encountering a carcinoma with mixed glandular/squamous features in which prostatic origin is being considered, awareness of GATA3 immunoreactivity in a subset of prostatic adenosquamous carcinoma is critical to avoid diagnostic pitfalls.

Topline/Final Diagnostic Inclusion of Relevant Histologic Findings in Surgical Pathology Reporting of Carcinoma in Prostate Biopsies.

INTRODUCTION: As the list of histologic parameters to include in surgical pathology reports of prostate cancer biopsies grows, some pathologists include this information in the microscopic description or summary sections of the report, whereas others include it in the "topline" or final diagnosis section. This prompted us to develop a multi-institutional survey to assess reporting trends among genitourinary (GU) pathologists. METHODS: A survey instrument was shared among 110 GU pathologists via surveymonkey.com. Anonymized respondent data was analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-four (76%) participants completed the survey across four continents. Most participants report tumor volume quantitation (88%), number of cores involved (89%), and both Gleason grade and Grade group (93%) in their topline; 71% include percent of pattern 4, with another 16% including it depending on cancer grade; 58% include the presence of cribriform growth pattern 4, with another 11% including it depending on cancer grade. When present, most include extraprostatic extension (90%), prostatic intraductal carcinoma (77%), and perineural invasion (77%). Inclusion of atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) in the topline diagnosis was cancer grade-dependent, with 74% including AIP in Grade group 1, 61% in Grade group 2, 45% in Grade group 3, 30% in Grade group 4, and 26% in Grade group 5 cancers. CONCLUSION: Certain histologic features such as Gleason grade and tumor volume/cores involved are frequently included in the topline diagnosis, whereas the incorporation of other findings are more variably included. Prostate biopsy reporting remains a dynamic process with stylistic similarities and differences existing among GU pathologists.

Upper Urothelial Tract Extraosseous Bone Formation: An Unexpected Finding and Differential Diagnostic Considerations.

Extraosseous bone formation of the upper urothelial tract is an unusual phenomenon with limited documentation in the uropathology literature, reported in only 2 clinical series of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal stones. While speculations regarding the pathogenesis of this occurrence have been published, heterotopic ossification is still poorly understood. We report the finding of extraosseous bone formation in the renal pelvis of a 30-year-old male patient with a history of kidney stones. Histologic sections of the ureter and renal pelvis showed submucosal nodules of woven bone. Ancillary fluorescence in-situ hybridization studies were negative for MDM2 amplification and USP6 rearrangement.

Vascular, adipose tissue, and/or calyceal invasion in clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumour: potentially problematic diagnostic scenarios.

AIMS: The 2022 WHO classification for kidney tumours recently downgraded clear cell tubulopapillary (also known as clear cell papillary) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to a benign neoplasm (i.e. clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumour) based on the overwhelmingly banal nature of this neoplasm. However, it has been recognized that some clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumours demonstrate vascular, adipose or pelvicalyceal invasion, raising the possibility of more aggressive behaviour. The goal of this study was to determine if these 'high stage' features have an effect on tumour prognosis, warranting a carcinoma designation. METHODS AND RESULTS: After excluding cases with tissue artefact (i.e. prior core biopsy track changes) and other RCC subtypes with next-generation sequencing, nine clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumours with these so-called 'high stage' features, and otherwise classic morphologic and immunophenotypic findings, including low-grade cytology and 'cup-like' CA9 expression, were evaluated. Median tumour size was 2.2 cm with a range of 0.8 to 6.7 cm. Eight cases (89%) demonstrated perinephric or hilar adipose tissue invasion, although most of these cases showed a bulging (in contrast to an infiltrative) growth pattern. One case demonstrated renal vascular invasion in addition to hilar adipose tissue invasion, and one case demonstrated extension into the pelvicalyceal system. There were no recurrences or evidence of metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: These overall findings continue to support the benign designation for clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumours, despite morphologic features that might raise the possibility of a 'higher stage' neoplasm.

Biphasic papillary (biphasic squamoid alveolar) renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 17 renal cell carcinomas including 10 papillary adenomas.

Biphasic papillary renal cell carcinoma (synonymous with biphasic squamoid alveolar renal cell carcinoma) is considered within the spectrum of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). With < 70 reported cases of biphasic PRCC, there is limited data on the pathologic spectrum and clinical course. Seventeen biphasic PRCC cases and 10 papillary adenomas with similar biphasic morphology were assessed. The mean age of the biphasic PRCC patients was 62 years (male to female ratio of 1.8:1), from 10 partial nephrectomies, 6 radical nephrectomies, and 1 biopsy. The mean tumor size was 3.6 cm (range 1.6-8 cm), with 24% showing multifocality. Fifteen out of 17 cases were limited to the kidney (one of which was staged as pT2a but had lung metastases at diagnosis) and 2/17 cases were staged as T3a. All tumors showed typical biphasic morphology with an extent of squamoid foci widely variable from 10 to 95%. Emperipolesis was identified in 88% of cases. All biphasic PRCC tested exhibited positivity for PAX8 (16/16), keratin 7 (17/17), EMA (15/15), AMACR (17/17), and vimentin (12/12) in both large and small cells; cyclin D1 was only expressed in the large cells (16/16). The 10 papillary adenomas showed a similar immunoprofile to biphasic PRCC. NGS testing performed on 13 biphasic PRCC revealed 4 (31%) harboring MET SNVs. In 1/5 (20%) papillary adenomas, a pathogenic MET SNV was identified. Biphasic PRCC is rare with a generally similar immunoprofile to "type 1" PRCC but with notable strong positivity for cyclin D1 in the large cell component. Although most of the biphasic PRCC cases were of small size, low stage, and with an indolent behavior, one patient had metastatic disease and one patient died of the disease.

Are Renal Tumor Diagnostics Becoming Too Advanced for Many Pathology Laboratories?

The recent influx of novel renal neoplasms, particularly molecularly-defined renal carcinomas, has introduced new challenges in the daily practice of most pathology laboratories. These tumors are uncommon, they do not always have well-established morphologic features, and the expression profile of most common biomarkers is not well understood. Moreover, the diagnosis of molecularly-defined renal carcinomas requires the documentation of the disease-defining molecular alteration, with molecular studies or surrogate immunohistochemical markers. Unfortunately, most pathology laboratories lack molecular laboratories, or it is not cost-effective to maintain assays of the specific biomarkers in these unusual tumors. Pathologists should have updated knowledge about the recent changes in renal neoplasms and be aware of these limitations.

Scars Run Deep: Problematic Morphology and Immunoprofile of Scars in Renal Oncocytomas.

In some instances, the central scar of renal oncocytoma can demonstrate entrapped cells with unusual morphology and aberrant immunoprofile creating potential diagnostic confusion. Herein, 100 renal oncocytomas containing scars with embedded epithelial cells were identified from 6 institutions, including nephrectomies (64% partial, 36% radical) of similar laterality (left = 51%) and sex distribution (male = 56%), with patient ages ranging from 38 to 86 years (mean = 64.3years) and tumor sizes ranging from 2 to 16 cm (mean = 5.3 cm). Immunohistochemistry was performed on all tumors for KRT7, KIT, vimentin, and CA9 with staining intensity and extensity separately analyzed. Of 4 architectural patterns of cells within the scar, 60% showed tubular pattern. Of 4 cytologies within the scar, flat/elongated (49%) and cuboidal cells (40%) predominated. Within the scar, 62% showed eosinophilic cytoplasm, with 38% showing both cleared and eosinophilic cytoplasm; notably, 79% showed higher grade nuclei than typical oncocytes. A subset of scar cells showed mucinous-like basophilic secretions (19%). Compared to background renal oncocytoma, tumor cells within the scar were more often positive for vimentin, KRT7, and CA9 and more frequently negativity for KIT. Specifically, of the notable "aberrant" immunoprofiles, 79% showed KRT7 positivity/KIT negativity/vimentin positive, 84% showed vimentin positivity/CA9 positivity, and 78% showed KIT negativity/vimentin positivity/CA9 positivity. While encountering scars within renal oncocytomas is not uncommon, what is not well appreciated is the unique morphology and immunohistochemistry of tumor cells within the scar. Comparing tumor morphology and immunoprofile of the scar to the background oncocytoma is helpful to avoid interpretative confusion.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma metastatic to the kidney: a series of 10 patients emphasizing unilateral presentation and long time interval from primary diagnosis.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) metastasis to kidney is rare. We identified 10 patients with metastatic AdCC in multi-institutional collaboration. Core needle biopsy was the most common specimen (n = 6). Patients were predominately female (n = 7) with a median age of 48 years (35-62 years). The most common primary location of the AdCC was head and neck (n = 6, among them parotid gland = 4), followed by lung (n = 2), breast (n = 1), and vulva (n = 1). Median lapse between primary AdCC and renal metastasis was almost 13 years (154 months, range 1-336 months). Moreover, all but one patient had unilateral kidney metastasis. The majority of metastatic AdCC within the kidney demonstrated mixed growth patterns, frequently cribriform, and tubular morphology. Follow-up available for 8 patients showed 6 alive with disease and 2 died of disease (the longest survival was 4 years past the diagnosis of renal metastasis). A systematic literature review including 29 patients revealed that kidney metastasis by AdCC is usually a late event, is typically unilateral, and is usually composed of one to three foci, and thus has clinical features which mimic a primary renal tumor.

Seminal Vesicle Stromal Lipofuscinosis: A Rare Incidental Finding with Potential for Misdiagnosis.

We report a patient with isolated stromal lipofuscinosis of the seminal vesicle, a rare entity characterized by intracytoplasmic pigmented granules within stromal cells intimately surrounding seminal vesicle epithelium. Only 4 patients with this unusual phenomenon have been previously reported in the literature. Recognizing this incidental and presumably non-pathologic finding is important to prevent misclassification as a more concerning lesion.

Germline APC Alterations May Predispose to Testicular Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors.

Sertoli cell tumor is a type of testicular sex cord-stromal tumor (TSCST) typically driven by gain-of-function CTNNB1 variants. Recently, molecular studies have identified TSCSTs (including Sertoli cell tumors) with loss-of-function APC variants, raising the possibility that germline APC alterations may predispose to TSCSTs. In this study, we evaluated 4 TSCSTs from 4 individual patients, including 3 APC -mutant neoplasms identified in prior studies (1 in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis [FAP] and 2 in patients with unknown syndromic status) and 1 tumor of unknown mutational status diagnosed in a patient with known FAP. Three neoplasms were typical Sertoli cell tumors, and 1 was a malignant unclassified TSCT. All neoplasms exhibited diffuse nuclear beta-catenin expression. Non-neoplastic tissue could be obtained for DNA sequencing in the 3 Sertoli cell tumors. Comparative assessment of non-neoplastic and lesional tissue in these cases suggested that germline APC variants with subsequent inactivation of the gene (loss of heterozygosity) were the likely oncogenic driver of these Sertoli cell tumors. In the malignant unclassified TSCSTs, APC inactivation was also interpreted as the most likely driver event, and the germline origin of the variant was inferred using a recently published method. The results of this study suggest that pathogenic germline APC alterations (eg, FAP and variants thereof) may predispose to TSCSTs.

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma With Syncytial-Type Multinucleated Giant Tumor Cells: A Clinicopathologic Study of 14 Cases.

The presence of syncytial-type multinucleated giant tumor cells with emperipolesis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is uncommon, with only 31 cumulative published cases to date. After a rereview of 125 clear cell RCC of World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grade 3 or 4, 14 clear cell RCCs with admixed syncytial-type giant cells (to our knowledge, the largest series to date) were found with a mean patient age of 67 years and with no sex difference (M = 7, F = 7). Mean tumor size was 7.3 cm. The syncytial-type giant cells comprised between 2% and 20% of the tumor and were present mainly around areas of necrosis. Five tumors were staged as pT1 or pT2, 8 as pT3, and 1 as pT4. Other findings included sarcomatoid differentiation (3/14), rhabdoid differentiation (4/14), and emperipolesis (12/14). Positive immunostains included keratin AE1/AE3 (13/13), carbonic anhydrase 9 and CD10 (12/14 each), vimentin (8/14), EMA (5/12), and alpha-methyacyl-CoA racemase (3/12). Keratin 7, keratin 20, human melanoma black 45, KIT, TFE3, cathepsin K, CD68, CD61, and beta human chorionic gonadotropin were negative. Six of 13 patients had recurrence or metastases during a mean follow-up time of 56 months. Four of 13 patients died of disease, 2 of 13 patients were alive with the disease, and 7 of 13 patients had no evidence of disease. Although the incidence of finding syncytial-type multinucleated giant tumor cells in clear cell RCC is low (approximately 1.2%), given that a subset of the patients showed poor outcomes while lacking other poor histologic parameters (eg, sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation), it may be prudent to recognize and report this feature when encountered.

Metastatic solid tumors to the testis: a clinicopathologic evaluation of 157 cases from an international collaboration.

To elucidate the spectrum of metastatic solid tumors to the testis and their clinicopathologic features. The databases and files of 26 pathology departments from 9 countries on 3 continents were surveyed to identify metastatic solid tumors to the testis and to characterize their clinicopathologic features in detail. We compiled a series of 157 cases of metastatic solid tumors that secondarily involved the testis. The mean patient age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 12-93 years). Most patients (127/144; 88%) had clinical manifestation of the disease, with testicular mass/nodule (89/127; 70%) being the most common finding. The main mechanism of testicular involvement was metastasis in 154/157 (98%) cases. Bilateral testicular involvement was present in 12/157 (8%) patients. Concurrent or prior extratesticular metastases were present in 78/101 (77%) patients. The diagnosis was made mainly in orchiectomy specimens (150/157; 95%). Different types of carcinomas (138/157; 87%), most commonly adenocarcinoma (72/157; 46%), were the most common malignancies. The most common primary carcinomas included prostatic (51/149; 34%), renal (29/149; 20%), and colorectal (13/149; 9%). Intratubular growth was identified in 13/124 (11%) cases and paratesticular involvement was found in 73/152 (48%) cases. In patients with available follow-up (110/157; 70%), more than half (58/110; 53%) died of disease. In this largest series compiled to date, we found that most secondary tumors of the testis represent metastases from the genitourinary and gastrointestinal tract carcinomas and typically occur in the setting of disseminated disease.

Metastatic solid tumours to the penis: a clinicopathologic evaluation of 109 cases from an international collaboration.

AIMS: To elucidate the spectrum of metastatic tumours to the penis and their clinicopathologic features. METHODS: The databases and files of 22 pathology departments from eight countries on three continents were queried to identify metastatic solid tumours of the penis and to characterize their clinical and pathologic features. RESULTS: We compiled a series of 109 cases of metastatic solid tumours that secondarily involved the penis. The mean patient age at diagnosis was 71 years (range, 7-94 years). Clinical presentation commonly included a penile nodule/mass (48/95; 51%) and localised pain (14/95; 15%). A prior history of malignancy was known in 92/104 (89%) patients. Diagnosis was made mainly on biopsy (82/109; 75%), or penectomy (21/109; 19%) specimens. The most common penile locations were the glans (45/98; 46%) and corpus cavernosum (39/98; 39%). The most frequent histologic type was adenocarcinoma (56%). Most primary carcinomas originated in the genitourinary (76/108; 70%) and gastrointestinal (20/108; 18%) tracts, including prostate (38/108; 35%), urinary bladder (27/108; 25%), and colon/rectum (18/108; 17%). Concurrent or prior extrapenile metastases were identified in 50/78 (64%) patients. Clinical follow-up (mean 22 months, range 0-171 months) was available for 87/109 (80%) patients, of whom 46 (53%) died of disease. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date of metastatic solid tumours secondarily involving the penis. The most frequent primaries originated from the genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts. Metastatic penile tumours usually presented with penile nodules/masses and pain, and they often occurred in the setting of advanced metastatic disease, portending poor clinical outcomes.