Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 90(3): 101403, 2024. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1564175

RESUMEN

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to compare the efficacy of labetalol and lidocaine in tympanoplasty surgery, specifically evaluating their impact on hemodynamic changes and perioperative outcomes. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 64 patients scheduled for tympanoplasty. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.5-2 mg/min labetalol or 1.5 mg/kg/h lidocaine 1% to achieve controlled hypotension during surgery. The efficacy of the drugs was assessed by comparing the Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), surgeon's satisfaction, time to target MAP, bleeding volume, postoperative pain scores, the need for analgesic medication in recovery, sedation, and other additional parameters. Results The hemodynamic parameters showed a similar trend over time in both the labetalol and lidocaine groups. The median bleeding volume in the labetalol group (10 cc) was lower than that in the lidocaine group (30 cc), although this difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.11). Similarly, surgeon's satisfaction level, pain intensity, and sedation level in the recovery room did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups (p> 0.05). The duration of surgery, recovery stay, and extubation time also did not significantly differ between the groups. Both medications took approximately the same time (20 min) to reach the target MAP and exhibited comparable hemodynamic responses (p> 0.05). Conclusion Both labetalol and lidocaine effectively achieved controlled hypotension during tympanoplasty surgery, thereby improving surgical conditions. The choice of medication should be based on individual patient characteristics and the anesthesiologist's judgment. Level of evidence: II.

2.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp ; 97: 100688, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36478707

RESUMEN

Background: A number of different medications are used in combination with intrathecal bupivacaine for cesarean section anesthesia, but their relative efficacy has not been well established. Objective: To study the relative efficacy of adding either intrathecal fentanyl, intrathecal sufentanil, or intravenous acetaminophen-morphine-fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for pain control in elective cesarean section operations. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial, 105 pregnant women eligible for cesarean section received 10 mg intrathecal bupivacaine (0.5%) in combination with 2 µg intrathecal sufentanil (group 1), 10 µg intrathecal fentanyl (group 2), and an intravenous cocktail of 1 g acetaminophen, 5 mg morphine, and 100 µg fentanyl (group 3). Patients were assessed for analgesia, time to block, and adverse effects. Results: The 3 groups were similar in terms of the time to onset of sensory block and the duration of both sensory and motor block. Groups 1 and 3 differed significantly in the time to peak sensory block, whereas group 1 differed significantly from groups 2 and 3 in the time to peak motor block. The sensory block level reached T4 in most patients. Significant differences in pain (visual analog scale) were demonstrated between groups 1 and 3 at 5 minutes after spinal injection, between groups 1 and 2 at the end of the surgery and upon arrival to the recovery room, and between all groups in the recovery room. Conclusions: When used in addition to 10 mg intrathecal bupivacaine, an intravenous cocktail of 1 g acetaminophen-5 mg morphine-100 µg fentanyl was as efficient as either 10 µg intrathecal fentanyl or 2 µg intrathecal sufentanil in terms of sensory and motor block duration and produced a higher dermatomal level of sensory block. However, intrathecal sufentanil provided better anesthesia quality (less time to onset of motor block and peak sensory-motor block) and better pain control. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2023; 84:XXX-XXX).

3.
Asian J Anesthesiol ; 58(1): 35-44, 2020 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33081432

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary bypass has been recognized as one of the main causes of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, leading to post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of melatonin on the serum levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL-9 in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. METHODS: Forty-four patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery were randomly allocated into two study groups of melatonin (n = 23) and placebo (n = 21). Patients in the melatonin group received two melatonin tablet, 5 mg daily for 3 days before surgery, 10 mg tablet (two doses of 5 mg) 1 h before induction of anesthesia and finally, 10 mg melatonin tablet in the intensive care unit, placebo group patients received placebo at the same time periods. Serum levels of IL-9 and IL-6 were measured as baseline (T1), before induction of anesthesia (T2), 6 and 24 h after off pump (T3, T4). Data were analyzed using SPSS 23 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: The mean serum level of IL-6 was significantly lower in the melatonin group at T3 and T4 (p < 0.05). Also, in both groups, serum levels of IL-6 in T3 showed a significant increase compared to T1. Serum levels of IL-9 had no significant difference between the two groups at T1, T2, T3, and T4. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that pre-operative melatonin administration could modify inflammatory cytokines secretion such as IL-6 while it has no significant effect on the serum levels of IL- 9. Neither of the changes was clinically significant.


Asunto(s)
Interleucina-6 , Melatonina , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Humanos , Interleucina-9
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA