Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transfusion ; 60 Suppl 2: S17-S37, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134122

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This report provides supplemental results from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey on characteristics of the donor population, autologous and directed donations and transfusions, platelets, plasma and granulocyte transfusions, pediatric transfusions, severe donor-related adverse events, cost of blood units, hospitals policies and practices, and inventory, dosing, and supply. METHODS: Weighting and imputation were used to generate national estimates including number of donors, donations, donor deferrals, autologous and directed donations and transfusions, severe donor-related adverse events, platelet and plasma collections and transfusions, number of cross-match procedures, irradiation and leukoreduction, and pediatric transfusions. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, successful donations decreased slightly by 2.1% with a 10.3% decrease in donations by persons aged 16-18 years and a 14.4% increase in donations by donors aged >65 years. The median price paid for blood components by hospitals decreased from $211 to $207 for leukoreduced red blood cell units, from $523 to $517 for leukoreduced apheresis platelet units, and from $54 to $51 for fresh frozen plasma units. Plasma transfusions decreased 13.6%, but group AB plasma units transfused increased 24.7%. CONCLUSION: Between 2015 and 2017, blood donations declined slightly because of decreases in donations from younger donors, but the number of donations from older donors increased. The price hospitals pay for blood has continued to decrease. Plasma transfusions have decreased, but the proportion of plasma transfusions involving group AB plasma have increased.


Asunto(s)
Bancos de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Donantes de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Bancos de Sangre/economía , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Eritrocitos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trasplante Homólogo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
2.
Transfusion ; 60 Suppl 2: S10-S16, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Serious transfusion-associated adverse events are rare in the United States. To enhance blood safety, various measures have been developed. With use of data from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS), we describe the rate of transfusion-associated adverse events and the implementation of specific blood safety measures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from the 2017 NBCUS were used with comparison to already published estimates from 2015. Survey weighting and imputation were used to obtain national estimates of transfusion-associated adverse events, and the number of units treated with pathogen reduction technology (PRT), screened for Babesia, and leukoreduced. RESULTS: The rate of transfusion-associated adverse events requiring any diagnostic or therapeutic interventions was stable (275 reactions per 100,000 transfusions in 2015 and 282 reactions per 100,000 transfusions in 2017). In 2017 among US blood collection centers, 16 of 141 (11.3%) reported screening units for Babesia and 28 of 144 (19.4%) reported PRT implementation; 138 of 2279 (6.1%) hospitals reported transfusing PRT-treated platelets. In 2017, 134 of 2336 (5.7%) hospitals reported performing secondary bacterial testing of platelets (50,922 culture-based and 63,220 rapid immunoassay tests); in 2015, 71 of 1877 (3.8%) hospitals performed secondary testing (87,155 culture-based and 21,779 rapid immunoassay tests). Nearly all whole blood/red blood cell units and platelet units were leukoreduced. CONCLUSIONS: Besides leukoreduction, implementation of most blood safety measures reported in this study remains low. Nationally, hospitals might be shifting from culture-based secondary bacterial testing to rapid immunoassays.


Asunto(s)
Seguridad de la Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Reacción a la Transfusión/epidemiología , Bancos de Sangre , Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos/estadística & datos numéricos , Plaquetas/microbiología , Seguridad de la Sangre/métodos , Eritrocitos/metabolismo , Genotipo , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reacción a la Transfusión/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Transfusion ; 60 Suppl 2: S1-S9, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32086817

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS) has demonstrated declines in blood collection and transfusion in the United States since 2008, including declines of 11.6% in red blood cell (RBC) collections and 13.9% in RBC transfusions during 2013-2015. This study described the 2017 NBCUS results. METHODS: The 2017 NBCUS was distributed to all US blood collection centers, all hospitals performing at least 1000 surgeries annually, and a 40% random sample of hospitals performing 100 to 999 surgeries annually. Weighting and imputation were used to generate national estimates for units of blood and components collected, deferred, distributed, transfused, and outdated. RESULTS: Response rates for the 2017 NBCUS were 88% for blood collection centers and 86% for transfusing hospitals. Compared with 2015, the number of RBC units collected during 2017 (12,211,000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11,680,000-12,742,000) declined by 3.0%, and transfused RBC units (10,654,000, 95% CI, 10,314,000-10,995,000) declined by 6.1%. Distributed platelet (PLT) units (2,560,000; 95% CI, 2,391,000-2,730,000 units) increased by 5.1%, and transfused PLT units (1,937,000, 95% CI, 1,794,000-2,079,000) declined by 2.3%. Distributed plasma units (3,209,000; 95% CI, 2,879,000-3,539,000) declined by 13.6%, and transfused plasma units (2,374,000; 95% CI, 2,262,000-2,487,000) declined by 12.9%. CONCLUSION: The 2017 NBCUS suggests a continued but slowing decline in demand for RBCs. The decline in blood collection and use will likely continue. Despite decreasing demand and increasing manufacturing costs of blood products, the US blood industry has met the regular and emergent needs of the country.


Asunto(s)
Donantes de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Bancos de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales , Humanos , Transfusión de Plaquetas/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trasplante Homólogo , Estados Unidos
4.
Transfusion ; 57 Suppl 2: 1588-1598, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28591469

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2011 and 2013, the National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS) revealed declines in blood collection and transfusion in the United States. The objective of this study was to describe blood services in 2015. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The 2015 NBCUS was distributed to all US blood collection centers, all hospitals performing at least 1000 surgeries annually, and a 40% random sample of hospitals performing 100 to 999 surgeries annually. Weighting and imputation were used to generate national estimates for units of blood and components collected, deferred, distributed, transfused, and outdated. RESULTS: Response rates for the 2015 NBCUS were 78.4% for blood collection centers and 73.9% for transfusing hospitals. In 2015, 12,591,000 units of red blood cells (RBCs) (95% confidence interval [CI], 11,985,000-13,197,000 units of RBCs) were collected, and 11,349,000 (95% CI, 10,592,000-11,747,000) were transfused, representing declines since 2013 of 11.6% and 13.9%, respectively. Total platelet units distributed (2,436,000; 95% CI, 2,230,000-2,642,000) and transfused (1,983,000; 95% CI, 1,816,000 = 2,151,000) declined by 0.5% and 13.1%, respectively, since 2013. Plasma distributions (3,714,000; 95% CI, 3,306,000-4,121,000) and transfusions (2,727,000; 95% CI, 2,594,000-2,859,000) in 2015 declined since 2013. The median price paid per unit in 2015-$211 for leukocyte-reduced RBCs, $524 for apheresis platelets, and $54 for fresh frozen plasma-was less for all components than in 2013. CONCLUSIONS: The 2015 NBCUS findings suggest that continued declines in demand for blood products resulted in fewer units collected and distributed Maintaining a blood inventory sufficient to meet routine and emergent demands will require further monitoring and understanding of these trends.


Asunto(s)
Bancos de Sangre/provisión & distribución , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Bancos de Sangre/tendencias , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Transfusión Sanguínea/tendencias , Hospitales , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
5.
Transfusion ; 57 Suppl 2: 1625-1633, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28591470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In August 2016, the Food and Drug Administration advised US blood centers to screen all whole blood and apheresis donations for Zika virus (ZIKV) with an individual-donor nucleic acid test (ID-NAT) or to use approved pathogen reduction technology (PRT). The cost of implementing this guidance nationally has not been assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Scenarios were constructed to characterize approaches to ZIKV screening, including universal ID-NAT, risk-based seasonal allowance of minipool (MP) NAT by state, and universal MP-NAT. Data from the 2015 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS) were used to characterize the number of donations nationally and by state. For each scenario, the estimated cost per donor ($3-$9 for MP-NAT, $7-$13 for ID-NAT) was multiplied by the estimated number of relevant donations from the NBCUS. Cost of PRT was calculated by multiplying the cost per unit ($50-$125) by the number of units approved for PRT. Prediction intervals for costs were generated using Monte Carlo simulation methods. RESULTS: Screening all donations in the 50 states and DC for ZIKV by ID-NAT would cost $137 million (95% confidence interval [CI], $109-$167) annually. Allowing seasonal MP-NAT in states with lower ZIKV risk could reduce NAT screening costs by 18% to 25%. Application of PRT to all platelet (PLT) and plasma units would cost $213 million (95% CI, $156-$304). CONCLUSION: Universal ID-NAT screening for ZIKV will cost US blood centers more than $100 million annually. The high cost of PRT for apheresis PLTs and plasma could be mitigated if, once validated, testing for transfusion transmissible pathogens could be eliminated.


Asunto(s)
Donantes de Sangre/provisión & distribución , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Selección de Donante/métodos , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/economía , ARN Viral/sangre , Torque teno virus , Reacción a la Transfusión , Estados Unidos , Infección por el Virus Zika/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA