Consolidative active scanning proton therapy for mediastinal lymphoma: selection criteria, treatment implementation and clinical feasibility.

AIMS: Proton therapy (PT) represents an advanced form of radiotherapy with unique physical properties which could be of great advantage in reducing long-term radiation morbidity for cancer survivors. Here, we aim to describe the whole process leading to the clinical implementation of consolidative active scanning proton therapy treatment (PT) for mediastinal lymphoma. METHODS: The process included administrative, technical and clinical issues. Authorization of PT is required in all cases as mediastinal lymphoma is currently not on the list of diseases reimbursable by the Italian National Health Service. Technically, active scanning PT treatment for mediastinal lymphoma is complex, due to the interaction between actively scanned protons and the usually irregular and large volumes to be irradiated, the nearby healthy tissues and the target motion caused by breathing. A road map to implement the technical procedures was prepared. The clinical selection of patients was of utmost importance and took into account both patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: The first mediastinal lymphoma was treated at our PT center in 2018, four years after the start of the clinical activities. The treatment technique implementation included mechanical deep inspiration breath-hold simulation computed tomography (CT), clinical target volume (CTV)-based multifield optimization planning and plan robustness analysis. The ultimate authorization rate was 93%. In 4 cases a proton-photon plan comparison was required. Between May 2018 and February, 2021, 14 patients were treated with consolidative PT. The main clinical reasons for choosing PT over photons was a bulky disease in 8 patients (57%), patient's age in 11 patients (78%) and the proximity of the lymphoma to cardiac structures in 10 patients (71%). With a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1-33 months) all patients but one (out-of-field relapse) are without evidence of disease, all are alive and no late toxicities were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical implementation of consolidative active scanning PT for mediastinal lymphoma required specific technical procedures and a prolonged experience with PT treatments. An accurate selection of patients for which PT could be of advantage in comparison with photons is mandatory.

Toxicity after moderately hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated prostate radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature.

BACKGROUND: Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) currently represents the standard RT approach for all prostate cancer (PCa) risk categories. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature, focusing on acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) of moderate hypofractionation for localized PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search was performed and two independent reviewers selected the records according to the following Population (P) Intervention (I) Comparator (C) and Outcomes (O) (PICO) question: "In patients affected by localized PCa (P), moderately hypofractionated RT (defined as a treatment schedule providing a single dose per fraction of 3-4.5 Gy) (I) can be considered equivalent to conventionally fractionated RT (C) in terms of G > 2 GI and GU acute and late adverse events (O)?". Bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias. RESULTS: Thirteen records were identified and a meta-analysis was performed. Risk of acute GI and GU > 2 adverse events in the moderately hypofractionated arm was increased by 9.8 % (95 %CI 4.8 %-14.7 %; I2 = 57 %) and 1.5 % (95 % CI -1.5 %-4.4 %; I2 = 0%), respectively. DISCUSSION: Overall, majority of trials included in our meta-analysis suggested that moderately hypofractionated RT is equivalent, in terms of GI and GU adverse events, to conventional fractionation. Pooled analysis showed a trend to increased GI toxicity after hypofractionated treatment, but this might be related to dose escalation rather than hypofractionation.

The impact of method of biopsy on the incidence of breast cancer sentinel lymph node metastases.

BACKGROUND: The dislocation of the malignant cells along the needle tract during breast cancer (BC) diagnosis has been demonstrated by several studies. However, the published experiences that relate the diagnostic technique with sentinel node (SN) involvement are few and controversial. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the impact of different techniques for preoperative BC biopsy among prognostic factors of metastases occurrence in SN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the institutional clinical database of our Center. A total of 674 patients were diagnosed between February 1999 and December 2006 with invasive BC. SN metastases classification followed the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM pathological staging: macrometastases, micrometastases, isolated tumor cells or negative. Only macrometastases and micrometastases were considered positive. Concerning fine-needle aspiration cytology, we used disposable needles of the size of 21-27 G. For percutaneous biopsy we used cutting needle type "tru-cut"; the Gauge needle ranged between 14 and 20. RESULTS: At univariate analysis of specific parameters using positive SN as outcome, percutaneous diagnostic technique did not affect significantly the SN positivity (p = 0.60). At multivariate models only central quadrant lesion (p = 0.005) and lymph vascular invasion (LVI) presence (p < 0.0001) maintained the statistical significance as risk factor for positive SN status. Polytomic logistics models showed that only LVI maintained the statistical significance both for prediction of micrometastases and macrometastases. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that different techniques used for BC diagnosis did not influence SN status.