Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 103
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 29(3): 180-205, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30183660

RESUMEN

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Venenos de Artrópodos/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anafilaxia/etiología , Anafilaxia/prevención & control , Animales , Niño , Humanos , Himenópteros/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Inmunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/complicaciones , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/terapia , Italia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Calidad de Vida
2.
Curr Med Chem ; 25(42): 6070-6081, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29773050

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are very effective medical tools for disease prevention and life span increase. Controversies have raised concern about their safety, from autism to polio vaccine contamination with simian virus 40 (SV-40). Hysteria surrounding vaccine-associated risks has resulted in a declining number of vaccinations in developed countries. Outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases (e.g. measles) have occurred in Europe and North America, causing also some causalities. OBJECTIVES: In this review, data on safety and efficacy of vaccines are discussed, showing that the benefits of vaccines far outweigh the risks and that it is important to comply with vaccination protocols, to avoid spreading of severe, preventable diseases. METHODS: Those opposed to vaccinations suggest that scientific literature supporting vaccines is influenced by pharmaceutical companies. In this review, studies on influenza produced by independent scientists and those authored by those who received some kind of benefit from the industry are discussed separately. All the chosen papers were selected through a MEDLINE research. RESULTS: Vaccination rates are decreasing, even though they are effective public health tools. Influenza, for example, is responsible for 250,000-500,000 deaths each year, according to the WHO. Yet, campaigns to extend influenza vaccine to all elderly subjects report little success, because of the vaccine scare and because not all patients develop immunity following vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This review proves that vaccine hysteria is detrimental because: 1) it causes an increased morbidity and mortality from preventable diseases; 2) it jeopardizes research for new vaccines; 3) patients are reluctant to accept any form of immune-therapy, commonly referred to as "vaccination".


Asunto(s)
Vacunación/psicología , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/etiología , Países Desarrollados , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Humanos , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/psicología , Medicina Preventiva , Timerosal/efectos adversos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas/inmunología
4.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 20(12): 2663-6, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27383320

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Nickel allergy is the most frequent contact allergy in the industrialized country. In allergic contact dermatitis after the presentation of haptenated peptides by resident or newly recruited skin cells, activated CD8+ T cells release IFN-γ and TNF-α, these cytokines are potent activator of keratinocytes. The role of specific cytokines in nickel allergy is not yet fully elucidated. The adenine nucleotide at position -308 in the promoter region of the TNFA gene is associated with an increased production of TNF-α, that is a potent activator of keratinocytes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the expression of TNF-α polymorphism in patients with allergic contact dermatitis and in healthy people, 41 patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel and 40 healthy controls were enrolled. A total of 81 subjects (41 cases and 40 controls) underwent genotyping for the 308 genetic polymorphism in the TNFA gene. RESULTS: The distribution of TNF genotypes TNF-α 308 G/A polymorphism in cases didn't differ significantly in the controls group. The genotype GA was present in the 75% of the patients with polysensitization. In one patient was observed the rare genotype A/A. CONCLUSIONS: The carriage of the TNFA-308 A/A and GA genotype may act as a marker of enhanced susceptibility to contact polysensitization, indicating that TNF-α is a key regulator of the initiation of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, the polymorphism seems to be not enough for the development of nickel monosensitization.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis por Contacto/genética , Níquel , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/genética , Biomarcadores , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/genética , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Humanos , Polimorfismo Genético
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27164625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Administration of carbapenems to ß-lactam-allergic patients has always been considered potentially harmful because of a 47.4% rate of cross-reactivity to imipenem reported in a single study. Nevertheless, recent studies have shown that the rate of cross-reactivity of imipenem and meropenem with penicillins is lower than 1%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using ertapenem in patients with an established IgE-mediated ß-lactam allergy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied all participants who came to our allergy unit and had a clinical history of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to ß-lactams. The inclusion criteria were a positive skin test result to at least 1 ß-lactam molecule and/or positive specific IgE (when available). All participants underwent immediate-type skin tests with several ß-lactam molecules including ertapenem. Challenges with intravenous ertapenem were performed on 2 different days in patients with negative skin test results. RESULTS: We examined 49 patients with a clinical history of immediate reactions to ß-lactams. All the patients had positive skin tests and/or positive specific IgE to at least 1 ß-lactam reagent and negative carbapenem skin tests. Thirty-six patients agreed to undergo the challenges and 35 tolerated the full dose of ertapenem. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of avoiding carbapenems in patients with ß-lactam allergy should be abandoned considering the very low rate of cross-reactivity. ß-Lactam-allergic patients who need ertapenem therapy should undergo skin tests and, if negative, a graded challenge to assess tolerability.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Imipenem/efectos adversos , Tienamicinas/efectos adversos , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Reacciones Cruzadas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/sangre , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Ertapenem , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Masculino , Meropenem , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Cutáneas
7.
Thromb Res ; 135(6): 1049-51, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25912931

RESUMEN

During pregnancy thrombo-prophylaxis could be required in high risk women. If a severe allergic reaction to low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) or a heparin-induced-thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs, it's mandatory to stop the drug. Fondaparinux could be an effective option. In the present review, the maternal and pregnancy outcomes of 65 pregnancies in women using Fondaparinux were reported. It was well-tolerated and rate of pregnancy complications was similar to that observed in general population. Regarding congenital malformations, further studies are necessary to investigate the safety of the drug.


Asunto(s)
Polisacáridos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fondaparinux , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Exposición Materna , Seguridad del Paciente , Polisacáridos/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Riesgo , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Trombocitopenia/prevención & control
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25345303

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: 13-Lactams are the most commonly used antibiotics but they can cause hypersensitivity reactions. We sought to estimate cross-reactivity and tolerability of cephalosporins in patients with cell-mediated allergy to penicillins. METHODS: We studied 97 patients with a clinical history of nonimmediate reactions to a penicillin and a positive patch test result to at least 1 of the penicillins tested. All patients also underwent patch testing with several cephalosporins. Patients with a negative patch test to a cephalosporin underwent test dosing in order to assess tolerability. RESULTS: We recorded 129 reactions. The most commonly involved drugs were aminopenicillins, and the most widely reported symptoms were delayed urticaria and maculopapular exanthema. Seventeen patients had positive patch test results for cephalosporins, mostly for cephalexin (n=10), cefaclor (n=9), and cefuroxime axetil (n=5). All the patients-except 4 who experienced an exanthema after the challenge test with cephalexin-tolerated a therapeutic dose of the cephalosporin tested without any adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins may be as high as 10.9% for first-generation cephalosporins and 1.1% for third-generation cephalosporins, possibly due to the involvement of similar side chains. Patch tests are a useful diagnostic tool to assess cross-reactivity, but a graded challenge is mandatory because a negative patch test does not always mean tolerability.


Asunto(s)
Cefalosporinas/inmunología , Reacciones Cruzadas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Penicilinas/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Cefalosporinas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
Dig Dis Sci ; 59(8): 1851-5, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24595654

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with standard triple therapy is very low. H. pylori is known to require the nickel-containing metalloenzymes urease and NiFe-hydrogenase to survive at the low pH environment in the stomach. AIM: To compare the H. pylori eradication rate of a nickel free-diet associated with standard triple therapy and standard triple therapy alone as the first-line regimen. METHODS: Fifty-two sex- and age-matched patients at the first diagnosis of H. pylori infection were randomized 1:1 into two different therapeutic schemes: (1) standard LCA (26 patients): lansoprazole 15 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and amoxicillin 1,000 mg bid for 7 days with a common diet; (2) standard LCA plus a nickel free-diet (NFD-LCA) (26 patients). Patients followed 30 days of a nickel-free diet plus a week of lansoprazole 15 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and amoxicillin 1,000 mg bid starting from day 15 of the diet. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. A significantly higher eradication rate was observed in the NFD-LCA group (22/26) versus LCA group (12/26) (p < 0.01). Only a few patients (9 of 52) reported the occurrence of mild therapy-related side effects, without any significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a nickel-free diet to standard triple therapy significantly increases the H. pylori eradication rate. The reduction of H. pylori urease activity due to the nickel-free diet could expose the bacterium to gastric acid and increase H. pylori's susceptibility to amoxicillin. Further studies are necessary to confirm this preliminary result.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter/dietoterapia , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Níquel , Adulto , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Contraindicaciones , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Lansoprazol/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto
10.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 16(9): 1197-210, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23047503

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of individuals allergic to latex, exhibiting cross-hypersensitivity with plant-derived food has been frequently reported as the so-called latex-fruit syndrome. Nonetheless, molecular mechanisms underlying allergy to latex and/or fruit are poorly understood. AIM: The aims of this study were to identify candidate genes that may be associated with the pathogenesis of allergy to latex and/or vegetable food, and to assess if similar molecular pathways are involved in both types of hypersensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA microarray analysis was performed to screen the molecular profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from patients with allergy to latex, to fruit, or with latex-fruit syndrome, and from control healthy subjects. RESULTS: Molecular profiling identified an overlapping dataset of genes commonly regulated in all the atopic patients enrolled in this study, suggesting that similar molecular mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of allergy to the fruit and/or latex. Several regulators of the innate and acquired immunity reported to polarize the immunological response towards a Th2-mediated immune response were overexpressed in the patients. Evidences suggested that the expression of T-regulatory cells might be defective in allergic patients, as a consequence of a dysregulation of some inflammatory cytokines. Finally, several transcription factors that may be responsible for the Th1/Th2 imbalance were modulated in allergic patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified relevant genes that may help to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying allergic disease. Knowledges of critical targets, along with transcription factors regulating gene activity may facilitate the development of new therapeutic options.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/genética , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/genética , Verduras/efectos adversos , Adulto , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/etiología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/etiología , Masculino , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Linfocitos T Reguladores/fisiología
12.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 25(2): 445-53, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22697076

RESUMEN

Natural rubber latex allergy (NRL-A) is an international problem of public health. About 50-60% of NRL-A patients may present adverse reactions after ingestion of cross-reacting vegetable foods. This condition, called "Latex-fruit Syndrome", is a matter of research. The aim of our study is to distinguish between clinical/subclinical latex-fruit syndrome and cross-sensitization to latex and food/pollen allergens on the basis of latex recombinant allergens. We studied 51 patients with food hypersensitivity and serological evidence of NRL sensitization. The subjects underwent an accurate allergological evaluation (skin prick test with latex, food and pollen extracts, specific IgE to latex and recombinant allergens, challenge provocation tests). The patients were divided in two groups: group A) 34 patients with clinical and serological latex and fruit/vegetable allergies; group B) 17 patients allergic to fruits/vegetables and/or pollens, with serological, but not clinical NRL-A. All the latex challenge tests resulted positive in group A patients and only two patients of group B presented positive cutaneous challenge tests. Moreover, specific IgE-antibodies were detected to rHev b 5, to rHev b 6.01, to rHev b 6.02 and to rHev b 8 (and other profilins) of group A patients, while in group B we observed a monosensitization to Hev b8, probably linked to a cross-sensitization to pollens and foods. At the present state of knowledge, we need a multi-parametric approach based on a combination of clinical history, diagnostic tests (CRD) and latex challenge tests to make diagnosis of latex-fruit syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Reacciones Cruzadas , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Hevea/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/inmunología , Látex/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/diagnóstico , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Ciudad de Roma , Adulto Joven
13.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 25(2): 531-5, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22697087

RESUMEN

Profilins are "panallergens", responsible for many cross-reactivities between inhalant, latex and plant-derived food allergens. We evaluated the effectiveness and the safety of sublingual desensitization treatment (SLIT) in two patients with allergic respiratory and food diseases. Skin prick tests, IgE and IgG4 assays to pollens, some plant-derived foods, profilin, non-lipid specific transfer protein and PR 10 proteins were performed. The patients also underwent double-blind placebo-controlled challenge (DBPCFC) with the culprit foods and profilin and then a SLIT with it. Both the patients had positive SPT, specific IgE and DBPCFCs with profilin and some vegetables referred in anamnesis. They therefore underwent SLIT with profilin extract. At the end of treatment, the patients had negative DBPCFCs with culprit foods and a decrease of specific IgE levels for profilin and vegetable foods. Profilin desensitization allowed our patients to manage their diet without restriction, eating several foods previously not tolerated.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/terapia , Profilinas/administración & dosificación , Profilinas/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Administración Sublingual , Adulto , Reacciones Cruzadas , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 21(3): 179-84, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21548445

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Labeling of major food allergens is mandatory for the safety of allergic consumers. Although enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, polymerase chain reaction, and mass spectrometry are sensitive and specific instruments to detect trace amounts of food proteins, they cannot measure the ability of food constituents to trigger activation of mast cells or basophils. AIM: We evaluated the basophil activation test as an instrument to determine the allergenic potential of trace amounts of food allergens in complex matrices. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergy was selected as a proof-of-concept model. METHODS: The study population comprised 5 severely peanut-allergic patients (3 males/2 females; median age, 12 years) all sensitized to 3 major peanut allergens (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3) and 5 peanut-tolerant individuals (2 males/3 females; median age, 8 years). Basophils from patients and controls were stimulated with pure peanut extract and blank and peanut-spiked (0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 ppm) biscuits (baking time 11, 16, 21, 26 minutes) and chocolate extracts. RESULTS: Blank biscuits and chocolate did not induce cell activation in patients or controls. A comparison between patients and controls showed significantly higher activation of basophils after stimulation with 0.1 and 0.01 ppm of peanut-spiked biscuit at all baking times and peanut-spiked chocolate (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The basophil activation test is a highly sensitive and specific tool to detect traces of functionally active food allergens. For biscuits, its accuracy seems independent of baking time. Furthermore, it allows even the most sensitive patients to be included in study protocols.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Basófilos/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Mastocitos/inmunología , Antígenos CD/genética , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Arachis/inmunología , Basófilos/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/metabolismo , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Masculino , Mastocitos/metabolismo , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/inmunología , Glicoproteínas de Membrana Plaquetaria/genética , Glicoproteínas de Membrana Plaquetaria/metabolismo , Tetraspanina 30
15.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 155(2): 155-9, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21196760

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cross-reactivity between aztreonam and ß-lactams is poor, but tolerability of aztreonam has been assessed in a few groups of patients suffering from IgE-mediated allergy to ß-lactams. The aim of this study was to assess the cross-reactivity of aztreonam with other ß-lactams and its tolerability in patients with cell-mediated allergy to these drugs. METHODS: We studied 78 patients with cell-mediated allergy to ß-lactams who underwent skin prick, immediate and delayed-reading intradermal tests as well as patch tests with penicilloyl-polylysine, minor determinant mixture, semi-synthetic penicillins, cephalosporins, aztreonam and imipenem. Patients with negative allergy testing with aztreonam underwent an intramuscular test dosing and were observed for 3 h. RESULTS: Our patients experienced 94 non-immediate reactions; delayed-onset urticaria (34 cases), maculopapular exanthema (13 cases), urticaria/angioedema (15 cases) and itching erythema (13 cases) were the most reported symptoms. Amoxicillin (35 cases), ampicillin (28 cases) and bacampicillin (18 cases) were the most involved drugs. All patients had a positive patch test and/or a positive delayed-reading intradermal test to at least 1 ß-lactam antibiotic and none had a positive patch or delayed-reading intradermal test to aztreonam. Then, 65 patients underwent intramuscular test dosing with aztroenam, and none of them had a clinical reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the lack of cross-reactivity between ß-lactams and aztreonam in patients with cell-mediated allergy to these drugs. Delayed-reading intradermal tests and patch tests with aztreonam represent a simple and rapid diagnostic tool to establish tolerability in ß-lactam-allergic patients.


Asunto(s)
Aztreonam/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Angioedema , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Aztreonam/uso terapéutico , Reacciones Cruzadas/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/fisiopatología , Exantema , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/fisiopatología , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche , Urticaria , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos
16.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 21(7): 527-31, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22312936

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The impact of processing on the allergenicity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) proteins has traditionally been studied using immunoglobulin (Ig) E binding assay. However, as this technique does not assess the potential of an allergen to trigger basophils and mast cells, studies based on it can hardly be considered complete. We evaluated the effect of processing on peanut allergenicity using flow-cytometric quantification of in vitro basophil activation (basophil activation test [BAT]). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Basophils from 10 patients with severe peanut allergy and 3 peanut-tolerant individuals were stimulated with extracts from 5 raw and thermally processed peanut varieties. Data were compared using protein staining (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [SDS-PAGE]) and IgE immunoblotting. RESULTS: Stimulation with different extracts resulted in patient-dependent and variety-dependent effects on basophil activation. SDS-PAGE revealed a considerable loss of identifiable bands, especially for the South Africa Common Natal, Argentina Runner, and US Virginia varieties. The results of IgE immunoblotting in patients were similar, irrespective of the responses observed in the BAT. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of thermal processing on the capacity of peanuts to trigger basophils seems highly divergent between patients and cannot be predicted using SDS-PAGE or IgE binding. BAT can be considered a complementary tool for the evaluation of food allergenicity.


Asunto(s)
Basófilos/fisiología , Manipulación de Alimentos , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/etiología , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Electroforesis en Gel de Poliacrilamida , Femenino , Calor , Humanos , Immunoblotting , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Masculino
17.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 23(3): 881-90, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20943060

RESUMEN

Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are an important medical problem. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics of children with ADR and to assess the tolerability of alternative drugs in children (under 16 yrs of age) with a history of ADR. We studied 278 children (132 males and 146 females). Patients were studied by recording personal history and performing in vivo skin testing, in vitro laboratory tests and challenge tests. Patients who had experienced mild adverse reactions underwent challenge tests without any premedication; patients with a clinical history of moderate reactions, received a premedication with sodium chromolyn 30 min before the oral challenge; patients with a clinical history of severe reactions or undergoing parenteral challenges, were given an antihistamine 30 minutes before. A total of 660 adverse events were reported with 126 different drugs involved. Antimicrobial agents were the most involved drugs (51.7%). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were involved in 22.7% of episodes. The most reported symptoms were cutaneous. Allergy testing was negative in 272 patients. A diagnosis of drug allergy was reported for 6 patients. A total of 669 challenge tests were performed. 639 were negative at first attempt while 22 were positive. Eight were repeated using a different premedication and resulted negative. Hypersensitivity drug reactions in children are mainly non-allergic. A premedication with sodium cromolyn or with oral H1-antihistamines may be useful in preventing ADR.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Adolescente , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/análisis , Masculino , Pruebas del Parche , Pruebas Cutáneas
18.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 23(2): 543-52, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20646349

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and safety of challenge tests and their usefulness in the diagnosis of latex allergy. Forty adult subjects (F/M = 34/6, aged 18-66 yrs) with a history of adverse reactions after latex exposure and positive prick test and/or specific IgE to latex were enrolled. They were compared with 20 control subjects. They underwent provocative (cutaneous, mucous-oral, sublingual, conjunctival, nasal, bronchial, vaginal) tests. Symptoms and drug scores were recorded for each patient during challenges. All patients reacted to at least one of the following: cutaneous, nasal and conjunctival tests. No systemic reactions requiring epinephrine occurred. Of the challenges, the vaginal test resulted as the safest, but it had low sensitivity and many limits related to the procedure. According to our data, bronchial and nasal tests had the highest sensitivity (76% and 82% respectively), and were more precise than other tests in determining latex exposure and symptoms, but the bronchial test also presented the highest rate of risk. Mucous and cutaneous tests resulted as the most reliable. For all the tests, specificity and positive predictive value were 100%. All control subjects resulted negative to all challenges. There were no statistically significant changes in skin and serologic tests between the first and second visits. Correlations between MIS and skin tests and between MIS and serum tests were not found. Challenges can be considered safe diagnostic procedures. Tests that most faithfully reproduce natural exposure, on the basis of a patient's history, are preferable.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad al Látex/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal , Pruebas Cutáneas
19.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 23(1): 193-201, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20378005

RESUMEN

Some patients with nickel (Ni) allergic contact dermatitis suffer from systemic (intestinal or cutaneous) symptoms after ingestion of Ni-rich foods and experience symptoms reduction with low-Ni diet, a condition termed Systemic Ni Allergy Syndrome (SNAS). We aimed at evaluating whether oral administration of low nickel doses improved clinical conditions and modulated immunological aspects of SNAS, without significant side effects. Thirty-six SNAS patients were enrolled. Treatment started after 1-month of low-Ni diet and consisted in an incremental oral NiOH dose phase (0.3ng to 1.5 microg/week) followed by a 12-months maintenance phase (1.5 microg/week). Randomly, twenty-four patients added Ni therapy to low-Ni diet and 12 remained with diet alone. All patients were allowed rescue medications (antihistamines and topical steroids). After 4 months, Ni-rich foods were gradually reintroduced. In vitro allergen-driven IL13, IL5 and IFN-gamma release by peripheral blood mononuclear cells was evaluated before and after treatment. Twenty-three patients receiving NiOH and the 12 control patients completed the study. Evaluation of SNAS clinical severity (by VAS and drug consumption) showed a significant difference in favor of NiOH-treated patients compared to controls. Twenty of 23 patients in the NiOH group and none in the control group tolerated Ni-rich food reintroduction. Release of all studied cytokines in culture supernatants was significantly lower after NiOH treatment. In conclusion NiOH is effective in reducing symptoms and drug consumption in SNAS and is able to modulate inflammatory parameters.


Asunto(s)
Citocinas/biosíntesis , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Níquel/efectos adversos , Células TH1/inmunología , Células Th2/inmunología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA