Parental attitudes in the pediatric emergency department about the COVID-19 vaccine.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccinations are now recommended in the United States (U.S.) for children ≥ 6 months old. However, pediatric vaccination rates remain low, particularly in the Hispanic/Latinx population. OBJECTIVE: Using the 4C vaccine hesitancy framework (calculation, complacency, confidence, convenience), we examined parental attitudes in the emergency department (ED) towards COVID-19 vaccination, identified dimensions of parental vaccine hesitancy, and assessed parental willingness to have their child receive the COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: As part of a larger multi-methods study examining influenza vaccine hesitancy, we conducted interviews that included questions about COVID-19 vaccine authorization for children. We used directed content analysis to extract qualitative themes from 3 groups of parents in the ED: Hispanic/Latinx Spanish speaking (HS), Hispanic/Latinx English speaking (HE), non-Hispanic/non-Latinx White English speaking (WE). Themes were triangulated with the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey, where higher scores indicate increased vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: Factors influencing vaccine hesitancy were mapped to the 4C framework from 58 sets of interviews and PACVs. HE and HS parents, compared to WE parents, had less knowledge about COVID-19 and its vaccine, and more beliefs in COVID-19 vaccine myths. However, both HS and HE parent groups were more inclined to endorse COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness as a reason to have their children vaccinated. HS parents felt that COVID-19 increased their fear of illnesses in general and were worried about confusing COVID-19 with other infections. Median PACV scores of HS (Mdn = 20) and HE (Mdn = 20) parent groups were higher than of WE parents (Mdn = 10), but parental willingness to have their child receive COVID-19 vaccination was similar across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among HS and HE parents compared to WE parents may be attributed to insufficient knowledge about COVID-19, its vaccine, along with COVID-19 vaccine myths. Efforts to provide targeted vaccine education to different populations is warranted.

Covid-19 presenting as a bulging fontanelle.

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic that has struck the United States particularly hard. While it has disproportionately caused severe illness in the elderly and older adult population, many children have also been infected with the virus and some have become critically ill. It is important to recognize COVID-19 may present differently in children; specifically, those under twelve months of age. We report a case of COVID-19 infection in an infant characterized by a bulging anterior fontanelle without any additional symptoms.

Right ventricle and tricuspid valve function at midterm after the Fontan operation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: impact of shunt type.

This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes including hemodynamics, right ventricle (RV) function, and tricuspid valve (TV) function in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) at midterm after completion of staged palliation based on the source of pulmonary blood flow provided at stage 1. The records of all patients with HLHS who completed Fontan palliation between 2001 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. The outcome variables were RV dysfunction, TV, and neo-atrioventricular (neo-AV) regurgitation (from latest echocardiogram), cardiac index (CI), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), pulmonary artery pressure (PAp), and right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (RVEDp) (from latest catheterization). Clinical status was obtained from medical records and by contact with the referring cardiologist if necessary. Of 118 patients undergoing a Fontan for HLHS, 116 had a fenestrated lateral tunnel and 2 had an extracardiac conduit. At the time of stage 1 palliation, 36 patients had a right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) conduit, and 82 patients had a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (mBTS). All the patients except one who died of sepsis on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) survived the Fontan operation and were discharged home. At a mean follow-up post-Fontan period of 28.4 months (range, 0.16-95.3 months), three patients had died (2 on the transplantation list and 1 from pulmonary vein stenosis), and one patient had the Fontan circulation taken down. No patient had a heart transplantation. A follow-up echocardiogram was performed for 115 patients (after a mean of 15.6 months for RV-PA and 32.1 months for BTS), and 66 patients underwent a post-Fontan catheterization (after a mean of 15.8 months for RV-PA and 29.3 months for BTS). The hemodynamic results for RV-PA conduit versus BTS were a CI of 3.4 ± 0.8 versus 3.4 ± 1.2, a PVR of 1.8 ± 0.7 versus 1.7 ± 0.8, a PAp of 14.3 ± 3.1 versus 14.2 ± 4.5, and an RVEDp of 7.1 ± 3.3 versus 8.9 ± 5.3. No statistically significant differences were found between shunt types regarding survival or degree of RV dysfunction or in terms of neo-AV regurgitation, CI, PVR, PAp, RVEDp, or rhythm problems. Patients in the BTS group required more tricuspid valvuloplasties and had more tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up evaluation. The patients in the RV-PA group had more PA interventions. In conclusion, the contemporary results after Fontan palliation for HLHS were excellent. At the midterm follow-up evaluation, outcomes and hemodynamic data were similar between shunt types. However, the patients in the BTS group exhibited more tricuspid regurgitation, and the patients in the RV-PA group had increased pulmonary artery interventions.