Using HCV-viremic organs for lung transplantation does not confer higher rejection rates compared to HCV-negative organs.

BACKGROUND: National data demonstrate that hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected organ donors are increasingly being used in the US, including for lung transplantation. We aimed to assess whether there were any differences in the acute or chronic rejection rates at 1 year following lung transplantation from HCV-viremic versus uninfected donors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all lung transplant recipients at our institution from April 1, 2017 to October 1, 2020 and then assessed various outcomes between those who received a transplant from HCV-viremic donors versus HCV-negative donors. Primary outcome was to determine if there was a higher incidence of acute and/or chronic allograft rejection when using HCV NAT+ lung donation. We carried out univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We transplanted 135 patients during the study period, including 18 from HCV-viremic donors. Standard induction therapy with basiliximab and maintenance triple drug immunosuppression was utilized per UC San Diego protocol. All 17 patients receiving HCV-viremic organs developed acute HCV infection and were treated in the postoperative period with 12 weeks of direct acting antivirals (DAA). HCV genotypes included 1, 2, and 3. DAA used included glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (12), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (1), and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (2) with drug choice determined by patient's medical insurance coverage. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks after end of DAA therapy (SVR12), indicative of a cure, was achieved in all (100%) recipients. No recipient had a serious adverse event related to HCV infection. The lung transplant recipient (LTR) HCV-viremic donors had lower rates of clinically significant rejection (5.9% vs. 11% LTR HCV-nonviremic donors), and no chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 1 year (vs. 5.9% LTR HCV-nonviremic donors). One-year survival was 100% in the LTR HCV-viremic donors compared to 95.8% in the LTR HCV-nonviremic donors. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility and success of using HCV NAT + donors with excellent results and without a higher incidence of rejection. Longer term follow-up and a larger sample size are needed to allow this to be a more widely accepted practice for lung transplant programs and payors.

Role of support measures and palliative care.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The care of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is challenging at a time when there are no medications with proven efficacy in extending patient survival or quality of life. However, a number of recent studies suggest that patients participating in clinical trials including the placebo arm have improved outcome. This suggests that there are elements of supportive care which may prove beneficial to IPF patients. Further, control of patient symptoms should be a critical goal in care of patients with IPF. RECENT FINDINGS: A number of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies are available to reduce symptoms in patients with IPF. These include low-dose narcotics, pulmonary rehabilitation and oxygen therapy. Further, addressing issues of depression may be beneficial for symptom management. Palliative care can and should be more fully integrated in the care of patients with IPF. SUMMARY: Incorporating supportive and palliative measures in the care of patients with IPF may improve both quality of life and survival, but far more research is needed in this fledgling field.