Effect of Direct Acting Antiviral Drugs on the Occurrence and Recurrence of Intra- and Extra-Hepatic Malignancies in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

Introduction: The use of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has drastically changed the management of HCV-infected patients by achieving a 95-98% sustained virologic response (SVR) and reducing morbidity and mortality in this population. However, despite their effectiveness, controversy exists concerning the occurrence of oncologic events following DAA therapy. Aims and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from the Swiss Hepatitis C Cohort Study, a prospective cohort involving patients with positive HCV viremia upon inclusion, enrolled in various Swiss centers from September 2000 to November 2021. To examine potential differences in the risk of intrahepatic tumor (IHT) occurrence and death among patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), untreated patients, and those receiving interferon (IFN)-based therapy, a semiparametric competing risk proportional hazards regression model was used. Results: Among 4082 patients (63.1% male, median age 45 years; genotype 1: 54.1%; cirrhosis: 16.1%), 1026 received exclusive treatment with IFN-based regimens, and 1180 were treated solely with DAAs. Over a median follow-up of 7.8 years (range: 3.8-11.9), 179 patients (4.4%) developed intrahepatic tumors (IHT), and 168 (4.1%) experienced extrahepatic tumors (EHT). The 5-year cumulative incidence of IHT was 1.55% (95% CI 0.96-2.48) for IFN-based therapy, 4.27% (95% CI 2.93-6.2) for DAA and 0.89% (95% CI 0.4-1.99) for untreated patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of developing IHT (HR = 1.34; 95% CI = [0.70; 2.58]; p = 0.380) or death (HR = 0.66; 95% CI = [0.43; 1.03]; p = 0.066) between patients treated with DAAs and those treated with IFN. Conclusions: The DAAs reduced the risk of death and were not associated with an increased risk of extrahepatic tumors (EHT). In the adjusted model, accounting for cirrhosis and high liver stiffness, the DAA treatment was associated with a higher risk of IHT occurrence compared with untreated patients, emphasizing the relevance of implementing standardized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening post-DAA treatment.

Use of statins after liver transplantation is associated with improved survival: results of a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the effects of statins on the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT), regarding either their use by LT recipients or donors. AIM: To analyse the association between statin exposure and recipient and graft survival. METHODS: We included adult LT recipients with deceased donors in a nationwide prospective database study. Using a multistate modelling approach, we examined the effect of statins on the transition hazard between LT, biliary and vascular complications and death, allowing for recurring events. The observation time was 3 years. RESULTS: We included 998 (696 male, 70%, mean age 54.46 ± 11.14 years) LT recipients. 14% of donors and 19% of recipients were exposed to statins during the study period. During follow-up, 141 patients died; there were 40 re-LT and 363 complications, with 66 patients having two or more complications. Treatment with statins in the recipient was modelled as a concurrent covariate and associated with lower mortality after LT (HR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.12-0.98; p = 0.047), as well as a significant reduction of re-LT (p = 0.004). However, it was not associated with lower incidence of complications (HR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.85-1.83; p = 0.266). Moreover, in patients developing complications, statin use was significantly associated with decreased mortality (HR = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.01-0.81; p = 0.030), and reduced recurrence of complications (HR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.20-0.93; p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Statin use by LT recipients may confer a survival advantage. Statin administration should be encouraged in LT recipients when clinically indicated.

The MELD upgrade exception: a successful strategy to optimize access to liver transplantation for patients with high waiting list mortality.

BACKGROUND: MELD exceptions are designed to equipoise liver transplant waiting list survival. We aimed to analyze the impact of the MELD Upgrade rule and all other MELD exceptions on the liver transplant waiting list outcomes during 2012-2017 in Switzerland. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study including all adult patients registered on the Swiss liver transplant waiting list between 2012 and 2017. Waiting list mortality and access to transplantation were analyzed, considering MELD exceptions as time-dependent covariates. RESULTS: 730 patients were included. Patients with MELD Upgrade exceptions had a higher risk of dying while on the waiting list (OR 2.13; CI 95% 1.30-3.47) and also an increased likelihood of receiving a liver transplantation, when compared to patients without MELD exceptions. Patients with any type of MELD exceptions were more likely to be transplanted when compared to patients without MELD exceptions. The proportion of patients with MELD exceptions increased from 2012 to 2017 (44% vs 88%). Allocation MELD at the time of transplantation showed an annual increase (23 ± 8 points vs 32 ± 5 points, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Only patients with MELD Upgrade exceptions had the expected combination of higher waiting list mortality and quicker access to liver transplantation.

Inflammatory activity affects the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography but not by two-dimensional shear wave elastography in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the impact of the severity of steatosis and inflammatory activity on the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) and by two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in staging liver fibrosis is still debated and scarce. We aimed to focus on this aspect. METHODS: We prospectively studied 104 patients requiring biopsy for the assessment of NAFLD. We used ordinary least squares regression to test for differences in the association between fibrosis and LSM by TE and 2D-SWE when other factors (steatosis and inflammatory activity) are considered. RESULTS: Among 104 patients, 102 had reliable LSM by TE, and 88 had valid LSM by 2D-SWE. The association between fibrosis based on histology and LSM was significantly stronger when 2D-SWE assessed LSM compared to TE (Spearman's correlation coefficient of .71; P < .001 vs .51, P < .001; Z = 2.21, P = .027). Inflammatory activity was an independent predictor of LSM by TE but not of LSM by 2D-SWE. After controlling for fibrosis, age, sex and body mass index, the inflammatory activity and the interaction between inflammatory activity and fibrosis independently explained 11% and 13% of variance in LSM by TE respectively. Steatosis did not affect the association of fibrosis and LSM by either method. CONCLUSION: Inflammatory activity on histology significantly affects LSM by TE, but not LSM by 2D-SWE in NAFLD. LSM by 2D-SWE reflects liver fibrosis more accurately than LSM by TE. Furthermore, the severity of steatosis on histology did not influence the association of LSM and fibrosis by either elastography method.