Cost-benefit ratio of modern medical education using micro-costing: a model calculation using the example of an innovative breast brachytherapy workshop.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation oncology is an essential component of therapeutic oncology and necessitates well-trained personnel. Multicatheter brachytherapy (MCBT) is one radiotherapeutic option for early-stage breast cancer treatment. However, specialized hands-on training for MCBT is not currently included in the curriculum for residents. A recently developed hands-on brachytherapy workshop has demonstrated promising results in enhancing knowledge and practical skills. Nevertheless, these simulation-based teaching formats necessitate more time and financial resources. Our analyses include computational models for the implementation and delivery of this workshop and can serve as a basis for similar educational initiatives. METHODS: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a previously developed and evaluated breast brachytherapy simulation workshop. Using a micro-costing approach, we estimated costs at a detailed level by considering supplies, soft- and hardware, and personnel time for each task. This method also allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the costs associated with implementing new medical techniques. The workshop costs were divided into two categories: development and workshop execution. The cost analysis was conducted on a per-participant basis, and the impact on knowledge improvement was measured using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The total workshop costs were determined by considering the initial workshop setup expenses including the development and conceptualization of the course with all involved collaborators, as well as the costs incurred for each individual course. The workshop was found to be financially efficient, with a per-participant cost of €â€¯39, considering the industrial sponsorship provided for brachytherapy equipment. In addition, we assessed the workshop's efficacy by analyzing participant feedback using Likert scale evaluations. The findings indicated a notable enhancement in both theoretical and practical skills among the participants. Moreover, the cost-to-benefit ratio (CBFR) analysis demonstrated a CBFR of €â€¯13.53 for each Likert point increment. CONCLUSION: The hands-on brachytherapy workshop proved to be a valuable and approximately cost-effective educational program, leading to a significant enhancement in the knowledge and skills of the participants. Without the support of industrial sponsorship, the costs would have been unattainable.

Development, implementation, and results of a simulation-based hands-on brachytherapy workshop for medical students.

PURPOSE: The new Medical Licensing Regulations 2025 (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) require the development of competence-oriented teaching formats. In addition, there is a great need for high-quality teaching in the field of radiation oncology, which manifests itself already during medical school. For this reason, we developed a simulation-based, hands-on medical education format to teach competency in performing accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy for early breast cancer. In addition, we designed realistic breast models suitable for teaching both palpation of the female breast and implantation of brachytherapy catheters. METHODS: From June 2021 to July 2022, 70 medical students took part in the hands-on brachytherapy workshop. After a propaedeutic introduction, the participants simulated the implantation of single-lead catheters under supervision using the silicone-based breast models. Correct catheter placement was subsequently assessed by CT scans. Participants rated their skills before and after the workshop on a six-point Likert scale in a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Participants significantly improved their knowledge-based and practical skills on APBI in all items as assessed by a standardized questionnaire (mean sum score 42.4 before and 16.0 after the course, p < 0.001). The majority of respondents fully agreed that the workshop increased their interest in brachytherapy (mean 1.15, standard deviation [SD] 0.40 on the six-point Likert scale). The silicone-based breast model was found to be suitable for achieving the previously defined learning objectives (1.19, SD 0.47). The learning atmosphere and didactic quality were rated particularly well (mean 1.07, SD 0.26 and 1.13, SD 0.3 on the six-point Likert scale). CONCLUSION: The simulation-based medical education course for multicatheter brachytherapy can improve self-assessed technical competence. Residency programs should provide resources for this essential component of radiation oncology. This course is exemplary for the development of innovative practical and competence-based teaching formats to meet the current reforms in medical education.

Design and practical evaluation of a shielded application system for intravenously administered radionuclide therapies.

AIM: Intravenous radionuclide therapies are gaining importance. With the increased frequency of these therapies, safe application procedures in combination with effective radiation protection are needed. We present a shielded system which can be universally used for the application of liquid radiopharmaceuticals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The application system consists of a cuboidal box made of lead with stainless steel coating, an inner layer of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), a disposable line/bottle system, and a medical infusion pump. No proprietary disposable parts are used. The system was tested and validated ex-vivo, and evaluated for Lu-177 peptide receptor radionuclide and for radioligand therapies (PRRT, RLT). RESULTS: Construction of the application system was performed in accordance with the physical characteristics of the used isotopes. 10 validation procedures with 1 GBq Tc-99m-pertechnetate confirmed functionality. 38 PRRT and 13 RLT procedures were performed successfully and completely. At least 98 % of the prescribed activities were infused. No leakage of radioactivity occurred. Dose rate measurements showed that the radiation in the box is shielded completely, and that exposure arises only from the infusion line outside the box and from the patient. CONCLUSION: The presented application system for intravenous radionuclide therapies is feasible, safe, and cost-efficient. It has been shown that Lu-177-PRRT and -RLT can be performed without complications while ensuring nearly complete infusion of the prescribed radiopharmaceutical dose. Radiation exposure of the applying physician and other staff is low. The construction of the shielding box ensures complete shielding of all radionuclides currently used for radiomolecular therapies.