Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 63(1): 2-7, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179336

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Surgical endarterectomy represents the gold standard for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the groin vessels. Endovascular treatment such as atherectomy with or without drug coated angioplasty (DCA) of the so called no stenting zones, i.e. inguinal and popliteal vessels, is gaining growing acceptance as alternative option to open surgery. This systematic review aims to scrutiny the current clinical evidence regarding atherectomy and DCA for the common artery (CFA). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted an exhaustive research in multiple platforms (Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Embase) on studies over atherectomy and angioplasty for inguinal atherosclerotic lesions published between 2000 and 2021. As search strategy we used a wide list of MeSH items, words, synonyms. Bibliographies of review articles were checked for further relating studies regarding atherectomy of CFA. A qualitative and quantitative data analysis was carried out. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative review. Not all studies were focused only on atherectomy of inguinal vessels, despite including such treatment. Hence, data regarding this treatment were not exhaustive. A fairly homogeneous data analysis was possible in 7 of 15 studies. The remaining 8 studies were qualitatively analyzed but not included in the statistical analysis. In all 7 included studies directional atherectomy and DCA under filter protection were carried out. In this subgroup, overall, 497 patients were treated with atherectomy. Sixty-eight percent of the patients were males. Rutherford class from 1-3 dominated against 4-6 (63% vs. 37%). Mean technical success rate was 96%, with a primary and secondary patency rate of 92% and 98% respectively at one year. Procedure related vascular complications ranged from 1% to 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature about atherectomy for inguinal arteries is scant, data are inhomogeneous and so are treatment modalities. Nevertheless, the results of this systematic review suggest that this endovascular strategy is feasible with good short and midterm results. Prospective trials with larger patient cohorts are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.


Asunto(s)
Aterectomía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Placa Aterosclerótica , Animales , Aterectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 52(1): 27-33, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29084493

RESUMEN

AIMS: The crossing of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is the key step for an endovascular treatment. The Ocelot system is a novel device that combines a steerable drilling tip with optical coherence tomography (OCT) technology. It provides intraluminal imaging to help the crossing of CTOs in the femoropopliteal segment. Aim of the study was to determine early and midterm results after recanalization with this device. METHODS AND RESULTS: During a period of 16 months, 84 CTOs were treated using the Ocelot system and prospectively registered. The primary end points were technical success and the primary and secondary patency of the lesion. Risk factors associated with early and midterm results were also analyzed. In all, 58 (69.0%) lesions were treated for intermittent claudication, 26 (31.0%) for critical limb ischemia, 34 (40.5%) were classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II D lesions, and 22 (26.2%) showed severe calcifications. The technical success rate was 72.6%. During 36 months of follow-up (mean 25.9), there were 10 reinterventions. The primary and secondary patency at 36 months were 54.2% and 68.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the Ocelot system would appear to be a safe and effective tool for increasing the applicability of endovascular techniques. However, the midterm results did not show drastic improvement.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Isquemia/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Constricción Patológica , Enfermedad Crítica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico por imagen , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
3.
J Endovasc Ther ; 24(3): 355-366, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28393673

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided atherectomy catheter in treating patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease. METHODS: The VISION trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01937351) was a single-arm, multicenter, global investigational device exemption study enrolling 158 subjects (mean age 67.2±10.5 years; 87 men) across 20 participating sites. In this cohort, 198 lesions were treated with an average length of 53±40 mm using the Pantheris catheter alone or Pantheris + adjunctive therapy. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of major adverse events (MAEs) through 6 months (objective performance goal 43.2%). Technical success (primary efficacy outcome) was defined as the percent of target lesions with a residual diameter stenosis ≤50% after treatment with the Pantheris device alone (objective performance goal 87.0%). Procedural success was defined as reduction in stenosis to ≤30% after Pantheris ± adjunctive therapy. Tissue specimens retrieved from each treated lesion were histologically analyzed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of OCT image guidance. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome was achieved in 192 (97.0%) of the 198 lesions treated with the Pantheris catheter. Across all lesions, mean diameter stenosis was reduced from 78.7%±15.1% at baseline to 30.3%±11.8% after Pantheris alone (p<0.001) and to 22.4%±9.9% after Pantheris ± adjunctive therapy (p<0.001). Of the 198 target lesions, 104 (52.5%) were treated with the Pantheris alone, 84 (42.4%) were treated with Pantheris + adjunctive angioplasty, and 10 (5.1%) with Pantheris + angioplasty + stenting. The composite MAE outcome through 6 months occurred in 25 (16.6%) of 151 subjects. There were no clinically significant perforations, 1 (0.5%) catheter-related dissection, 4 (2%) embolic events, and a 6.4% clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate at 6 months. The 40-lesion chronic total occlusion (CTO) subset (mean lesion length 82±38 mm) achieved a similar significant reduction in stenosis to 35.5%±13.6% after Pantheris alone (p<0.001). Histological analysis of atherectomy specimens confirmed <1% adventitia in 82.1% of the samples, highlighting the precision of OCT guidance. Characterization of the OCT-guided lesions revealed evidence of an underestimation of disease burden when using fluoroscopy. CONCLUSION: OCT-guided atherectomy for femoropopliteal disease is safe and effective. Additionally, the precision afforded by OCT guidance leads to greater removal of plaque during atherectomy while sparing the adventitia.


Asunto(s)
Aterectomía/métodos , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Anciano , Angioplastia/instrumentación , Aterectomía/efectos adversos , Aterectomía/instrumentación , Competencia Clínica , Constricción Patológica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Alemania , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular
4.
Vascular ; 25(1): 3-9, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26438613

RESUMEN

Objective Current evidence in the literature about endovascular treatment (ET) of visceral vessels in patients with chronic mesenterial ischemia (CMI) based on morphological characteristics is limited. The aim of this study was the evaluation of ET in occluded and stenotic visceral vessels. Methods Patients undergoing ET for CMI between November 2000 and November 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Primary measure outcome was the symptom-free survival (SFS). Secondary outcomes were primary (PPR), secondary patency (SPR) rates and technical success rate (TSR). A Cox-regression analysis identified risk factors for the primary and secondary measure outcomes. Results Forty patients were included in the present study (men: 21, mean age: 68). The overall number of vessels with intention-to-treat was 62. Fifty-two visceral arteries (18 occlusions and 34 stenoses) were successfully treated by endovascular means. The overall TSR was 84%. Visceral vessel occlusions and atherosclerotic disease of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were identified as independent risk factors for poorer TSR ( p < 0.05). The 12-month SFS was 60%. The overall 12-month PPR and SPR were 71% and 94%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between occluded and stenotic vessels ( p > 0.05) concerning the PPR. On the other hand, the subgroup analysis revealed higher SPR among occluded visceral vessels ( p < 0.001) and coeliac axis lesions ( p < 0.001). Conclusions ET was associated with high incidence of symptoms recurrence despite the satisfying patency rates in both occluded and stenotic vessels. Additionally, visceral vessel occlusion and presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the SMA were associated with poorer TSR.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Enfermedad Crónica , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatología , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
5.
J Endovasc Ther ; 20(6): 770-81, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24325693

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the optical coherence tomography-guided Ocelot catheter to cross femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (CTOs). METHODS: The CONNECT II study was a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized single-arm study of the safety and effectiveness of the Ocelot catheter in CTO crossing. Key inclusion criteria were a 99% to 100% stenosed femoropopliteal segment, lesion length between 1 and 30 cm, and resistance to guidewire crossing. The main exclusion criterion was a severely calcified target vessel. The primary safety endpoint was 30-day major adverse events (MAE), while the primary effectiveness endpoint was successful CTO crossing (i.e., guidewire placement in the distal true lumen) with the Ocelot catheter. Endpoint analysis was based on pre-specified objective performance criteria. Between February and June 2012, 100 patients (55 men; mean age 69 years) were enrolled. Most of the CTOs (94%) were in the superficial femoral artery (SFA); mean lesion length was 16.6±9.3 cm. RESULTS: Through 30 days, 2 patients experienced MAE (significant perforations) related to the Ocelot catheter. The Ocelot catheter successfully crossed 97% of target CTOs either alone (72%), in conjunction with an assist device (18%), or in conjunction with a re-entry device (7%). Both primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met. CONCLUSION: The Ocelot catheter with optical coherence tomography guidance offers physicians a reliable option for crossing femoral and popliteal chronic total occlusions with low MAE rates.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Competencia Clínica , Constricción Patológica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA